`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 967-6 Filed 02/11/22 Page 1 of 5 PagelD# 27275
`
`EXHIBIT 6
`EXHIBIT 6
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 967-6 Filed 02/11/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID# 27276
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`
`
`v.
`
`RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC. and
`R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY,
`
`Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants,
`
`
`
`ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC; PHILIP
`MORRIS USA INC.; and PHILIP MORRIS
`PRODUCTS S.A.,
`
`Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs.
`
`Case No. 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB
`
`
`REYNOLDS’S IDENTIFICATION OF MOTION IN LIMINE TOPICS
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Order Granting Joint Motion For Scheduling Order (Dkt. 801),
`
`RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company (collectively, “Reynolds”)
`
`hereby identify the list of topics on which they intend to move in limine. Reynolds’s review is
`
`ongoing, and Reynolds reserves the right to supplement, amend, subtract from, and/or modify
`
`this list of initial topics for motions in limine prior to January 14, including after reviewing
`
`PMP/Altria’s list of topics for motion in limine. Reynolds also reserves the right to submit
`
`additional motion in limine topics related to PMP’s claim for injunctive relief because no
`
`schedule or procedure for trial of that issue has been set, and the Court has stayed expert
`
`discovery on that issue. Reynolds identifies these topics for motions in limine without prejudice
`
`to Reynolds’s right to object to any other evidence or arguments made at trial to the extent
`
`permitted under the Federal Rules of Evidence or any other applicable rules or Court orders.
`
`• No reference to any VUSE products as allegedly being illegal or unlawful
`• No reference to youth vaping or alleged targeting of the VUSE products to youths
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 967-6 Filed 02/11/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID# 27277
`
`• No reference to the alleged harms of vaping
`• No evidence or argument regarding Reynolds’s activity pre-issuance of a given
`patent in support of alleged willful infringement of such patent
`• No evidence or argument regarding the PTAB’s denials or institutions of inter
`partes review proceedings on any of the asserted Altria or PMP patents
`• No evidence or argument regarding Reynolds’s not relying on an opinion of
`counsel
`• No evidence or argument that any VUSE products allegedly infringe any claim of
`the ’545 patent on the basis that JUUL and/or NuMark allegedly practiced that
`patent
`• No reference to the location in China of Reynolds’s suppliers of any VUSE
`products
`• No evidence or argument relating to incorrect images, diagrams, drawings, or
`descriptions of the VUSE Alto cartridge; references to incorrect images,
`diagrams, drawings, or descriptions of the VUSE Alto cartridge in Reynolds’s
`PMTA; or any testimony relating to incorrect images, diagrams, drawings, or
`descriptions of the VUSE Alto cartridge
`• No evidence or argument that Reynolds infringed or has been accused of
`infringing third-party patents
`• No offering of any opinions by an expert that were not previously disclosed in
`expert reports
`• No evidence or argument regarding any request for or alleged entitlement to
`issuance of an injunction
`• No evidence or argument regarding any request for or alleged entitlement to an
`award of treble damages or attorneys’ fees
`• No evidence or argument regarding: (1) any jury study or focus study groups that
`have been conducted by any party, (2) the use by any party of a shadow jury
`during trial, or (3) the use by any party of jury consultants
`• No references to objections or sidebar comments by counsel during depositions
`• No evidence or argument relating to motions in limine, that the Court has made a
`ruling in response to motions in limine, suggesting or inferring that the parties
`have moved to prohibit proof, or that the Court has excluded proof on any
`particular matters
`• No reference to any objections made by the parties in answers to interrogatories,
`responses to requests for production, hearings, depositions, or at trial
`• No reference to the purported success of IQOS outside of the U.S.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 967-6 Filed 02/11/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID# 27278
`
`Dated: December 3, 2021
`
`
`Stephanie E. Parker
`JONES DAY
`1221 Peachtree Street, N.E.
`Suite 400
`Atlanta, GA 30361
`Telephone: (404) 521-3939
`Facsimile: (404) 581-8330
`Email: separker@jonesday.com
`
`
`Anthony M. Insogna
`JONES DAY
`4655 Executive Drive
`Suite 1500
`San Diego, CA 92121
`Telephone: (858) 314-1200
`Facsimile: (844) 345-3178
`Email: aminsogna@jonesday.com
`
`William E. Devitt
`JONES DAY
`77 West Wacker
`Suite 3500
`Chicago, IL 60601
`Telephone: (312) 269-4240
`Facsimile: (312) 782-8585
`Email: wdevitt@jonesday.com
`
`Sanjiv P. Laud
`JONES DAY
`90 South Seventh Street
`Suite 4950
`Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
`Telephone: (612) 217-8800
`Facsimile: (844) 345-3178
`Email: slaud@jonesday.com
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
` /s/ David M. Maiorana
`David M. Maiorana (VA Bar No. 42334)
`Ryan B. McCrum
`JONES DAY
`901 Lakeside Ave.
`Cleveland, OH 44114
`Telephone: (216) 586-3939
`Facsimile: (216) 579-0212
`Email: dmaiorana@jonesday.com
`Email: rbmccrum@jonesday.com
`
`John J. Normile
`JONES DAY
`250 Vesey Street
`New York, NY 10281
`Telephone: (212) 326-3939
`Facsimile: (212) 755-7306
`Email: jjnormile@jonesday.com
`
`
`Alexis A. Smith
`JONES DAY
`555 South Flower Street
`Fiftieth Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (213) 243-2653
`Facsimile: (213) 243-2539
`Email: asmith@jonesday.com
`
`Charles B. Molster, III Va. Bar No. 23613
`THE LAW OFFICES OF
`CHARLES B. MOLSTER, III PLLC
`2141 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W. Suite M
`Washington, DC 20007
`Telephone: (703) 346-1505
`Email: cmolster@molsterlaw.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiffs RAI Strategic Holdings,
`Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 967-6 Filed 02/11/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID# 27279
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that on this 3rd day of December 2021, the foregoing was served on counsel
`
`for Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs using
`
`the following designated email address:
`
`pmiedva.lwteam@lw.com.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ David M. Maiorana
`David M. Maiorana (VA Bar No. 42334)
`JONES DAY
`901 Lakeside Ave.
`Cleveland, OH 44114
`Telephone: (216) 586-3939
`Facsimile: (216) 579-0212
`Email: dmaiorana@jonesday.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiffs RAI Strategic Holdings,
`Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
`
`
`
`
`