`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`GEOSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`STIPULATED ORDER FOR ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION
`
`Plaintiff Geoscope Technologies Pte Ltd. ("Geoscope" or "Plaintiff), and Defendant
`
`Google LLC ("Google" or "Defendant") (together with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), submit this
`
`Stipulated Order for Electronically Stored Information. The Parties to this action hereby agree and
`
`stipulate to the following:
`
`1.
`
`This Stipulated Order for Electronically Stored Information shall apply to this
`
`case as a supplement to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any other applicable orders and
`
`rules.
`
`2.
`
`Electronically stored information ("ESI") will be part of the discoverable material
`
`in this case and the Parties agree to cooperatively exchange discoverable material and use
`
`reasonable, good faith and proportional efforts to identify, preserve, collect, and produce
`
`information relevant to a Party's claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case
`
`considering the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the amount in controversy, the
`
`Parties' relative access to relevant information, the Parties' resources, the importance of the
`
`discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery
`
`outweighs its likely benefit. This includes identifying appropriate limits on discovery, including
`
`limits on custodians, identification of relevant subject matter, time periods for discovery, and
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 2 of 14 PageID# 685
`
`other parameters to limit and guide preservation and discovery issues. A Party's meaningful
`
`compliance with this order and efforts to promote efficiency and reduce costs will be considered
`
`in cost-shifting determinations.
`
`3.
`
`Costs may be shifted for disproportionate ESI production requests pursuant to
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. Likewise, a Party's nonresponsive or dilatory discovery
`
`tactics are cost-shifting considerations.
`
`4.
`
`This Stipulation relates solely to the protocol in this case for identifying,
`
`collecting, and producing ESI. Any Party may bring a motion to modify or clarify the
`
`application of this Stipulation.
`
`Sources of and Limitations on ESI
`
`5.
`
`The Parties recognize the obligation to take reasonable and proportional steps to
`
`identify and preserve discoverable information within the Party's possession, custody and
`
`control, and agree to identify and preserve ESI from the following data sources:
`
`a.
`
`Electronic mail;
`
`b.
`
`Computer or laptop hard drives and/or storage; and
`
`c.
`
`Network file servers and archives.
`
`6.
`
`General ESI production requests under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 34 and
`
`45 shall not include email or other forms of electronic correspondence (collectively "email").
`
`Neither party is required to search for or produce email in response to discovery requests. To the
`
`extent that any email is found in connection with collecting and producing general (i.e. non-
`
`email) ESI, such emails shall not be withheld solely on the basis of this paragraph. Should a
`
`party determine in good faith that email discovery is required, the parties agree to meet and
`
`confer on whether email production is appropriate and, if so, the procedures for email discovery,
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 3 of 14 PageID# 686
`
`including the identification of custodians, search terms, and timeframes for such discovery.
`
`7.
`
`To reduce the costs and burdens of preservation and to ensure proper ESI is
`
`preserved, the Parties agree that:
`
`a. The Parties will meet and confer in good faith to reach agreement on the
`
`number of custodians per Party for whom ESI will be preserved, searched, reviewed, and
`
`produced
`
`b.
`
`Notwithstanding prior agreement on the custodians and search terms to be used
`
`for electronic searches, the Parties agree to meet and confer in good faith on the need for
`
`different or additional custodians or search terms;
`
`c.
`
`The following data sources are not reasonably accessible because of undue
`
`burden or cost pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(B) and ESI from these sources will be
`
`preserved pursuant to normal business retention, but not searched, reviewed, or produced:
`
`1. backup systems and/or tapes used for disaster recovery; and
`
`2. systems no longer in use that cannot be accessed.
`
`8.
`
`Absent a showing of good cause the following categories of ESI need not be
`
`searched, preserved or collected and are considered inaccessible due to undue burden and/or
`
`expense, or because the information is more reasonably available elsewhere:
`
`a.
`
`Deleted, slack, fragmented, or unallocated data only accessible by
`
`forensics;
`
`b.
`
`Random access memory (RAM), temporary files, or other
`
`ephemeral data that are difficult to preserve without disabling the operating
`
`system;
`
`c.
`
`On-line data such as temporary internet files, history, cache,
`
`cookies, and the like;
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 4 of 14 PageID# 687
`
`d.
`
`Data in metadata fields that are frequently updated automatically
`
`as part of the usual operation of a software application, operating system, or
`
`network, such as last-opened or last modified dates;
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`Voice messages;
`
`Instant messages and chats that are not chronicled to an email
`
`archive system;
`
`g.
`
`Information contained on handsets, mobile devices, personal
`
`digital assistants, and tablets that is duplicative of information that resides in a
`
`reasonably accessible data source;
`
`h.
`
`Mobile device activity logs;
`
`i.
`
`Server, system, or network logs except for those related to or
`
`involved in the functionality or operation of any Accused Instrumentalities;
`
`j.
`
`Dynamic fields in databases or log files not stored or retained in
`
`the usual course of business;
`
`k.
`
`Automatically saved versions of documents and emails;
`
`1.
`
`Video and audio recordings; and
`
`m. Other forms of ESI whose preservation requires unreasonable,
`
`disproportionate, non-routine measures that are not utilized in the ordinary
`
`course of business.
`
`Search
`
`9.
`
`The parties agree that in responding to an initial Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 request, they
`
`will meet and confer about methods to search ESI in order to identify ESI that is subject to
`
`production in discovery and filter out ESI that is not subject to discovery.
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 5 of 14 PageID# 688
`
`b)
`
`Each party will use its best efforts to filter out common system files and
`
`application executable files by using a commercially reasonable hash identification process.
`
`Hash values that may be filtered out during this process are located in the National Software
`
`Reference Library ("NSRL") NIST hash set list. Additional culling of file types based on file
`
`header information may include, but are not limited to: Application Package File, Backup
`
`Files, Batch Files, Binary Disc Image, C++ File Formats, Cascading Style Sheet, Configuration
`
`File, Database File, Dictionary Files, Dynamic Link Library, Event Log Files, Executable
`
`Files, Hypertext Cascading Stylesheet, Java Archive Files, JavaScript files, JavaScript Source
`
`Code and Class Files, Macintosh Resource Fork Files, MP3 Files, MP4 Files, Package
`
`Manager Files, Program Files, Program Installers, Python Script Files, Quicktime Files, Shell
`
`Script Files, System or Temporary Files, Thumbnail Cache Files, Troff Files, TrueType Font
`
`Files, Video Media Files, Waveform Audio File Format, Windows Cabinet File, Windows
`
`Command Files, Windows File Shortcut, Windows Help Files, Windows Metafiles and
`
`Enhanced Metafiles, Windows Spool Files, Windows System File. Source code files will be
`
`provided according to the Protective Order and not included in custodial data productions.
`
`Production Format
`
`10.
`
`Except as otherwise provided below, ESI and hard copy documents shall be
`
`produced in accordance with the specifications set forth in Appendix I to this Order.
`
`a. an ASCII delimited data file (.DAT) using standard delimiters;
`
`b. an image load file (.OPT) that can be loaded into commercially acceptable
`
`production software {e.g.. Relativity);
`
`c. TIFF images; and
`
`d. Document level .TXT files for all documents containing extracted full text or
`
`OCR text.
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 6 of 14 PageID# 689
`
`11.
`
`Documents that exist as ESI shall be converted and produced as TIFFs, except as
`
`provided below. Where the TIFF image is unreadable or has materially degraded the quality of
`
`the original, the producing Party shall endeavor to provide a higher quality TIFF image or the
`
`native or original file upon request. The Parties reserve their rights to reasonably seek additional
`
`electronic documents in their native format.
`
`12.
`
`Documents originating in paper form will be scanned at 300 DPI and undergo
`
`Optical Character Recognition (OCR). These documents will be produced in single-page TIFF
`
`image format as indicated below together with document-level text files. Paper documents will
`
`be logically unitized to reflect correct document boundaries for each document.
`
`13.
`
`All production documents will be produced with image load files, the data fields
`
`provided in the table in Appendix 1, below, and either extracted text or text generated using OCR
`
`that render documents searchable. In those instances where redaction is used, OCR text will be
`
`provided in lieu of the extracted text to allow for removal of the redacted text from production.
`
`For documents produced in native format, in addition to producing extracted text (or OCR text)
`
`files and the data fields in the table in Appendix 1 below, the producing Party will provide
`
`placeholder TIFF images endorsed with the production number and level of confidentiality
`
`pursuant to any applicable protective orders in this case.
`
`14.
`
`ESI will be processed and produced with all hidden text (e.g., track changes,
`
`speaker's notes, hidden rows or columns, comments, markups, notes, etc.) and formulas exposed
`
`and extracted in the TIFF image or extracted text file.
`
`15.
`
`ESI shall be produced as kept in the ordinary course of business.
`
`16.
`
`Parent-child relationships will be maintained in production. A parent document
`
`(/.e., a document with attachments, enclosures, exhibits, or other subordinate documents) and its
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 7 of 14 PageID# 690
`
`subordinate documents shall be produced as a group and in the order and form in which they are
`
`kept. More specifically, each discrete document in the group will be assigned its own production
`
`numbers and will be identified as a separate document in the load files, but the documents within
`
`a group will be produced consecutively, and all documents in the group will have the same group
`
`range (as indicated by the BEGATTACH and ENDATTACH fields), which will begin with the
`
`beginning production number of the first document in the group and will end with the ending
`
`production number of the last document in the group.
`
`17.
`
`If a particular document warrants a different production format, the Parties will
`
`cooperate in good faith to arrange for a mutually acceptable production format.
`
`18.
`
`Documents shall be encrypted and produced through electronic means, such as
`
`secure file sharing methods {e.g., FTP), or on flash drive or extemal hard drive ("Production
`
`Media"). Each piece of Production Media shall identify a production number corresponding to
`
`the production volume {e.g., "VOLOOl"). Each piece of Production Media shall also identify: (a)
`
`the producing Party's name; (2) the production date; (3) the Bates number range of the materials
`
`contained on the Production Media. Nothing in this Order will preclude or impair any and all
`
`protections provided the Parties by any applicable protective order(s). Any data produced by the
`
`producing Party must be protected in transit, in use, and at rest by all in receipt of such data.
`
`Parties will use best efforts to avoid the unnecessary copying or transmittal of produced
`
`documents. Any copies made of produced data must be kept on media or hardware employing
`
`whole-disk or folder level encryption or otherwise secured on information systems and networks
`
`in a manner consistent with the best practices for data protection.
`
`Image Format
`
`19.
`
`Documents that are converted to TIFF format will be produced in accordance with
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 8 of 14 PageID# 691
`
`the following technical specifications:
`
`20.
`
`Single-page, Group IV TIFF image files with at least 300 dpi;
`
`21.
`
`Presentations {e.g., PowerPoint slides) and PDF documents in color shall be
`
`produced in color. Other documents or ESI need not be produced initially in color. However, if
`
`an original document or ESI item contains color markings, the requesting Party may, in good
`
`faith, make reasonable requests for the document or ESI item to be produced in its original
`
`colors.
`
`22.
`
`Bates numbers should be endorsed on the lower right comer of all TIFF images
`
`(including placeholder TIFF images for native files) with a unique, consistently formatted
`
`identifier, i.e. alpha prefix along with a fixed length number (e.g., ABCOOOOOOl). The number
`
`of digits in the numeric portion of the Bates number format should not change in subsequent
`
`productions;
`
`23.
`
`Confidentiality designations, if any, will be endorsed on the lower left comer of
`
`all TIFF images (including placeholder TIFF images for native files);
`
`24.
`
`Presentations (e.g., PowerPoint slides) should be rendered to TIFF in full slide
`
`image format, with any hidden slides or speaker's notes unhidden, with any speaker's notes
`
`shown on the same TIFF image as the corresponding slide or immediately after the
`
`corresponding slide;
`
`25.
`
`Spreadsheets (e.g.. Excel) will only be rendered to TIFF image format if (1) the
`
`file can be fully viewed, meaning that all hidden information in the Excel file (e.g., rows,
`
`columns and comments) will be rendered to TIFF; or (2) the Excel file has undergone redaction.
`
`Otherwise such documents will be produced natively, as described below;
`
`26.
`
`The Parties agree to respond to reasonable and specific requests for the production
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 9 of 14 PageID# 692
`
`of higher resolution images. Nothing in this Stipulation shall preclude a producing Party from
`
`objecting to such requests as unreasonable in number, timing or scope, provided that a producing
`
`Party shall not object if the document as originally produced is illegible or difficult to read. The
`
`producing Party shall have the option of responding by producing a native-file version of the
`
`document. If a dispute arises with regard to requests for higher resolution images, the Parties will
`
`meet and confer in good faith to try and resolve it.
`
`27.
`
`The Parties are not obligated to include populate manually any of the metadata
`
`fields in Appendix 1 if such fields do not exist or cannot be extracted from a document, with the
`
`exception of the following: (a) BEGBATES (or PRODBEG), (b) ENDBATES (or PRODEND),
`
`(c) BEGATTACH, (d) ENDATTACH, (e) CONFIDENTIALITY, (f) CUSTODIAN, (g) TEXT,
`
`and (h) NATIVEFILE (if applicable).
`
`28.
`
`If particular documents warrant a different production format, the Parties will
`
`cooperate in good faith to arrange for a mutually acceptable production format.
`
`29.
`
`Notwithstanding the foregoing, all documents that the producing Party received
`
`from third parties should be produced in the same manner and form, including native files and all
`
`metadata, as the producing Party received from the producing third party.
`
`Searchable Text
`
`30.
`
`Searchable text of entire documents will be produced either as extracted text for
`
`all documents that originate in electronic format, or, for paper documents and any document
`
`from which text cannot be extracted, as text generated using Optical Character Recognition
`
`(OCR) technology. For redacted documents, the full text of the redacted version of the
`
`document will be produced.
`
`31.
`
`Searchable text will be produced as a document-level multi-page ASCII text file
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 10 of 14 PageID# 693
`
`with the text file named the same as the PRODBEG field, placed in a separate folder. The full
`
`path of the text file must be provided in the .DAT file for the TEXT field.
`
`Native Files
`
`32. To the extent that they are produced in this action, audio, video, and multi-media
`
`files will be produced in native format.
`
`33.
`
`Native file documents may be included with the electronic production using the
`
`below criteria:
`
`34.
`
`Native file documents must be named the same as the PRODBEG number;
`
`35.
`
`The full path of the native file must be provided in the .DAT file for the
`
`NATIVE_FILE field;
`
`36. When native files are produced, a TIFF image placeholder will be produced
`
`endorsed with the file name. Bates number, confidentiality designation, and the legend
`
`"Document Produced in Native Format" (or something similar);
`
`37.
`
`Native files will be produced applicable metadata fields as set forth in the table in
`
`Appendix 1.
`
`38.
`
`If documents produced in native format are printed for use in depositions, motions
`
`or hearings, the Party printing the document must label the front page of the file that is printed
`
`with the corresponding production number and a sequencing page number and, if applicable, the
`
`confidentiality designation assigned by the producing Party to that file under an applicable
`
`protective order to be entered in this action.
`
`De-Duplication
`
`39. A Party is required to produce only a single copy of a responsive document, and a
`
`Party may de-duplicate responsive ESI across Custodians. A Party may also de-duplicate email
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 11 of 14 PageID# 694
`
`threads and attachments as follows: In an email thread, only the most evolved responsive email
`
`in a thread will be produced. Where an earlier-in-thread email has a responsive attachment not
`
`contained within the most evolved responsive email, the most evolved earlier-in-thread email
`
`containing the attachment will also be produced along with its attachment. An attachment is a
`
`file associated with an email for retention and storage as a single message unit.
`
`40.
`
`Should a producing Party de-duplicate any documents in accordance with the
`
`procedure outlined above, the producing Party agrees to produce in the CUSTODIAN data field
`
`listed in the table in Appendix 1 the name of each custodian who possessed a duplicate copy of
`
`any such documents.
`
`41.
`
`If applicable, no provision of this Order affects the inspection or production of
`
`source code which will be collected and made available consistent with the Protective Order
`
`governing this case.
`
`Documents Protected from Discovery
`
`42. As set forth in the Protective Order, pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(d), the
`
`production of a privileged or work-product-protected document is not a waiver of privilege or
`
`protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. Disclosures
`
`among Defendant's attorneys and attorneys for the Defendant in Geoscope Technologies Pte.
`
`Ltd. V. Apple Inc., No. 1:22-cv-01373-MSN-JFA (E.D. Va.), of work product or other
`
`communications relating to issues of common interest shall not affect or be deemed a waiver of
`
`any applicable privilege or protection from disclosure.
`
`b)
`
`Activities undertaken in compliance with the duty to preserve information are
`
`protected from discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3)(A) and (B).
`
`c)
`
`Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to require disclosure of irrelevant
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 12 of 14 PageID# 695
`
`infomiation or relevant information protected by the attorney-client privilege, work-product
`
`doctrine, or any other applicable privilege or immunity. The parties do not waive any
`
`objections to the production, discoverability, admissibility, or confidentiality of documents and
`
`ESI.
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
`
`DATED: April 3. 2023
`
`/s/ Christopher W. Bascom
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`DATED: April 3. 2023
`
`/s/ Stephen E. Noona
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`DATED:
`
`./S/
`John F, Anderson
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`John F. Anderson
`
`United States Biitiitt/Magistrate Judge
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 13 of 14 PageID# 696
`
`Appendix 1
`
`A. Production Components. Productions shall include, in addition to single page TIFFs
`and Text Files, (a) an ASCII delimited metadata file (.txt, .dat, or .csv), and (b) an image
`load file that can be loaded into commercially acceptable production software (e.g..
`Concordance).
`
`B. Image Load File shall contain the following comma-delimited fields:
`BEGBATES, VOLUME, IMAGE FILE PATH, DOCUMENT BREAK, FOLDER
`BREAK, BOX BREAK, PAGE COUNT
`
`C. Metadata Load File shall be delimited according to the following characters:
`0 Delimiter = D (ASCII:0020)
`0 Text-Qualifier = (ASCI1:00254)
`
`D. The following Metadata Fields shall appear in the metadata load file:
`
`Field Name
`
`BEGBATES (or
`PRODBEG)
`
`Field Description
`
`Beginning Bates number as stamped on the production image
`
`ENDBATES (or ENDBEG) Ending Bates number as stamped on the production image
`
`BEGATTACH
`
`ENDATTACH
`
`CUSTODIAN
`
`First production Bates number of the first document in a family
`
`Last production Bates number of the last document in a family
`
`Includes the Individual (Custodian) from whom the documents
`originated and all Individual(s) whose documents de-duplicated
`out (De-Duped Custodian).
`
`SUBJECT
`
`TITLE
`
`Subject line of email
`
`Title from properties of document
`
`DATESENT
`
`Date email was sent (format: MMfDD/YYYY)
`
`TO
`
`FROM
`
`CC
`
`BCC
`
`AUTHOR
`
`All recipients that were included on the "To" line of the email
`
`The name and email address of the sender of the email
`
`All recipients that were included on the "CC" line of the email
`
`All recipients that were included on the "BCC" line of the email
`
`Any value populated in the Author field of the document
`properties
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 59 Filed 04/04/23 Page 14 of 14 PageID# 697
`
`FILENAME
`
`Filename of an electronic document (Edoc only)
`
`DATEMOD
`
`DATECREATED
`
`Date an electronic document was last modified (format:
`MM/DD/YYYY) (Edoc only)
`
`Date the document was created (format: MM/DD/YYYY)
`(Edoc only)
`
`NATIVELINK
`
`Native File Link (Native Files only)
`
`TEXT
`
`PAGES
`
`The extracted text or OCR text of the document
`
`The number of pages of each individual document
`
`FILESIZE
`
`Size of the document in KB
`
`FILEEXTENSION
`
`The file extension
`
`CONFIDENTIALITY
`
`The confidentiality designation assigned
`
`14
`
`