`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-1373
`
`GEOSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER
`REGARDING THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS
`
`Plaintiff Geoscope Technologies Pte. Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`(“Defendant”) anticipate that documents, testimony, or information containing or reflecting
`
`confidential, proprietary, trade secret, and/or commercially sensitive information are likely to
`
`be disclosed or produced during the course of discovery, initial disclosures, and supplemental
`
`disclosures in this case and request that the Court enter this Order setting forth the conditions
`
`for treating, obtaining, and using such information.
`
`Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds
`
`good cause for the following Agreed Protective Order Regarding the Disclosure and Use of
`
`Discovery Materials (“Order” or “Protective Order”).
`
`1.
`
`PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
`
`(a)
`
`Protected Material designated under the terms of this Protective Order shall
`
`be used by a Receiving Party solely for this case, and shall not be used directly or indirectly for
`
`any other purpose whatsoever without the prior written consent of the Producing Party or upon
`
`order of the Court.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 2 of 39 PageID# 482
`
`(b)
`
`The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections
`
`on all disclosures during discovery, or in the course of making initial or supplemental disclosures
`
`under Rule 26(a). Designations under this Order shall be made with care and shall not be made
`
`absent a good faith belief that the designated material satisfies the criteria set forth below. If it
`
`comes to a Producing Party’s attention that designated material does not qualify for protection at
`
`all, or does not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, the Producing Party must
`
`promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing or changing the designation.
`
`2.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`(a)
`
`“Discovery Material” means all items or information, including from any
`
`non-party, regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among
`
`other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced, disclosed, or generated
`
`in connection with discovery or Rule 26(a) disclosures in this case.
`
`(b)
`
`“Outside Counsel” means (i) outside counsel who appear on the pleadings
`
`as counsel for a Party and (ii) partners, associates, and staff of such counsel to whom it is
`
`reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation.
`
`(c)
`
`“Patents-in-suit” means U.S. Patent Nos. 7,561,104, 8,320,264, 8,400,358,
`
`8,406,753, 8,786,494, 9,097,784, and any other patent asserted in this action, as well as any related
`
`patents, patent applications, provisional patent applications, continuations, and/or divisionals.
`
`(d)
`
` “Party” means any party to this case, including all of its officers, directors,
`
`employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel and their support staffs.
`
`(e)
`
`“Producing Party” means any Party or non-party that discloses or produces
`
`any Discovery Material in this case.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 3 of 39 PageID# 483
`
`(f)
`
`“Protected Material” means any Discovery Material that is designated as
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE,” as provided for in this Order. Protected
`
`Material shall not include: (i) advertising materials that have been actually published or publicly
`
`disseminated; and (ii) materials that show on their face they have been disseminated to the public.
`
`(g)
`
`“Receiving Party” means any Party who receives Discovery Material from
`
`a Producing Party.
`
`(h)
`
` “Source Code” means computer code, scripts, assembly, binaries, object
`
`code, source code listings (e.g., file names and path structure), descriptions of source code (e.g.,
`
`descriptions of declarations, functions, and parameters), object code listings and descriptions of
`
`object code, Hardware Description Language (HDL) or Register Transfer Level (RTL) files that
`
`describe the hardware design of any ASIC or other chip, and Computer Aided Design (CAD) files
`
`that describe the hardware design of any component.
`
`3.
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPUTATION OF TIME
`
`The computation of any period of time prescribed or allowed by this Order shall
`
`be governed by the provisions for computing time set forth in Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure 6.
`
`4.
`
`SCOPE
`
`(a)
`
`The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Discovery Material
`
`governed by this Order as addressed herein, but also any information copied or extracted
`
`therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony,
`
`conversations, or presentations by Parties or their counsel in court or in other settings that might
`
`reveal Protected Material.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 4 of 39 PageID# 484
`
`(b)
`
`Nothing in this Protective Order shall prevent or restrict a Producing Party’s
`
`own disclosure or use of its own Protected Material for any purpose, and nothing in this Order
`
`shall preclude any Producing Party from showing its Protected Material to an individual who
`
`prepared the Protected Material.
`
`(c)
`
`Nothing in this Order shall be construed to prejudice any Party’s right to
`
`use any Protected Material in court or in any court filing with the consent of the Producing Party
`
`or by order of the Court.
`
`(d)
`
`This Order is without prejudice to the right of any Party to seek further or
`
`additional protection of any Discovery Material or to modify this Order in any way, including,
`
`without limitation, an order that certain matter not be produced at all.
`
`5.
`
`
`
`DURATION
`
`Even after the termination of this case, the confidentiality obligations imposed by
`
`this Order shall remain in effect until a Producing Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order
`
`otherwise directs.
`
`6.
`
`ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
`
`(a)
`
` Basic Principles. All Protected Material shall be used solely for
`
`prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this case or any related appellate proceeding, and
`
`not for any other purpose whatsoever, including without limitation any other litigation, patent
`
`prosecution or acquisition, patent reexamination or reissue proceedings, or any business or
`
`competitive purpose or function without the prior written consent of the Producing Party or upon
`
`order of the Court.
`
`(b)
`
`Patent Prosecution Bar. Absent the written consent of the Producing Party,
`
`any person on behalf of the Plaintiff who receives one or more items designated
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 5 of 39 PageID# 485
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –SOURCE CODE” by a Defendant shall not be involved, directly
`
`or indirectly, in any of the following activities: (i) advising on, consulting on, preparing,
`
`prosecuting, drafting, editing, and/or amending of patent applications, specifications, claims,
`
`and/or responses to office actions, or otherwise affecting the scope of claims in patents or patent
`
`applications relating to the geolocation of mobile devices using network signals (i.e., Wi-Fi,
`
`cellular, and Bluetooth signals), including without limitation the patents asserted in this action and
`
`any patent or application claiming priority to or otherwise related to the patents asserted in this
`
`action, before any foreign or domestic agency, including the United States Patent and Trademark
`
`Office; and (ii) the acquisition of patents (including patent applications), or the rights to any such
`
`patents or patent applications with the right to sublicense, relating to the geolocation of mobile
`
`devices using network signals (i.e., Wi-Fi, cellular, and Bluetooth signals). These prohibitions are
`
`not intended to and shall not preclude counsel from participating in proceedings on behalf of a
`
`Party challenging the validity of any patent, but are intended, inter alia, to preclude counsel from
`
`participating directly or indirectly in reexamination, covered business method review, or reissue
`
`proceedings on behalf of a patentee. To avoid any doubt, counsel of record in this action shall not
`
`be prohibited from serving as counsel to Geoscope Technologies Pte. Ltd. in any inter partes
`
`review proceeding involving any of the patents asserted in this action. These prohibitions shall
`
`begin when access to “CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`
`ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” materials are first received by the
`
`affected individual, and shall end two (2) years after the final resolution of this action, including
`
`all appeals.
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 6 of 39 PageID# 486
`
`(c)
`
`Secure Storage, No Export. Protected Material must be stored and
`
`maintained by a Receiving Party at a location in the United States and in a secure manner that
`
`ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. To ensure compliance
`
`with applicable United States Export Administration Regulations, Protected Material may not be
`
`exported outside the United States or released to any foreign national (even if within the United
`
`States), except as permitted by 22(c).
`
`(d)
`
`Legal Advice Based on Protected Material. Nothing in this Protective Order
`
`shall be construed to prevent counsel from advising their clients with respect to this case based in
`
`whole or in part upon Protected Materials, provided counsel does not disclose the Protected
`
`Material itself except as provided in this Order.
`
`(e)
`
`Limitations. Nothing in this Order shall restrict in any way a Producing
`
`Party’s use or disclosure of its own Protected Material. Nothing in this Order shall restrict in any
`
`way the use or disclosure of Discovery Material by a Receiving Party: (i) that is or has become
`
`publicly known through no fault of the Receiving Party; (ii) that is lawfully acquired by or known
`
`to the Receiving Party independent of the Producing Party; (iii) previously produced, disclosed
`
`and/or provided by the Producing Party to the Receiving Party or a non-party without an
`
`obligation of confidentiality and not by inadvertence or mistake; (iv) with the consent of the
`
`Producing Party; or (v) pursuant to order of the Court.
`
`7.
`
`DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
`
`(a)
`
`Available Designations. Any Producing Party may designate Discovery
`
`Material with any of the following designations, provided that it meets the requirements for such
`
`designations as provided for herein: “CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL -
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE.”
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 7 of 39 PageID# 487
`
`(b) Written Discovery and Documents and Tangible Things. Written
`
`discovery, documents (which include “electronically stored information,” as that phrase is used in
`
`Federal Rule of Procedure 34), and tangible things that meet the requirements for the
`
`confidentiality designations listed in Paragraph 7(a) may be so designated by placing the
`
`appropriate designation on every page of the written material prior to production. For digital files
`
`being produced, the Producing Party may mark each viewable page or image with the appropriate
`
`designation, and mark the medium, container, and/or communication in which the digital files were
`
`contained. In the event that original documents are produced for inspection, the original
`
`documents shall be presumed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
`during the inspection and re-designated, as appropriate during the copying process.
`(c) Native Files. Where electronic files and documents are produced in native
`
`electronic format, such electronic files and documents shall be designated for protection under this
`
`Order by appending to the file names or designators information indicating whether the file
`
`contains “CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE,” material, or shall use any other reasonable
`
`method for so designating Protected Materials produced in electronic format. When electronic files
`
`or documents are printed for use at deposition, in a court proceeding, or for provision in printed
`
`form to an expert or consultant pre-approved pursuant to paragraph 12(b), the party printing the
`
`electronic files or documents shall affix a legend to the printed document corresponding to the
`
`designation of the Designating Party and including the production number and designation
`
`associated with the native file. No one shall seek to use in this litigation a .tiff, .pdf or other image
`
`format version of a document produced in native file format without first (1) providing a copy of
`
`the image format version to the Producing Party so that the Producing Party can review the image
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 8 of 39 PageID# 488
`
`to ensure that no information has been altered, and (2) obtaining the consent of the Producing
`
`Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
`
`(d)
`
`Depositions and Testimony. Parties or testifying persons or entities may
`
`designate depositions and other testimony with the appropriate designation by indicating on the
`
`record at the time the testimony is given or by sending written notice of how portions of the transcript
`
`of the testimony is designated within fourteen (14) days of receipt of the transcript of the testimony.
`
`If no indication on the record is made, all information disclosed during a deposition shall be
`
`deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” until the time within
`
`which it may be appropriately designated as provided for herein has passed. Any Party that wishes
`
`to disclose the transcript, or information contained therein, may provide written notice of its intent
`
`to treat the transcript as non-confidential, after which time, any Party that wants to maintain any
`
`portion of the transcript as confidential must designate the confidential portions within fourteen
`
`(14) days, or else the transcript may be treated as non-confidential. Any Protected Material that is
`
`used in the taking of a deposition shall remain subject to the provisions of this Protective Order,
`
`along with the transcript pages of the deposition testimony dealing with such Protected Material.
`
`In such cases the court reporter shall be informed of this Protective Order and shall be required to
`
`operate in a manner consistent with this Protective Order. In the event the deposition is videotaped,
`
`the original and all copies of the videotape shall be marked by the video technician to indicate that
`
`the contents of the videotape are subject to this Protective Order, substantially along the lines of
`
`“This videotape contains confidential testimony used in this case and is not to be viewed or
`
`the contents thereof to be displayed or revealed except pursuant to the terms of the operative
`
`Protective Order in this matter or pursuant to written stipulation of the parties.” Counsel for
`
`any Producing Party shall have the right to exclude from oral depositions, other than the
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 9 of 39 PageID# 489
`
`deponent, deponent’s counsel, the reporter and videographer (if any), any person who is not
`
`authorized by this Protective Order to receive or access Protected Material based on the
`
`designation of such Protected Material. Such right of exclusion shall be applicable only during
`
`periods of examination or testimony regarding such Protected Material.
`
`8.
`
`DISCOVERY MATERIAL DESIGNATED AS “CONFIDENTIAL”
`
`(a)
`
`A Producing Party may
`
`designate Discovery Material
`
`as
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL” if it contains or reflects confidential, proprietary, and/or commercially
`
`sensitive information.
`
`(b)
`
`Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Discovery Material designated as
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL” may be disclosed only to the following:
`
`(i)
`
`The Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel, such counsel’s immediate
`
`paralegals and staff, and any copying or clerical litigation support services working at the direction
`
`of such counsel, paralegals, and staff;
`
`(ii)
`
`Not more than three (3) representatives of the Receiving Party who
`
`are officers or employees of the Receiving Party, who may be, but need not be, in-house counsel
`
`for the Receiving Party, as well as their immediate paralegals and staff, to whom disclosure is
`
`reasonably necessary for this case, provided that: (a) each such person has agreed to be bound by
`
`the provisions of the Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A; and (b) no unresolved
`
`objections to such disclosure exist after proper notice has been given to all Parties as set forth
`
`in Paragraph 12 below;
`
`(iii) Any outside expert or consultant retained by the Receiving Party to
`
`assist in this action, provided that disclosure is only to the extent necessary to perform such work;
`
`and provided that: (a) such expert or consultant has agreed to be bound by the provisions of the
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 10 of 39 PageID# 490
`
`Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A; (b) such expert or consultant is not a current
`
`officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party, nor anticipated at the time
`
`of retention to become an officer, director or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party; (c)
`
`such expert or consultant accesses the materials in the United States only, and does not transport
`
`them to or access them from any foreign jurisdiction; and (d) no unresolved objections to such
`
`disclosure exist after proper notice has been given to all Parties as set forth in Paragraph 12 below.
`
`(iv) Court reporters, stenographers and videographers retained to record
`
`testimony taken in this action;
`
`(v)
`
`The Court, jury, and court personnel;
`
`(vi) Graphics, translation, design, and/or trial consulting personnel,
`
`having first agreed to be bound by the provisions of the Protective Order by signing a copy of
`
`Exhibit A;
`
`(vii) Mock jurors who have signed an undertaking or agreement agreeing
`
`not to publicly disclose Protected Material and to keep any information concerning Protected
`
`Material confidential;
`
`(viii) Any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her
`
`staff, subject to their agreement to maintain confidentiality to the same degree as required by this
`
`Protective Order; and
`
`(ix) During during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom
`
`disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement
`
`to Be Bound” (Exhibit A). The Receiving Party shall provide the Producing Party notice at
`
`least 3 business days in advance if it reasonably expects a deposition to include Protected
`
`Material so that the Producing Party can ensure that only authorized individuals are present at
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 11 of 39 PageID# 491
`
`those proceedings. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that
`
`reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be
`
`disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order;
`
`(x)
`
`the author, signatory, or recipient of a document containing the
`
`information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or personally knows the
`
`information;
`
`(xi) Any other person with the prior written consent of the Producing
`
`Party.
`
`
`
`9.
`
`
`DISCOVERY MATERIAL DESIGNATED AS “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`– ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
`
`(a)
`
`A Producing Party may designate Discovery Material as “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” if it contains or reflects information that is
`
`extremely confidential and/or sensitive in nature and the Producing Party reasonably believes that
`
`the disclosure of such Discovery Material is likely to cause economic harm or significant
`
`competitive disadvantage to the Producing Party. The Parties agree that the following information,
`
`if non-public, shall be presumed to merit the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’
`
`EYES ONLY” designation: trade secrets, pricing information, financial data, sales information,
`
`sales or marketing forecasts or plans, business plans, sales or marketing strategy, product
`
`development information, engineering documents, testing documents, employee information, and
`
`other non-public information of similar competitive and business sensitivity.
`
`(b)
`
`Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Discovery Material designated as
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” may be disclosed only to:
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 12 of 39 PageID# 492
`
`(i)
`
`The Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel, provided that such Outside
`
`Counsel is not involved in competitive decision-making, as defined by U.S. Steel v. United States,
`
`730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984), on behalf of a Party or a competitor of a Party, and such
`
`Outside Counsel’s immediate paralegals and staff, and any copying or clerical litigation support
`
`services working at the direction of such counsel, paralegals, and staff;
`
`(ii) With respect to Discovery Material produced by the Plaintiff, not
`
`more than three (3) in-house counsel of the Receiving Party, as well as their immediate paralegals
`
`and staff to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this case, provided that: (a) each such
`
`person has agreed to be bound by the provisions of the Protective Order by signing a copy of
`
`Exhibit A; and (b) no unresolved objections to such disclosure exist after proper notice has
`
`been given to all Parties as set forth in Paragraph 12 below;
`
`(iii) Any outside expert or consultant retained by the Receiving Party to
`
`assist in this action, provided that disclosure is only to the extent necessary to perform such work;
`
`and provided that: (a) such expert or consultant has agreed to be bound by the provisions of the
`
`Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A; (b) such expert or consultant is not a current
`
`officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party, nor anticipated at the time
`
`of retention to become an officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party;
`
`(c) such expert or consultant is not involved in competitive decision-making, as defined by U.S.
`
`Steel v. United States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984), on behalf of a Party or a
`
`competitor of a Party; (d) such expert or consultant accesses the materials in the United States
`
`only, and does not transport them to or access them from any foreign jurisdiction; and (e) no
`
`unresolved objections to such disclosure exist after proper notice has been given to all Parties as
`
`set forth in Paragraph 12 below;
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 13 of 39 PageID# 493
`
`(iv) Court reporters, stenographers and videographers retained to record
`
`testimony taken in this action;
`
`(v)
`
`The Court, jury, and court personnel;
`
`(vi) Graphics, translation, design, and/or trial consulting personnel,
`
`having first agreed to be bound by the provisions of the Protective Order by signing a copy of
`
`Exhibit A;
`
`(vii) Any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her
`
`staff, subject to their agreement to maintain confidentiality to the same degree as required by this
`
`Protective Order; and
`
`(viii) During during their depositions, current employee witnesses of
`
`one of the Parties to the Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have
`
`signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A). The Receiving Party
`
`shall provide the Producing Party notice at least 3 business days in advance if it reasonably
`
`expects a deposition to include Protected Material so that the Producing Party can ensure that
`
`only authorized individuals are present at those proceedings. Pages of transcribed deposition
`
`testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately bound
`
`by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this
`
`Stipulated Protective Order
`
`(ix)
`
`the author, signatory, or recipient of a document containing the
`
`information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or personally knows the
`
`information, unless that author, signatory or recipient is a former employee of a Party and that
`
`Party objects to the disclosure based on a good faith belief that the former employee should no
`
`longer have access to the document or its contents to protect its confidentiality.
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 14 of 39 PageID# 494
`
`(x)
`
`Any other person with the prior written consent of the Producing
`
`Party.
`
`(c)
`
`In addition, a Party may disclose arguments and materials derived from
`
`Discovery Material designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
`
`to mock jurors who have signed an undertaking or agreement agreeing not to publicly disclose
`
`Protected Material and to keep any information concerning Protected Material confidential. A
`
`Party may not disclose to mock jurors any original, as-produced materials or information
`
`(including, for example, documents, deposition testimony, or interrogatory responses) produced
`
`by another Party designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
`
`10.
`
`DISCOVERY MATERIAL DESIGNATED AS “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`– SOURCE CODE”
`
`(a)
`
`To the extent production of Source Code becomes necessary to the
`
`prosecution or defense of the case, a Producing Party may designate Source Code as “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” if it comprises or includes confidential, proprietary, and/or
`
`trade secret Source Code.
`
`(b)
`
`Nothing in this Order shall be construed as a representation or admission
`
`that Source Code is properly discoverable in this action, or to obligate any Party to produce any
`
`Source Code.
`
`(c)
`
`Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Discovery Material designated as
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” shall be subject to the provisions set forth in
`
`Paragraph 11 below, and may be disclosed, subject to Paragraph 11 below, solely to:
`
`(i)
`
`The Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel, provided that such Outside
`
`Counsel is not involved in competitive decision-making, as defined by U.S. Steel v. United States,
`
`730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984), on behalf of a Party or a competitor of a Party, and such
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 15 of 39 PageID# 495
`
`Outside Counsel’s immediate paralegals and staff, and any copying or clerical litigation support
`
`services working at the direction of such counsel, paralegals, and staff;
`
`(ii)
`
`Any outside expert or consultant retained by the Receiving Party to
`
`assist in this action, provided that disclosure is only to the extent necessary to perform such work;
`
`and provided that: (a) such expert or consultant has agreed to be bound by the provisions of the
`
`Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A; (b) such expert or consultant is not a current
`
`officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party, nor anticipated at the time
`
`of retention to become an officer, director or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party; (c)
`
`such expert or consultant is not involved in competitive decision-making, as defined by U.S. Steel
`
`v. United States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984), on behalf of a Party or a competitor of
`
`a Party; and (d) no unresolved objections to such disclosure exist after proper notice has been given
`
`to all Parties as set forth in Paragraph 12 below;
`
`(iii) Court reporters, stenographers and videographers retained to record
`
`testimony taken in this action, provided that such reporters and videographers shall not retain or
`
`be given copies of any portions of the source code, which if used during a deposition, will not be
`
`attached as an exhibit to the transcript but instead shall be identified only by its production
`
`numbers;
`
`(iv)
`
`The Court, jury, and court personnel;
`
`(v)
`
`Any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her
`
`staff, subject to their agreement to maintain confidentiality to the same degree as required by this
`
`Protective Order;
`
`(vi) while testifying at deposition or trial in this action only: (i) any
`
`current officer, director, or employee of the Producing Party or original source of the information;
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 16 of 39 PageID# 496
`
`(ii) any person designated by the Producing Party to provide testimony pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6)
`
`of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and/or (iii) any person who authored, previously received
`
`(other than in connection with this litigation), or was directly involved in creating, modifying, or
`
`editing the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE” Information or Items, as evident from
`
`its face or reasonably certain in view of other testimony or evidence. Persons authorized to view
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –SOURCE CODE” Information or Items pursuant to this sub-
`
`paragraph shall not retain or be given copies of the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE
`
`CODE” Information or Items except while so testifying. Only printed copies of the Source Code
`
`will be provided to testifying witnesses during their testimony; and
`
`(vii) Any other person with the prior written consent of the Producing
`
`Party.
`
`11. DISCLOSURE AND REVIEW OF SOURCE CODE
`
`(a)
`
`Any Source Code that is produced by Plaintiff shall be made available for
`
`inspection in electronic format at the New York office of its outside counsel, Stroock & Stroock
`
`& Lavan, or any other location mutually agreed by the Parties. Any Source Code that is produced
`
`by Apple Inc. will be made available for inspection at the New York office of its outside counsel,
`
`Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, or any other location mutually agreed by the Parties. The parties agree
`
`to cooperate in good faith such that maintaining the Producing Party’s source code in any location
`
`described in this paragraph shall not unreasonably hinder the Receiving Party’s ability to
`
`efficiently and effectively conduct the prosecution or defense of this matter. Source Code will be
`
`made available for inspection between the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. local time on business days
`
`(i.e., weekdays that are not Federal holidays), although the Parties will be reasonable in
`
`accommodating reasonable requests to conduct inspections at other times.
`
`
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA Document 50 Filed 04/04/23 Page 17 of 39 PageID# 497
`
`(b)
`
`Prior to the first inspection of any requested Source Code, the Receiving
`
`Party shall provide seven (7) days notice of the Source Code that it wishes to inspect. The
`
`Receiving Party shall provide three (3) days notice prior to any additional inspections.
`
`(c)
`
`Source Code that is designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE
`
`CODE” shall be produced for inspection and review subject to the following provisions,
`
`unless otherwise agreed by the Producing Party:
`
`(i)
`
`All Source Code shall be made available by the Producing Party to
`
`the Receiving Party’s outside counsel and/or experts in a secure room on a secured computer
`
`without Internet access or network access to other computers and on which all access ports have
`
`been disabled (except for one USB port to which a printer may be connected), as necessary and
`
`appropriate to prevent and protect against any unauthorized copying, transmission, removal or
`
`other transfer of any Source Code outside or away from the computer on which the Source Code
`
`is provided for inspection (the “Source Code Computer” in the “Source Code Review Room”).
`
`The Source Code Computer laptop shall be reasonably configured to permit th