Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 55
`Case 2:17-cv—00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 55
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 2 of 55
`
`THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CYWEE GROUP LTD.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`HTC CORPORATION; and HTC AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`DEFENDANTS HTC CORPORATION
`AND HTC AMERICA, INC.’S
`PRELIMINARY INVALIDITY
`CONTENTIONS
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA, INC.’S
`PRELIMINARY INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 3 of 55
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`upon treatises, published industry standards, and similar documents to demonstrate the
`
`knowledge of one of ordinary skill in the relevant art. Where HTC cites to a particular drawing
`
`or figure, the citation encompasses the description of the drawing or figure as well as any text
`
`associated with the drawing or figure. Similarly, where HTC cites to particular text concerning a
`
`drawing or figure, the citation encompasses that drawing or figure as well. Also, where HTC
`
`cites to any portion of prior art as disclosing a particular limitation, that citation applies with
`
`equal force to all similar or identical limitations in each of the Asserted Claims.
`
`In addition to the prior art identified herein and in the accompanying invalidity claim
`
`charts, HTC also incorporates by reference any additional invalidity contentions, identified prior
`
`art, and/or invalidity claim charts previously disclosed by any party to any other pending or prior
`
`litigation or U.S. Patent & Trademark Office proceeding involving the Asserted Patents or any
`
`related patent, including any invalidity contentions yet to be produced by Plaintiff from prior
`
`litigations and proceedings. HTC also incorporates by reference any additional invalidity
`
`contentions, identified prior art, and/or invalidity claim charts disclosed at any later date by any
`
`party to any other litigation or U.S. Patent & Trademark Office proceeding involving the
`
`Asserted Patents or any related patent, including, but not limited to, invalidity contentions from
`
`Apple Inc. (Case No. 4-14-cv-01853); Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al (Case No. 2-17-cv-
`
`00140); LG Electronics, Inc. et al (Case No. 3-17-cv-01102); Huawei Technologies, Co., Inc.
`
`(Case No. 2:17-cv-00495); Motorola Mobility LLC (Case No. 1-17-cv-00780); and ZTE
`
`Corporation (Case No. 3-17-cv-02130).
`
`Furthermore, the identification of anticipatory references and obviousness combinations
`
`of references provided below under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 is merely exemplary and is not
`
`intended to be exhaustive. In particular, HTC is currently unaware of the extent to which
`
`Plaintiff may contend that limitations of the claims at issue are not disclosed in the art identified
`
`by HTC as anticipatory. To the extent that an issue arises with any such limitation, HTC
`
`reserves the right to identify other references which make obvious the addition of the allegedly
`
`HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA, INC.’S
`PRELIMINARY INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 4 of 55
`Case 2:17-cv—00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 4 of 55
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 5 of 55
`Case 2:17-cv-00932—JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 5 of 55
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`CYWEE GROUP LTD.,
`
`nlniua-I-li‘l‘
`f lalllull
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.
`AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`
`AMERICA, INC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`mmmmmmmmwmm
`
`No. 2: I7_Cv—00140—Rws—RSP
`
`DEFENDANTS‘ INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America,
`
`Inc.
`
`(collectively, “Defendants"), by their attorneys, make these Invalidity Contentions concerning
`
`US. Patent Nos. 8,441,438 (“the ”438 Patent”) and 8,552,978 (“the ’978 Patent”) (collectively,
`
`“Asserted Patents”), to Plaintiff CyWee Group Ltd. (“Plaintiff’ or “CyWee”) in connection with
`
`the above—referenced action, pursuant to the Docket Control Order entered by the Court (Dkt.
`
`No. 34) and Local Patent Rule (P.R.) 3-3. The citation of prior art herein and the accompanying
`
`Exhibits are not intended to reflect Defendants‘ claim construction contentions, which will be
`
`disclosed in due course in accordance with the Docket Control Order, and may instead reflect
`
`Plaintiff’s apparent (and potentially erroneous) claim constructions based on its Infringement
`
`Contentions.
`
`Defendants” Invalidity Contentions herein reflect Defendants1 knowledge as of this early
`
`date in the present action. Defendants reserve the right, to the extent permitted by the Court and
`
`the applicable statutes and rules,
`
`to modify and/or supplement their Invalidity Contentions in
`
`response to becoming aware of additional prior art or information regarding prior art, any
`
`modification or supplementation of Plaintiff’s Infringement Contentions, any claim construction
`
`CYWEE_HTCOZ1042
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 6 of 55
`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 6 of 55
`
`In addition, there is no essential feature in any of the references that conflicts with an
`
`essential feature of any other. Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art would have naturally been
`
`motivated to combine the teachings found within these references.
`
`Accordingly, combining the teachings of Wells with one or more of Abbate, Yang,
`
`Bachmann, Zhu, Gallagher, Nasiri, Bachmann 11, and/or Simon is merely: (a) a combination of
`
`prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results;
`
`(b) a simple
`
`substitution of one known element for another to obtain predictable results; (c) a use of known
`
`technique to improve similar devices in the same way; (d) application ofa known technique to a
`
`known device ready for improvement to yield predictable results; (6) obvious to try; and/or (1")
`
`known work in one field ofendeavor prompting variations of it for use in either the same field or
`
`a different one based on design incentives or other market forces since the variations are
`
`predictable to one of ordinary skill in the art.
`
`11].
`
`Local Patent Rule 3-3(d)
`
`Any grounds of invalidity based on indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(2) or enablement or written description under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(1) of any of the asserted claims.
`
`In addition to and including the grounds of invalidity set forth in the Invalidity
`
`Contentions incorporated by reference herein, Defendants contend that the asserted claims ofthe
`
`Asserted Patents are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraphs one andfor two for at least the
`
`following reasons.
`
`A.
`
`[ndefiniteness under 35 U.S.C. § 112(2)
`
`The asserted claims of the Asserted Patents are invalid because they fail to meet the
`
`“definiteness” requirement of 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 112,
`
`‘l 2, which states that
`
`the claims must
`
`“particularly point[] out and distinctly claim[] the subject matter which the inventor [] regards as
`
`[the] invention." In particular, the asserted claims of the Asserted Patents are indefinite because
`
`72
`
`CYWEE_HTCOZ1113
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 7 of 55
`Case 2:17-cv-00932—JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 7 of 55
`
`ofat least the following terms or phrases:
`
`l.
`
`5438 Patent
`
` Term
`
`Asserted claim 1
`
`“calculating said first and second signal sets"
`
`
`
`Asserted claim 1 “utilizing a comparison”
`
`pointing device in the spatial pointer
`
`reference frame”
`
`Asserted claim 1
`
`Asserted claim 1
`
`“a rotation sensor for detecting and
`generating a first signal set comprising
`angular velocities tux, my, 032 associated with
`said movements and rotations of the 3D
`
`“an accelerometer for detecting and
`generating a second signal set comprising
`axial accelerations Ax, Ay, A2 associated
`with said movements and rotations of the 3D
`
`pointing device in the spatial pointer
`reference frame”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Asserted claim 4 “first longitudinal side”
`
`Asserted claims 14 and 19
`
`“calculating and converting the updated
`,,
`state
`
`
`
`Asserted claims 14 and 19 “second quaternion”
`
`Asserted claims 14 and 19
`
`“comparing the second quaternion in relation
`to the measured angular velocities 03x, (93,-, 03Z
`of the current state at current time T with the
`
`measured axial accelerations Ax, Ay, AZ and
`the predicted axial accelerations Ax', Ay’,
`
`Az' also at current time T”
`
`”978 Patent
`2.
`
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`
`
`
`Asserted claim 10
`
`“generating an orientation output”?
`“generating the orientation output”
`
`73
`
`CYWEE_HTCOZ1114
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 8 of 55
`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 8 of 55
`
`
`
`Asserted claim 10
`
`
`
`
`
`“obtaining one or more resultant deviation
`including a plurality of deviation angles
`using a plurality of measured magnetisms
`Mx, My, M2 and a plurality of predicted
`magnetism Mx', My' and M2' for the second
`signal set"
`
`To the extent other asserted claims contain one of these terms or phrases, either directly
`
`or through being a dependent claim of a claim that does, those asserted claims of the Asserted
`
`Patents are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112, '1 2.
`
`The claims are indefinite because they fail to inform, with reasonable certainty, those
`
`skilled in the art about the scope of the invention.
`
`B.
`
`Lack of Enablement under 35 U.S.C. §112(l)
`
`The asserted claims of the Asserted Patents are invalid because they fail to meet the
`
`“enablement” requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112,
`
`'1 1, because the Asserted Patents does not
`
`disclose sufficient information to enable or teach one skilled in the field ofthe invention to make
`
`and use the full scope of the claimed invention without undue experimentation for at least the
`
`following temis or phrases:
`
`l.
`
`”438 Patent
`
`Term
` Claim
`“threeedimensional (3D) pointing device”
`where the display is incorporated into the
`Asserted claims 1, 14, 19
`device
`
`“obtain .
`
`.
`
`. a measured state associated with
`
`Asserted claim 1
`
`said second signal set; wherein the measured
`state includes a measurement of said second
`
`signal set and a predicted measurement
`obtained based on the first signal set without
`
`using any derivatives ofthe first signal set”
`
`
`
`
`
`Asserted claim 1
`
`“an update program to obtain an updated
`state based on a previous state associated
`with said first signal set and a measured state
`associated with said second signal set”
`
`74
`
`CYWEE_HTCOZ1115
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 9 of 55
`Case 2:17-cv—00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 9 of 55
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 10 of 55
`
`THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
`CYWEE GROUP LTD.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`HTC CORPORATION; and HTC AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`DEFENDANTS HTC CORPORATION
`AND HTC AMERICA, INC.’S
`INITIAL PROPOSED CLAIM
`TERMS AND ELEMENTS FOR
`CONSTRUCTION FOR U.S. PATENT
`NOS. 8,441,438 AND 8,522,978
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`HTC’S INITIAL PROPOSED CLAIM TERMS FOR
`CONSTRUCTION
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 11 of 55
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 131(a), Defendants HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.
`
`(collectively, “HTC”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby disclose to Plaintiff
`
`CyWee Group Ltd. the following list of claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,441,438 (“the ’438
`
`Patent”) and 8,522,978 (“the ’978 Patent”) (together, “Asserted Patents”) that Defendants
`
`contend should be construed by the Court.
`
`HTC’s investigation and discovery are ongoing, and HTC, therefore, reserves the right to
`
`amend and/or supplement this list contained herein. HTC further reserves the right to
`
`supplement this disclosure in light of the positions that Plaintiff takes in this litigation, the
`
`positions that Plaintiff takes in related litigation involving the Asserted Patents, and any claim
`
`construction decisions issued in any proceeding involving the Asserted Patents. Such positions
`
`and decisions may require the Court to construe other claim terms in addition to the ones listed in
`
`this disclosure. In particular, HTC reserves the right to propose a construction for any additional
`
`terms that Plaintiff proposes for construction.
`
`The following terms, phrases, or clauses are identified for construction wherever they
`
`appear in any claim or element, including all dependent claims or claims where multiple terms
`
`appear in combination. To the extent that the asserted claims contain identical claim terms,
`
`phrases, or clauses, HTC’s identifications below shall apply equally to each of the asserted
`
`claims in which those claim terms, phrases, or clauses appear. HTC contends that all terms not
`
`identified should be given the ordinary and customary meaning that the term would have to a
`
`person of ordinary skill in the art in question reading the asserted patents at the time of the
`
`invention, i.e., as of the effective filing dates of the patent applications.
`
`In accordance with the above, HTC provides the following list of those claim terms in
`
`need of construction along with their respective proposed constructions:
`
`1. utilizing a comparison to compare the first signal set with the second signal set (’438
`
`patent at claim 1);
`
`HTC’S INITIAL PROPOSED CLAIM TERMS FOR
`CONSTRUCTION
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`- 1 -
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 12 of 55
`
`2. measured state includes a measurement of said second signal set and a predicted
`
`measurement obtained based on the first signal set without using any derivatives of the first
`
`signal set (’438 patent at claim 1);
`
`3. comparing the second quaternion in relation to the measured angular velocities ωx,
`
`ωy, ωz of the current state at current time T with the measured axial accelerations Ax, Ay, Az
`
`and the predicted axial accelerations Ax', Ay', Az' also at current time T (’438 patent at claim 14
`
`and 19);
`
`4.
`
`three-dimensional (3D) pointing device / 3D pointing device (’438 patent at claims 1,
`
`3, 4, 5, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 19; ’978 patent at claim 10);
`
`5. six-axis motion sensor (’438 patent at claims 1, 5, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 19);
`
`6. generating the orientation output based on the first signal set, the second signal set
`
`and the rotation output or based on the first signal set and the second signal set (’978 patent at
`
`claim 10);
`
`7. using the orientation output and the rotation output to generate a transformed output
`
`associated with a fixed reference frame associated with a display device (’978 patent at claim
`
`10); and
`
`8. quaternion (’438 patent at claims 14 and 16; ’978 patent at claim 12).
`
`Dated: February 20, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`s/ James C. Yoon
`James C. Yoon, CA Bar #177155 (pro hac vice)
`Ryan R. Smith, CA Bar #229323 (pro hac vice)
`Albert Shih, CA Bar # 251726 (pro hac vice)
`Jamie Y. Otto, CA Bar # 295099 (pro hac vice)
`Ty Callahan, CA Bar # 312548 (pro hac vice)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI PC
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`Facsimile: (650) 565-5100
`Email: jyoon@wsgr.com
`rsmith@wsgr.com
`ashih@wsgr.com
`jotto@wsgr.com
`
`HTC’S INITIAL PROPOSED CLAIM TERMS FOR
`CONSTRUCTION
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`- 2 -
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 13 of 55
`Case 2:17-cv—00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 13 of 55
`
`EXHIBIT D
`
`EXHIBIT D
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 14 of 55
`
`
`
`
`THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`DEFENDANTS HTC CORPORATION
`AND HTC AMERICA, INC.’S
`DISCLOSURE OF PRELIMINARY
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS AND
`EVIDENCE FOR U.S. PATENT NOS.
`8,441,438 AND 8,522,978
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CYWEE GROUP LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HTC CORPORATION, and HTC AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`HTC CORPORATION, and HTC AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`Third-Party Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`STMicroelectronics N.V., STMicroelectronics,
`Inc., and CyWee Motion Group Ltd.,
`
`Third-Party Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HTC’S DISCLOSURE OF PRELIMINARY
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 15 of 55
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Patent L.R. 131, Defendants HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.
`
`(collectively, “HTC”) by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby disclose to Plaintiff
`
`CyWee Group Ltd. (“CyWee”) their proposed claim constructions for terms of claims 1, 3, 4, 5,
`
`14, 15, 17, and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 8,441,438 (“the ’438 Patent”), and claims 10 and 12 of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 8,522,978 (“the ’978 Patent”) disclosed by the parties pursuant to Patent L.R. 130.
`
`HTC notes that its position regarding claim construction is preliminary, and HTC reserves the
`
`right to supplement and/or amend its constructions once CyWee identifies the constructions it
`
`believes are in dispute as part of the meet and confer process required under Patent L.R. 4-1(c)
`
`and/or in light of CyWee’s proposed claim construction(s). HTC incorporates by reference
`
`discovery and evidence from related actions in the Western District of Washington, including
`
`CyWee Group Ltd. v. Apple Inc. (Case No. 4-14-cv-01853); CyWee Group Ltd. v. Samsung
`
`Electronics Co. Ltd. et al (Case No. 2-17-cv-00140); CyWee Group Ltd. v. LG Electronics, Inc.
`
`et al (Case No. 3-17-cv-01102); CyWee Group Ltd. v. Huawei Technologies, Co., Inc. (Case No.
`
`2:17-cv-00495); CyWee Group Ltd. v. Motorola Mobility LLC (Case No. 1-17-cv-00780); and
`
`CyWee Group Ltd. v. ZTE Corporation (Case No. 3-17-cv-02130).
`
`In accordance with the above, HTC provides the following list of those claim terms in
`
`need of construction along with their respective proposed constructions:
`
`
`Claim Term
`(Claim)
`
`1. “three-
`dimensional (3D)
`pointing device / 3D
`pointing device”
`(’438 patent at
`claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 14,
`15, 16, 17, and 19;
`’978 patent at claim
`10)
`
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`a device that detects
`the motion of the
`device in three-
`dimensions and
`translates the
`detected motions to
`control the
`movement of a
`cursor or pointer on
`a display
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`’438 Patent,
`Abstract, Figs. 1, 2,
`3, 5, 9, cols. 1:15–
`2:37, 9:6-10:8;
`16:16–17:47
`
`’978 Patent,
`Abstract, Figs. 1, 2,
`3, 5, 9, cols. 1:21–
`2:40, 3:53–4:11;
`12:20-13:4; 20:49–
`
`MCGRAW-HILL
`DICTIONARY OF
`SCIENTIFIC AND
`TECHNICAL TERMS
`2144 (6th ed. 2003)
`(definitions of
`“three-dimensional”
`and “three-
`dimensional display
`system”)
`
`
`HTC’S DISCLOSURE OF PRELIMINARY
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 16 of 55
`
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`(Claim)
`
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`THE NEW OXFORD
`AMERICAN
`DICTIONARY 1318
`(2001) (defines a
`“pointing device” as
`a device “used to
`control the
`movement of a
`cursor on a
`computer screen.”)
`
`THE AMERICAN
`HERITAGE
`DICTIONARY 1355
`(4th ed. 2001)
`(defines a “pointing
`device” as a device
`“with which one can
`move or manipulate
`a cursor or pointer
`on a GUI.”)
`
`
`MCGRAW-HILL
`DICTIONARY OF
`SCIENTIFIC AND
`TECHNICAL TERMS
`1944 (6th ed. 2003)
`(definition of “six-
`axis system”)
`
`22:8; 22:34–40;
`23:8–17; 47–58;
`26:40–45; 35:30–38
`
`
`’438 Patent, Figs. 3,
`4, 5, 6, cols. 7:26–
`55; 7:56–8:18; 9:7–
`27; 10:9–29
`
`1/28/13 Non-Final
`Rejection for ’978
`patent, including at
`2-3; 4/17/13
`Response to Office
`Action, including at
`2-3, 9-10
`
`2. “six-axis motion
`sensor” (’438 patent
`at claims 1, 5, 14,
`15, 16, 17, and 19)
`
`a module consisting
`of only two types of
`sensors: (i) rotation
`sensor and (ii)
`accelerometer
`
`3. “a predicted
`measurement
`obtained based on
`the first signal set
`without using any
`
`predicted axial
`accelerations
`calculated using the
`angular velocities
`without computing
`
`
`
`’438 Patent 6:13-19,
`8:52-56, 13:6-10,
`FIG. 7, 11:8-44.
`
`
`HTC’S DISCLOSURE OF PRELIMINARY
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 17 of 55
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`(Claim)
`derivatives of the
`first signal set” (’438
`patent at claim 1)
`
`4. “using the
`orientation output
`and the rotation
`output to generate a
`transformed output
`associated with a
`fixed reference
`frame associated
`with a display
`device” (’978 patent
`at claim 10)
`
`5. “quaternion”
`(’438 patent at
`claims 14, 16 and
`19; ’978 patent at
`claim 12)
`
`Proposed
`Construction
`derivatives of said
`angular velocities
`(i.e., angular
`accelerations)
`
`
`using the orientation
`output and the
`rotation output to
`generate a
`transformed output
`that corresponds to a
`two-dimensional
`movement in a plane
`that is parallel to the
`screen of a display
`device
`
`a quantity or
`operator expressed
`as the sum of a real
`number and three
`complex numbers,
`equivalent to the
`quotient of two
`vectors
`
`Indefinite
`
`6. “communicating
`with the six-axis
`motion sensor
`module to calculate a
`resulting deviation
`comprising resultant
`angles in said spatial
`pointer reference
`
`HTC’S DISCLOSURE OF PRELIMINARY
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`10/15/12 Response
`to Office Action for
`’438 patent at 10-11
`
`
`
`
`’978 Patent,
`Abstract, Figs. 1, 2,
`8, 9, 11, 13, cols.
`5:11-45; 7:55-67;
`8:1-12; 11:31-43;
`19:61-20:24; 31:50-
`32:3; 33:4-19
`
`’438 Patent, Figs. 7,
`8, cols. 10:42–
`15:26; 15:37–39
`
`’978 Patent,
`Abstract, Figs. 7, 8,
`10, 11, cols. 14:32-
`15:3; 15:27-52;
`16:9-19:60; 22:43-
`23:8; 23:17-46;
`23:66-24:56; 25:2-
`10; 25:15-20; 25:28-
`35; 25:35-47; 25:65-
`26:2; 29:35-49;
`31:4-50; 33-53-65
`
`’438 Patent,
`Abstract, Figs. 3-8,
`cols. 1:16–27; 4:8–
`19; 4:20–30; 4:59–
`65; 5:50–67; 6:4–27;
`7:36–55; 7:56–63;
`8:19–9:5; 9:6–26;
`9:26–46; 9:47–10:8;
`
`THE PENGUIN
`COMPLETE ENGLISH
`DICTIONARY 1181
`(2006) (definition of
`“quaternion”)
`
`OXFORD ENGLISH
`REFERENCE
`DICTIONARY 1143
`(2nd ed., revised
`2003) (definition of
`“quaternion”)
`
`MCGRAW-HILL
`DICTIONARY OF
`SCIENTIFIC AND
`TECHNICAL TERMS
`1944 (6th ed. 2003)
`(definition of “six-
`axis system”)
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 18 of 55
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Indefinite
`
`Indefinite
`
`10:9–42; 10:42–
`14:34; 15:37–39
`
`’438 Patent,
`Abstract, Figs. 7, 8,
`cols. 1:16–27; 3:10-
`13; 4:8-19; 4:20–30;
`4:59-65; 6:4–27;
`8:4-8; 8:19–59;
`9:47–10:8; 10:42–
`14:34; 15:37–39
`
`
`’438 Patent,
`Abstract, Figs. 7, 8,
`cols. 1:16–27; 3:10-
`13; 4:20–30; 6:4–27;
`8:19–59; 9:47–10:8;
`10:42–14:34
`
`
`
`
`
`THE PENGUIN
`COMPLETE ENGLISH
`DICTIONARY 1181
`(2006) (definition of
`“quaternion”)
`
`OXFORD ENGLISH
`REFERENCE
`DICTIONARY 1143
`(2nd ed., revised
`2003) (definition of
`“quaternion”)
`
`Indefinite
`
`
`
`’978 Patent, Figs. 4,
`10-13, cols. 4:15-44;
`5:45-6:27; 6:46-7:4;
`9:57-10:30; 10:50-
`11:30; 22:9-30:50
`
`Claim Term
`(Claim)
`frame” (’438 patent
`at claim 1)
`
`7. “utilizing a
`comparison to
`compare the first
`signal set with the
`second signal set”
`(’438 patent at claim
`1)
`
`8. “comparing the
`second quaternion in
`relation to the
`measured angular
`velocities ωx, ωy, ωz
`of the current state at
`current time T with
`the measured axial
`accelerations Ax,
`Ay, Az and the
`predicted axial
`accelerations Ax',
`Ay', Az' also at
`current time T”
`(’438 patent at claim
`14 and 19)
`
`9. “generating the
`orientation output
`based on the first
`signal set, the second
`signal set and the
`rotation output or
`based on the first
`signal set and the
`second signal set”
`(’978 patent at claim
`10)
`
`
`
`HTC’S DISCLOSURE OF PRELIMINARY
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 19 of 55
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 30, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`s/ James C. Yoon
`James C. Yoon, CA Bar #177155 (pro hac vice)
`Ryan R. Smith, CA Bar #229323 (pro hac vice)
`Albert Shih, CA Bar # 251726 (pro hac vice)
`Jamie Y. Otto, CA Bar # 295099 (pro hac vice)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`Facsimile: (650) 565-5100
`Email: jyoon@wsgr.com
`
`rsmith@wsgr.com
`
`ashih@wsgr.com
`
`jotto@wsgr.com
`
`
`Gregory L. Watts, WSBA #43995
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Telephone: (206) 883-2500
`Facsimile: (206) 883-2699
`Email: gwatts@wsgr.com
`
`Ty W. Callahan, CA Bar #312548 (pro hac vice)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-2027
`Telephone: (323) 210-2900
`Facsimile: (866) 974-7329
`Email: tcallahan@wsgr.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HTC’S DISCLOSURE OF PRELIMINARY
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 20 of 55
`Case 2:17-cv—00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 20 of 55
`
`EXHIBIT E
`
`EXHIBIT E
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 66-6 Filed 02/23/18 Page 1 of 39 PageID #: 1729Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 21 of 55
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`CYWEE GROUP LTD.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
` CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF JOSEPH J. LAVIOLA, JR., PH.D.
`
`I hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I have been asked by counsel for Plaintiff CyWee Group Ltd. (“CyWee”) to offer
`
`my opinions regarding claim construction and indefiniteness for certain terms.
`
`2.
`
`In connection with the preparation of this Declaration, I have reviewed the
`
`materials listed below:
`
`• U.S. Patent No. 8,441,438 (the “’438 patent”),
`
`• U.S. Patent No. 8,552,978 (the “’978 patent”),
`
`• The file wrappers for both the ’438 and ’978 patents,
`
`• The parties’ respective Patent L.R. 4-2 preliminary claim constructions and materials,
`
`• The parties’ revised claim constructions,
`
`• The Declaration of Ray M. Mercer, dated January 26, 2018 (“Mercer Dec.”), and
`
`• Any additional evidence cited herein.
`
`3.
`
`All of the opinions stated in this Declaration are based on my personal knowledge
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 66-6 Filed 02/23/18 Page 5 of 39 PageID #: 1733Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 22 of 55
`
`the term is indefinite. Clear and convincing evidence requires that the challenging party prove
`
`that it is highly probably that the challenger’s contention is correct. In evaluating a term for
`
`indefiniteness, I have been told that the meaning of the words depends on the context of the term
`
`used within the claim and specification.
`
`IV. OPINIONS REGARDING SPECIFIC TERMS
`
`A. “utilizing a comparison to compare the first signal set with the second signal set”
`(’438 patent claim 1)
`
`17.
`
`CyWee proposes that this term be construed as “determining or assessing
`
`differences based on a previous state associated with the first signal set and a measured state
`
`associated with the second signal set while calculating deviation angles.” Samsung alleges that
`
`this term is indefinite. In my opinion this term is not indefinite because it informs, with
`
`reasonable certainty, a person of ordinary skill in the art, of the scope of the invention. Further, it
`
`is my opinion that this term has the meaning proposed by CyWee when read by a person of
`
`ordinary skill in the art in light of the intrinsic evidence.
`
`18.
`
`“Comparison” of two values in mathematics and computer science generally
`
`refers to determining or assessing differences between those values as required by CyWee’s
`
`construction. That determination may be a relation between them, e.g. they are equal or unequal
`
`and one is larger than the other. Comparison can also refer to assessing by what amount two
`
`values are different. This understanding is consistent with CyWee’s construction, which requires
`
`“determining or assessing differences.” One approach to this assessment would be to subtract
`
`one value from another to determine the difference. If two values cannot be directly compared,
`
`such as being in different units or different physical quantities, values can often be mapped or
`
`transformed to a common state/units/space before comparison. For example, when comparing
`
`monetary amounts in different currencies (i.e. rubles vs. francs), those currencies can be
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 66-6 Filed 02/23/18 Page 6 of 39 PageID #: 1734Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 81-1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 23 of 55
`
`converted to a common currency.
`
`19.
`
`The ’438 patent itself provides support for CyWee’s construction. The
`
`“comparing” as used in claim 1 corresponds to the process of using the calculation of actual
`
`deviation angles to compare the current state (i.e., the second quaternion) with the measured state
`
`(i.e., the measured axial accelerations and predicted axial accelerations) during t