throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 425 Filed 04/14/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 24157
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
`
`
`
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant/Counter-Claimant.
`
`
` CIVIL NO. 1:22-CV-61
`
`
` (KLEEH)
`
`ORDER DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND
`FOR EMERGENCY STATUS CONFERNCE [ECF NO. 415]
`
`On April 10, 2023, Defendant/Counter-Claimant Mylan
`
`Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Mylan”) filed an emergency motion to modify
`scheduling order and for emergency status conference. On April
`12, 2023, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Regeneron Pharmaceuticals,
`Inc. (“Regeneron”) filed a response.
`
`In its motion, Mylan asks the Court to order Regeneron to
`immediately narrow the scope of the proceedings to 3 patents and
`12 claims. Mylan states that Regeneron continues to assert 4
`patents and 60 claims. Mylan argues that it should not be forced
`to contend with “five times” the number of patent claims during
`pretrial exchanges and trial, “a practical impossibility under the
`current pretrial schedule and in the nine days the Court has
`allotted for trial.”
`
`The Court’s Scheduling Order contemplates two rounds of claim
`narrowing. First, Regeneron was required to reduce its asserted
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 425 Filed 04/14/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 24158
`REGENERON V. MYLAN
`
`1:22-CV-61
`
`ORDER DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND
`FOR EMERGENCY STATUS CONFERNCE [ECF NO. 415]
`
`patents to 6 patents within 3 days of entry of the Scheduling
`Order, which it did. Second, Regeneron is required to narrow to
`“3 patents and 25 claims” within “7 days after Markman order or 7
`days after close of fact discovery, whichever is later.” The close
`of fact discovery was on January 18, 2023, but the court has not
`yet entered its Markman order, so Regeneron has not yet been
`required to narrow its case to 3 patents and 25 claims.
`Regeneron has not violated a Court order by failing, at this
`point, to narrow its case to 3 patents and 25 claims. The Court
`finds that Mylan’s motion lacks merit. Mylan has not shown good
`cause for an emergency status conference or a modification of the
`scheduling order, and its motion is DENIED [ECF No. 415].
`It is so ORDERED.
`
`The Clerk is DIRECTED to transmit copies of this Order to
`
`counsel of record.
`
`DATED: April 14, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________
`THOMAS S. KLEEH, CHIEF JUDGE
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket