throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 771-2 Filed 07/02/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 20735
`
`Exhibit 2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 771-2 Filed 07/02/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID# 20736
`
`Michalik, John M. <jmichalik@JonesDay.com>
`Friday, June 25, 2021 9:24 AM
`Koh, Jennifer (SD); #C-M PMIEDVA - LW TEAM
`RJREDVA; Charles Molster
`RE: RAI Strategic Holdings v. Altria Client Services (EDVa) - MIL and Daubert motions
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Jennifer - -
`
`Reynolds does not agree with Counterclaim-Plaintiffs’ proposed schedule for motions in limine and Daubert
`motions. The Joint Proposed Discovery Plan Pursuant To Rule 26(f) submitted in the case calls for Daubert motions and
`motions in limine to be filed “in time to be heard at least two weeks before the applicable trial”. (Dkt. 97 at
`24.) Moreover, there are a number of issues that will have further clarity or be resolved between now and the parties’
`April 4, 2022, trial that will impact the issues on which the parties may want to move. Without providing an exhaustive
`list, we expect the Court’s ruling on the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment will impact the issues on
`which the parties file Daubert motions or move in limine. In addition, the Final Determination and expiration of the
`presidential review period in Inv. No. 337-TA-1199 – due in September 2021 and November 2021, respectively – also is
`likely to influence the issues on which the parties move the Court. As just one more example, the PTAB is expected to
`issue decisions on institution for Reynolds’s IPR petitions against Counterclaim-Plaintiffs’ asserted patents in September,
`October, and November of 2021. The PTAB’s decisions on institution likewise may affect the issues on which the parties
`move in limine.
`
`Thus, given these and other intervening deadlines between now and trial on Counterclaim-Plaintiffs’ asserted patents
`that may affect the parties’ filings, Reynolds proposes a schedule as follows that is more consistent with the timeline laid
`out in the Joint Discovery Plan and the regular practice in EDVA to have these types of motions argued shortly before
`trial:
`
`Event
`Exchange MIL topics
`Meet and confer on MIL topics
`Opening MILs and Daubert motions
`Oppositions to MILs and Daubert motions
`Replies to MILs and Daubert motions
`
`Deadline
`December 3, 2021
`December 10, 2021
`January 14, 2022
`January 28, 2022
`February 3, 2022
`
`John M. Michalik
`Partner
`JONES DAY® - One Firm Worldwide℠
`77 West Wacker
`Chicago, Illinois 60601-1692
`Office +1.312.269.4215
`Mobile +1.312.315.5926
`jmichalik@jonesday.com
`
`From: Jennifer.Koh@lw.com <Jennifer.Koh@lw.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2021 4:17 PM
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 771-2 Filed 07/02/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID# 20737
`
`August 20
`September 3
`
`Deadline
`August 6 at 6 PM
`August 10 by 6 PM
`
`To: RJREDVA <RJREDVA@jonesday.com>
`Cc: pmiedva.lwteam@lw.com
`Subject: RAI Strategic Holdings v. Altria Client Services (EDVa) - MIL and Daubert motions
`
`** External mail **
`
`Counsel,
`
`
`Below is a proposed schedule for motions in limine and Daubert motions. Please let us know by
`Friday, June 25 whether you have any comments to the proposed schedule. Absent any comments
`from you, we will prepare a stipulation at that time. We are available to discuss if needed.
`
`Event
`Exchange MIL topics
`Meet and confer on MIL
`topics
`Opening MILs and Dauberts
`Oppositions to MILs and
`Dauberts
`Replies to MILs and Dauberts September 10
`
`
`Regards,
`Jennifer
`
`
`Jennifer Koh
`
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`12670 High Bluff Drive
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Direct Dial: +1.858.523.3949
`Email: jennifer.koh@lw.com
`https://www.lw.com
`
`
`_________________________________
`
`This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of
`the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express
`permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
`copies including any attachments.
`
`Latham & Watkins LLP or any of its affiliates may monitor electronic communications sent or received by our
`networks in order to protect our business and verify compliance with our policies and relevant legal
`requirements. Any personal information contained or referred to within this electronic communication will be
`processed in accordance with the firm's privacy notices and Global Privacy Standards available at www.lw.com.
`***This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected
`by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system
`without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected.***
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket