throbber
Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 82-1 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`SEATTLE DIVISION
`
` CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DECLARATION OF ARI B. RAFILSON
`
`NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR:
`MAY 4, 2018
`
`CYWEE GROUP LTD.,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HTC CORPORATION
`and
`HTC AMERICA, INC.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF ARI B. RAFILSON
`CASE NO. 2:17-CV-932-JLR– 1
`
`
`
`
`
`SHORE CHAN DEPUMPO LLP
`901 MAIN STREET, SUITE 3300
`DALLAS, TX 75202
`TELEPHONE: 214-593-9110
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 82-1 Filed 05/04/18 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`
`I, Ari B. Rafilson, declare as follows:
`
`1. I am an attorney at Shore Chan DePumpo LLP and counsel of record for Plaintiff
`
`CyWee Group Ltd. (“CyWee”) in the above-captioned matter. I am over the age of 21 and
`
`competent to make this declaration. All the statements set forth herein are true and correct and
`
`are based upon my personal knowledge.
`
`2. CyWee has asserted the patents at issue in this case in seven other cases against the
`
`following parties: Apple Inc. (“Apple”) (Case No. 4-14-cv-01853, N.D. Cal.); Samsung
`
`Electronics Co. Ltd. et al (“Samsung”) (Case No. 2-17-cv-00140, E.D. Tex.); LG Electronics,
`
`Inc. et al (“LG”) (Case No. 3-17-cv-01102, S.D. Cal.); Huawei Technologies, Co., Inc.
`
`(“Huawei”) (Case No. 2:17-cv-00495, E.D. Tex.); Motorola Mobility LLC (“Motorola”) (Case
`
`No. 1-17-cv-00780, D. Del.); ZTE Corporation (“ZTE”) (Case No. 3-17-cv-02130, S.D. Cal.);
`
`and Google Inc (Case No. 1:18-cv-00571, D. Del.).
`
`3. So far, Apple has served 3,126 pages of invalidity contentions, including 140 alleged
`
`prior art references and twenty-four charts. Samsung has served 4,105 pages of invalidity
`
`contentions, including 83 alleged prior art references and 56 charts. Huawei has served 2,948
`
`pages of invalidity contentions, including 177 alleged prior art references and 64 charts.
`
`Motorola has served 4,216 pages of invalidity contentions, including 83 alleged prior art
`
`references and 56 charts. LG and ZTE have not yet served invalidity contentions and the case
`
`against Google was only filed on April 16, 2018. Further, the Defendants in the above-
`
`referenced case (collectively “HTC”) have served 2,536 pages of invalidity contentions.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF ARI B. RAFILSON
`CASE NO. 2:17-CV-932-JLR– 2
`
`
`
`
`
`SHORE CHAN DEPUMPO LLP
`901 MAIN STREET, SUITE 3300
`DALLAS, TX 75202
`TELEPHONE: 214-593-9110
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 82-1 Filed 05/04/18 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`4. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing
`
`is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
`
`
`
`Dated: May 4, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Ari B. Rafilson
`Ari B. Rafilson
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF ARI B. RAFILSON
`CASE NO. 2:17-CV-932-JLR– 3
`
`
`
`
`
`SHORE CHAN DEPUMPO LLP
`901 MAIN STREET, SUITE 3300
`DALLAS, TX 75202
`TELEPHONE: 214-593-9110
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket