throbber
1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 62 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 27
`
`THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
`CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`DEFENDANTS HTC CORPORATION
`AND HTC AMERICA, INC.’S
`ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF CYWEE
`GROUP LTD.’S SECOND AMENDED
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
`INFRINGEMENT
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`CYWEE GROUP LTD.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`HTC CORPORATION, and HTC AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`HTC CORPORATION, and HTC AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`Third-Party Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`STMicroelectronics N.V., STMicroelectronics,
`Inc., and CyWee Motion Group Ltd.,
`
`Third-Party Defendants.
`
`Defendants HTC Corporation (“HTC Corp.”) and HTC America, Inc. (“HTC America”)
`
`(collectively, “HTC” or “Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby
`
`respond to Plaintiff CyWee Group Ltd.’s (“CyWee” or “Plaintiff”) Second Amended Complaint
`
`for Patent Infringement of United States Patent No. 8,441,438 (“the ’438 Patent”) and United
`
`States Patent No. 8,552,978 (“the ’978 Patent”) as follows. To the extent any allegation in the
`
`Second Amended Complaint is not explicitly admitted herein, it is denied.
`
`ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`- 1 -
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 62 Filed 03/23/18 Page 2 of 27
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 1, and therefore denies them.
`
`2.
`
`HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 2, and therefore denies them.
`
`3.
`
`HTC Corp. admits that it is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
`
`Taiwan, with a principal place of business located at No. 88, Section 3, Zhongxing Road,
`
`Xindian District, New Taipei City 231, Taiwan. HTC Corp. admits that it manufactures products
`
`that are available in the United States. Except as expressly admitted herein, HTC Corp. denies
`
`the remaining allegations in Paragraph 3.
`
`4.
`
`HTC America admits that it is a corporation organized and existing under the
`
`laws of the state of Washington, with its principal place of business located at 308 Occidental
`
`Avenue South, Floor 3, Seattle, Washington 98104. HTC America admits that it has imported,
`
`sold, or offered for sale various products within the United States. Except as expressly admitted
`
`herein, HTC America denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 4.
`
`5.
`
`HTC America admits that it does business within the state of Washington. Except
`
`as expressly admitted herein, HTC denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 5.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`6.
`
`HTC admits that CyWee’s Second Amended Complaint purports to set forth an
`
`action arising under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1, et seq., and that this
`
`Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a), provided that
`
`the requirements of standing are satisfied. Except as expressly admitted herein, HTC denies the
`
`remaining allegations in Paragraph 6.
`
`7.
`
`HTC America does not contest that this Court has personal jurisdiction over it.
`
`For purposes of this case only, HTC Corp. does not contest that this Court has personal
`
`jurisdiction over it. HTC America admits that it has conducted business within the state of
`
`Washington. HTC Corp. admits that it filed a complaint in the civil action captioned, HTC
`
`ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`- 2 -
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 62 Filed 03/23/18 Page 3 of 27
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`Corporation v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, No. 2:17-cv-00534-MJP (W.D. Wash. Apr. 6,
`
`2017). HTC America admits that it is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
`
`state of Washington. Except as expressly admitted herein, HTC denies the remaining allegations
`
`in Paragraph 7.
`
`8.
`
`HTC America admits that it does business within the state of Washington. Except
`
`as expressly admitted herein, HTC denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 8.
`
`9.
`
`HTC America admits that it is a corporation organized and existing under the
`
`laws of the state of Washington. HTC America does not contest that venue in this case is proper.
`
`HTC denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 9.
`
`10.
`
`HTC Corp. admits that it is not incorporated in the United States. HTC Corp.
`
`does not contest that venue is proper. HTC denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 10.
`
`11.
`
`HTC admits that the U.S. section of htc.com includes a webpage for U.S.
`
`copyright terms and U.S. copyright agent information. To the extent Paragraph 11 describes,
`
`quotes, or cites specific documents, HTC responds that these documents speak for themselves.
`
`To the extent the allegations of Paragraph 11 set forth a legal conclusion, no response is required.
`
`HTC denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 11.
`
`12.
`
`HTC America admits that certain products that it sells have an HTC trademark.
`
`HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations
`
`in Paragraph 12 regarding consumers, and therefore denies them. HTC denies the remaining
`
`allegations in Paragraph 12.
`
`13.
`
`For purposes of this case only, HTC Corp. does not contest that venue is proper.
`
`To the extent the remaining allegations of Paragraph 13 set forth a legal conclusion, no response
`
`is required. HTC denies any other remaining allegations in Paragraph 13.
`
`14.
`
`HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 14, and therefore denies them.
`
`///
`
`ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`- 3 -
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 62 Filed 03/23/18 Page 4 of 27
`
`15.
`
`HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 15, and therefore denies them.
`
`16.
`
`HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 16, and therefore denies them.
`
`17.
`
`HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 17, and therefore denies them.
`
`18.
`
`HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 18, and therefore denies them.
`
`PATENT INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,441,438
`
`19.
`
`HTC reasserts and incorporates by reference its responses to all preceding
`
`Paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
`
`20.
`
`HTC admits that the ’438 Patent, on its face, is entitled “3D Pointing Device and
`
`Method for Compensating Movement Thereof,” bears an issue date of May 14, 2013, lists the
`
`assignee as CyWee Group Limited, and lists the inventors as Zhou Ye, Chin-Lung Li, and Shun-
`
`Nan Liou. HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`remaining allegations in Paragraph 20, and therefore denies them.
`
`21.
`
`HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 21, and therefore denies them.
`
`22.
`
`HTC admits that what purports to be the declaration of Nicholas Gans, Ph.D., is
`
`attached to the Second Amended Complaint as Exhibit C. HTC lacks knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 22, and
`
`therefore denies them.
`
`23.
`
`HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 23, and therefore denies them.
`
`24.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`Denied.
`
`Denied.
`
`Denied.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`- 4 -
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 62 Filed 03/23/18 Page 5 of 27
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`27.
`
`HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 27, and therefore denies them.
`
`28.
`
`HTC admits that it received a copy of the ’438 Patent when it was served with the
`
`complaint in this action. HTC denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 28.
`
`29.
`
`HTC admits that the HTC 10 includes a display screen, as HTC generally
`
`understands that term.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 30 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`30.
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 30.1
`31.
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 31 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 31.
`
`32.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 32 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 32.
`
`33.
`
`HTC admits that the HTC 10 includes at least one printed circuit board (“PCB”),
`
`as HTC generally understands that term.
`
`34.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 34 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 34.
`
`35.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 35 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 35.
`
`36.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 36 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 36.
`
`///
`///
`
`1 CyWee’s allegations seeking admission of individual claim limitations were rejected in a
`related litigation as seeking legal conclusions to which no responses were required. See CyWee
`Grp. Ltd. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd., No. 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP, slip op. at 2 (E.D. Tex.
`Sept. 20, 2017) (“The Court agrees with Samsung. Given our Local Patent Rules and our
`District’s well-established process for identifying and resolving claim-construction issues, the
`interests of justice do not require Samsung to make an unconditional admission or denial as to
`specific claim limitations this early.”).
`
`ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`- 5 -
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 62 Filed 03/23/18 Page 6 of 27
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`37.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 37 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 37.
`
`38.
`
`39.
`
`HTC admits that the HTC 10 runs a version of the Android operating system.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 39 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 39.
`
`40.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 40 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 40.
`
`41.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 41 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 41.
`
`42.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 42 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 42.
`
`43.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 43 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 43.
`
`44.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 44 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 44.
`
`45.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 45 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 45.
`
`46.
`
`HTC admits that the HTC One M9 includes a display screen, as HTC generally
`
`understands that term.
`
`47.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 47 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 47.
`
`48.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 48 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 48.
`
`49.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 49 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 49.
`
`50.
`
`HTC admits that the HTC One M9 includes at least one PCB, as HTC generally
`
`understands that term.
`
`ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`- 6 -
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 62 Filed 03/23/18 Page 7 of 27
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`51.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 51 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 51.
`
`52.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 52 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 52.
`
`53.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 53 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 53.
`
`54.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 54 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 54.
`
`55.
`
`HTC admits that the HTC One M9 runs a version of the Android operating
`
`system.
`
`56.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 56 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 56.
`
`57.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 57 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 57.
`
`58.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 58 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 58.
`
`59.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 59 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 59.
`
`60.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 60 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 60.
`
`61.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 61 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 61.
`
`62.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 62 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 62.
`
`63.
`
`HTC admits that the HTC One A9 includes a display screen, as HTC generally
`
`understands the term.
`
`///
`
`ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`- 7 -
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 62 Filed 03/23/18 Page 8 of 27
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`64.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 64 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 64.
`
`65.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 65 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 65.
`
`66.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 66 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 66.
`
`67.
`
`HTC admits that the HTC One A9 includes at least one PCB, as HTC generally
`
`understands that term.
`
`68.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 68 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 68.
`
`69.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 69 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 69.
`
`70.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 70 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 70.
`
`71.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 71 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 71.
`
`72.
`
`HTC admits that the HTC One A9 runs a version of the Android operating
`
`system.
`
`73.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 73 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 73.
`
`74.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 74 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 74.
`
`75.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 75 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 75.
`
`76.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 76 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 76.
`
`///
`
`ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`- 8 -
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 62 Filed 03/23/18 Page 9 of 27
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`77.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 77 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 77.
`
`78.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 78 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 78.
`
`79.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 79 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 79.
`
`80.
`
`HTC admits that the HTC Bolt includes a display screen, as HTC generally
`
`understands that term.
`
`81.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 81 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 81.
`
`82.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 82 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 82.
`
`83.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 83 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 83.
`
`84.
`
`HTC admits that the HTC Bolt includes at least one PCB, as HTC generally
`
`understands that term.
`
`85.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 85 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 85.
`
`86.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 86 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 86.
`
`87.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 87 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 87.
`
`88.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 88 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 88.
`
`89.
`
`90.
`
`HTC admits that the HTC Bolt runs a version of the Android operating system.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 90 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 90.
`
`ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`- 9 -
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 62 Filed 03/23/18 Page 10 of 27
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`91.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 91 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 91.
`
`92.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 92 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 92.
`
`93.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 93 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 93.
`
`94.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 94 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 94.
`
`95.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 95 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 95.
`
`96.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 96 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 96.
`
`97.
`
`HTC admits that the HTC U Ultra includes a display screen, as HTC generally
`
`understands that term.
`
`98.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 98 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 98.
`
`99.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 99 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 99.
`
`100.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 100 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 100.
`
`101. HTC admits that the HTC U Ultra includes at least one PCB, as HTC generally
`
`understands that term.
`
`102.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 102 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 102.
`
`103.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 103 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 103.
`
`///
`
`ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`- 10 -
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 62 Filed 03/23/18 Page 11 of 27
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`104.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 104 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 104.
`
`105.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 105 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 105.
`
`106. HTC admits that the HTC U Ultra runs a version of the Android operating system.
`
`107.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 107 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 107.
`
`108.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 108 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 108.
`
`109.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 109 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 109.
`
`110.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 110 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 110.
`
`111.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 111 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 111.
`
`112.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 112 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 112.
`
`113.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 113 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 113.
`
`114. HTC admits that it creates and provides marketing and technical materials for the
`
`HTC One M9, HTC One A9, HTC 10, HTC Bolt, and HTC U Ultra (collectively, “Accused
`
`Products”) to its customers in the United States. HTC denies the remaining allegations in
`
`Paragraph 114.
`
`115. HTC admits that it provides manuals and instructions for the Accused Products in
`
`the United States and support materials for the Accused Products on its U.S. website. HTC
`
`admits that it provides materials relating to HTC’s “Motion Launch” feature for the Accused
`
`Products in the United States. To the extent Paragraph 115 describes, quotes, or cites these
`
`ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`- 11 -
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 62 Filed 03/23/18 Page 12 of 27
`
`materials, HTC responds that these documents and materials speak for themselves. HTC denies
`
`the remaining allegations in Paragraph 115.
`
`116. HTC admits that it provides user guides for the Accused Products that include
`
`materials relating to “motion gesture” features. To the extent the Second Amended Complaint
`
`describes, quotes, or cites these user guides, HTC responds that these user guides speak for
`
`themselves. HTC denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 116.
`
`117. HTC admits that it provides materials on its U.S. website relating to HTC’s
`
`“Motion Launch” features and HTC’s “motion gesture” features. To the extent the Second
`
`Amended Complaint describes, quotes, or cites these online materials, HTC responds that these
`
`online materials speak for themselves. HTC admits that it provides materials on its HTC
`
`Tutorials YouTube channel relating to HTC’s “motion gesture” features. To the extent the
`
`Second Amended Complaint describes, quotes, or cites these videos, HTC responds that these
`
`videos speak for themselves. HTC denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 117.
`
`118. HTC admits that what purports to be a claim chart for claim 14 of the ’438 Patent
`
`is attached to the Second Amended Complaint as Exhibit A. HTC denies the remaining
`
`allegations in Paragraph 118.
`
`119. Denied.
`
`120. Denied.
`
`PATENT INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,552,978
`
`121. HTC reasserts and incorporates by reference its responses to all preceding
`
`Paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
`
`122. HTC admits that the ’978 Patent, on its face, is entitled “3D Pointing Device and
`
`Method for Compensating Rotations of the 3D Pointing Device Thereof,” bears an issue date of
`
`October 8, 2013, lists the assignee as CyWee Group Limited, and lists the inventors as Zhou Ye,
`
`Chin-Lung Li, and Shun-Nan Liou. HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 122, and therefore denies them.
`
`///
`
`ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`- 12 -
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 62 Filed 03/23/18 Page 13 of 27
`
`123. HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 123, and therefore denies them.
`
`124. HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 124, and therefore denies them.
`
`125. HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 125, and therefore denies them.
`
`126. Denied.
`
`127. Denied.
`
`128. Denied.
`
`129. HTC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 129, and therefore denies them.
`
`130. HTC admits that it received a copy of the ’978 Patent when it was served with the
`
`complaint in this action. HTC denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 130.
`
`131.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 131 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 131.
`
`132.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 132 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 132.
`
`133.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 133 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 133.
`
`134.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 134 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 134.
`
`135.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 135 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 135.
`
`136.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 136 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 136.
`
`137.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 137 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 137.
`
`ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`- 13 -
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Tel: (206) 883-2500
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 62 Filed 03/23/18 Page 14 of 27
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`138.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 138 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 138.
`
`139.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 139 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 139.
`
`140.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 140 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 140.
`
`141.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 141 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 141.
`
`142.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 142 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 142.
`
`143.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 143 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HTC denies all remaining allegations of Paragraph 143.
`
`144.
`
`To the extent that the allegation of Paragraph 144 sets forth a legal conclusion, no
`
`response is required. HT

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket