throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 763-8 Filed 06/30/21 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 20607
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 763-8 Filed 06/30/21 Page 1 of 6 Page|D# 20607
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 10
`
`
`EXHIBIT 10
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 763-8 Filed 06/30/21 Page 2 of 6 PageID# 20608
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Grant, Max (NY-DC)
`Wednesday, June 30, 2021 11:04 AM
`Michalik, John M.; Orlady, Will (DC); RJREDVA
`cmolster@molsterlaw.com; #C-M PMIEDVA - LW TEAM
`RE: RAI Strategic Holdings v. Altria Client Services (EDVa) -- Cross-Motion
`
`Thank you for belatedly confirming RJR’s intent to oppose.
`
`We have nothing to add to our prior emails. As for the substance of what you contend qualifies for a meet and confer
`process in Judge O’Grady’s court, we’ll make him aware of the facts and let him determine that.
`
`From: Michalik, John M. <jmichalik@JonesDay.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 11:01 AM
`To: Grant, Max (NY-DC) <Max.Grant@lw.com>; Orlady, Will (DC) <Will.Orlady@lw.com>; RJREDVA
`<RJREDVA@jonesday.com>
`Cc: cmolster@molsterlaw.com; #C-M PMIEDVA - LW TEAM <pmiedva.lwteam@lw.com>
`Subject: RE: RAI Strategic Holdings v. Altria Client Services (EDVa) -- Cross-Motion
`
`Max - -
`
`While we do intend to oppose your motion, the Court’s rules require the formality of a meet and confer. Accordingly,
`please circulate a dial in for 11:30 am ET.
`
`John M. Michalik
`Partner
`JONES DAY® - One Firm Worldwide℠
`77 West Wacker
`Chicago, Illinois 60601-1692
`Office +1.312.269.4215
`Mobile +1.312.315.5926
`jmichalik@jonesday.com
`
`From: Max.Grant@lw.com <Max.Grant@lw.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 9:52 AM
`To: Michalik, John M. <jmichalik@JonesDay.com>; Will.Orlady@lw.com; RJREDVA <RJREDVA@jonesday.com>
`Cc: cmolster@molsterlaw.com; pmiedva.lwteam@lw.com
`Subject: RE: RAI Strategic Holdings v. Altria Client Services (EDVa) -- Cross-Motion
`
`** External mail **
`
`Respectfully, conferring with you John has been demonstrated to be a waste of time.
`
`The local rules require genuine efforts to resolve the issues, particularly when they are significant. In this case, that
`requires a lead counsel to lead counsel discussion and the participation of VA counsel. If you do not confirm Chip will be
`on the line, and identify your lead counsel and confirm they too will be on the line by 11am, then it is Reynolds that is
`refusing to confer in good faith, and we’ll take it up directly with the Court.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 763-8 Filed 06/30/21 Page 3 of 6 PageID# 20609
`
`Please also confirm that RJR is seriously willing to consider not opposing our motion for fees. Make that representation
`in writing, by 11am.
`
`Maximilian A. Grant
`
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`885 Third Ave. (53rd St.) | New York, NY 10022 | 1.212.906.1325
`555 Eleventh Street, NW | Washington, D.C. 20004 | 1.202.637.2267
`Email: max.grant@lw.com
`Bio: Attorney Profile
`http://www.lw.com
`
`
`
`From: Michalik, John M. <jmichalik@JonesDay.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 10:47 AM
`To: Grant, Max (NY-DC) <Max.Grant@lw.com>; Orlady, Will (DC) <Will.Orlady@lw.com>; RJREDVA
`<RJREDVA@jonesday.com>
`Cc: cmolster@molsterlaw.com; #C-M PMIEDVA - LW TEAM <pmiedva.lwteam@lw.com>
`Subject: RE: RAI Strategic Holdings v. Altria Client Services (EDVa) -- Cross-Motion
`
`Counsel - -
`
` I
`
` will be available at that time if you circulate a dial in. If you refuse, we will await your motion and respond to it
`accordingly.
`
`
`John M. Michalik
`Partner
`JONES DAY® - One Firm Worldwide℠
`77 West Wacker
`Chicago, Illinois 60601-1692
`Office +1.312.269.4215
`Mobile +1.312.315.5926
`jmichalik@jonesday.com
`
`From: Max.Grant@lw.com <Max.Grant@lw.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 9:42 AM
`To: Michalik, John M. <jmichalik@JonesDay.com>; Will.Orlady@lw.com; RJREDVA <RJREDVA@jonesday.com>
`Cc: cmolster@molsterlaw.com; pmiedva.lwteam@lw.com
`Subject: RE: RAI Strategic Holdings v. Altria Client Services (EDVa) -- Cross-Motion
`
`
`** External mail **
`
`Pls confirm Chip and RJR’s lead counsel will be on the line, and identify that person by 11am eastern.
`
`Maximilian A. Grant
`
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`885 Third Ave. (53rd St.) | New York, NY 10022 | 1.212.906.1325
`555 Eleventh Street, NW | Washington, D.C. 20004 | 1.202.637.2267
`Email: max.grant@lw.com
`Bio: Attorney Profile
`http://www.lw.com
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 763-8 Filed 06/30/21 Page 4 of 6 PageID# 20610
`
`
`
`From: Michalik, John M. <jmichalik@JonesDay.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 10:40 AM
`To: Grant, Max (NY-DC) <Max.Grant@lw.com>; Orlady, Will (DC) <Will.Orlady@lw.com>; RJREDVA
`<RJREDVA@jonesday.com>
`Cc: cmolster@molsterlaw.com; #C-M PMIEDVA - LW TEAM <pmiedva.lwteam@lw.com>
`Subject: RE: RAI Strategic Holdings v. Altria Client Services (EDVa) -- Cross-Motion
`
`Counsel - -
`
`We are available at 11:30 am ET. Please circulate a dial in.
`
`
`John M. Michalik
`Partner
`JONES DAY® - One Firm Worldwide℠
`77 West Wacker
`Chicago, Illinois 60601-1692
`Office +1.312.269.4215
`Mobile +1.312.315.5926
`jmichalik@jonesday.com
`
`From: Max.Grant@lw.com <Max.Grant@lw.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 4:47 PM
`To: Michalik, John M. <jmichalik@JonesDay.com>; Will.Orlady@lw.com; RJREDVA <RJREDVA@jonesday.com>
`Cc: cmolster@molsterlaw.com; pmiedva.lwteam@lw.com
`Subject: RE: RAI Strategic Holdings v. Altria Client Services (EDVa) -- Cross-Motion
`
`
`** External mail **
`
`Chip – this implicates 28 USC 1927 and the court’s inherent authority, as is plain. You told the court when moving to
`amend you had “real facts” supporting an IEC counterclaim. You took no discovery, never provided a factual basis, and
`conceded 45 of 45 undisputed facts on SJ. Your offer to “dismiss” came only after you – meaning you personally as VA
`counsel – knew PMP and Altria had already paid for a SJ motion to be drafted, and after blowing off our May 14 email
`asking you to drop the unsupported counterclaim/defenses.
`
`If you are seriously considering agreeing to our motion – rather than wasting our time with more nonsense and
`needlessly dragging out the meet and confer process – then you and whoever is JD’s lead trial counsel please let me
`know your availability to speak tomorrow morning before 12 noon and we’ll get on the phone. Otherwise, this is more
`of the same nonsense that precipitated this cross-motion and it needs to stop.
`
`Respectfully,
`
`Maximilian A. Grant
`
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`885 Third Ave. (53rd St.) | New York, NY 10022 | 1.212.906.1325
`555 Eleventh Street, NW | Washington, D.C. 20004 | 1.202.637.2267
`Email: max.grant@lw.com
`Bio: Attorney Profile
`http://www.lw.com
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 763-8 Filed 06/30/21 Page 5 of 6 PageID# 20611
`
`
`
`From: Michalik, John M. <jmichalik@JonesDay.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 5:24 PM
`To: Orlady, Will (DC) <Will.Orlady@lw.com>; RJREDVA <RJREDVA@jonesday.com>
`Cc: cmolster@molsterlaw.com; #C-M PMIEDVA - LW TEAM <pmiedva.lwteam@lw.com>
`Subject: RE: RAI Strategic Holdings v. Altria Client Services (EDVa) -- Cross-Motion
`
`Will - -
`
`Please provide the legal basis for your motion so we can meaningfully confer.
`
`
`John M. Michalik
`Partner
`JONES DAY® - One Firm Worldwide℠
`77 West Wacker
`Chicago, Illinois 60601-1692
`Office +1.312.269.4215
`Mobile +1.312.315.5926
`jmichalik@jonesday.com
`
`From: Will.Orlady@lw.com <Will.Orlady@lw.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 2:50 PM
`To: RJREDVA <RJREDVA@jonesday.com>
`Cc: cmolster@molsterlaw.com; pmiedva.lwteam@lw.com
`Subject: RAI Strategic Holdings v. Altria Client Services (EDVa) -- Cross-Motion
`
`
`** External mail **
`
`Counsel,
`
`As we previewed in our summary judgment reply brief last week, PMP/Altria is cross-moving to recover the fees and
`costs associated with defending against RJR’s (now admittedly baseless) inequitable conduct counterclaim. Please
`provide us with your position. Otherwise, we are available to meet and confer tomorrow at 10 AM ET.
`
`Best,
`Will
`
`Will Orlady
`Pronouns: he/him/his
`
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`555 Eleventh Street, NW
`Suite 1000
`Washington, D.C. 20004-1304
`Direct Dial: +1.202.637.3391
`Mobile: +1.213.760.6738
`Email: will.orlady@lw.com
`https://www.lw.com
`
`
`_________________________________
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 763-8 Filed 06/30/21 Page 6 of 6 PageID# 20612
`
`This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of
`the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express
`permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
`copies including any attachments.
`
`Latham & Watkins LLP or any of its affiliates may monitor electronic communications sent or received by our
`networks in order to protect our business and verify compliance with our policies and relevant legal
`requirements. Any personal information contained or referred to within this electronic communication will be
`processed in accordance with the firm's privacy notices and Global Privacy Standards available at www.lw.com.
`***This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected
`by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system
`without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected.***
`***This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected
`by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system
`without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected.***
`***This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected
`by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system
`without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected.***
`***This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected
`by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system
`without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected.***
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket