`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 952-3 Filed 02/11/22 Page 1 of 7 PagelD# 26423
`
`EXHIBIT 3(cid:3)
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 952-3 Filed 02/11/22 Page 2 of 7 PageID# 26424
`
`
`
`RESTRICTED – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC. and
`R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY,
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs and Counterclaim
`Defendants,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC; PHILIP
`MORRIS USA INC.; and PHILIP MORRIS
`PRODUCTS S.A.,
`
`Defendants and Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs.
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-393
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SECOND AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL OPENING EXPERT REPORT OF JOHN
`ABRAHAM RELATING TO US PATENT NOS. 10,104,911 AND 10,555,556
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 952-3 Filed 02/11/22 Page 3 of 7 PageID# 26425
`
`RESTRICTED-ATTORNEYS ' EYES ONLY
`
`-
`
`274. The polypropylene tube is a "housing having an opening" based on the plain and
`
`ordina1y meaning of the te1m because it (i) houses other components and (ii) includes an aperture
`
`or hole, which is the plain and ordinaiy meaning of "opening." This is consistent with the '556
`
`Patent, which shows an "opening 44" in Figure 2 (the "opening" shown is further "defined by the
`
`172
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 952-3 Filed 02/11/22 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 26426
`
`RESTRICTED – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`substrate”). ’556 Patent at 12:4-9. The ’556 Patent also describes an “open end” with an “aperture
`
`44” in Figure 3. Id. at 12:46-47.
`
`
`
`Figure 2
`
`Figure 3
`
`34
`
`31
`
`24
`
`
`
`34
`
`
`
`’556 Patent at Figs. 2 and 3.
`
`275. To the extent Reynolds argues that the polypropylene tube does not include an
`
`“opening,” I disagree for several reasons.
`
`276. First, Reynolds’ corporate representative testified that the tub includes an opening.
`
`See also Hunt Dep. Tr. at 149:10-150:3 (the “polypropylene tube” has an end that is “open” when
`
`unassembled).
`
`277. Second, to the extent Reynolds argues that the polypropylene tube does not include
`
`an opening
`
`
`
` this would be
`
`inconsistent with the disclosures of the ’556 Patent. For example, as shown in Figure 3 of the ’556
`
`Patent, the patent teaches that “[t]he housing 24 has an open end” (or “aperture”) even where it
`
`may be “covered by a removable cover 26.” ’556 Patent at 12:33-47.
`
`173
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 952-3 Filed 02/11/22 Page 5 of 7 PageID# 26427
`
`
`
`RESTRICTED – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`Figure 3
`
`48
`
`42
`
`26
`
`36
`
`4
`
`46
`
`40
`
`’556 Patent at Fig. 3.
`
`34
`
`
`
`278. Third, the VUSE Vibe air flow path shows that air flows through the “opening” I
`
`identified
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-- ■ -----1 ■ -
`
` In any event, as the
`
`’556 Patent contemplates, an “opening” may be covered by something else, but is still an
`
`“opening.”
`
`174
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 952-3 Filed 02/11/22 Page 6 of 7 PageID# 26428
`
`RESTRICTED-ATTORNEYS ' EYES ONLY
`
`279.
`
`Fourth, as discussed, I understand that Reynolds attempted to argue at the claim
`
`construction phase that the te1m "the housing having an opening" means "the housing having a
`
`passage or hole through which liquid aerosol-fo1ming substrate can flow." Dkt. No. 226. I
`
`understand that the Comt rejected this constrnction and instead adopted the plain and ordinaiy
`
`meaning for opening, which is a hole or apertme. Dkt. No. 360. This refutes any argument by
`
`Reynolds that the opening of the polypropylene tube, which is a hole or aperture, does not infringe
`
`this li1nitation.
`
`c.
`
`"wherein the liquid storage portion comprises at least two
`parts in fluid communication with each other"
`
`280. The VUSE Vibe Caitridges include a liquid storage p01tion comprises at least two
`
`parts in fluid communication with each other. This is shown in the photograph I took, as discussed
`
`with respect to the prior limitation.
`
`175
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 952-3 Filed 02/11/22 Page 7 of 7 PageID# 26429
`
`RESTRICTED – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the
`
`foregoing statements are true and correct.
`
`
`
`DATED: May 10, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`Dr. John Abraham
`
`
`
`
`
`220
`
`