`Reply to Restriction Requirement of September 25, 2007
`
`SUMMARY OF CLAIMS
`
`Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 12~20 are withdrawn. Accordingly, no new matter is
`
`added. Reconsideration is respectfully requested in light of the following remarks.
`
`REMARKS
`
`The Examiner identified the following two claimed inventions in this case and required
`
`restriction to one of them:
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`Claim 1-11, drawn to a detection device.
`
`Claims 12-16, drawn to a detection device.
`
`Applicants elect group I without traverse. However, during the pendency of the present
`
`application Applicants reserve the right pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §121 to file one or more divisional
`
`applications directed to the non—elected invention of group II of the instant restriction requirement
`
`and additionally to the non-elected invention of group II as set forth in the restriction requirement
`
`dated June 5, 2007.
`
`3206770_1.DOC
`
`Atty. Docket No. 30696-712201
`
`
`
`Appln. No.2 11/388,723
`Reply to Restriction Requirement of September 25, 2007
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`Applicants submit that this paper fully addresses the Office Action mailed
`
`September 25, 2007. Should the Examiner have any questions, the Examiner is encouraged to
`
`contact the undersigned attorney at (650) 849-3383. No fee is believed to be due for this
`
`submission. However, the Commissioner is authorized to charge any additional fees which may be
`
`required, including petition fees and extension of time fees, to Deposit Account No. 23-2415
`
`(Docket No. 30696—712201).
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`
`Dated: October25 2007
`
`
`
`By: ,%g%
`
`Steven G. Bacsi, Ph.D. (Reg. No. 50,736)
`
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304—1050
`
`(650) 493-9300
`Customer No. 021971
`
`3206770_1.DOC
`
`Atty. Docket No. 30696-712201
`
`