`
`
`p09 15’1““;
`
`,
`
`4* IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Applicant: Roger M. Snow
`
`Examiner:
`
`Benjamin Layno
`
`_ Serial No.
`
`10/864,051
`
`Group Art Unit:
`
`3711
`
`Filed:
`
`Title:
`
`June 8, 2004
`
`Docket No.
`
`PA1027.ap.US
`
`PLAYER-BANKED FOUR CARD POKER
`
`MAIL STOP: AMENDMENT
`Commissioner for Patents
`
`PO. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`DECLARATION UNDER 37 CFR 1.131 OF ROGER M. SNOW, INVENTOR
`
`Dear Sir:
`
`1, Roger M. Snow, do state and declare as follows:
`
`1) My name is Roger M. Snow.
`
`I am the Roger M. Snow listed as the inventor on
`
`US. Patent application Serial No. 10/864,051, filed June 9, 2004 (hereinafier referred to
`
`as the “APPLICATION”), which APPLICATION is a continuation-in-part of US. Patent
`application Serial No. 10/152,325 filed May 20, 2002.
`
`2) I was previously employed as the director of game development at Shuffle
`
`Master, Inc. in Las Vegas, Nevada.
`
`I have recently been promoted to Senior Vice
`
`President of Products.
`
`3) I am a listed inventor on at least seven (10) US. Patents:
`
`1
`
`7 246 799
`
`
`
`Method of Playing a poker-type game with multiple betting
`o utions.
`
`in Hand
`Poker Game with Dealer Dis uali
`Poker Game with Re uired Dealer Discard
`Poker _ame 1a ed aainst multi-le dealer hands
`Method of playing a poker-type wagering game with multiple
`bettin; o utions
`
`—_ 6
`
`7,165,770
`7,130,614
`6,986,514
`938 900
`
`2
`3
`4
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6 923 446
`6,808 173
`6 789 801
`6,698,759
`6,604,741
`
`WaHerin arne with table bonus
`lack'ack ame with side wa_er on dis-layed cards
`accarat Side waer _ame
`la er banked three card ooker and associated ames
`lit Card feature durin; continued 1a of black'ack
`
`(0’0
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Declaration Under 37 CFR 1.131 _
`Serial No. 10/864,051
`_
`Filed: June 8, 2004
`Player—Ranked Four Card Poker
`
`Docket NO- PA1027-aP-US
`
`I am also a named inventor on at least 40 published applications.
`
`4) As part of my ordinary employment by Shuffle Master, Inc., I evaluate table
`
`games submitted to the company and develop and design games invented by me and by
`
`others.
`
`5) I have read and reviewed the APPLICATION and read and reviewed an Office
`
`Action received in the APPLICATION from the US. Patent and Trademark Office.
`
`6) I understand that a Published US. Patent Application No. 20020175468 was
`
`cited against claims in the APPLICATION as prior art (U.8. Application Serial No.
`
`10/300,359, filed 18 March 2002. That published US Patent application shall be referred
`
`to by me herein as the Kenny ‘468 Application.
`
`7) The Kenny ‘468 application makes the following priority claim:
`Related US. Application Data
`(60)
`Provisional Application No. 60/277,018, filed March 19, 2001. Provisional
`Application No. 60/314,503, filed on August 23, 2001. I
`
`Attached herewith as Exhibit A is a chart showing the priority relationship between the
`
`various Kenny applications.
`
`8) I have looked at the text of the Kenny Application and with guidance from
`
`outside Patent Law Counsel, Mark A. Litman, have considered the disclosure in the US.
`
`Provisional Applications in the priority claim of the Kenny Application.
`
`9) The Kenny ‘468 Application claims priority from two separate Provisional
`
`Applications.
`
`10) The relevant section of the Kenny ‘468 application is reproduced below:
`
`
`
`

`

`Declaration Under 37 CFR 1.131
`Serial No. 10/864,051
`_
`Filed: June 8, 2004
`Player-Ranked Four Card Poker
`
`Docket NO- PA1027~3P-US’
`
`In a second embodiment of the invention, one or more players initially
`[0011]
`place bets and then five cards are dealt to the player and six cards are dealt to the
`dealer. . . ..In games against the dealer, the player would play their best four cards
`out of five and compare that to the dealers’ best four cards out of six to determine
`the winner.
`
`11)
`
`It is my understanding from the above quotation is that the ‘468 application
`
`is able to claim priority from earlier filed provisional applications only if the earlier
`
`applications contained the essential disclosure necessary to support the claims.
`
`I have
`
`reviewed the text of the two provisional applications and believe that there is no priority
`
`‘ in either Provisional Application for specifically a five—card player hand dealt against a
`
`six-card dealer hand.
`
`12) It is believed that the ‘468 application filed on 18 March 2002 was the first
`
`filing of Kenny that provided antecedent basis for the use of a S-card player hand in
`
`combination with a six-card dealer hand.
`
`12) As I understand the law (with advice from Patent Law Counsel) and by my
`reading of the disclosure of the earlier Provisional Kenny Applications and the later filed
`
`‘468 application, I see that the first Provisional Application filed on March 19, 2001 (the
`
`‘01 8 provisional) does not contain any disclosure of the dealer’s initial hand receiving
`
`more cards than the player’s initial hand (e.g., it does not contain disclosure of a 6-card
`
`dealer hand versus a player’s 5-card hand). Also, while the second application (the ‘503
`
`provisional), with the priority date of August 23, 2001 contains disclosure of the use of 6
`
`cards (besides 4 or 5 initial cards), there is again no specific reference or disclosure to the
`
`dealer’s initial hand receiving more cards (e.g., 6-cards) than the player’s initial hand
`
`(e.g., 5-cards) when the hands are played against each other. The only statement found in
`
`the later filed Provisional Application is on Page 7, stating:
`
`THIS IS ONE ANALYSIS OF PLAY FOUR POKER, BUT NOT THE
`EXCLUSIVE WAY. POSSIBLE OTHER BETS AND OTHER PAYOFF
`SCHEDULES WILL FOLLOW DEPENDENT ON WHETHER THE GAME IS
`PLAYED THIS WAY OR WITH THE BEST FOUR FROM (6) SIX CARDS
`
`
`
`

`

`Declaration Under 37 CFR 1.131
`Serial No. 10/864,051
`Filed: June 8, 2004
`Player-Ranked Four Card Poker-
`
`Docket No. PA1027.ap-US
`
`BEING DEALT OR JUST FOUR CARDS BEING DEALT TO THE PLAYERS
`AND DEALER, AND THEY PLAY WITH JUST THOSE FOUR (4) CARDS.
`
`13) My review of the above language clearly indicates to me that the ‘503
`
`Provisional Application never specifically indicated that the dealer has more cards than
`
`the player or that the dealer has six cards while the player has five cards.
`
`14) I personally recollect, and that recollection is supported by documentary
`
`evidence, that I had both conceived of and reduced to practice the play of a casino table
`
`poker game (at the time referred to internally as “Quad Poker,” indicating that it was a
`
`four-card poker hand) at least as early as May or June of 2001 , well before the available
`
`reference date of 23 August 2001 of the Kenny ‘503 Provisional Patent Application.
`
`15) That game, as I recollect it was played as follows, with the description taken
`
`from the text of an patent application filed in my name:
`
`“A casino table card game is played on a table by at least one player
`and a dealer. The dealer usually represents the house or the casino in the play
`of the game. As shown in Figure 1, wagering areas 10 are provided for each
`player, and card receiving areas 12 are available for each of the players and the
`dealer. The wagering area may include three distinct wagering zones for each
`player comprising a Bonus wager area 14 (e.g., the Aces-Up wager), an Ante
`area 16, and a Bet area 18. To initiate play of the game, at least one (and
`usually only one) deck of standardor variant playing cards is provided.
`In other
`forms of the game, multiple intermixed decks of cards, decks with wild cards or
`special decks (i.e. decks with certain cards removed) are used. Each player who
`wishes to enter the play of the game makes at least one wager selected from the
`Bonus Bet (or Aces-Up bet) and the Ante. One or both of these wagers may be
`made. The player may also play the hand blind (also referred to as the “House
`Way”) by placing both an Ante and an additional Game Bet (referred to in
`Figure l as the “Play Bet”). After placement of the at least one wager, gala
`player who has made an at least one wager is provided with a number of cards,
`preferably five, from which to select a best four-card poker hand. The cards
`may be dealt as a complete set of five cards or in portions of one or more cards.
`At about the Same time, the dealer is dealt a number of cards exceeding four. In
`one example of the invention, six cards are dealt. One or more additional cards
`can be dealt to the player, the dealer or both.
`
`
`
`

`

`Declaration Under 37 CFR 1.131
`Serial No. 10/864,051
`_
`Filed: June 8, 2004
`Player-Ranked Four Card Poker
`
`Docket NO- PA1027.ap.US
`
`“Although in one example of the invention the dealer receives one
`more card than each player, the number of cards dealt can be equal. What is
`important is that enough cards are dealt so that at least one discard can be made.
`“In a preferred form of the invention, a four card poker hand is played.
`The player reviews the five cards received at that player position and
`determines what best four-card poker hand can be made from the five cards. If
`the player believes that the cards cannot form a four-card poker rank of
`' sufficiently high rank to warrant competition against the dealer’s hand (even
`without that hand or any portion of that hand having been displayed), the player
`may fold the hand, refusing to place an additional wager. At this time or
`usually a later time, the Ante would be collected by the dealer. In one example
`of the invention, if the player made the Aces—Up bet and the Ante bet and
`decides to fold, the Aces-Up bet is swept along with the Ante. In another form
`of the invention, if the player remains in the game by making the Play Bet and
`the player’s hand does not contain a hand ranking of a pair of Aces or higher,
`and a bet was made on the Ace-Up wager, that wager may be now or later
`collected by the dealer. If the player determines that the rank of the best four-
`card poker hand that can be made from the five cards dealt to the player is
`sufficiently high as to warrant competition against the dealer (or if the player
`wants to ‘blufi’ against the dealer, particularly if the dealer must qualify), the
`player makes an additional wager, referred to as a play bet or game bet. That
`additional wager may be multiples of the Ante, such as 1X, 2X, 3X, 4X or 5X
`the amount of the original Ante, at the option of the player. In some examples
`of the invention, the game bet is 1X the ante unless the player has a qualifying
`hand such as a pair of kings or better for example. If the player’s hand qualifies
`he has the option of increasing his bet. Fractional amounts or larger amounts
`may be allowed, but they can complicate the payout or alter the hold for the
`house, so those changes are in the discretion of the casino. After discarding
`excess cards and placing the Game Bet, or placing the fifth card face down, or
`merely leaving the fifth card in the hand so that the hand may be arranged and
`ranked by the dealer or player when exposed, the player’s hand is placed on the
`table for display. The dealer’s hand is then revealed after each and every player
`has determined whether or not the Game Bet is to be made. The-dealer
`compares the value or rank of his hand against the value or rank of each
`player’s hand, usually in succession around the table, and each series of wagers
`(the Aces-Up wager, the Ante and the Game Bet) is resolved. Ties on the rank
`of player’s hands and dealers hands may be either paid to the player, called a
`push, or collected by the dealer, depending upon the desired house advantage
`the casino wants to build into the game. The dealer may either always qualify
`(a preferred method of play), or a level of qualification may be built into the
`game (such as at least Queen high, at least King high, at least Queen-Jack, At
`least King-Jack, at least Ace-King, or at least one pair).”
`
`
`
`

`

`Declaration Under 37 CFR 1.131
`Serial No. 10/864,051
`_
`Filed: June 8, 2004
`Player-Ranked Four Card Poker
`
`Docket No. PA1027-aP-US
`
`16) After reducing the game to practice by defining the specific rules of play, I
`
`provided the rules of play to WKB Associates, Inc. in Reno, Nevada. The purpose of the
`
`submission of the rules was to have them evaluate the statistical events in the play of the
`
`game to determine casino hold and statistical outcomes. This is an essential step in
`
`evaluating the likelihood of success of a game, at least from the casino’s standpoint of
`
`determining how much money the casinos would statistically retain on the game.
`
`17) To confirm the fact that the complete knowledge of the game as described
`to me was in my possession at a time earlier than August 23, 2001, I attached herewith a
`
`copy of an Invoice sent to me at Shuffle Master, Inc., by WKB Associates, Inc. regarding
`
`the analysis of the “Quad Poker” game.
`
`I have redacted the dates from the invoice. The ‘
`
`invoice represents charges for work completed by WKB associates.
`
`18) I hereby declare and state that the date of the invoice showing completion of
`the analysis of Quad Poker Was substantively earlier than 23 August 2001.
`
`19) I hereby confirm and state that the different dates of the “DESCRIPTION”
`
`indicated on the Invoice for “Write program to Analyze ‘Quads’ version of poker” and
`
`“Write report, phone with R. Snow” were both earlier than the invoice date, which was
`
`itself substantively earlier than 23 August 2001.
`
`20) Also attached hereto is a copy of an authorization letter for a “Novelty
`Search for QUAD POKER” sent by Shuffle Master, Inc. to its outside Patent Counsel
`
`with a date that is earlier then the dates of the Invoice to WKB Associates, which are in
`turn earlier then the 23 August 2001 available reference date in the ‘503 Provisional
`
`Application filed 23 August 2001 used to establish priority for the concept of more
`
`dealer’s cards (e.g., a 6-card hand) than in the player’s hand (e.g., a S-card hand) to play a
`
`player-versus-dealer game of 4-card poker games. Although the date of the letter was
`
`redacted, I confirm that it was earlier than the redacted date on the Invoice and earlier
`
`than 23 August 2001.
`
`
`
`

`

`Declaration Under 37 CFR 1.131
`Serial No. 10/864,051
`Filed: June 8, 2004
`Player-Ranked Four Card Poker
`
`Docket NO- PA1027-aP-US
`
`21) The authorization letter of paragraph 16) specifically describes the game of
`
`QUAD POKER therein as including steps of:
`
`a) “ n order to play the game, the player makes an optional player
`wager. He receives five cards, and uses these cards to make his best four card
`poker hand. In TCP [note, Three Card Poker® game] and CSP {note, Caribbean
`Stud® poker], players receive a hand of three or five cards, and all cards are used
`to play the game.”
`b) “The dealer then receives 6 cards. He makes his best four card
`hand. If the player hand beats the dealer hand, the player wins even more money
`on both the ante and play bet.”
`
`22) I believe that the documentary information in the form of the Invoice from
`
`WKB Associates, Inc. and the letter of authorization provide confirmation of my
`
`reduction to practice of the game described above as Quad Poker, and that the dates on
`
`the Invoice establish that this reduction to practice was earlier than 23, August 2001.
`
`23) Based upon the documentary evidence in the form of the Invoice from
`WKB Associates, Inc., the letter of authorization from Shuffle Master, Inc. and my I
`
`specific recollection of the game, as subsequently filed on in the United States Patent
`
`Office with the description provided above, I know that I invented the subject matter
`described above with regard to the play of Quad Poker earlier than 23 August 200I.
`
`24) Also attached to the Declaration is an e-mail request for instructions to
`
`proceed with the file of an Application on Quad Four Poker. The date of this e—mail
`
`correspondence and the attachments thereto, is even earlier than the earliest priority date
`
`in the Kenney stream of US. Patent Applications, namely Provisional Application No.
`
`60/277,018, filed March 19, 2001. Even though that earliest application was
`
`shown above to lack antecedent basis for the disclosure of greater numbers of
`
`cards (and specifically six cards) in adealer's hand versus a lesser number of
`
`cards (and specifically five cards) in a player's hand, this set of documents (e-
`
`
`
`

`

`Declaration Under 37 CFR 1.131
`Serial No. 10/864,051
`Filed: June 8, 2004
`Player-Ranked Four Card Poker
`
`Docket NO- PA1027.ap.US
`
`mail cover sheet and the attachments) shows that Applicant was in possession of
`
`the technology and limitations of the claims in advance of the faulty earliest
`
`Kenny priority date as well as any substantively sufficient later priority date for
`
`these concepts.
`
`25) Based upon the documentary evidence in the form of the two rules sheets
`and the e—mail correspondence forwarding those Rules Sheets requesting instructions by
`the Shuffle Master, Inc. inventor (myself, Roger Snow) and my specific recollection of
`
`the game, as described in the e-mail attachments), I know that I invented the subject
`
`matter described above with regard to the play of Quad Poker earlier than 1 March 2001.
`
`26) Based upon my understanding of the law as explained to me by Patent
`
`Counsel, Mark A. Litman, these facts establish that neither the Kenny ‘468 Application
`nor the Kenny 60/277,018 establish a date for that reference that is early enough to
`provide prior art against my own invention date for the use of a dealer hand with more
`
`cards (e.g., 6-cards) than the number of cards in a player hand (5 cards) used to play a
`
`four-card poker game, as it does not establish an earlier or prior date.
`
`27) Further Affiant Sayeth Not.
`Signed and Declared this
`l
`l
`
`date of August 2007 by Declarant
`
`Roger M. Snow, Declarant
`
`
`
`

`

`4.
`
`.
`."
`Farrar, Jennifer
`
`Snow, Pmor
`‘
`Fridav.
`Farrar, Jennifer
`RE: 4 Card
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Subject:
`
`[$3an
`Rulmds
`
`Snow‘ Roger
`
`I'm new at this, so let me know if you need more info.
`
`-----Original Message-m5
`From:
`Farrar, Jennifer
`Sent:
`Friday,§ .
`"
`To:
`Subject:
`
`RE: 4 Card
`
`Why don't you develop a set of betting and dealing rules. and I'll let you know if it's patentable}
`
`-~~-0riglnal Message-----
`From:
`Snow, Roqer
`Sent:
`Friday, i
`To:
`Farrar, Jennifer
`Subject: 4 Card
`
`"
`
`Hi Jennifer. Suppose I wanted to patent a four-card poker game. What would I need to do?
`
`

`

`
`
`.
`an
`Farrar, Jennifer
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Subject:
`
`Farrar, Jennifer
`Friday,
`.
`,
`‘
`Levin, Suzan
`Novelty Search for 4 Card Poker Game-
`
`Suzan-Please open a novelty search file for this game.
`
`

`

`
`
`6}
`
`O
`
`QUAD (the four-card poker game)
`Rules Overview
`
`1) Player against Dealer
`a. Player antes
`b. Player dealt five cards, to make best four-card poker hand.
`c. Player has two choices
`i. Fold and lose ante bet
`
`'
`
`ii. Stay in the game with a Play bet at least equal to the Ante bet, but
`no more than three times it.
`
`(1. Dealer gets six cards
`9’
`After players finish acting on their hands, dealer reveals his six cards and
`makes his best four-card hand. If players hand beats the dealer’s, they win
`even money.
`
`2) Player against Pay Table
`3. Players bet their four-card hand will qualify for odds payouts, as posted on '
`the table felt.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`O
`
`0
`
`QUAD: Rules of the game
`
`Game 1: Player vs Dealer
`1 Players ante
`2 Players receive four cards
`3 They have three options:
`Fold and lose ante bet.
`Match their ante bet and draw one card.
`Double their ante bet and draw no cards.
`4 Dealer receives five cards and makes the best four-card hand.
`
`5 Winning bets get even money.
`6 No dealer qualifying
`
`Game 2: Player vs Pay table
`Players four-card hand against a pay table.
`
`

`

`
`
`QUAD (the font-card poker game)
`Rules Overview
`
`1) Player against Dealer r
`a. Player antes
`b. Player dealt five cards, to make best four-card poker hand.
`c. Player has two choices
`,
`i. Fold and lose ante bet
`ii. Stay in the game with a Play bet at least equal to, the Ante bet, but
`no more than three times it.
`
`(1. Dealer gets six cards
`.0
`After players finish acting on their hands, dealer reveals his six cards and
`makes his best four-card hand. If players hand beats the dealer’s, they win
`eVen money.
`'
`I
`
`2) Player against Pay Table
`a. Players bet their four—card hand will qualify for odds payouts, as posted on
`the table felt.
`
`
`
`

`

`on
`
`*xmxmmwm -CUI
`
`[DURNFL— WWWW DRTE JUL-14~
`
`. W TIME 13:33 madman
`
`MODE = MEMORY TRQNSMISSION
`
`STRRT=JUL-14 13:32
`
`WD=M-14 13133
`
`FILE N0.=484
`
`STN NU.
`
`COMM.
`
`FIBER NO.
`
`STRTION NAME/TEL NU.
`
`PPGES
`
`DLRRTION
`
`881
`
`OK
`
`8
`
`17022681146
`
`091/981 80189118
`
`MWW*W*WMMWW -MRRKLITMRNRSSOC - ma: -
`
`952 832 9191- WWW
`
`Invoice
`
`WKBAssociaxes Inc
`
`350 Yellow Pine Road
`
`Reno.NV 89511
`
`
`
`SWMCR In: - Raga Snow
`lIOG Palm: AirwflDflV!
`1.33 Vegas. NV 39119
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`.
`‘
`.
`d poker
`. 3%
`Wnuamymfotmalymormoqnudam
`’
`
`Finish sinmhrionmvefifilalculmgn
`L” 7% 45'} _ 09
`fig-in: upon phue canvas-tin mm F: 5110
`
`3 5 ‘
`Shit: pray-m to Wyn 'Quads' vcmon ofpokcr
`
`.
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`
`
`.
`
`.
`
`1.; m 8M847l96_
`
`

`

`07/14/2006 10:22. FAX 7022601146
`
`.
`
`,
`
`,
`
`-
`
`,- »-
`
`..
`
`'
`
`I003
`SMG LEGAL m 8‘ PATENTS
`SHUFFLE MASTER wc.
`114478
`WKB Associates Inc.
`.
`.
`‘
`.1
`. ‘
`,
` gffiinfiu;¢@af¢
`,vfgznr4
`::.;{;_“¥a}"-
`A
`.
`‘fi
`.
`_
`”#55:.‘N9tpAmbunt
`C.
`~.
`”
`..
`r
`~
`_
`.'I$.;0290,_.= $1,362.30
`I.
`.
`
`Cheat" 114478
`."
`'
`
`1'»? ..
`
`.
`'
`
`'
`4-
`
`‘
`e 11:? f,
`‘mfim;
`.
`~‘
`r.
`_
`.
`y,’
`'.
`'.'~'i'-€_“'
`. ",
`u fulfimfifi?
`'1. "R9,.
`t.”
`'
`s
`.w (mad ~‘
`-
`-
`.
`a." m, m
`-
`.-...
`~
`w
`‘
`.
`‘ .
`‘
`15: “(3 X.
`‘J h ‘. z”
`. h.$%\,§§gi¥‘;&)&.
`‘
`95155.1‘
`‘1. filfig‘anfiflgmflrig ..
`.‘
`.
`‘ ""
`-"o
`Vskl‘»...
`,v:
`.
`,1
`v»,
`'
`I
`vekw‘gfiM-u I’m-111311.. 12(5)::\MJ
`I.ri\i‘€i.\lfi
`£31313};“Li"; x§v¥€\1§“"iz§§?fi§ifill§
`M mmhzhlhuzbi: l‘s‘fi‘difiifit:Eil'éifiti‘x;
`.
`~‘J‘1
`r
`.
`,
`
`t ,
`
`'
`
`.'
`
`V
`
`.
`‘
`.'
`' 2? flirt?“
`i‘vlfi'vgihaiejh.‘
`Au “ ‘2'.
`
`'
`
`H
`A"
`~.:
`hmi’q‘fl
`‘5” ‘.‘:'l.;)~”.4'
`
`.
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`____,_-_.——-—-
`Write program for analyiss of modified 3 card poker
`Finish simulation to verify calculation
`0' 7 9’0
`Writ: report, phone conversation with R. Sno ‘
`Write program to analyze "Quads" version of poker
`Write report. phone with K Snow
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`07/14/2008 10:22 FAX 7022601146
`
`SfiG LEGéL TM & YAIENIS
`
`Shuffle Maséer,.1nc.
`HISTORICAL AGED mm BALANCE.
`Payables Management
`
`4
`
`First - Laet
`F05:
`First - 6/30/2006
`Posting Date:
`Document Nunber:First - Last
`
`.flvv.
`
`1
`Page:
`User ID: LEmster
`
`Print Cptiomfifi’i‘AIL
`Aged By:
`Document Date
`Aging Date:
`6/30/2006
`
`‘
`System:
`“User Date:
`
`.7/14/2006
`7/14/2006
`
`10:05:13 AM
`
`'
`Ranges:
`WGAOO - WKEA'JO
`ID:
`Vendor
`First - Last
`Class 10:
`Payment Priority First - Lest
`
`First - Last
`Vendor Name:
`Exclude: Multicurrency Info
`Sorted 5y:Vendor Name
`Due Date
`Print Currency In: Functional
`
`(Z-USS)
`
`* - Indicates an untested credit document the: has been apglied.
`
`Venue:
`ID
`Name
`Voucher/Payment No.
`Document Hunter
`
`Class ID
`F05
`Current Period
`Document Amount
`Disc Avail
`Due Date
`Disc Date
`Writeoff Amount
`
`Type
`Doc Date
`
`VwKBAOO
`000209‘1
`104215
`
`0K5 Associates Inc.
`EMT
`
`010
`($900.00)
`_
`
`'
`
`ORIGIN
`
`31 — 60 Days
`
`61 - 90 Dais
`
`1 and Over
`
`($1,400.00)
`
`'
`
`3?
`
`00033005
`107000
`
`00035436
`109910
`
`00038223
`112659
`
`00040119
`114478
`
`00041125
`115307
`
`00033355
`103
`00028931
`00039071
`106
`00033003
`00042113
`2004
`00035436
`00047263
`2007
`00036223}
`00050315
`2014
`00040119
`00052143
`2016
`00041125
`
`PHT
`
`PMT
`.
`
`EMT
`
`,,
`
`v”.
`
`“.
`
`‘
`
`‘5
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`PMT
`
`PM?
`'
`
`INV
`.
`PMT
`luv
`EMT
`rxv
`PM?
`INV
`PM?
`[NV
`EMT
`INV
`PM?
`
`($1,062.50)
`
`($1,562.50)
`
`($1,562.50)
`
`-
`
`($437.50)
`
`$900.00
`5/26/2000
`104215
`$1,400 00
`10/15/2000
`107800
`$1,062.50
`1/12/2001
`109918
`$1,562.50
`5/2/2001
`11255
`$1,562.50
`7/19/2001
`114479
`$437.50
`6/21/2001
`113307
`
`.
`
`_
`
`.
`
`_
`
`,
`
`‘
`
`5;
`
`.
`
`_
`
`$300.00
`($900.00)
`$1,430.00
`{$1,403.00}
`$1,051.50
`{31,552 50)
`$1,322.50
`($1,562.50)
`$1,5E2155
`'
`($1,562.50)
`Efi37 53
`(5437 53
`
`

`

`07/14/2008 10:22 FAX 7022801148
`
`SMG LEGAL TM 8: PATENTS
`
`(gy's'cémz’
`
`‘ 7/14/2006
`
`10:05:13 AM
`
`HISTORICAL mo TRIAL mm
`
`Page:
`
`2
`
`Vendor
`
`ID
`
`Name
`
`Class ID
`
`FOB
`
`Disc Avail
`Document Amount
`Type
`Voucher/Payment No.
`Disc Date
`Due Date
`Doc Date
`Document Number
`—__—-_-__—__-_--..__-__-..-_-— -_--..__.._---__...-------_--
`
`31 - 60 Days
`
`_
`
`Current Period
`Writeoff Amount
`--_--—--__---__- _--__--__..--_-_.. —_----__-__—---— -- ..............
`
`61 — 90 Days
`
`91 and Over
`
`12 chcher(s)
`
`Cue:
`
`50.00
`==::-_===:==:cuq
`
`Aged Totals:
`
`$0.60
`$0.00
`$0.00
`=o==m======== ._-.—___.-—- .—_——__-_,
`
`$0.00
`
`1 Vendor”)
`
`Due:
`
`$0.00 Vendor Totals:
`__..__.—._—---—-------:==:€=lu
`
`
`
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`50.00
`_..___.______.._._ ___.____._.-__ “'2‘—“"==:===: ___,_____________
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket