DBD.
`
`( OF
`
`*
`
`frws
`%
`é,
`
`Stares oF
`
`Patent and Trademark Office
`
`UNITED STAQ@SDEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Address: COMMISSIONER OF PATENTSAND TRADEMARKS
`Washington, D.C. 20231
`v0)ANA
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`FILING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`Mos?71
`
`Qo/S2/ 99
`
`ROTHSCHILD
`
`J
`
`i7io. oo Sonos
`
`-
`
`TMOd/ Latns
`STERNE EESSLER GOLDSTEIN &® FOX Putt
`SUITE 600
`Lion NEW YORE AVENUE NW
`WASHINGTON Dm 20005-3934
`
`Se=
`
`MAUNG. Z
`
`:
`
`2154
`DATE MAILED:
`
`[©
`
`La/oe/ nono
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerningthis application or
`proceeding.
`
`Commissionerof Patents and Trademarks
`
`PTO-90C (Rev. 2/95)
`*U.S. GPO: 2000-473-000/44602
`
`

`

`=A_
`
`Interview Summary
`
`ApplicationNo. Aei.
`Examine?
`Group Art Unit
`
`LL earns aseHAT
`
`Rothschild etal.
`
`All participants (applicant, applicant's representative, PTO personnel):
`
`(1) Zarni Maung
`
`(2) Mr. Raymond Millien (Registration No. 43,806)
`Dec 7, 2000
`
`Date of Interview
`
`
`
`
`
`(3)
`
`(4)
`
`Type:
`
`RTelephonic
`
`[Bersonal (copyis given to
`
`applicant
`
`applicant's representative).
`
`If yes, brief description:
`iG.
`Yes
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted:
`
`
`
`Agreement
`
`[Kwasreached.
`
`[Was not reached.
`
`Claim(s) discussed: 10,18 and 23
`
`identification of prior art discussed:
`None
`
`
`Description of the general nature of what was agreedto if an agreement was reached, or any other comments:
`The examiner informed to the applicant's attorney that there are typographical errors on the page 3 of the examiner's
`amendment paper 9, mailed on 12/5/2000. The examinerinformedto the applicant's attorney to disregard the amendmentto
`claim 10, line 13, claim 18, line 13 and claim 23, line 12 which appeared on page 3 ofthe examiner's amendment.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(A fuller description, if necessary, and a copy of the amendments,if available, which the examiner agreed would render
`the claims allowable must be attached. Also, where no copy of the amendents which would renderthe claims allowable
`is available, a summary thereof must be attached.)
`
`1.
`
`(7
`
`Itis not necessary for applicant to provide a separate record of the substance of the interview.
`
`Unless the paragraph above has been checkedto indicate to the contrary, AFORMAL WRITTEN RESPONSETO THE LAST
`OFFICE ACTION IS NOT WAIVED AND MUST INCLUDE THE SUBSTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW. (See MPEPSection
`713.04).
`If a responseto the last Office action has already been filed, APPLICANT IS GIVEN ONE MONTH FROM THIS
`INTERVIEW DATE TO FILE A STATEMENT OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW.
`
`2. (Since the Examiner's interview summary above (including any attachments) reflects a complete responseto
`each of the objections, rejections and requirements that may be presentin the last Office action, and since the
`claims are now allowable, this completed form is consideredtofulfill the response requirements of the last
`Office action. Applicant is not relieved from providing a separate record of the interview unless box 1 above
`
`is alsochecked.
`
`7fh
`
`.
`_
`:
`Examiner Note: You must sign and stampthis form unlessit is an attachmentto a signed Office action.
`U. S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTO-413 (Rev. 10-95)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`MAUNG
`ZARNI
`PRIMARY EXAMINER
`ART UNIT 2154
`
`Paper No.
`
`10
`
`