throbber
Case 1:24-cv-00053-TSK Document 17-8 Filed 06/12/24 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 2708
`Case 1:24-cv-00053-TSK Document17-8 Filed 06/12/24 Page 1of5 PagelD #: 2708
`
`EXHIBIT 6
`EXHIBIT 6
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cv-00053-TSK Document 17-8 Filed 06/12/24 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 2709
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
`THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
`
`
`
`MDL No.: 1:24-md-3103-TSK
`
`
`
`
`IN RE: AFLIBERCEPT PATENT LITIGATION
`
`
`
`This Document Relates to All Cases
`
`[JOINT PROPOSED] ORDER REQUIRING FILING AND SERVING OF REDACTED
`VERSIONS OF SEALED FILINGS
`
`Whereas the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation has consolidated actions brought
`
`by Plaintiff Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) against Defendants Mylan
`
`Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Biocon Biologics Inc., Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., Celltrion, Inc.,
`
`Formycon AG, and Amgen Inc. (collectively, including any defendant to a case that is added to
`
`this Multi-District Litigation (“MDL”) in the future, the “Defendants”) (Plaintiff and Defendants
`
`together, the “Parties”) pursuant to its order dated April 11, 2024 (ECF No. 1);
`
`Whereas protective orders governing confidential information of the Parties either have
`
`been entered or will be entered in each of the actions that is part of this MDL;
`
`
`
`Whereas the Parties have made and expect to make numerous filings under seal including
`
`materials related to preliminary injunction motions, summary judgment motions, and trial, which
`
`contain confidential information of one or more Parties;
`
`
`
`Whereas public, nonconfidential versions of filings should be filed in the public record
`
`with redactions necessary to protect confidential information;
`
`
`
`Whereas the Parties have a need for a procedure under which all Parties will have access
`
`to redacted non-confidential versions of all MDL filings;
`
`Now, therefore, for good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the Motion for an Order
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cv-00053-TSK Document 17-8 Filed 06/12/24 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 2710
`
`Deleted: <#>Applicability: This Order shall apply
`prospectively to any documents filed in this MDL and in any
`member case to this MDL on or after [insert filing date of
`stipulation]. This Order shall not apply to any documents filed in
`any member case to this MDL or in in the MDL prior to this date. ¶
`
`
`
`Requiring Filing and Serving of Redacted Versions of Sealed Filings, and ORDERS as follows:
`
`1. Non-Public Service Copies of Future Sealed Filings: Any Party who files a document
`
`in this MDL with the Court under seal shall serve (but not file) on all other Parties within
`
`seven (7) calendar days of such filing, a redacted copy that does not include any
`
`Defendant’s confidential information. Such redacted copy shall be clearly marked
`
`“REDACTED VERSION – CONTAINS PLAINTIFF CONFIDENTIAL
`
`INFORMATION” as appropriate.
`
`2. Public Versions of Future MDL Court Filings: Any Party who files a document in this
`
`MDL with the Court under seal shall file on the public record within fourteen (14)
`
`calendar days of such filing, a redacted copy that does not include any Party’s
`
`confidential information. Such redacted copy shall be clearly marked “PUBLIC
`
`VERSION.”
`
`3. Public Versions of Sealed Court Orders: If the Court enters a sealed order,
`
`memorandum opinion, or any other sealed document (each, a “Sealed Court Order”) in
`
`this MDL or in any member case to this MDL, the affected Parties shall coordinate to
`
`jointly file, on the public record, a copy of the Sealed Court Order with all confidential
`
`information redacted within fourteen (14) business days of issuance of the Sealed Court
`
`Deleted:
`
`Order. Such redacted copy shall be clearly marked “PUBLIC VERSION.”
`
`4. Non-Public Service Copies of Sealed Court Orders: Within seven (7) business days of
`
`issuance of a Sealed Court Order, any Defendant asserting that such Sealed Court Order
`
`contains its confidential information shall provide to Regeneron a redacted copy of such
`
`Sealed Court Order that does not include its confidential information. Regeneron shall
`
`then produce to each party to this MDL the redacted copy provided by Defendants,
`
`Deleted: Regeneron shall serve (but not file) on each Party to
`this MDL
`Deleted: w
`Deleted: three
`Deleted: 3
`
`Deleted: , a redacted copy of the Sealed Court Order that
`Deleted: any
`Deleted: Defendant’s
`Formatted: Font: 12 pt
`Formatted: Font: 12 pt
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cv-00053-TSK Document 17-8 Filed 06/12/24 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 2711
`
`
`
`
`
`appropriately branded under the relevant protective order to reflect the level of
`
`Regeneron confidential information it contains (i.e., “REDACTED VERSION –
`
`CONTAINS PLAINTIFF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” or “REDACTED
`
`VERSION – CONTAINS PLAINTIFF OUTSIDE COUNSEL’S EYES ONLY
`
`Deleted: Regeneron’s confidential information shall not be
`redacted in these non-public service copies. Such redacted copy
`shall be clearly marked
`Deleted: as
`
`INFORMATION.”
`
`Deleted: appropriate.
`
`5. Access to Pleadings Filed Before Entry of this Order. Within fourteen (14) calendar
`
`days of the entry of this Order, each Defendant shall provide to Regeneron redacted
`
`copies of all motions and supporting declarations filed under seal in each member case
`
`that do not contain the relevant Defendants’ confidential information. Within seven (7)
`
`calendar days of receipt, Regeneron shall then produce to each party to this MDL the
`
`redacted copy provided by Defendants, appropriately branded under the relevant
`
`protective order to reflect the level of Regeneron confidential information it contains (i.e.,
`
`“REDACTED VERSION – CONTAINS PLAINTIFF CONFIDENTIAL
`
`INFORMATION” or “REDACTED VERSION – CONTAINS PLAINTIFF OUTSIDE
`
`COUNSEL’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION.”
`
`6. Challenge to Redactions. On receipt of redacted copies of Sealed Court Orders pursuant
`
`to Paragraph 4, any party may within two (2) business days dispute in writing the
`
`confidential status of information redacted by any other party. The party that redacted
`
`the challenged information shall respond in writing within two (2) business days with
`
`either a version of the Sealed Court Order that does not redact the challenged
`
`information, or an explanation of why the information is entitled to confidential status
`
`under the relevant protective order. Within two (2) business days of such response, the
`
`challenging party may present the dispute to the Court for a ruling on the matter. On
`
`3
`
`Formatted: Font: 12 pt
`Formatted: Font: 12 pt
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cv-00053-TSK Document 17-8 Filed 06/12/24 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 2712
`
`
`
`receipt of redacted copies of pleadings filed before entry of this order, the parties shall
`
`have the same right to challenge a redaction, but shall have ten (10) business days to do
`
`so. The challenged party shall have three (3) business days to respond, and the
`
`challenging party must bring the dispute to the court within three (3) business days of the
`
`response. In every case, the party asserting the claim of confidentiality having the burden
`
`of proof.
`
`It is so ORDERED.
`
`
`
`Dated: _____________________
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`HONORABLE THOMAS S. KLEEH
`CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`Deleted: <#>Defendants’ Responsibility to Provide
`Redactions: It is the responsibility of the Defendant whose
`confidential information is at issue to timely provide redactions to
`the Party that is required by this Order to file or serve a redacted
`copy that does not contain any Defendant’s confidential
`information. ¶
`Regeneron’s Confidential Information: Regeneron’s
`confidential information shall not be redacted from non-public
`service copies required by this Order, but shall be subject to the
`applicable Protective Order in each recipient Defendant’s case, or
`shall be maintained on an Outside Counsel Eyes Only (“OCEO”)
`basis by the Defendant’s counsel pending entry of a Protective
`Order. Regeneron shall designate any non-public service copies
`accordingly.
`Deleted: <#>¶
`
`
`
`4
`
`Formatted: Font: 12 pt
`Formatted: Font: 12 pt
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket