`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`
`
`Case No. 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB
`
`
`
`RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC. and
`R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY,
`
`Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants,
`
`v.
`
`
`ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC; PHILIP
`MORRIS USA, INC.; and PHILIP MORRIS
`PRODUCTS S.A.,
`
`Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A.’S MOTION TO
`SEAL
`
`This matter is before the Court on the motion filed by Defendant Philip Morris Products
`
`S.A. (“PMP”) to seal an un-redacted version of PMP’s Opposition to R.J. Reynolds Vapor
`
`Company’s Motion to Compel 30(b)(6) Witnesses Relating to Injunctive Relief and
`
`accompanying Exhibit 1 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d) and Local Civil Rule
`
`5(C). Because the documents that PMP seeks to seal contain confidential and proprietary
`
`business information of the Plaintiffs RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc., and R.J. Reynolds Vapor
`
`Company (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), Plaintiffs filed a memorandum in support of PMP’s sealing
`
`request.
`
`Before this Court may seal documents, it must: “(1) provide public notice of the request
`
`to seal and allow interested parties a reasonable opportunity to object, (2) consider less drastic
`
`alternatives to sealing the documents, and (3) provide specific reasons and factual findings
`
`supporting its decision to seal the documents and for rejecting the alternatives.” Ashcraft v.
`
`Conoco, Inc., 218 F.3d 282, 288 (4th Cir. 2000) (internal citations omitted). Upon consideration
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 658-1 Filed 05/24/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID# 14929
`
`of PMP’s motion to seal and its memorandum in support thereof, the Court hereby FINDS as
`
`follows:
`
`1.
`
`The public has received notice of the request to seal and has had reasonable
`
`opportunity to object. PMP’s sealing motion was publicly docketed on May 19, 2021, in
`
`accordance with Local Civil Rule 5. Plaintiffs have filed a memorandum in support of sealing.
`
`The “public has had ample opportunity to object” to PMP’s motion and, since “the Court has
`
`received no objections,” the first requirement under Ashcraft, 218 F.3d at 302, has been satisfied.
`
`GTSI Corp. v. Wildflower Int’l, Inc., No. 1:09-cv-123-JCC, 2009 WL 1248114, at *9 (E.D. Va.
`
`Apr. 30, 2009); U.S. ex rel. Carter v. Halliburton Co., No. 1:10-cv-864-JCC/TCB, 2011 WL
`
`2077799, at *3 (E.D. Va. May 24, 2011) (“[T]he parties provided public notice of the request to
`
`seal that allowed interested parties a reasonable opportunity to object—nearly two weeks.”).
`
`2.
`
`PMP seeks to seal and redact from the public record only information designated
`
`by the parties as confidential. PMP has filed publicly a redacted version of PMP’s Opposition to
`
`RJRV’s Motion to Compel 30(b)(6) Witnesses Relating to Injunctive Relief and accompanying
`
`Exhibit 1 (Dkt. 624), in addition to a sealed version (Dkt. 627), and have redacted only those
`
`limited portions they seek to seal. This selective and narrow protection of confidential material
`
`constitutes the least drastic method of shielding the information at issue. Adams v. Object
`
`Innovation, Inc., No. 3:11-cv-272-REP-DWD, 2011 WL 7042224, at *4 (E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 2011)
`
`(The “proposal to redact only the proprietary and confidential information, rather than seal the
`
`entirety of his declaration, constitutes the least drastic method of shielding the information at
`
`issue.”). The public has no legitimate interest in information that is confidential to Plaintiffs. Id.
`
`at *4 (“[T]here is no legitimate public interest in disclosing the proprietary and confidential
`
`information of [PMP] … and disclosure to the public could result in significant damage to the
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 658-1 Filed 05/24/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID# 14930
`
`company.”). The information that PMP seeks to seal includes confidential and proprietary
`
`business information of Plaintiffs, PMP, and/or third parties, each of which could face harm if
`
`such information were to be released publicly. Specifically, the sensitive information that PMP
`
`moves for leave to file under seal, and to redact from a publicly filed version, includes:
`
`• An un-redacted version of PMP’s Opposition; and
`• Exhibit 1: email correspondence between counsel.
`
`
`
`3.
`
`There is support for filing portions of PMP’s Opposition to RJRV’s Motion to
`
`Compel 30(b)(6) Witnesses Relating to Injunctive Relief and accompanying Exhibit 1 under
`
`seal, with publicly filed versions containing strictly limited redactions. PMP’s Opposition to
`
`RJRV’s Motion to Compel 30(b)(6) Witnesses Relating to Injunctive Relief and accompanying
`
`Exhibit 1 contain material that falls within the scope of the stipulated protective order. Placing
`
`these materials under seal is proper because the public’s interest in access is outweighed by a
`
`party’s interest in “preserving confidentiality” of the limited amount of confidential information
`
`that is “normally unavailable to the public.” Flexible Benefits Council v. Feltman, No. 1:08-cv-
`
`371-JCC, 2008 WL 4924711, at *1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 13, 2008); U.S. ex rel. Carter, 2011 WL
`
`2077799, at *3.
`
`Therefore, based on the findings above, for good cause shown, it is hereby
`
`ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and PMP is granted leave to file a
`
`REDACTED version of PMP’s Opposition to RJRV’s Motion to Compel 30(b)(6) Witnesses
`
`Relating to Injunctive Relief and accompanying Exhibit 1.
`
`And to file UNDER SEAL an un-redacted version of PMP’s Opposition to RJRV’s
`
`Motion to Compel 30(b)(6) Witnesses Relating to Injunctive Relief and accompanying Exhibit 1.
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 658-1 Filed 05/24/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID# 14931
`
`And FURTHER ORDERED that the un-redacted version of PMP’s Opposition to
`
`RJRV’s Motion to Compel 30(b)(6) Witnesses Relating to Injunctive Relief and accompanying
`
`Exhibit 1, shall remain SEALED until further order of the Court.
`
`
`
`ENTERED this _____ day of _________________, 2021.
`
`Alexandria, Virginia
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`__________________________________________
`
`