throbber
Case 1:23-cv-00089-TSK Document 100-5 Filed 02/14/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 4244
`Case 1:23-cv-00089-TSK Document 100-5 Filed 02/14/24 Page 1of 4 PagelD #: 4244
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 5
`EXHIBIT 5
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00089-TSK Document 100-5 Filed 02/14/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 4245
`
`Griffin, Renee
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Fogel, Louis E. <LFogel@jenner.com>
`Thursday, February 8, 2024 12:14 PM
`Kayali, Kathryn; bspann@tcspllc.com; dgriffith@tcspllc.com; Van Horn, Shaun M.;
`Mascherin, Terri L.
`Eylea; Eylea Biosimilars; DL_FYB203Internal
`RE: MDL No. 3103: In re Aflibercept Patent Litigation
`
`Counsel,
`
`
`We reject your request to serve unredacted copies of excerpts of Formycon’s Detailed Statement pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
`262(l)(3)(B) or information contained therein on outside counsel for other defendants. As you acknowledge, Formycon
`designated its § 262(l)(3)(B) contentions as confidential information pursuant to the parties’ August 23, 2023 Section
`262(l) Confidentiality Agreement and § 262(l)(1). Pursuant to the Confidentiality Agreement, only Regeneron’s
`Authorized Evaluators may view Formycon’s confidential information. And pursuant to § 262(l)(1)(D), such confidential
`information “shall be used for the sole and exclusive purpose of determining, with respect to each patent assigned to or
`exclusively licensed by the reference product sponsor, whether a claim of patent infringement could reasonably be
`asserted if the subsection (k) applicant engaged in the manufacture, use, offering for sale, sale, or importation into the
`United States of the biological product that is the subject of the application under subsection (k).” Regeneron’s JPML
`reply clearly falls outside the scope of that sole and exclusive purpose for using Formycon’s confidential
`information. And nothing about the statement in our JPML opposition suggests a waiver of Formycon’s rights with
`respect to its confidential information.
`
`As such, any disclosure or use of Formycon’s confidential information in connection with Regeneron’s JPML reply would
`constitute a violation of the parties’ Confidentiality Agreement and § 262(l)(1), for which Formycon would be entitled to
`seek immediate injunctive relief. Formycon reserves all rights with respect to the confidentiality of its § 262(l)(3)(B)
`contentions.
`
`Best regards,
`Louis
`
`
`From: Kayali, Kathryn <KKayali@wc.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2024 4:15 AM
`To: bspann@tcspllc.com; dgriffith@tcspllc.com; Fogel, Louis E. <LFogel@jenner.com>; Van Horn, Shaun M.
`<SVanHorn@jenner.com>; Mascherin, Terri L. <TMascherin@jenner.com>
`Cc: Eylea <Eylea@wc.com>; Eylea Biosimilars <Eylea.Biosimilars@weil.com>
`Subject: MDL No. 3103: In re Aflibercept Patent Litigation
`
`
`External Email - Do Not Click Links or Attachments Unless You Know They Are Safe
`
`Counsel,
`
`In your MDL opposition brief, you stated that your defenses differ from the defenses raised by other Defendants
`(Amgen, Celltrion, Samsung Bioepis, Mylan and/or Biocon). We therefore assume you reviewed the defenses
`asserted by other Defendants or otherwise conferred regarding their content. Please confirm that you therefore
`agree to Regeneron’s service of unredacted copies of excerpts of Formycon’s contentions pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
`§ 262(l)(3)(B) (or information contained therein) on outside counsel for each of the other Defendants, which
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00089-TSK Document 100-5 Filed 02/14/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 4246
`
`will be included as part of Regeneron’s JPML reply. Any such material will be filed under seal or redacted and
`not visible to the public. To the extent your position differs as to Formycon’s infringement contentions and
`Formycon’s invalidity contentions, please so specify. In the absence of agreement, we will need to serve
`outside counsel only with redacted copies of Regeneron’s reply.
`
`
`
`In the alternative, if your client does not consider its contentions to be confidential, please let us know so that
`we may dispense with the sealing process.
`
`
`
`Best,
`
`
`
`Kat
`
`
`
`Kathryn S. Kayali
`
`Williams & Connolly LLP
`
`680 Maine Avenue S.W., Washington, DC 20024
`
`(P) 202-434-5644 | (F) 202-434-5029
`
`kkayali@wc.com | www.wc.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and
`confidential. If you have received this message in error, please do not read, use, copy, distribute, or disclose the contents of the
`message and any attachments. Instead, please delete the message and any attachments and notify the sender immediately. Thank
`you.
`
`
`Louis E. Fogel
`
`Jenner & Block LLP
`353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456 | jenner.com
`+1 312 923 2661 | TEL
`+1 312 989 6834 | MOBILE
`LFogel@jenner.com
`Download V-Card | View Biography
`
`
`CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING: This email may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00089-TSK Document 100-5 Filed 02/14/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 4247
`
`use or disclosure of this communication is prohibited. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it
`from your system.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket