throbber
Case 3:14-cv-00757-REP-DJN Document 47-5 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 1163
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA,
`" RICHMOND DIYISION
`
`Civil Action No. 3 :14-cv-7 57-REP
`
`SAMSLING ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONIC S AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`-vs.-
`
`NVIDIA CORPORATION, VELOCITY
`MICRO, INC. D/B/A VELOCITY MICRO
`AND VELOCITY HOLDINGS, LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`DECLARATION OF DAVID, LUEBKE IN SUPPORT OF
`DEFENDANT NVIDIA CORPORATION'S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE
`PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. $ 1404(a), SEVER" AND STAY
`
`I, David Luebke, declare:
`1.
`
`I am a full-time employee of NVIDIA Corporation ("NVIDIA"), where I hold the
`
`position of Senior Director of Research Staff within the Computer Graphics Research Group. I
`
`have held that position since March of 2012. I have been employed with NVIDIA since 2006.
`
`The statements in this declaration are based upon my personal knowledge, corporate records,
`
`information maintained by NVIDIA in the ordinary course of business, or reasonable
`
`investigation, and I could and would testifu competently to these matters if called upon to do so.
`2.
`
`I understand that Plaintiffs have sued NVIDIA and accused NVIDIA of infringing
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 5,860,158; 6,262,938; 6,287,902; 6,819,602;8,252,675; and 6,804,724 based on
`
`its manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale, or importation of products, including without limitation
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-00757-REP-DJN Document 47-5 Filed 01/12/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 1164
`
`Graphic Processing Units ("GPUs"), system-on-a-chip units ("SOCs"), and graphics cards that
`
`allegedly practice the inventions of the asserted patents.
`
`3. NVIDIA has a small regional office located at 410 East Water Street, Suite 200
`
`Charlottesville, VA 22902.
`4.
`
`There are three employees, including myself, who work in the Charlottesville
`
`office.
`
`5. To my knowledge after a reasonable investigation, none of the NVIDIA
`
`employees in the Charlottesville office do any substantive work related to the design,
`
`development, or manufacture of the accused products, or has ever sold any of the accused
`
`devices, or works on any marketing or financial reporting of the accused products.
`
`6.
`
`In addition to the employees who work in the Charlottesville office, there are nine
`
`NVIDIA employees who work from home and reside in Virginia.
`
`7.
`
`To my knowledge after a reasonable investigation, none of the NVIDIA
`
`employees who work from home and reside in Virginia do any substantive work related to the
`
`design, development, or manufacture of the accused products, or has ever sold any of the accused
`
`devices, or works on any marketing or financial reporting of the accused products.
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct. Executed this
`
`1lth day of January, 2015 in Charlottesville, Virginia.
`
`David Luebke
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket