throbber
Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 1 of 14 PageID# 684
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`GEOSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`STIPULATED ORDER FOR ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION
`
`Plaintiff Geoscope Technologies Pte Ltd. ("Geoscope" or "Plaintiff), and Defendant
`
`Google LLC ("Google" or "Defendant") (together with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), submit this
`
`Stipulated Order for Electronically Stored Information. The Parties to this action hereby agree and
`
`stipulate to the following:
`
`1.
`
`This Stipulated Order for Electronically Stored Information shall apply to this
`
`case as a supplement to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any other applicable orders and
`
`rules.
`
`2.
`
`Electronically stored information ("ESI") will be part of the discoverable material
`
`in this case and the Parties agree to cooperatively exchange discoverable material and use
`
`reasonable, good faith and proportional efforts to identify, preserve, collect, and produce
`
`information relevant to a Party's claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case
`
`considering the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the amount in controversy, the
`
`Parties' relative access to relevant information, the Parties' resources, the importance of the
`
`discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery
`
`outweighs its likely benefit. This includes identifying appropriate limits on discovery, including
`
`limits on custodians, identification of relevant subject matter, time periods for discovery, and
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 2 of 14 PageID# 685
`
`other parameters to limit and guide preservation and discovery issues. A Party's meaningful
`
`compliance with this order and efforts to promote efficiency and reduce costs will be considered
`
`in cost-shifting determinations.
`
`3.
`
`Costs may be shifted for disproportionate ESI production requests pursuant to
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. Likewise, a Party's nonresponsive or dilatory discovery
`
`tactics are cost-shifting considerations.
`
`4.
`
`This Stipulation relates solely to the protocol in this case for identifying,
`
`collecting, and producing ESI. Any Party may bring a motion to modify or clarify the
`
`application of this Stipulation.
`
`Sources of and Limitations on ESI
`
`5.
`
`The Parties recognize the obligation to take reasonable and proportional steps to
`
`identify and preserve discoverable information within the Party's possession, custody and
`
`control, and agree to identify and preserve ESI from the following data sources:
`
`a.
`
`Electronic mail;
`
`b.
`
`Computer or laptop hard drives and/or storage; and
`
`c.
`
`Network file servers and archives.
`
`6.
`
`General ESI production requests under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 34 and
`
`45 shall not include email or other forms of electronic correspondence (collectively "email").
`
`Neither party is required to search for or produce email in response to discovery requests. To the
`
`extent that any email is found in connection with collecting and producing general (i.e. non-
`
`email) ESI, such emails shall not be withheld solely on the basis of this paragraph. Should a
`
`party determine in good faith that email discovery is required, the parties agree to meet and
`
`confer on whether email production is appropriate and, if so, the procedures for email discovery,
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 3 of 14 PageID# 686
`
`including the identification of custodians, search terms, and timeframes for such discovery.
`
`7.
`
`To reduce the costs and burdens of preservation and to ensure proper ESI is
`
`preserved, the Parties agree that:
`
`a. The Parties will meet and confer in good faith to reach agreement on the
`
`number of custodians per Party for whom ESI will be preserved, searched, reviewed, and
`
`produced
`
`b.
`
`Notwithstanding prior agreement on the custodians and search terms to be used
`
`for electronic searches, the Parties agree to meet and confer in good faith on the need for
`
`different or additional custodians or search terms;
`
`c.
`
`The following data sources are not reasonably accessible because of undue
`
`burden or cost pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(B) and ESI from these sources will be
`
`preserved pursuant to normal business retention, but not searched, reviewed, or produced:
`
`1. backup systems and/or tapes used for disaster recovery; and
`
`2. systems no longer in use that cannot be accessed.
`
`8.
`
`Absent a showing of good cause the following categories of ESI need not be
`
`searched, preserved or collected and are considered inaccessible due to undue burden and/or
`
`expense, or because the information is more reasonably available elsewhere:
`
`a.
`
`Deleted, slack, fragmented, or unallocated data only accessible by
`
`forensics;
`
`b.
`
`Random access memory (RAM), temporary files, or other
`
`ephemeral data that are difficult to preserve without disabling the operating
`
`system;
`
`c.
`
`On-line data such as temporary internet files, history, cache,
`
`cookies, and the like;
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 4 of 14 PageID# 687
`
`d.
`
`Data in metadata fields that are frequently updated automatically
`
`as part of the usual operation of a software application, operating system, or
`
`network, such as last-opened or last modified dates;
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`Voice messages;
`
`Instant messages and chats that are not chronicled to an email
`
`archive system;
`
`g.
`
`Information contained on handsets, mobile devices, personal
`
`digital assistants, and tablets that is duplicative of information that resides in a
`
`reasonably accessible data source;
`
`h.
`
`Mobile device activity logs;
`
`i.
`
`Server, system, or network logs except for those related to or
`
`involved in the functionality or operation of any Accused Instrumentalities;
`
`j.
`
`Dynamic fields in databases or log files not stored or retained in
`
`the usual course of business;
`
`k.
`
`Automatically saved versions of documents and emails;
`
`1.
`
`Video and audio recordings; and
`
`m. Other forms of ESI whose preservation requires unreasonable,
`
`disproportionate, non-routine measures that are not utilized in the ordinary
`
`course of business.
`
`Search
`
`9.
`
`The parties agree that in responding to an initial Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 request, they
`
`will meet and confer about methods to search ESI in order to identify ESI that is subject to
`
`production in discovery and filter out ESI that is not subject to discovery.
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 5 of 14 PageID# 688
`
`b)
`
`Each party will use its best efforts to filter out common system files and
`
`application executable files by using a commercially reasonable hash identification process.
`
`Hash values that may be filtered out during this process are located in the National Software
`
`Reference Library ("NSRL") NIST hash set list. Additional culling of file types based on file
`
`header information may include, but are not limited to: Application Package File, Backup
`
`Files, Batch Files, Binary Disc Image, C++ File Formats, Cascading Style Sheet, Configuration
`
`File, Database File, Dictionary Files, Dynamic Link Library, Event Log Files, Executable
`
`Files, Hypertext Cascading Stylesheet, Java Archive Files, JavaScript files, JavaScript Source
`
`Code and Class Files, Macintosh Resource Fork Files, MP3 Files, MP4 Files, Package
`
`Manager Files, Program Files, Program Installers, Python Script Files, Quicktime Files, Shell
`
`Script Files, System or Temporary Files, Thumbnail Cache Files, Troff Files, TrueType Font
`
`Files, Video Media Files, Waveform Audio File Format, Windows Cabinet File, Windows
`
`Command Files, Windows File Shortcut, Windows Help Files, Windows Metafiles and
`
`Enhanced Metafiles, Windows Spool Files, Windows System File. Source code files will be
`
`provided according to the Protective Order and not included in custodial data productions.
`
`Production Format
`
`10.
`
`Except as otherwise provided below, ESI and hard copy documents shall be
`
`produced in accordance with the specifications set forth in Appendix I to this Order.
`
`a. an ASCII delimited data file (.DAT) using standard delimiters;
`
`b. an image load file (.OPT) that can be loaded into commercially acceptable
`
`production software {e.g.. Relativity);
`
`c. TIFF images; and
`
`d. Document level .TXT files for all documents containing extracted full text or
`
`OCR text.
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 6 of 14 PageID# 689
`
`11.
`
`Documents that exist as ESI shall be converted and produced as TIFFs, except as
`
`provided below. Where the TIFF image is unreadable or has materially degraded the quality of
`
`the original, the producing Party shall endeavor to provide a higher quality TIFF image or the
`
`native or original file upon request. The Parties reserve their rights to reasonably seek additional
`
`electronic documents in their native format.
`
`12.
`
`Documents originating in paper form will be scanned at 300 DPI and undergo
`
`Optical Character Recognition (OCR). These documents will be produced in single-page TIFF
`
`image format as indicated below together with document-level text files. Paper documents will
`
`be logically unitized to reflect correct document boundaries for each document.
`
`13.
`
`All production documents will be produced with image load files, the data fields
`
`provided in the table in Appendix 1, below, and either extracted text or text generated using OCR
`
`that render documents searchable. In those instances where redaction is used, OCR text will be
`
`provided in lieu of the extracted text to allow for removal of the redacted text from production.
`
`For documents produced in native format, in addition to producing extracted text (or OCR text)
`
`files and the data fields in the table in Appendix 1 below, the producing Party will provide
`
`placeholder TIFF images endorsed with the production number and level of confidentiality
`
`pursuant to any applicable protective orders in this case.
`
`14.
`
`ESI will be processed and produced with all hidden text (e.g., track changes,
`
`speaker's notes, hidden rows or columns, comments, markups, notes, etc.) and formulas exposed
`
`and extracted in the TIFF image or extracted text file.
`
`15.
`
`ESI shall be produced as kept in the ordinary course of business.
`
`16.
`
`Parent-child relationships will be maintained in production. A parent document
`
`(/.e., a document with attachments, enclosures, exhibits, or other subordinate documents) and its
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 7 of 14 PageID# 690
`
`subordinate documents shall be produced as a group and in the order and form in which they are
`
`kept. More specifically, each discrete document in the group will be assigned its own production
`
`numbers and will be identified as a separate document in the load files, but the documents within
`
`a group will be produced consecutively, and all documents in the group will have the same group
`
`range (as indicated by the BEGATTACH and ENDATTACH fields), which will begin with the
`
`beginning production number of the first document in the group and will end with the ending
`
`production number of the last document in the group.
`
`17.
`
`If a particular document warrants a different production format, the Parties will
`
`cooperate in good faith to arrange for a mutually acceptable production format.
`
`18.
`
`Documents shall be encrypted and produced through electronic means, such as
`
`secure file sharing methods {e.g., FTP), or on flash drive or extemal hard drive ("Production
`
`Media"). Each piece of Production Media shall identify a production number corresponding to
`
`the production volume {e.g., "VOLOOl"). Each piece of Production Media shall also identify: (a)
`
`the producing Party's name; (2) the production date; (3) the Bates number range of the materials
`
`contained on the Production Media. Nothing in this Order will preclude or impair any and all
`
`protections provided the Parties by any applicable protective order(s). Any data produced by the
`
`producing Party must be protected in transit, in use, and at rest by all in receipt of such data.
`
`Parties will use best efforts to avoid the unnecessary copying or transmittal of produced
`
`documents. Any copies made of produced data must be kept on media or hardware employing
`
`whole-disk or folder level encryption or otherwise secured on information systems and networks
`
`in a manner consistent with the best practices for data protection.
`
`Image Format
`
`19.
`
`Documents that are converted to TIFF format will be produced in accordance with
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 8 of 14 PageID# 691
`
`the following technical specifications:
`
`20.
`
`Single-page, Group IV TIFF image files with at least 300 dpi;
`
`21.
`
`Presentations {e.g., PowerPoint slides) and PDF documents in color shall be
`
`produced in color. Other documents or ESI need not be produced initially in color. However, if
`
`an original document or ESI item contains color markings, the requesting Party may, in good
`
`faith, make reasonable requests for the document or ESI item to be produced in its original
`
`colors.
`
`22.
`
`Bates numbers should be endorsed on the lower right comer of all TIFF images
`
`(including placeholder TIFF images for native files) with a unique, consistently formatted
`
`identifier, i.e. alpha prefix along with a fixed length number (e.g., ABCOOOOOOl). The number
`
`of digits in the numeric portion of the Bates number format should not change in subsequent
`
`productions;
`
`23.
`
`Confidentiality designations, if any, will be endorsed on the lower left comer of
`
`all TIFF images (including placeholder TIFF images for native files);
`
`24.
`
`Presentations (e.g., PowerPoint slides) should be rendered to TIFF in full slide
`
`image format, with any hidden slides or speaker's notes unhidden, with any speaker's notes
`
`shown on the same TIFF image as the corresponding slide or immediately after the
`
`corresponding slide;
`
`25.
`
`Spreadsheets (e.g.. Excel) will only be rendered to TIFF image format if (1) the
`
`file can be fully viewed, meaning that all hidden information in the Excel file (e.g., rows,
`
`columns and comments) will be rendered to TIFF; or (2) the Excel file has undergone redaction.
`
`Otherwise such documents will be produced natively, as described below;
`
`26.
`
`The Parties agree to respond to reasonable and specific requests for the production
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 9 of 14 PageID# 692
`
`of higher resolution images. Nothing in this Stipulation shall preclude a producing Party from
`
`objecting to such requests as unreasonable in number, timing or scope, provided that a producing
`
`Party shall not object if the document as originally produced is illegible or difficult to read. The
`
`producing Party shall have the option of responding by producing a native-file version of the
`
`document. If a dispute arises with regard to requests for higher resolution images, the Parties will
`
`meet and confer in good faith to try and resolve it.
`
`27.
`
`The Parties are not obligated to include populate manually any of the metadata
`
`fields in Appendix 1 if such fields do not exist or cannot be extracted from a document, with the
`
`exception of the following: (a) BEGBATES (or PRODBEG), (b) ENDBATES (or PRODEND),
`
`(c) BEGATTACH, (d) ENDATTACH, (e) CONFIDENTIALITY, (f) CUSTODIAN, (g) TEXT,
`
`and (h) NATIVEFILE (if applicable).
`
`28.
`
`If particular documents warrant a different production format, the Parties will
`
`cooperate in good faith to arrange for a mutually acceptable production format.
`
`29.
`
`Notwithstanding the foregoing, all documents that the producing Party received
`
`from third parties should be produced in the same manner and form, including native files and all
`
`metadata, as the producing Party received from the producing third party.
`
`Searchable Text
`
`30.
`
`Searchable text of entire documents will be produced either as extracted text for
`
`all documents that originate in electronic format, or, for paper documents and any document
`
`from which text cannot be extracted, as text generated using Optical Character Recognition
`
`(OCR) technology. For redacted documents, the full text of the redacted version of the
`
`document will be produced.
`
`31.
`
`Searchable text will be produced as a document-level multi-page ASCII text file
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 10 of 14 PageID# 693
`
`with the text file named the same as the PRODBEG field, placed in a separate folder. The full
`
`path of the text file must be provided in the .DAT file for the TEXT field.
`
`Native Files
`
`32. To the extent that they are produced in this action, audio, video, and multi-media
`
`files will be produced in native format.
`
`33.
`
`Native file documents may be included with the electronic production using the
`
`below criteria:
`
`34.
`
`Native file documents must be named the same as the PRODBEG number;
`
`35.
`
`The full path of the native file must be provided in the .DAT file for the
`
`NATIVE_FILE field;
`
`36. When native files are produced, a TIFF image placeholder will be produced
`
`endorsed with the file name. Bates number, confidentiality designation, and the legend
`
`"Document Produced in Native Format" (or something similar);
`
`37.
`
`Native files will be produced applicable metadata fields as set forth in the table in
`
`Appendix 1.
`
`38.
`
`If documents produced in native format are printed for use in depositions, motions
`
`or hearings, the Party printing the document must label the front page of the file that is printed
`
`with the corresponding production number and a sequencing page number and, if applicable, the
`
`confidentiality designation assigned by the producing Party to that file under an applicable
`
`protective order to be entered in this action.
`
`De-Duplication
`
`39. A Party is required to produce only a single copy of a responsive document, and a
`
`Party may de-duplicate responsive ESI across Custodians. A Party may also de-duplicate email
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 11 of 14 PageID# 694
`
`threads and attachments as follows: In an email thread, only the most evolved responsive email
`
`in a thread will be produced. Where an earlier-in-thread email has a responsive attachment not
`
`contained within the most evolved responsive email, the most evolved earlier-in-thread email
`
`containing the attachment will also be produced along with its attachment. An attachment is a
`
`file associated with an email for retention and storage as a single message unit.
`
`40.
`
`Should a producing Party de-duplicate any documents in accordance with the
`
`procedure outlined above, the producing Party agrees to produce in the CUSTODIAN data field
`
`listed in the table in Appendix 1 the name of each custodian who possessed a duplicate copy of
`
`any such documents.
`
`41.
`
`If applicable, no provision of this Order affects the inspection or production of
`
`source code which will be collected and made available consistent with the Protective Order
`
`governing this case.
`
`Documents Protected from Discovery
`
`42. As set forth in the Protective Order, pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(d), the
`
`production of a privileged or work-product-protected document is not a waiver of privilege or
`
`protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. Disclosures
`
`among Defendant's attorneys and attorneys for the Defendant in Geoscope Technologies Pte.
`
`Ltd. V. Apple Inc., No. 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA (E.D. Va.), of work product or other
`
`communications relating to issues of common interest shall not affect or be deemed a waiver of
`
`any applicable privilege or protection from disclosure.
`
`b)
`
`Activities undertaken in compliance with the duty to preserve information are
`
`protected from discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3)(A) and (B).
`
`c)
`
`Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to require disclosure of irrelevant
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 12 of 14 PageID# 695
`
`infomiation or relevant information protected by the attorney-client privilege, work-product
`
`doctrine, or any other applicable privilege or immunity. The parties do not waive any
`
`objections to the production, discoverability, admissibility, or confidentiality of documents and
`
`ESI.
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
`
`DATED: April 3. 2023
`
`/s/ Christopher W. Bascom
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`DATED: April 3. 2023
`
`/s/ Stephen E. Noona
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`DATED:
`
`./S/
`John F, Anderson
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`John F. Anderson
`
`United States Biitiitt/Magistrate Judge
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 13 of 14 PageID# 696
`
`Appendix 1
`
`A. Production Components. Productions shall include, in addition to single page TIFFs
`and Text Files, (a) an ASCII delimited metadata file (.txt, .dat, or .csv), and (b) an image
`load file that can be loaded into commercially acceptable production software (e.g..
`Concordance).
`
`B. Image Load File shall contain the following comma-delimited fields:
`BEGBATES, VOLUME, IMAGE FILE PATH, DOCUMENT BREAK, FOLDER
`BREAK, BOX BREAK, PAGE COUNT
`
`C. Metadata Load File shall be delimited according to the following characters:
`0 Delimiter = D (ASCII:0020)
`0 Text-Qualifier = (ASCI1:00254)
`
`D. The following Metadata Fields shall appear in the metadata load file:
`
`Field Name
`
`BEGBATES (or
`PRODBEG)
`
`Field Description
`
`Beginning Bates number as stamped on the production image
`
`ENDBATES (or ENDBEG) Ending Bates number as stamped on the production image
`
`BEGATTACH
`
`ENDATTACH
`
`CUSTODIAN
`
`First production Bates number of the first document in a family
`
`Last production Bates number of the last document in a family
`
`Includes the Individual (Custodian) from whom the documents
`originated and all Individual(s) whose documents de-duplicated
`out (De-Duped Custodian).
`
`SUBJECT
`
`TITLE
`
`Subject line of email
`
`Title from properties of document
`
`DATESENT
`
`Date email was sent (format: MMfDD/YYYY)
`
`TO
`
`FROM
`
`CC
`
`BCC
`
`AUTHOR
`
`All recipients that were included on the "To" line of the email
`
`The name and email address of the sender of the email
`
`All recipients that were included on the "CC" line of the email
`
`All recipients that were included on the "BCC" line of the email
`
`Any value populated in the Author field of the document
`properties
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 14 of 14 PageID# 697
`
`FILENAME
`
`Filename of an electronic document (Edoc only)
`
`DATEMOD
`
`DATECREATED
`
`Date an electronic document was last modified (format:
`MM/DD/YYYY) (Edoc only)
`
`Date the document was created (format: MM/DD/YYYY)
`(Edoc only)
`
`NATIVELINK
`
`Native File Link (Native Files only)
`
`TEXT
`
`PAGES
`
`The extracted text or OCR text of the document
`
`The number of pages of each individual document
`
`FILESIZE
`
`Size of the document in KB
`
`FILEEXTENSION
`
`The file extension
`
`CONFIDENTIALITY
`
`The confidentiality designation assigned
`
`14
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket