throbber
Case 3:14-cv-00757-REP-DJN Document 54-1 Filed 01/26/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 2591
`Case 3:14-cv-00757-REP-DJN Document 54-1 Filed 01/26/15 Page 1 of 5 Page|D# 2591
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`NVIDIA Comments on Samsung ITC Lawsuit | NVIDIA Blog
`Case 3:14-cv-00757-REP-DJN Document 54-1 Filed 01/26/15 Page 2 of 5 PageID# 2592
`
`BLOG
`
`Home
`
`Auto
`
`Corporate
`
`Gaming
`
`Mobile
`
`Enterprise
`
`Cloud
`
`38
`
`1811
`
`
`
`CORPORATE
`NVIDIA Comments on Samsung ITC Lawsuit
`
`By David Shannon on December 23, 2014
`
`
`
`Share
`
`
`
`You’ve seen this story before.
`
`Back in September, we filed a patent lawsuit in U.S. District Court against Samsung and Qualcomm for using
` our GPU technology patents without compensation. Two months later, Samsung countersued us, dragging
` along for good measure Velocity Micro, a small customer of ours based in Virginia, who has nothing to do with
` this fight.
`
`http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2014/12/23/samsung-itc/[1/23/2015 11:56:27 AM]
`
`

`

`NVIDIA Comments on Samsung ITC Lawsuit | NVIDIA Blog
`Case 3:14-cv-00757-REP-DJN Document 54-1 Filed 01/26/15 Page 3 of 5 PageID# 2593
`
`When we submitted that lawsuit, we also filed a second case in the International Trade Commission, seeking
` to block Samsung from shipping into the U.S. Galaxy phones and tablets that improperly use our patents.
` Predictably enough, Samsung went to the ITC last month to countersue us there, too, dragging along a dozen
` other small partners of ours who also have nothing to do with this fight. Today, the ITC announced that, just
` as it will hear our case against Samsung, it will allow Samsung’s case against us to proceed.
`
`This is typical legal ping pong. But amid the positioning, it’s important not to lose track of a few basic
` principles that guide our commitment to protect our IP.
`
`First, over the past two decades, NVIDIA has invested more than $9 billion to create the world’s best visual
` computing technology portfolio, comprising 7,000 patents issued and pending. Despite several years of trying,
` our licensing team was repeatedly unable to obtain any compensation from Samsung for using our technology.
`
`Second, we must earn an appropriate return on our investments. We are now seeking the courts’ judgment to
` confirm the infringement, validity and value of our patents so that we may be able to reach agreement with
`
`http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2014/12/23/samsung-itc/[1/23/2015 11:56:27 AM]
`
`

`

`NVIDIA Comments on Samsung ITC Lawsuit | NVIDIA Blog
`Case 3:14-cv-00757-REP-DJN Document 54-1 Filed 01/26/15 Page 4 of 5 PageID# 2594
` Samsung.
`
`Third, Samsung’s cynical measure to blame our partners is unfair to these third parties and will create more
` negative fallout for the company. In the case of Velocity Micro, a small family business was named so that
` Samsung could attempt to get its case heard in the fast-moving local district court. As Velocity’s CEO wrote in
` a blog, “…(Samsung is) all too willing to throw a private company under the proverbial bus for their own
` strategic reasons. It’s simply wrong….” In Samsung’s new ITC case, a dozen other companies are named that
` also have nothing to do with Samsung’s use of NVIDIA’s IP.
`
`Among all these cases, we still expect that the first to be decided will be our suit against Samsung in the ITC.
` And we look forward to that.
`
`NVIDIA remains focused on ensuring that we receive fair compensation from Samsung for using our technology
` in Galaxy phones and tablets. We won’t allow ourselves to get sidetracked by the company’s attempts to
` intimidate our partners who have nothing to do with the unlicensed use of our IP. We look forward to the
` court setting this right.
`
`Categories: Corporate
`
`Similar Stories
`
`NVIDIA Brings Maxwell
` to Millions of Gamers
` with GeForce GTX 960
`
`Level Up: With Windows
` 10 – and DirectX 12 –
` PC Gaming Will Soon
` Be Better Than Ever
`
`Why 64-bit Hypervisor
` Support Is a Big Deal
` (Hint: More vGPUs)
`
`192-Core Tegra K1
` Named Best Mobile
` Chip of 2014 … Wait
` Till They See Our 256-
`Core X1
`
`http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2014/12/23/samsung-itc/[1/23/2015 11:56:27 AM]
`
`

`

`NVIDIA Comments on Samsung ITC Lawsuit | NVIDIA Blog
`Case 3:14-cv-00757-REP-DJN Document 54-1 Filed 01/26/15 Page 5 of 5 PageID# 2595
`Next Post »
`« Previous Post
`
` Solutions:
`3DTV Play | 3D PCs | Optimus | Graphics Cards | GRID | High Performance Computing | Visualization | CUDA | Tegra | Cool Stuff
` Corporate: Events | Affiliate Program | Developers | Channel Partners | Careers | RSS Feeds | Newsletter | Contact Us | Security
`Copyright © 2015 NVIDIA Corporation | Legal Info | Privacy Policy
`
`http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2014/12/23/samsung-itc/[1/23/2015 11:56:27 AM]
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket