`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
`
`CYWEE GROUP LTD.,
`
`CASE NO. C17-0932JLR
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`HTC CORPORATION, et al.,
`
`ORDER ON STIPULATED
`MOTION
`
` Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs,
`
` v.
`
`CYWEE MOTION GROUP LTD.,
`
` Third-Party Defendant.
`
`The court is in receipt of the parties’ stipulated motion to postpone claim
`
`
`
`
`
`
`construction dates. (Stip. Mot. (Dkt. # 124).) The parties represent that they have
`
`“agreed to postpone . . . the remaining claim construction deadlines” in view of Plaintiff
`
`CyWee Group Ltd. and Third-Party Defendant CyWee Motion Group Ltd.’s motion for a
`
`partial stay pending inter partes review proceedings and Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiffs
`
`ORDER - 1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00932-JLR Document 125 Filed 03/06/19 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`1
`
`HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.’s “expected opposition and cross-motion for a
`
`2
`
`complete stay.” (Id. at 1; see also Mot. for Stay (Dkt. # 123).) The court GRANTS the
`
`3
`
`stipulated motion, VACATES the deadline to submit responsive claim construction
`
`4
`
`briefs, and STRIKES the Markman hearing, currently scheduled for April 19, 2019. The
`
`5
`
`court will reset the remaining claim construction deadlines, if necessary, after ruling on
`
`6
`
`the motion for a partial stay pending inter partes review proceedings. (See Mot. for
`
`7
`
`Stay.)
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`
`
`Dated this 6th day of March, 2019.
`
`A
`
`The Honorable James L. Robart
`U.S. District Court Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER - 2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
