throbber
1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 174 Filed 07/31/23 Page 1 of 5
`
`THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`90-DAY JOINT STATUS REPORT
`
`
`CYWEE GROUP LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`HTC CORPORATION; and HTC AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`HTC CORPORATION, and HTC AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Third-Party Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`CYWEE MOTION GROUP LTD.,
`
`Third-Party Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STATUS REPORT
`CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BREWER LAW GROUP PLLC
`1700 SEVENTH AVE., SUITE 2100
`SEATTLE, WA 98101
`TELEPHONE: (206) 357-8442
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 174 Filed 07/31/23 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s August 19, 2019, Order (ECF No. 146), Plaintiff CyWee Group
`Ltd. (“CyWee Group”), Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs HTC Corporation and HTC
`America, Inc., and Third-Party Defendant CyWee Motion Group Ltd. respectfully submit the
`following joint status report:
`
`The Google IPRs:
`
`On January 9, 2020, the PTAB held the following claims invalid in the two IPR
`
`proceedings filed by Google (the “Google IPRs”):
`
`Asserted Patent
`
`IPR Case No. Original Claims
`Held Invalid
`
`8,441,438
`8,552,978
`
`IPR2018-01258 1, 3–5
`IPR2018-01257 10, 12
`
`Proposed Contingent
`Amended Claims Held
`Invalid
`20, 21
`19, 20
`
`CyWee appealed the PTAB’s final written decisions in the Google IPRs. The Federal
`
`Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed those decisions. On April 4, 2021, CyWee filed petitions for en
`
`banc review. The Federal Circuit denied those petitions on June 3, 2021. Mandates issued on June
`
`10, 2021. On September 23, 2021, per CyWee’s request, the Federal Circuit recalled the mandates,
`
`reinstated the appeals, and remanded the Google IPRs to allow CyWee the opportunity to request
`
`Director rehearing. On October 24, CyWee filed requests for de novo review by the Director in the
`
`Google IPRs. On January 7, 2022, the Commissioner for Patents denied review. On January 21,
`
`2022, CyWee notified the Federal Circuit of that denial, and on April 21, 2022, CyWee filed its
`
`opening brief in the appeal. On February 8, 2023, the Federal Circuit affirmed PTAB’s ruling.
`
`The ZTE IPR:
`
`On February 17, 2021, the PTAB held all challenged claims invalid in an inter partes
`
`review proceeding filed by ZTE and joined by LGE (the “ZTE IPR”):
`
`Asserted Patent
`
`IPR Case No. Original Claims
`Held Invalid
`
`8,441,438
`
`IPR2019-00143 1, 4, 5, 14–17, 19
`
`Proposed Contingent
`Amended Claims Held
`Invalid
`20-24
`
`JOINT 90-DAY STATUS REPORT
`CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BREWER LAW GROUP PLLC
`1700 SEVENTH AVE., SUITE 2100
`SEATTLE, WA 98101
` TELEPHONE: (206) 357-8442
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 174 Filed 07/31/23 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`
`IPR2019-01203
`
`CyWee appealed the PTAB’s final written decision in the ZTE IPR on April 8, 2021. On
`
`June 30, 2021, CyWee filed a motion requesting that the Federal Circuit dismiss its appeal of the
`
`ZTE IPR and remand the matter to the USPTO for further proceedings in light of the Supreme
`
`Court’s recent decision in United States v. Arthrex, Inc., No. 19-1434, 2021 WL 2519433 (June
`
`21, 2021) holding that “the unreviewable authority wielded by APJs during inter partes review is
`
`incompatible with their appointment by the Secretary to an inferior office.” On July 14, 2021, the
`
`Federal Circuit issued an order (1) certifying CyWee’s constitutional challenge to the Attorney
`
`General, (2) directing the Attorney General to inform the Court within 30 days whether the United
`
`States intends to intervene and if so to file any response to CyWee’s motion to remand, (3) ordering
`
`appellee to file any response within that 30-day timeframe, and (4) staying the briefing schedule
`
`in the appeal. On August 13, 2021, the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and
`
`Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office informed the Federal Circuit of its
`
`intention to intervene and filed a response. On September 24, 2021 (“September 24 Order”), per
`
`CyWee’s request, the Federal Circuit remanded the ZTE IPR to allow CyWee the opportunity to
`
`request Director rehearing. On October 25, CyWee filed a request for de novo review by the
`
`Director in the ZTE IPR. On January 7, 2022, the Commissioner for Patents denied review. On
`
`January 21, 2022, CyWee notified the Federal Circuit of that denial. On March 28, 2022, the
`
`Federal Circuit ordered that CyWee’s brief is due no later than 60 days from the date of filing of
`
`the updated certified list, and on July 15, 2022, CyWee filed its opening brief in the appeal. On
`
`September 23, 2022, Intervenor Katherine K. Vidal and the appellees each filed a respective
`
`responsive brief. On November 14, 2022, CyWee filed its reply brief. The parties are currently
`
`awaiting a date for oral arguments. The appeal is pending.
`
`JOINT 90-DAY STATUS REPORT
`CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BREWER LAW GROUP PLLC
`1700 SEVENTH AVE., SUITE 2100
`SEATTLE, WA 98101
` TELEPHONE: (206) 357-8442
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 174 Filed 07/31/23 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`
`Because the matters described above may affect claims in this case, neither party requests
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`lifting the stay at this time.
`
`Dated July 31, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 31, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Carmen E. Bremer
`Carmen E. Bremer, WSBA 47,565
`Carmen.bremer@bremerlawgroup.com
`BREMER LAW GROUP PLLC
`1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 2100
`Seattle, WA 98101
`T: (206) 357-8442
`F: (206) 858-9730
`
`Michael W. Shore* (mshore@shorefirm.com)
`Chijioke E. Offor* (coffor@shorefirm.com)
`Halima Shukri Ndai* (hndai@shorefirm.com)
`THE SHORE FIRM LLP
`901 Main Street, Suite 3300
`Dallas, Texas 75202
`T: (214) 593-9110
`F: (214) 593-9111
`*Admitted pro hac vice
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff CyWee Group Ltd. and
`Third-Party Defendant CyWee Motion Group Ltd.
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Ryan R. Smith
`James C. Yoon, CA Bar #177155 (pro hac vice)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`Facsimile: (650) 565-5100
`Email: jyoon@wsgr.com,
`
`
`JOINT 90-DAY STATUS REPORT
`CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BREWER LAW GROUP PLLC
`1700 SEVENTH AVE., SUITE 2100
`SEATTLE, WA 98101
` TELEPHONE: (206) 357-8442
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 174 Filed 07/31/23 Page 5 of 5
`
`Gregory L. Watts, WSBA #43995
`Ryan R. Smith, WSBA #57331
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Telephone: (206) 883-2500
`Facsimile: (206) 883-2699
`Email: gwatts@wsgr.com, rsmith@wsgr.com
`
`Jamie Y. Otto, CA Bar #295099 (pro hac vice)
`Ty W. Callahan, CA Bar #312548 (pro hac vice)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90017-2027
`Telephone: (323) 210-2900
`Facsimile: (866) 974-7329
`Email: jotto@wsgr.com, tcallahan@wsgr.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs
`HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on July 31, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with the
`
`Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all
`counsel of record.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Carmen E. Bremer
`Carmen E. Bremer
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT 90-DAY STATUS REPORT
`CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00932-JLR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BREWER LAW GROUP PLLC
`1700 SEVENTH AVE., SUITE 2100
`SEATTLE, WA 98101
` TELEPHONE: (206) 357-8442
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket