`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
`
`
`IN RE: AFLIBERCEPT PATENT
`LITIGATION
`
`
`
`
`Master Case No: 1:24-md-3103-TSK
`MDL 3103
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` CIVIL NO. 1:23-CV-94
`
`THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
`________________________________________________________________
`
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG BIOEPIS, CO., LTD.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG BIOEPIS, CO., LTD.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` CIVIL NO. 1:23-CV-106
`
`ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCES [ECF 181, 163]
`
`Pending before the Court is “Motion to Withdraw Appearances
`
`of J. Brett Milbourn and Joe Kronawitter” filed by J. Brett
`Milbourn and Joe Kronawitter of the law firm Horn Aylward & Bandy,
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-md-03103-TSK Document 78 Filed 05/16/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1860
`
`
`ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCES [ECF 181, 163]
`
`LLC [ECF No. 181, 23cv94; ECF No. 163, 23cv106]. For reasons
`contained in the motion, and pursuant to Rule 83.03 of the Northern
`District of West Virginia Local Rules of General Practice and
`Procedure, the Court GRANTS the motion to withdraw as counsel [ECF
`No. 121]. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate J. Brett Milbourn and
`Joe Kronawitter of the law firm Horn Aylward & Bandy, LLC as
`limited appearance counsel for Plaintiff. Attorneys from the law
`firms of Carey, Douglas, Kessler & Ruby, PLLC; Kellogg, Hansen,
`Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C.; Williams & Connolly LLP; and
`Wiel, Gotshal & Manges will continue as counsel for Plaintiff
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`It is so ORDERED.
`
`
`The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to
`counsel of record via the CM/ECF filing system.
`DATED: May 16, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________
`THOMAS S. KLEEH, CHIEF JUDGE
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
`
`
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
