`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 895-10 Filed 01/21/22 Page 1 of 5 PagelD# 24694
`
`EXHIBIT 10
`EXHIBIT 10
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 895-10 Filed 01/21/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID# 24695
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,803,545
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`In the Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,803,545
`Trial No.: Not Yet Assigned
`Issued:
`October 12, 2004
`Filed:
`June 5, 2002
`Inventors: Clinton E. Blake, et al.
`Assignee: Philip Morris USA, Inc.
`Title:
`ELECTRICALLY HEATED SMOKING SYSTEM AND
`METHODS FOR SUPPLYING ELECTRICAL POWER FROM A
`LITHIUM ION POWER SOURCE
`
`
`MAIL STOP PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.100
`On behalf of R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company (“Petitioner”) and in accordance with
`
`35 U.S.C. § 311 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.100, inter partes review (“IPR”) is respectfully
`
`requested for claims 1–4 and 7 (“the Challenged Claims”) of U.S. Patent No. 6,803,545
`
`(“the ’545 patent”) (Ex.1001).
`
`The undersigned representative of Petitioner authorizes the Office to charge the
`
`$41,500 Petition and Post-Institution Fees, and any additional fees, to Deposit Account
`
`503013, ref: 629000-851003.
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 895-10 Filed 01/21/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID# 24696
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,803,545
`
`
`vice versa. Id.
`
`IV.
`
`Identification Of Challenge Pursuant To 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)(1): Claims For Which IPR Is Requested
`A.
`IPR is requested for claims 1–4 and 7 of the ’545 patent.
`
`B.
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)(2): The Prior Art And Specific Grounds On
`Which The Challenge To The Claims Is Based
`IPR is requested in view of the following references:
`
`• U.S. Patent No. 6,641,953 to Takeuchi et al. (“Takeuchi”) (Ex.1002). Takeuchi
`
`was filed on January 9, 2001, claims priority to Provisional Application No.
`
`60/175,709, filed on January 12, 2000, issued on November 4, 2003, and is prior art to
`
`the ’545 patent under at least 35 U.S.C. § 102(e).
`
`• U.S. Patent No. 6,040,560 to Fleischhauer et al. (“Fleischhauer”) (Ex.1003).
`
`Fleischhauer was filed on October 10, 1997, issued on March 21, 2000, and is prior art
`
`to the ’545 patent under at least 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
`
`• U.S. Patent No. 5,144,962 to Counts et al. (“Counts ’962”) (Ex.1004). Counts
`
`’962 was filed on December 1, 1989, issued on September 8, 1992, and is prior art to
`
`the ’545 patent under at least 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
`
`• Panasonic Lithium Ion Batteries Technical Handbook ’00/01 (“Panasonic
`
`Handbook”) (Ex.1005) was published by Matsushita Battery Industrial Co., Ltd.
`
`Panasonic Handbook bears a copyright date of 2000 and is labeled “January 2000.”
`
`Panasonic Handbook is prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as a printed publication that
`
`-13-
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 895-10 Filed 01/21/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID# 24697
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,803,545
`
`
`was published on and publicly available over the Internet. See Ex.1006 (explaining
`
`Panasonic Handbook’s status as a printed publication and public availability).
`
`The specific statutory grounds on which the challenge to the claims is based and
`
`prior art relied upon for each ground are as follows:
`
`Ground 1a: Claims 1–3 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Fleischhauer
`
`in view of Takeuchi; and
`
`Ground 1b: Claims 4 and 7 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over
`
`Fleischhauer in view of Takeuchi, and in further view of Panasonic Handbook.
`
`Ground 2a: Claims 1–3 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Fleischhauer
`
`in view of Counts ’962; and
`
`Ground 2b: Claims 4 and 7 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over
`
`Fleischhauer in view of Counts ’962, and in further view of Panasonic Handbook.
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)(3): Claim Construction
`C.
`The Board gives claims their ordinary and customary meaning, or “the meaning
`
`that the term would have to a [POSA] at the time of the invention.” Phillips v. AWH
`
`Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1312–13 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (en banc). At this time, Petitioner
`
`proposes no terms for construction.
`
`In the event that Patent Owner asserts that construction is required of the phrase
`
`“to prevent damage to the lithium ion power source” of claim 1, Petitioner asserts that
`
`it has its plain and ordinary meaning. That meaning is that the claimed controller will
`
`-14-
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 895-10 Filed 01/21/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID# 24698
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,803,545
`
`
`
`wdevitt@jonesday.com
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b), a Power of Attorney accompanies this petition.
`
`Please address all correspondence to lead and back-up counsel at the addresses above.
`
`Petitioner also consents to electronic service by email at the email addresses listed
`
`above.
`
`VIII. Conclusion
`Petitioner therefore requests that the Board order an IPR trial and then proceed
`
`to cancel claims 1–4 and 7.
`
`Dated: March 26, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Matthew W. Johnson
`Matthew W. Johnson
`Reg. No. 59,108
`JONES DAY
`500 Grant Street, Suite 4500
`Pittsburgh, PA 15219
`Telephone: (412) 394-9524
`Facsimile: (412) 394-7959
`mwjohnson@jonesday.com
`
`-67-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`