`Case 3:14-cv-00757-REP-DJN Document 55-1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 2 Page|D# 2731
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA,
`RICHMOND DIVISION
`
`Civil Action NO. 3:14-cv—757—REP
`
`
`
`)
`
`i
`)
`
`) 3
`
`) %
`
`3
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`-VS.-
`
`NVIDIA CORPORATION, VELOCITY
`MICRO, INC. D/B/A VELOCITY MICRO
`AND VELOCITY HOLDINGS, LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`SECOND DECLARATION OF RANDALL COPELAND IN SUPPORT OF
`DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE PURSUANT
`
`TO 28 U.S.C. § 14041211, SEVER, AND STAY
`
`I, Randall Copeland, declare:
`
`1.
`
`At no time has either Velocity Holdings or Velocity Micro ever sold any accused
`
`computer with a hybrid drive.
`
`2.
`
`There are products from other manufacturers that are comparable to the NVIDIA
`
`products that Velocity uses in its computers that Velocity could use instead Of the NVIDIA
`
`products in Velocity’s computers.
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, the accused SX chassis is manufactured in China
`
`and the accused GX—2 chassis is manufactured in Taiwan.
`
`4.
`
`Neither Velocity Holdings nor Velocity Micro has ever sold the ASUS G750JX,
`
`with an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M Video card.
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-00757-REP-DJN Document 55-1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 2732
`Case 3:14-cv-00757-REP-DJN Document 55-1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 2 of 2 Page|D# 2732
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct. Executed this
`
`2nd day of February, 2015 in Midlothian, Virginia.
`
`
`
`*7lefawn/Q
`
`Randall Copeland
`
`