.4'
`
`
`
`W02004/064809A1|||||||I|||||l||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||Il||||||||||||l|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||l||||
`
`Document FPS
`
`Appl. No.: 11/273,575
`
`;_J
`
`(12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)
`
`(19) World Intellectual Property
`Organization
`International Bureau
`
` ||l|||IlllllllllIlllll|||l|||||||||l||||i|||IllIlllllllll|l|ll||||||||||||||lllllillllllllllll
`
`(10) International Publication Number
`(43) International Publication Date
`PCT
`5 August 2004 (05.08.2004)
`WO 2004/064809 A1
`
`(51) International Patent Classificationl:
`
`A61K 9/20
`
`(74)
`
`(21) International Application Number:
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`(81)
`
`(22) International Filing Date: 21 January 2004 (21.01.2004)
`
`(25) Fillng Language:
`
`(26) Publication Language:
`
`English
`
`English
`
`(30) Priority Data:
`03014719
`103 54 862.9
`1024899
`
`GB
`22 January 2003 (22.01.2003)
`24 November 2003 (24.11.2003) DE
`27 November 2003 (27.11.2003) NL
`
`(34)
`
`(71) Applicant (forall designated States except US): SANDOZ
`GMBH [AT/AT]; Biochemiestrasse 10, A-6250 Kundl
`(AT).
`
`(72) Inventors; and
`(75) Inventors/Applicants (for US only): BHARATRA-
`JAN, Ramaswaml [IN/IN]; 86—B/l2 Vrindavan Society,
`Thane (West) 400 601 (IN). ZEISL, Erich [AT/AT];
`Wiesing 74b, A-6200 Wiesing (AT). KOFLER, Niklaus
`[AT/AT]; Feldweg 44, 6134 Vomp (AT). PATIL, Man-
`isha, Rajesh [IN/IN]; B2-602, Vikas Complex, Castlemill
`compound, LBSMarg, Thane (West) 400 601 (IN). SA-
`HASRABUDHE, Parfulla, S. [IN/IN]; 13, Pradnya, G.K.,
`Gokhalc Road, Mulund (East), Mumbai, 400 081 (IN).
`
`Agent: GRUBB, Philip; Novartis AG, Corporate Intellec-
`tual Property, CH—4002 Basel (CH).
`
`Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every
`kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM,
`AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CN,
`CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI,
`GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE,
`KG, KP, KR, KZ, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LV, MA, MD,
`MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MZ, NA. NI, NO, NZ, OM, PG,
`PH, PL, PI, RO, RU, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SY, TJ, TM,
`TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, YU, ZA, ZM,
`ZW.
`
`Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every
`kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH,
`GM, KE, LS, MW, MZ, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW),
`Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, TM), Euro-
`pean (AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR,
`GB, GR, HU, IE, IT. LU. MC, NL, PT, RO, SE, SI, SK,
`TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW,
`ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG).
`
`Published:
`with international search report
`before the expiration of the time limit for amending the
`claims and to be republished in the event of receipt of
`amendments
`
`For two-letter codes and other abbreviations, refer to the "Guid-
`ance Notes on Codes andAbbreviatians" appearing at the begin-
`ning ofeach regular issue of the PCT Gazette.
`
`
`
`(54) Title: SOLID PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING RAMIPRIL
`
`(57) Abstract: The present invention relates to solid pharmaceutical compositions comprising ramipril with a suitably low water
`content, and processes for preparing said compositions.
`
`

`

`WO 2004/064809
`
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`SOLID PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING RAMIPRIL
`
`Organic Compounds
`
`The present invention relates to solid pharmaceutical compositions comprising ramipril with a
`suitably low water content, and processes for preparing said compositions.
`
`Description of the invention
`
`The present invention relates to the discovery of stable pharmaceutical compositions
`
`containing ramipril and to methods for making such compositions.
`
`Ramipril (1) corresponds to (28,3aS,SaS)-1—{(S)-N-([(S)-1—carboxy-3—
`phenylpropyl]alanyl}octahydro-cyclopenta[b]pyrrole-Z-carboxylic acid 1-ethyl ester and is
`used for the treatment of i.a. hypertension, heart failure, and nephropathia.
`
`5
`CH, 3
`‘
`N
`“JR/“(swifir
`0
`H
`O HO
`
`s
`s
`
`0
`
`(1)
`
`The preparation of ramipril has been described in EP 0 079 022 A2.
`Stability is an important aspect of a pharmaceutical composition. The degradation of
`ramipril occurs mainly via two pathways: the hydrolysis to ramipril diacid [(2); impurity E
`. described in the European Pharmacopoeia] and the cyclization to ramipril diketopiperazide
`
`[(3): Impurity D described in European Pharmacopoeia].
`
`2
`
`CH3
`
`Horn/km?“
`
`o
`
`O
`
`HO
`
`O
`
`(2)
`
`H,cvo\n/\N/Kfo
`
`3
`
`CH,
`
`N
`
`0
`
`O
`
`(3)
`
`Information published in EP 0 317 878 A1. data generated on stress stability testing of
`commercial ramipril formulations (e. g. Delix®) and data generated internally during
`development of own formulations reveal that the major instability arises from the formation of
`the diketopiperazide. Table 1 shows the level of ramipril diketopiperazide and ramipril diacid
`after storage of Delix® 1.25mg (batch number C—423; originating from the German market) for
`
`8 weeks at 40° C/75% relative humidity (RH).
`
`

`

`WO 2004/064809
`
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`Table 1:
`
`
`
`
`
`ramipril diketopiperazide [%]
`
`
`
`
`
`ramipril diacid [%]
`
`
`
`
`
`If not specified othentvise, assay values of ramipril (1). ramipril diacid (2) and ramipril
`
`diketopiperazide (3) in % are generated with suitable HPLC methods, eg. as described in
`
`the European Pharmacopoeia 2001, monograph ‘Ramipril'.
`
`The European Pharmacopoeia states and encourages a limit of 0.5% for diketopiperazide.
`
`Preferably the stability of a commercial composition is such that, after 3 months, preferably 6
`
`months storage in a controlled environment of 40° C/75% RH, the loss of the active principle
`
`is less than 5% and the increase of impurities is preferably less than double the amount
`
`stated in the relevant Pharmacopoeia, in the case of ramipril the European Pharmacopoeia
`
`for the relevant impurity in the active principle. In the particular case of ramipril the level of
`
`ramipril diketopiperazide should preferably not exceed 1.0% after storage at 40° C/75% RH
`
`for 3 months, preferably 6 months.
`
`According to EP 0 317 878 A1 it is well documented that ramipril formulations manufactured
`
`by standard technologies show a considerable degree of instability. Hoechst did manage to
`
`overcome the stability problem by applying a commercially expensive and technically
`
`complicated technology (coating of ramipril with a polymer prior to compression). It was
`
`surprisingly found that these prior art stability problems can be overcome applying
`
`pharmaceutical standard technologies when properly controlling/limiting water content in the
`
`final formulation. It was found that stability with the proposed formulations and processes is
`
`even improved over the currently marketed commercial formulations of ramipril. it was
`
`surprisingly found that other prior art approaches for stabilisation of ACE inhibitors
`
`(formulations with acid-donors, formulations with sodium bicarbonate) did not reveal a
`
`sufficiently stable formulation except when water content was properly controlled
`
`concurrently. In addition it was surprisingly found that testing formulations with controlled
`
`water content not applying prior art approaches prove sufficiently stable as well. Whereas the
`
`focus of the trials was put on tablet formulations, the principle could be demonstrated to be
`
`as well suitable for capsules and is considered to be suitable for sachets as well.
`
`

`

`WO 2004/064809
`
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`The cyclization of ramipril to the ramipril diketopiperazide seems to be directly linked to the
`
`presence of moisture in the formulation.
`
`Therefore the invention covers a solid pharmaceutical composition containing
`(a) ramipril and/or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof and
`
`(b) one or more pharmaceutical excipients,
`
`wherein the composition has a suitably low water content.
`
`Solid pharmaceutical compositions according to the invention include tablets, capsules,
`capsulets and sachets. Tablets may be suitably coated (film coated tablets, pills). Capsule
`
`formulations may cover both soft and hard capsules.
`
`The form of the ramipril and/or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof is not particularly
`
`limited and includes all pharmaceutically acceptable anhydrates, solvates. hydrates,
`
`crystalline and amorphous forms. The amount of ramipril in the solid pharmaceutical
`composition is not particularly limited and comprises any amount that is pharmaceutically
`effective.
`
`Low water content can be achieved by a combination of suitable excipients showing low
`
`water content, process parameters that prohibit uptake of moisture during manufacture and
`proper packaging material that prohibits uptake of moisture during storage of the finished
`dosage form over shelf life. Suitable excipients with low water content are most preferably
`special grades of microcrystaliine cellulose (e. g. Avicel PH 112), starch (e. 9. Starch 1500
`LM), silicon dioxide (e. g. Syloid AL-1 FP), calcium hydrogen phosphate (e. g. Dicafos A) but
`should not be limited to the excipients mentioned herein but extended to all declared low
`
`water content excipients including diluents, binders lubricants, disintegrants colorants, etc.
`
`In another embodiment of the invention, one or more of the excipients can be dried prior to
`
`use or throughout the manufacturing process to achieve the required level of water content.
`Even when applying excipients with low levels of water the blend and final formulation is
`susceptible to take up moisture during manufacture and during storage. Accumulation of
`humidity during processing can be properly limited by performing the manufacture under
`controlled environmental conditions. Preferred is the manufacture in an environment of equal
`
`

`

`WO 2004/064809
`
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`-4-
`
`or less than 35% RH at ambient temperature, preferably in an environment of equal or less
`
`than 35% RH at equal or less than 30°C.
`Accumulation of moisture during storage can be properly avoided by using packaging
`
`materials known to be suitably tight against penetration of humidity. Preferred packaging
`materials are containers including lid composed of polyethylene and/or polypropylene and/or
`
`glass, and blisters or strips composed of aluminium or high density polyethylene.
`Therefore, other embodiments of the inventions are packages comprising compositions of a
`suitably low water content packaged with packaging materials which are suitably tight against
`penetration of humidity, preferably packaging materials as mentioned above.
`
`The water content in the composition can, for example, be determined by loss-on-drying
`(LOD) and/or Karl-Fischer (KF)-analysis as it is understood by workers skilled in the art. For
`the determination of all the data cited the below mentioned methods were used. Out of these
`two methods, KF is known to be more reproducible and specific. Thus KF is the preferred
`
`method to assess water content in pharmaceutical formulations.
`
`LOD: For tablet formulations, tablets are crushed to powder in a mortar with a pestle. For
`capsule or sachet formulations, the content of the capsule or sachet is emptied. The loss on
`drying is determined on a moisture balance e.g. Mettler LP 16 using approximately 1.0 g of
`the sample. The mixture is evenly spread on the weighing plate of the moisture balance. The
`weighing plate is preheated to 80°C and the mixture is then dried for 15 minutes at 80° C.
`
`KF: For tablet formulations tablets are crushed to powder in a mortar with a pestle. For
`capsule or sachet formulations the content of the capsule or sachet is emptied out. The water
`content is determined with an automated KF apparatus e. g. Metrohm 784 KFP Titrino using
`
`conventional Karl Fischer reagent using 0.1 g of the sample.
`
`Manufacturing the product with conventional excipients results in a considerably high
`decrease of ramipril and increase in ramipril diketopiperazide on storage. In EP 0 317 878
`A1. the increase of ramipril diketopiperazide up to 22.8% after 6 months at 40° C/70% RH
`and the decrease of ramipril down to 20% after 6 months at 40° C was attributed to
`mechanical stress,, and therefore the active principle was coated in order to protect it from
`
`mechanical stress.
`
`

`

`WO 2004/064809
`
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`Commercial formulations of Ramipril can be taken as reference for formulations
`
`manufactured with conventional excipients and showing normal levels of water content.
`
`Results on commercial formulations of Ramipril achieved with LCD and KF are presented in
`
`Tables 2 and 3.
`
`Strength
`
`Formulation
`
`.
`
`Table 2: Water content of originator formulation as determined by KF
`
`
`Product Name Batch No
`
`
`
`
`
`Water content
`weioht-%
`
`
`
`
`
`W—
`
`
`
`
`
`Product Name Batch No.
`
`40A428
`40A475
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2.5m
`.
`'
`Tablets
`6.11%
`.
`
`
`
`.—
`
`6.70%
`
`This type of formulation is only stable when ramipril is separated by a polymeric barrier from
`
`the water —containing excipients. The effect of the barrier was attributed by EP 0 317 878 A1
`
`to reduced mechanical stress during compression, but according to our surprising findings
`
`might as well be attributable to minimising the contact of ramipril with water on storage over
`the shelf life.
`
`Stability results generated on Examples 3 and 4 demonstrate the superior stability of
`
`formulations with low water contents (Table 4).
`
`Table 4: Stability of ramipril in tablets as a function of water content
`Assa of rami-ril %
`Example 3 (water content by
`LOD: 2.71 wei-ht-%
`101.11
`102.23
`
`99.90
`
`Example 4 (water content by
`LOD: 6.60 wei- ht-%
`97.85
`90.73
`
`

`

`WO 2004/064809
`
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`Besides choosing excipients with low water content, performing the manufacture in an
`
`environment of sufficiently low relative humidity is essential as demonstrated in enclosed
`
`example. A blend manufactured according to Example 1 was exposed to well defined
`environmental conditions of relative humidity at ambient temperature for up to 6 hours. Only
`
`when maintaining the relative humidity at approximately 30% the initial load with moisture
`could be maintained. At ambient humidity levels (50 — 60%) the blend has significantly taken
`
`up moisture already after 2 hours (Table 5). Considering that normal processing times for
`pharmaceutical products range from 8 hour up to one week control of this parameter
`becomes essential.
`
`
`
`
`
`Table 5: Water uptake in tablets as a function of relative humidity during production
`I
`
`
`
`30% RH
`'
`
`LOD
`wei . ht-%
`
`KF
`wei . ht-%
`
`50-60% RH
`LOD
`wei . ht—%
`
`KF
`wei - ht-%
`
`70% RH
`
`LOD
`wei . ht—%
`
`KF
`wei . ht-%_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The third factor to control humidity in the final product is to prevent uptake of moisture during
`
`storage. It is well established that storing products in the containers including lid made of
`polypropylene and/or polyethylene and/or glass or in blisters and/or strips composed of
`aluminium or high density polyethylene prevents them from taking up moisture during
`
`storage over shelf life. Table 6 shows the uptake of moisture of tablets manufactured
`according to Example 1 and stored at 40° C/75% RH in various packaging materials.
`
`Whereas trilaminate (PVC/PE/PVDC 250p/25p/90 gsm and aluminium foil 20 pm) blister
`
`packs reach a level of saturation already after 1 month, polypropylene containers with
`polyethylene lid and Alu/Alu strips show no increase in water content over up to 6 months.
`
`Table 6: Water content as a function of packaging material
`
`LOD [weight-%]
`
`
`
`
`PVC/PE/PVDC
`250p/25u/90 gsm and
`aluminium foil 20 pm
`
`Alu/Alu 40 gm strip pack
`
`
`
`
`Polypropylene container
`with polyethylene lid
`
`

`

`WO 2004/064809
`
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`
`
`Application of the above mentioned principles reliably yields compositions with a suitably low
`water content, preferably less than 4.0 weight-%, most preferably less than 3.0 weight-% as
`determined by LOD, or less than 5.5 weight-%, most preferably less than 4.5 weight-% as
`determined by KF. By applying adequate packaging technologies the moisture content in the
`
`formulation can be maintained adequately low.
`
`it was surprisingly observed that these pharmaceutical compositions only prove sufficiently
`stable under accelerated testing conditions when water content is low. Concurrently with
`
`increase of moisture, degradation to diketopiperazide occurs.
`
`Working Examples:
`
`Example 1:
`During the manufacturing process environmental conditions of 30% RH/ 30°C are kept.
`Milled glycine hydrochloride (0.300kg) is dry-mixed with ramipril (0.125kg), microcrystalline
`cellulose (Avicel PH112; 7.125kg), precipitated silicon dioxide (Syloid AL-1-FP; 0.800kg) and
`pregelatinised starch (Starch 1500 LM; 0.450kg), and the resulting mixture is dry-mixed with
`glycerol dibehenate (Compritol ATO 888; 0.200kg) and compressed to yield 100,000 tablets
`
`containing 1.25mg Ramipril each.
`
`For enclosed stability investigation the tablets are immediately packaged into PVC/PE/PVDC
`
`250ul25p/90 gsm and aluminium foil 20 um blister packs and Alu/Alu 40 pm strips. The
`samples are subjected to stability testing at 40° C/75% RH. The LOD of the tablets after
`
`manufacture is 3.19 weight—%.
`
`Table 7: Stability and water content as a function of packaging material
`
`Alu/Alu 40 pm strip pack
`
`
`
`PVC/PE/PVDC 250p/25p/90 gsm and
`aluminium foil 20 m blister ack
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`e%
`%
`wei-ht-%
`e%
`%
`wei-ht-%
`months
`um
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`WO 2004/064809
`
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`-3-
`
`Example 1 demonstrates that pharmaceutical compositions prepared with glycine
`hydrochloride prove sufficiently stable under accelerated testing conditions when water
`content is low but prove unstable when water content increases to normal levels of moisture
`
`within pharmaceutical formulations.
`
`Example 2:
`During the manufacturing process environmental conditions of 30% RH/ 30°C are kept.
`Milled glycine hydrochloride (0.300kg) is dry-mixed with Ramipril (0.500kg), microcrystalline
`cellulose (Avicel PH112; 29.36kg), precipitated silicon dioxide (Syloid AL-1FP; 3.200kg),
`pregelatinised starch (Starch 1500 LM; 1.800kg), and Iron Oxide Red (0.040kg) and the
`resulting mixture is dry-mixed with glycerol dibehenate (Compritol ATO 888; 0.800kg) and
`compressed to yield 100,000 tablets containing 5mg ramipril each, which are immediately
`packaged into PVC/PE/PVDC 250p/25u/90 gsm and aluminium foil 20 um blister packs.
`Alu/Alu 40 um strips and polypropylene container with polyethylene lid. The LCD of the
`
`tablets after manufacture is 3.19 weight-%.
`
`Table 8: Stability of ramipril (1), generation of ramipril diketopiperazide (3) and water content
`
`as a function of packaging material
`Packag
`PVC/PE/PVDC
`e
`250u/25u/90 gsm and
`aluminium foil 20 um blister
`
`LCD
`Time
`[weight
`[month
`%
`s]
`n .
`
`(1)
`[%]
`
`Alu/Alu 40 um strip pack
`
`Polypropylene container
`with polyethylene lid
`
`.
`
`Example 2 supports the findings of example 1. In particular example 2 demonstrates that low
`humidity compositions maintain levels of diketopiperazide far below the limit of 0.5% as
`stated in the European Pharmacopoeia and far below the results obtained for commercial
`ramipril formulation (Delix® 1.25mg batch number C-423; originating from the German
`
`market; 2.16% diketopiperazide).
`
`Example 3:
`
`

`

`WO 2004/064809
`
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`In analogy to example 1 aluminium strips containing tablets with the following composition
`
`are prepared: ramipril (1 .25mg), microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH112; 50.32mg),
`
`precipitated silicon dioxide (Syloid AL—1-FP; 4.6mg), lactose (Lactose DCL-21; 37mg),
`
`glycerol dibehenate (Compritol ATO 888; 1.83mg) at laboratory scale at ambient
`
`environmental conditions. The tablets are packaged into Alu/Alu 40 um strips and put on
`
`stability at 40° 0/75% RH. The LCD of the tablets after manufacture is 2.71 weight-%.
`
`Table 9: Stability at low water content
`
`
`—_I_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Example 3 demonstrates that pharmaceutical compositions prepared with suitable excipients
`
`and not containing prior art stabilising agents do not show any significant degradation over 4
`
`weeks when stored under accelerated testing conditions.
`
`Example 4:
`
`In analogy to example 1 aluminium strips containing tablets with the following composition
`
`are prepared: ramipril (1.25mg), starch (Starch 1500; 20.32mg), silicon dioxide (Aerosil 200;
`
`1.00mg), lactose (Lactose DCL—21; 78.00mg), Ac-Di-Sol (4.00mg) and Sterotex (1.80mg)‘ at
`
`laboratory scale at ambient environmental conditions. The tablets are packaged into Alu/Alu
`
`40 pm strips and put on stability at 40° C/75% RH. The LCD of the tablets after manufacture
`
`is 6.60 weight-%.
`
`Table 10: Stability at high water content
`
`
`__.-
`
`
`
`
`
`—_
`
`
`_—
`
`
`
`Example 4 demonstrates that pharmaceutical compositions prepared with conventional
`
`excipients and not containing prior art stabilising agents do not prove stable when stored
`
`under accelerated testing conditions. Already after one week of storage the content of
`
`ramipril has decreased by more than 5%.
`
`

`

`WO 2004/064809
`
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`-10-
`
`Example 5:
`
`At laboratory scale at ambient environmental conditions capsules containing ramipril
`
`(1.25mg) and starch (Starch 1500; 138.75mg) are prepared by dry-mixing of ramipril and
`Starch 1500 and filling the blend into conventional hard gelatine capsules. The capsules are
`
`packaged into Alu/Alu 40 um strips and put on stability at 40° C/75% RH. The LCD of the
`
`capsules is 8.27 weight-%.
`
`Table 11: Stability at high water content
`
`
` 4 weeks
`
`Diketo - i oeraZIde [%
`
`3.93
`
`
`
`
`
`Example 5 demonstrates that capsule formulations showing a conventional level of water
`content do not prove stable when stored under accelerated testing conditions. After 6 weeks
`
`of storage at accelerated testing conditions the content of diketopiperazide has increased up
`to 4%.
`
`Example 6:
`
`In analogy to example 5 aluminium strips containing capsules with the following composition
`are prepared: ramipril (1.25mg), starch (Starch 1500 LM; 37.00mg) and perlitol (148.75mg)
`
`are mixed and the blend is filled into conventional capsules at laboratory scale at ambient
`
`environmental conditions. The capsules are packaged into Alu/Alu 40 um strips and put on
`
`stability at 40° C/75% RH. The LCD of the capsules 5.79 weight-%.
`
`Table 12: Stability at high water content
`
`DiketOui oerazide _°.
`
`

`

`WO 2004/064809
`
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`-11-
`
`Example 6 support the findings of example 5. A LOD above 5 weight-% does not allow a
`
`sufficiently stable formulation. A significant trend toward stabilisation with decreased
`
`moisture load is obvious.
`
`Example 7:
`
`In analogy to example 5 aluminium strips containing capsules with the following composition
`
`are prepared: ramipril (1.25mg), microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH 101; 71.48mg). starch
`
`(Starch 1500; 20.47mg), and arginine (1.80mg) are mixed and the blend is filled into
`
`conventional capsules at laboratory scale at ambient environmental conditions. The capsules
`
`are packaged into Alu/Alu 40 um strips and put on stability at 40° CI75% RH. The LCD of the
`
`capsules 3.24 weight-%.
`
`Table 13: Stability at low water content
`
`
`
`_—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Diketo-i nerazide _%]
`
`Example 7 demonstrates that capsule formulations showing a low level of water content
`
`prove considerably stable towards cyclization of the active principle to diketopiperazide when
`
`storage at accelerated testing conditions. Example 5, 6 and 7 demonstrate that the principle
`
`of stabilising ramipril formulations by excluding moisture in the formulation applies for
`
`capsule formulations as well. The assay of ramipril as well remains above 95%.
`
`

`

`WO 2004/064809
`
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`-12-
`
`Claims
`
`1.
`
`Solid pharmaceutical composition comprising
`
`(a) an effective amount of ramipril and/or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof and
`
`(b) one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients,
`
`wherein the composition has a suitably low water content.
`
`Composition according to claim 1, wherein the water content is less than about 5.5
`
`weight-% measured by Karl-Fischer-analysis.
`
`Composition according to claim 1, wherein the water content is less than about 4.5
`
`weight-% measured by Karl-Fischer-analysis.
`
`Composition according to any of the preceding claims, wherein ramipril and/or a
`
`pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof is in form of pharmaceutically acceptable
`
`anhydrate, solvate and/or, hydrate and/or in crystalline and amorphous form.
`
`Composition according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the pharmaceutical
`
`composition is a tablet.
`
`Composition according to claim 5, wherein the tablet is suitably coated to generate a
`
`filmcoated tablet and/or a pill.
`
`Composition according to claim 1 —4, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a
`
`capsule.
`
`Composition according to claim 1 — 4, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a
`sachet
`
`Composition according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the excipients have a
`
`suitably low water content.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`Composition according to claim 9, wherein one of said excipients is microcrystalline
`cellulose.
`
`Composition according to claim 1 — 9, wherein one of said excipients is Avicel PH 112.
`
`Composition according to claim 9, wherein one of said excipients is starch.
`
`Composition according to claim 1 - 9, wherein one of said excipients is Starch 1500
`LM.
`
`Composition according to claim 9, wherein one of said excipients is silicon dioxide.
`
`Composition according to claim 1 - 9, wherein one of said excipients is Syloid AL-1
`FP.
`
`Composition according to claim 9, wherein one of said excipients is calcium hydrogen
`
`phosphate.
`
`

`

`WO 2004/064809
`
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`-13-
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`Composition according to claim 1 — 9, wherein one of said excipients is Dicafos A orA
`
`Tab or Anhydrous Emcompress.
`
`Composition according to claim 9, wherein one of said excipients is lactose.
`
`Composition according to claim 1 - 9, wherein one of said excipients is Pharmatose
`DCL 21.
`
`Composition according to claim 9, wherein one of said excipients is mannitol.
`
`Composition according to claim 1 - 9, wherein one of said excipients is Perlitol.
`
`Composition according to claim 9, wherein one of said excipients is calcium sulphate.
`
`Composition according to claim 1 - 9, wherein one of said excipients is Destab or
`
`Drierlte.
`
`Composition according to any of the preceding claims where one or more excipients
`
`are dried prior to use or throughout the manufacturing process to achieve the
`
`required level of water content.
`
`Process for the preparation of a composition according to any of the preceding
`
`claims, wherein environmental conditions during manufacture are maintained at a
`
`relative humidity equal or less than 35% at ambient temperature.
`
`Process for the preparation of a composition according to claim 1 - 23, wherein
`
`environmental conditions during manufacture are maintained at a relative humidity
`
`equal or less than 35% at equal or less than 30° C.
`
`Process according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the pharmaceutical
`
`composition is packaged into a packaging material suitably tight against penetration
`
`of humidity.
`
`‘
`
`Process according to claim 27, wherein the packaging material is a container
`
`including lid composed of polyethylene and/or polypropylene and/or glass.
`
`Process according to claim 27, wherein the packaging material is a strip or blister
`
`pack composed of aluminium which might be suitably coated or high density
`
`polyethylene.
`
`Package comprising a composition according to claims 1 - 23 packaged with
`
`packaging material suitably tight against penetration of humidity.
`
`Package according to claim 30, wherein the packaging material is a container
`
`including lid composed of polyethylene and/or polypropylene and/or glass.
`
`Package according to claim 30, wherein the packaging material is a strip or blister
`
`pack composed of aluminium which might be suitably coated or high density
`
`polyethylene.
`
`

`

`l'iFRNAHONALSEARCHREPORT
`it
`
`
`in.tlonal Application No
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`A. CLASSIFICATION OF UBJECT MATTER
`IPC 7
`A61K9 20
`
`According to International Patent Classification (IPC) or to both national classification and IPC
`B. FIELDS SEARCHED
`Minimum documentation seardted (classification system followed by classification symbols)
`IPC 7
`A61K
`
`Documentation searched other than minimum documentation to the extent that such documents are included in the fields searched
`
`Electronic data base consulted during the International search (name at data base and. where practical. search terms used)
`
`EPO-Internai, NPI Data, PAJ, BIOSIS, EMBASE, CHEM ABS Data
`
`0. DOCUMENTS COt‘SlDEFtED TO BE RELEVANT
`
`Category ‘
`
`Citation of document. with Indication. where appropriate, at the relevant passages
`
`Relevant to claim No.
`
`
`
`US 5 442 008 A (FUELBERTH WERNER
`15 August 1995 (1995—08-15)
`column 1,
`line 60 — column 2,
`
`line 64
`
`ET AL)
`
`DE 44 20 102 A (ASTA MEDICA AG)
`14 December 1995 (1995—12—14)
`example 8
`
`EP 0 317 878 A (HOECHST AG)
`31 May 1989 (1989—05-31)
`cited in the application
`examples 6,7
`
`m Furtherdocumente are listed In the continuation of box 0.
`° Special categories at cited documents:
`
`‘A' document defining the general state of the art which is not
`mnsidered to be of particular relevance
`'E' ear-Her document but published on or atterthe intemallonel
`filing date
`
`which Is cited to e
`blish the publica ion date of another
`'L' comment which ma throw doubts on priority olalm(s) or
`citation or other special reason (as specified)
`'0' document reierrlng to an oral disclosure. use. exhibition or
`other means
`'P' document published prior to the lntemationat tiling date but
`later than the priority date claimed
`Date of the actual completion of the international search
`
`14 May 2004
`Name and mailing address at the lSA
`European Patent Ottloe. PB 5818 Patentiaan 2
`NL — 2280 HV Fillswiik
`Tel. (+31—70) 340-2040. Tx. 31 651 epo ni.
`Fax: (+31—70) 340-3016
`
`Form PCT/ISN210 (socmd shoot) (January 2004)
`
`'T'
`
`Patent tamlly members are listed in annex.
`later document published after the lntematlonal filing date
`or priority date and not In conflict with the application but
`vent on
`fitter“? understand the principle or theory underlying the
`'X' document at particular relevance; the claimed invention
`cannot be considered novel or cannot be considered to
`involve an inventive step when the document is taken alone
`'Y' document at particular relevance; the claimed invention
`cannot be considered to involve an lnventtle step when the
`document is combined with one or more other such docu~
`e
`.
`metrntshiuch combination being obvious to a person skilled
`'5' document member at the same patent family
`Date of mailing or the intematlcnal search report
`
`26/05/2004
`Authorized officer
`
`VON EGGELKRAUT, S
`
`page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`‘
`
`I‘ERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT
`
`
`c.(Conunuauon) DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED TO as RELEVANT
`
`
`Category °
`
`Citalion of document, with indlmllon, where appropriaie. o! the relavam passages
`
`ll'.tlonal Applicaflon No
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`Relevant to claim No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NO 99/03453 A (LEK TOVARNA FARMACEVTSKIH ;
`REBIC LJUBOMIRA BARBARA (SI); KOFLER
`BOJAN) 28 January 1999 (1999—01—28)
`page 4, paragraph 3
`page 7, paragraph 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Faun PCT/ISAI21 D (mmhualbon 01 second #106!) (January 2904)
`
`page 2 of 2-
`
`

`

`I
`
`[BNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT
`Inlormation on patent family members
`
`
`In
`
`none! Appllmtlon No
`
`
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`
`
`A
`
`Publlcation
`date
`
`Patent family
`member(s)y
`
`Publication
`date
`
`15--08-1995
`
`3739690 A1
`08-06-1989
`74513 T
`15--04-1992
`2581888 A
`25-05-1989
`1338344 C
`21-05-1996
`13-06-1990
`1042917 A ,B
`3869919 D1
`14-05-1992
`653688 A
`25-05-1989
`31—05-1989
`0317878 A1
`2033400 T3
`16-03-1993
`25-05-1989
`885398 A ,3,
`3004925 T3
`28-04-1993
`
`28-06-1989
`48455 AZ
`05-10-1994
`61173 81
`
`29-06-1989
`1165596 A
`10-05-1996
`2049604 0
`
`7068140 8
`26-07-1995
`9704908 Bl
`08-04-1997
`
`25-05—1989
`885213 A ,3,
`227032 A
`28—05-1991
`
`21-06-1993
`27416 A
`01-12-1988
`89061 A ,3
`
`29-09—1992
`5151433 A
`
`8808734 A
`26-07— 1989
`
`
`
`Patent document
`cited in search report
`
`
`
`US 5442008
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A
`
` EP 0317878
` 08-06-1989
` 3739690 A1
`31~05~1989
`15-04-1992
`74513 T
`
`2581888 A
`25-05-1989
`
`21-05—1996
`1338344 0
`13-06-1990
`1042917 A ,8
`
`3869919 01
`14-05-1992
`653688 A
`25-05-1989
`
`31-05-1989
`0317878 A1
`2033400 T3
`16-03-1993
`
`25-05—1989
`885398 A ,8,
`3004925 T3
`28—04-1993
`
`48455 AZ
`28-06-1989
`
`61173 Bl
`05-10~1994
`
`29-06-1989
`1165596 A
`2049604 C
`10-05-1996
`
`26-07-1995
`7068140 8
`9704908 Bl
`08-04-1997
`
`25-05-1989
`885213 A ,3,
`
`227032 A
`28-05-1991
`
`21-06-1993
`27416 A
`01-12-1988
`89061 A ,8
`
`15-08-1995
`5442008 A
`
`
`5151433 A
`29-09-1992
`
`26—07-1989
`8808734 A
`
`
`
`
` NO 9903453
`28-02-1999
`A
`28-01—1999
`9700186 A
`
`
`756884 82
`23-01-2003
`8252398 A
`10-02-1999
`
`1003487 A1
`31-05—2000
`25-09-2000
`338010 A1
`
`9903453 A1
`28-01—1999
`
`18“09~2003
`2003175348 A1
`
`
`
`Form PCT/Isuzu] (patent (amlty emu) (January 2cm)
`
`page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`ISERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT
`
`Infotmatlon on patent famlly membnrs
`
`In
`
`Hana! Application No
`
`PCT/EP2004/000456
`
`.
`
`
`
`Form PCT

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket