throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 87 Filed 10/25/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2215
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
`CLARKSBURG DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 1:22-cv-00061-TSK
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`On September 28, 2022, this Court held a Scheduling Conference in the above-styled
`
`matter. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b) and 26(f), and the Local Rules of
`
`Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED that the below listed dates be adopted:
`
`Regeneron identifies 6 patents from 3 patent
`families for initial proceedings. All deadlines herein
`apply only to those patents.
`Regeneron stipulates that it will not seek injunctive
`relief on the other 18 patents asserted in its
`Complaint (ECF 1) with respect to the United States
`marketing or sales of Mylan’s current aBLA Product
`(BLA No. 761274)
`Submission of Protective Order or Disagreements
`concerning same
`Markman: exchange of proposed terms for
`construction
`Markman: exchange of preliminary constructions
`and intrinsic support
`Markman: File joint claim construction chart
`The parties may identify no more than 12 claim
`terms for construction (6 per side)
`Markman: file positions regarding word limits
`
`1
`
`DATE
`
`3 days after this Order
`
`November 1, 2022
`
`November 3, 2022
`
`November 10, 2022
`
`November 17, 2022
`
`November 17, 2022
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 87 Filed 10/25/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2216
`
`Markman: parties file joint opening claim
`construction briefs
`Markman: parties file joint responsive claim
`construction briefs
`Substantial completion of document production
`Markman hearing
`Deadline to amend pleadings
`Parties serve final infringement and invalidity
`contentions
`Close of Fact Discovery
`Regeneron narrows initial proceedings to 3 patents
`and 25 claims
`Opening Expert Reports on Issues for Which the
`Party Bears the Burden of Proof
`Responsive/Rebuttal Expert Reports
`Reply Expert Reports
`Motions for Summary Judgment (if any)
`Responses to Motions for Summary Judgment (if
`any)
`Replies to Responses to Motions for Summary
`Judgment (if any)
`Close of Expert Discovery
`Motions in Limine and Daubert Motions
`Responses to Motions in Limine and Daubert
`Motions
`Joint Stipulation of Facts
`Proposed Joint Pretrial Order, L.R. Civ. P. 16.04(b)
`Final Pretrial and Settlement Conference
`Trial
`
`It is so ORDERED.
`
`November 29, 2022
`
`December 15, 2022
`
`December 7, 2022
`January 6, 2023 (10:00 a.m.)
`December 9, 2022
`
`January 12, 2023
`
`January 18, 2023
`7 days after Markman order or 7 days
`after close of fact discovery, whichever
`is later
`February 2, 2023
`
`March 2, 2023
`March 30, 2023
`April 20, 2023
`
`May 4, 2023
`
`May 11, 2023
`
`April 20, 2023
`May 11, 2023
`
`May 18, 2023
`
`May 18, 2023
`May 18, 2023
`May 30, 2023 (10:00 a.m.)
`June 12-23, 2023
`
`The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to all counsel of record herein.
`
`DATED: October 25, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THOMAS S. KLEEH, CHIEF JUDGE
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket