throbber
1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 180 Filed 06/20/24 Page 1 of 4
`
`THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
`CYWEE GROUP LTD.,
`
`CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`HTC CORPORATION; and HTC AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`JOINT STATUS REPORT
`
`Defendants.
`
`HTC CORPORATION, and HTC AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`Third-Party Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`CYWEE MOTION GROUP LTD.,
`
`Third-Party Defendant.
`
`JOINT STATUS REPORT
`CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`BREWER LAW GROUP PLLC
`1700 SEVENTH AVE., SUITE 2100
`SEATTLE, WA 98101
`TELEPHONE: (206) 357-8442
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 180 Filed 06/20/24 Page 2 of 4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s August 19, 2019, Order (ECF No. 146), Plaintiff CyWee Group
`Ltd. (“CyWee Group”) and the parties’ most recent 90-Day Joint Status Report (ECF No. 179),
`Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc., and Third-Party
`Defendant CyWee Motion Group Ltd. respectfully submit the following joint status report:
`The Google IPRs:
`
`On January 9, 2020, the PTAB held the following claims invalid in the two IPR
`
`proceedings filed by Google (the “Google IPRs”):
`
`Asserted Patent
`
`IPR Case No. Original Claims
`Held Invalid
`
`8,441,438
`8,552,978
`
`IPR2018-01258
`IPR2018-01257
`
`1, 3–5
`10, 12
`
`Proposed Contingent
`Amended Claims Held
`Invalid
`20, 21
`19, 20
`
`CyWee appealed the PTAB’s final written decisions in the Google IPRs. On February 8,
`
`2023, the Federal Circuit finally affirmed PTAB’s ruling.
`
`The ZTE IPR:
`
`On February 17, 2021, the PTAB held all challenged claims invalid in an inter partes
`
`review proceeding filed by ZTE and joined by LGE (the “ZTE IPR”):
`
`Asserted Patent
`
`IPR Case No. Original Claims
`Held Invalid
`
`8,441,438
`
`IPR2019-00143
`IPR2019-01203
`
`1, 4, 5, 14–17, 19
`
`Proposed Contingent
`Amended Claims Held
`Invalid
`20-24
`
`CyWee appealed the PTAB’s final written decision in the ZTE IPR on April 8, 2021. On
`
`January 18, 2024, the Federal Circuit finally affirmed PTAB’s ruling.
`
`On May 20, 2024, the parties submitted a Joint Status Report in which the parties agreed
`
`to request a further stay of 30 days so that the parties may discuss and decide how to proceed with
`
`the case and to submit a further status report in 30 days instead of 90 days.
`
`JOINT STATUS REPORT
`CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`BREWER LAW GROUP PLLC
`1700 SEVENTH AVE., SUITE 2100
`SEATTLE, WA 98101
`TELEPHONE: (206) 357-8442
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 180 Filed 06/20/24 Page 3 of 4
`
`After careful consideration, CyWee will ask the Court to dismiss the patent infringement
`
`claims invalidated in the IPRs. The IPR proceedings have mooted the proceedings for patent
`
`infringement of the ‘438 and ‘978 patents. CyWee is investigating whether any of the
`
`approximately four dozen patents granted since the case was stayed are infringed by the Defendant.
`
`That analysis should be complete by August 15, 2024.
`
`As to the non-patent claims, CyWee contends that they should not be dismissed because
`
`the IPR results do not impact those claims. CyWee further contends that a new scheduling order
`
`should be entered requiring CyWee to file a motion to amend the complaint on or before August
`
`15, 2024. Defendants oppose CyWee’s attempts to bring new patents or new claims into this
`
`case—rather, any such patents or claims should be litigated in a separate action. After the Court
`
`resolves this issue, the parties request that a new Scheduling Order be entered based upon any
`
`remaining claims and defenses asserted in this action.
`
`Dated: June 20, 2024
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Carmen E. Bremer
`Carmen E. Bremer, WSBA 47,565
`Carmen.bremer@bremerlawgroup.com
`BREMER LAW GROUP PLLC
`1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 2100
`Seattle, WA 98101
`T: (206) 357-8442
`F: (206) 858-9730
`
`Michael W. Shore* (mshore@shorefirm.com)
`THE SHORE FIRM LLP
`901 Main Street, Suite 3300
`Dallas, Texas 75202
`T: (214) 593-9110
`F: (214) 593-9111
`*Admitted pro hac vice
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff CyWee Group Ltd. and
`Third-Party Defendant CyWee Motion Group Ltd.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`JOINT STATUS REPORT
`CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`BREWER LAW GROUP PLLC
`1700 SEVENTH AVE., SUITE 2100
`SEATTLE, WA 98101
`TELEPHONE: (206) 357-8442
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 180 Filed 06/20/24 Page 4 of 4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`Dated: June 20, 2024
`
`/s/ Ryan R. Smith
`James C. Yoon, CA Bar #177155 (pro hac vice)
`Ryan R. Smith, WSBA #57331
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`Facsimile: (650) 565-5100
`Email: jyoon@wsgr.com, rsmith@wsgr.com
`
`Gregory L. Watts, WSBA #43995
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Telephone: (206) 883-2500
`Facsimile: (206) 883-2699
`Email: gwatts@wsgr.com
`
`Jamie Y. Otto, CA Bar #295099 (pro hac vice)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90017-2027
`Telephone: (323) 210-2900
`Facsimile: (866) 974-7329
`Email: jotto@wsgr.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs
`HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I hereby certify that on June 20, 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing with the
`Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all
`counsel of record.
`
`/s/ Ryan R. Smith
`Ryan R. Smith
`
`JOINT STATUS REPORT
`CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`BREWER LAW GROUP PLLC
`1700 SEVENTH AVE., SUITE 2100
`SEATTLE, WA 98101
`TELEPHONE: (206) 357-8442
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket