`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 1 of 35 PageID# 625
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA
`
`
`
`
`GEOSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`1.
`
`STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
`
`Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of
`
`confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public
`
`disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted.
`
`Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following
`
`Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket
`
`protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from
`
`public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to
`
`confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The Parties further acknowledge, as
`
`set forth in Section 14.5, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file
`
`confidential information under seal; Local Civil Rule 5 sets forth the procedures that must be
`
`followed and the standards that will be applied when a Party seeks permission from the Court to
`
`file material under seal.
`
`2.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`2.1
`
`Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 2 of 35 PageID# 626
`
`
`information or items under this Order.
`
`2.2
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is
`
`generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule
`
`of Civil Procedure 26(c).
`
`2.3
`
`Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as
`
`well as their support staff).
`
`2.4
`
`Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that
`
`it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE
`
`CODE”.
`
`2.5
`
`Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the
`
`medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things,
`
`testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or
`
`responses to discovery in this matter.
`
`2.6
`
`Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to
`
`the litigation who (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or
`
`as a consultant in this action, (2) is not a past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s
`
`competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party
`
`or of a Party’s competitor.
`
`2.7
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or
`
`Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another
`
`Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by
`
`less restrictive means.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 3 of 35 PageID# 627
`
`
`2.8
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” Information or Items:
`
`extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items” representing computer code and
`
`associated comments and revision histories, formulas, engineering specifications, or schematics
`
`that define or otherwise describe in detail the algorithms or structure of software or hardware
`
`designs, disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of
`
`serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means.
`
`2.10 House Counsel: attorneys who are members in good standing of at least one state
`
`bar, who are employees of a Party, and who have responsibility for managing this action. House
`
`Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.
`
`2.11 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal
`
`entity not named as a Party to this action.
`
`2.12 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this
`
`action but are retained to represent or advise a Party and have appeared in this action on behalf of
`
`that Party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that Party.
`
`2.13 Party: any party to this action.
`
`2.14 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery
`
`Material in this action.
`
`2.15 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services
`
`(e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and
`
`organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium, and professional jury or trial
`
`consultants) and their employees and subcontractors, who (1) have been retained by a Party or its
`
`counsel to provide litigation support services with respect to this action, (2) are (including any
`
`employees and subcontractors) not a past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 4 of 35 PageID# 628
`
`
`competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, are not anticipated to become an employee of a Party
`
`or of a Party’s competitor.
`
`2.16 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL,” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or as
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE.”
`
`2.17 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material.
`
`3.
`
`SCOPE
`
`The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material
`
`(as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2)
`
`all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony,
`
`conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.
`
`However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following
`
`information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a
`
`Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as
`
`a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the
`
`public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party
`
`prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who
`
`obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating
`
`Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order.
`
`In addition, nothing in this Stipulation and Order shall prevent or restrict a Producing Party’s
`
`own disclosure or use of its own Protected Material for any purpose, and nothing in this
`
`Stipulation and Order shall preclude any Producing Party from showing its Protected Material to
`
`an individual who prepared the Protected Material.
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 5 of 35 PageID# 629
`
`
`4.
`
`DURATION
`
`Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by
`
`this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a Court
`
`order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all
`
`claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; or (2) entry of a final judgment
`
`herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews
`
`of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of
`
`time pursuant to applicable law.
`
`5.
`
`DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
`
`5.1
`
`Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party
`
`or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care
`
`to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards.
`
`Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to
`
`be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily
`
`encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and
`
`burdens on other Parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.
`
`If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated
`
`for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify for the level of protection
`
`initially asserted, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is
`
`withdrawing the mistaken designation.
`
`5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order
`
`(see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered,
`
`Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 6 of 35 PageID# 630
`
`
`designated before the material is disclosed or produced.
`
`Designation in conformity with this Order requires:
`
`(a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but
`
`excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing
`
`Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’
`
`EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” to each page that contains
`
`protected material.
`
`A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection
`
`need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which
`
`material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all
`
`of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants
`
`copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents qualify for
`
`protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing
`
`Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE”) to each
`
`page that contains Protected Material.
`
`(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that
`
`the Designating Party when practical identify on the record, before the close of the deposition,
`
`hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony and specify the level of protection being
`
`asserted. When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to
`
`protection and it appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the
`
`Designating Party shall have up to 14 days to identify the specific portions of the testimony as to
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 7 of 35 PageID# 631
`
`
`which protection is sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted. Only those
`
`portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the 14 days shall
`
`be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. Alternatively, a Designating
`
`Party may specify, at the deposition or up to 14 days afterwards if that period is properly
`
`invoked, that the entire transcript shall be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE
`
`CODE.”
`
`Parties shall give the other Parties reasonable notice (a minimum of two business days) if
`
`they reasonably expect a deposition, hearing or other proceeding to include Protected Material so
`
`that the other Parties can ensure that only authorized individuals who have signed the
`
`“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A) are present at those proceedings.
`
`The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition shall not in any way affect its designation as
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE.”
`
`Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an obvious legend on the title page
`
`that the transcript contains Protected Material, and the title page shall be followed by a list of all
`
`pages (including line numbers as appropriate) that have been designated as Protected Material
`
`and the level of protection being asserted by the Designating Party. The Designating Party shall
`
`inform the court reporter of these requirements. Any transcript that is prepared before the
`
`expiration of a 14-day period for designation shall be treated during that period as if it had been
`
`designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” in its entirety unless
`
`otherwise agreed. After the expiration of that period, the transcript shall be treated only as
`
`actually designated.
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 8 of 35 PageID# 632
`
`
`(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any
`
`other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the
`
`container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL”
`
`or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE”.
`
`5.3
`
`Inadvertent or Mistaken Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent
`
`or mistaken failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive
`
`the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon
`
`timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure
`
`that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.
`
`6.
`
`CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
`
`6.1
`
`Timing of Challenges. Any Party may challenge a designation of confidentiality
`
`at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality designation is
`
`necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a
`
`significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a
`
`confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original
`
`designation is disclosed.
`
`6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution
`
`process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis
`
`for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written
`
`notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this
`
`specific paragraph of the Protective Order. The Parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in
`
`good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 9 of 35 PageID# 633
`
`
`forms of communication are not sufficient) within 4 business days of the date of service of
`
`notice. In conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the
`
`confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to
`
`review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation
`
`is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to
`
`the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first
`
`or establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer
`
`process within 4 business days of the written notice.
`
`6.3
`
`Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without Court
`
`intervention, the Challenging Party shall request that the Court cancel or modify a designation
`
`within 4 business days of the Parties meeting and conferring. Each such motion must be
`
`accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet
`
`and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph.
`
`The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating
`
`Party. Frivolous challenges and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose
`
`unnecessary expenses and burdens on other Parties) may expose the Challenging Party to
`
`sanctions. All Parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to
`
`which it is entitled under the Designating Party’s designation until the Court rules on the
`
`challenge.
`
`7.
`
`ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
`
`7.1
`
`Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed
`
`or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for
`
`prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material shall not be
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 10 of 35 PageID# 634
`
`
`used for any business purpose, in connection with any other legal proceeding, or directly or
`
`indirectly for any other purpose whatsoever without the prior written consent of the Designating
`
`Party or upon order of the Court. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the
`
`categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order.1 When the litigation has
`
`been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 15 below
`
`(FINAL DISPOSITION).
`
`Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and
`
`in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.
`
`Protected Material shall not be copied or otherwise reproduced by a Receiving Party, except for
`
`transmission to qualified recipients, without the written permission of the Producing Party or by
`
`further order of the Court.
`
`7.2
`
`Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise
`
`ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may
`
`disclose any information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:
`
`(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as
`
`employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the
`
`information for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be
`
`Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A;
`
`
`1 In the event a Non-Party witness is authorized to receive Protected Material that is to be used
`during his/her deposition but is represented by an attorney not authorized under this Order to
`receive such Protected Material, the attorney must provide prior to commencement of the
`deposition an executed “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” in the form attached
`hereto as Exhibit A. In the event such attorney declines to sign the “Acknowledgment and
`Agreement to Be Bound” prior to the examination, the Parties, by their attorneys, shall jointly seek
`a protective order from the Court prohibiting the attorney from disclosing Protected Material in
`order for the deposition to proceed.
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 11 of 35 PageID# 635
`
`
`(b) Up to one House Counsel of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is
`
`reasonably necessary for this litigation, and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and
`
`Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
`
`(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is
`
`reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and
`
`Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
`
`(d) the Court and its personnel;
`
`(e) stenographic reporters, videographers and/or their staff, and Professional
`
`Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the
`
`“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
`
`(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is
`
`reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”
`
`(Exhibit A). The Receiving Party shall provide the Designating Party notice at least 3 business
`
`days in advance if it reasonably expects a deposition to include Protected Material so that the
`
`Designating Party can ensure that only authorized individuals are present at those proceedings.
`
`Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected
`
`Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone
`
`except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order.
`
`(g) the author, signatory, or recipient of a document containing the information or
`
`a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or personally knows the information.
`
`(f) mock jurors who have signed onto this Stipulated Protective Order and agreed
`
`to be bound by its terms.
`
`7.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 12 of 35 PageID# 636
`
`
`Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the
`
`Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to:
`
`(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as
`
`employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the
`
`information for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be
`
`Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A;
`
`(b) Experts of the Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary
`
`for this litigation, (2) who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”
`
`(Exhibit A), and (3) as to whom the procedures set forth in paragraph 7.5(a)(2), below, have been
`
`followed;
`
`(c) the Court and its personnel;
`
`(d) stenographic reporters, videographers and their respective staff, and
`
`Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who
`
`have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
`
`(e) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is
`
`reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”
`
`(Exhibit A). The Receiving Party shall provide the Designating Party notice at least 3 business
`
`days in advance if it reasonably expects a deposition to include Protected Material so that the
`
`Designating Party can ensure that only authorized individuals are present at those proceedings.
`
`Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected
`
`Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone
`
`except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order.
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 13 of 35 PageID# 637
`
`
`(f) the author, signatory, or recipient of a document containing the information or
`
`a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or personally knows the information.
`
`7.4 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” Information or
`
`Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a
`
`Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`
`– SOURCE CODE” only to:
`
`(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as
`
`employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the
`
`information for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be
`
`Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A;
`
`(b) up to five Experts of the Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably
`
`necessary for this litigation, (2) who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be
`
`Bound” (Exhibit A), and (3) as to whom the procedures set forth in paragraph 7.5(a)(2), below
`
`and specifically identified as eligible to access “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE
`
`CODE” Information or Items, have been followed;
`
`(c) the Court and its personnel;
`
`(d) stenographic reporters, videographers and their respective staff who have
`
`signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A) and are transcribing or
`
`videotaping a deposition wherein “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” Information
`
`or Items are being discussed, provided that such reporters and videographers shall not retain or
`
`be given copies of any portions of the source code, which if used during a deposition, will not be
`
`attached as an exhibit to the transcript but instead shall be identified only by its production
`
`numbers.
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 14 of 35 PageID# 638
`
`
`(e) while testifying at deposition or trial in this action only: (i) any current officer,
`
`director or employee of the Designating Party or original source of the information; (ii) any
`
`person designated by the Designating Party to provide testimony pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the
`
`Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and/or (iii) any person who authored, previously received
`
`(other than in connection with this litigation), or was directly involved in creating, modifying, or
`
`editing the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” Information or Items, as evident
`
`from its face or reasonably certain in view of other testimony or evidence. Persons authorized to
`
`view “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” Information or Items pursuant to this
`
`sub-paragraph shall not retain or be given copies of the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`
`SOURCE CODE” Information or Items except while so testifying.
`
`7.5 Procedures for Approving or Objecting to Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`
`– ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE”
`
`Information or Items to Experts.
`
`(a)(1) Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed to in writing by the
`
`Designating Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an Expert (as defined in this Order) any
`
`information or item that has been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’
`
`EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” pursuant to paragraphs
`
`7.3(b) or 7.4(b) first must make a written request to the Designating Party2 that (1) identifies the
`
`general categories of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or
`
`
`2 For a Designating Party that is a Non-Party, experts previously disclosed and approved prior to
`the Non-Party’s production of any information or item that has been designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE
`CODE” need not be disclosed to said Non-Party unless such Non-Party requests such information
`prior to the production of any Protected Material. Moreover, unless otherwise requested by the
`Non-Party, subsequently disclosed experts need not be disclosed to the Non-Party before that Non-
`Party’s Protected Material may be disclosed thereto.
`
`14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 15 of 35 PageID# 639
`
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” information that the Receiving Party seeks
`
`permission to disclose to the Expert, (2) sets forth the full name of the Expert and the city and
`
`state of his or her primary residence, (3) attaches a copy of the Expert’s current resume, (4)
`
`identifies the Expert’s current employer(s), (5) identifies each person or entity from whom the
`
`Expert has received compensation or funding for work in his or her areas of expertise or to
`
`whom the expert has provided professional services, including in connection with a litigation, at
`
`any time during the preceding five years,3 and (6) identifies (by name and number of the case,
`
`filing date, and location of court) any litigation in connection with which the Expert has offered
`
`expert testimony, including through a declaration, report, or testimony at a deposition or trial,
`
`during the preceding five years.
`
`(b) A Party that makes a request and provides the information specified in the
`
`preceding respective paragraphs may disclose the subject Protected Material to the identified
`
`Expert unless, within five days of delivering the request, the Party receives a written objection
`
`from the Designating Party. Any such objection must set forth in detail the grounds on which it is
`
`based.
`
`(c) A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with the
`
`Designating Party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to resolve the matter by
`
`agreement within three business days of the written objection. If no agreement is reached, the
`
`Party seeking to make the disclosure to the Expert may file a motion as provided in Local Civil
`
`Rule 7 (or as provided by the Court’s Rule 16(b) Order or local motion practice) seeking
`
`
`3 If the Expert believes any of this information is subject to a confidentiality obligation to a third-
`party, then the Expert should provide whatever information the Expert believes can be disclosed
`without violating any confidentiality agreements, and the Party seeking to disclose to the Expert
`shall be available to meet and confer with the Designating Party regarding any such engagement.
`15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 16 of 35 PageID# 640
`
`
`permission from the court to do so. Any such motion must describe the circumstances with
`
`specificity, set forth in detail the reasons why the disclosure to the Expert is reasonably
`
`necessary, assess the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail, and suggest any additional
`
`means that could be used to reduce that risk. In addition, any such motion must be accompanied
`
`by a competent declaration describing the parties’ efforts to resolve the matter by agreement (i.e.,
`
`the extent and the content of the meet and confer discussions) and setting forth the reasons
`
`advanced by the Designating Party for its refusal to approve the disclosure.
`
`(d) In any such proceeding, the Party opposing disclosure to the Expert shall bear the
`
`burden of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail (under the safeguards
`
`proposed) outweighs the Receiving Party’s need to disclose the Protected Material to its Expert.
`
`(e) A party who has not previously objected to disclosure of Protected Material to an
`
`Expert or whose objection has been resolved with respect to previously produced Protected
`
`Material shall not be precluded from raising an objection to an Expert at a later time with respect
`
`to Protected Material that is produced after the time for objecting to such Expert has expired or if
`
`new information about that Expert is disclosed or discovered. Any such objection shall be
`
`handled in accordance with the provisions set forth above.
`
`8.
`
`PROSECUTION AND ACQUISITION BAR
`
`(a) Absent written consent from Google LLC, any individual who receives access to
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” information designated by Google LLC shall
`
`not be involved in the prosecution of patents or patent applications relating to the geolocation of
`
`mobile devices using network signals (i.e., Wi-Fi, cellular, and Bluetooth signals), including
`
`without limitation the patents asserted in this action and any patent or application claiming
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01331-MSN-JFA Document 54 Filed 03/28/23 Page 17 of 35 PageID# 641
`
`
`priority to or otherwise related to the patents asserted in this action, before any foreign or
`
`domestic agency, including the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“the Patent Office”).
`
`For purposes of this paragraph, “prosecution” includes any activity related to (i) the preparation
`
`or prosecution (for any person or entity) of patent applications, including among others
`
`reexamination and reissue applications or (