throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 1 of 14 PageID# 10690
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 1 of 14 Page|D# 10690
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 4
`
`EXHIBIT 4
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 2 of 14 PageID# 10691
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`------------------------------x
`
`In the Matter of Investigation No.
`
`
`
`CERTAIN TOBACCO HEATING ARTICLES 337-TA-1199
`
`AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`------------------------------x
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pages:
`
`Place:
`
`Date:
`
`1396 through 1603
`Washington, D.C.
`February 1, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HERITAGE REPORTING CORPORATION
`Official Reporters
`1220 L Street, N.W., Suite 206
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 628-4888
`contracts@hrccourtreporters.com
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 3 of 14 PageID# 10692
`
`
`
` 1405
`
`
` 1 regulation of tobacco and nicotine products.
`
` 2 JUDGE CHENEY: Any objection?
`
` 3 MR. BAYUK: No objection from Complainants, Your
`
` 4 Honor.
`
` 5 MS. SLADIC: No objection from the Staff.
`
` 6 JUDGE CHENEY: Hearing no objection, Ms. Ehrlich
`
` 7 will be recognized as an expert in the field of FDA law and
`
` 8 regulation of tobacco and nicotine products.
`
` 9 Please proceed, Mr. Grant.
`
` 10 MR. GRANT: Thank you very much, Your Honor.
`
` 11 BY MR. GRANT:
`
` 12 Q. Now, have you ever testified as an expert in any
`
` 13 kind of a court case before?
`
` 14 A. No, I have not, although I have been approached
`
` 15 a few times in the past.
`
` 16 Q. Okay. Well, if you've been approached in the
`
` 17 past and you haven't testified, I can only surmise that you
`
` 18 said no. If that's true, why did you say yes in this case?
`
` 19 A. Yeah, I -- I decided to participate in this case
`
` 20 because I do believe it's essential to public health for
`
` 21 smokers to have access to a wide variety of potentially
`
` 22 reduced risk products that have been evaluated and
`
` 23 authorized by FDA. IQOS is -- is one of only two products
`
` 24 that has been both PMTA and MRPT authorizations from FDA,
`
` 25 and, as a result, I think it is important to public health
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 4 of 14 PageID# 10693
`
`
`
` 1406
`
`
` 1 to maintain access to IQOS.
`
` 2 Q. Okay. Well, let's talk about MRTPs. What is
`
` 3 the purpose of an MRTP?
`
` 4 A. An MRTP application is intended to obtain a
`
` 5 modified risk tobacco product authorization from FDA.
`
` 6 Q. And what are the two types of MRTPs?
`
` 7 A. So there's only one MRTP, a modified risk
`
` 8 tobacco product. All products authorized under that
`
` 9 pathway are considered modified risk tobacco products.
`
` 10 However, there are two kinds of orders that you can get
`
` 11 under the MRTP provision.
`
` 12 You can get a risk modification order or an
`
` 13 exposure modification order.
`
` 14 Q. Okay. And just so we're clear for the Court,
`
` 15 what type of MRTP order did the FDA grant IQOS?
`
` 16 A. IQOS has an exposure modification order.
`
` 17 Q. Okay. Now, last week when court was ongoing,
`
` 18 did you have the opportunity to listen to the testimony of
`
` 19 Reynolds' experts, Dr. Murrelle and Mr. Clissold?
`
` 20 A. I did.
`
` 21 Q. Okay. And what's your reaction to
`
` 22 Dr. Murrelle's characterization that shoe polish could get
`
` 23 a reduced exposure MRTP?
`
` 24 A. I think that's preposterous. And I think
`
` 25 Mr. Clissold would agree with that. Obviously, the MRTP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 5 of 14 PageID# 10694
`
`
`
` 1414
`
`
` 1 Q. Okay. Why does it take so long to obtain a
`
` 2 PMTA?
`
` 3 A. It's just -- there's a -- there's a lot of data,
`
` 4 a lot of, you know, information in there and it has to be
`
` 5 reviewed by many different disciplines at FDA. So it's a
`
` 6 very, very rigorous review that -- you know, it just -- it
`
` 7 takes a very long time.
`
` 8 Q. Okay. We can take down the FDA authorization of
`
` 9 IQOS.
`
` 10 I'd like to turn to e-cigarettes now. So that
`
` 11 the Judge has it clear in his mind, have any e-cigarettes
`
` 12 whatsoever received a PMTA authorization?
`
` 13 A. No, none.
`
` 14 Q. Okay. Now, from a regulatory perspective, are
`
` 15 e-cigarettes IQOS substitutes?
`
` 16 A. I don't believe so. In fact, they're all
`
` 17 illegal currently. There are no legally marketed
`
` 18 e-cigarettes right now. Some are covered by FDA's
`
` 19 enforcement discretion policy under the Maryland District
`
` 20 Court order in the American Academy of Pediatrics case, but
`
` 21 none are legally marketed.
`
` 22 Q. Okay. So we've talked a little bit about this
`
` 23 American Academy of Pediatrics. Can you give the Judge a
`
` 24 little bit more background on the case and what led to its
`
` 25 filing?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 6 of 14 PageID# 10695
`
`
`
` 1415
`
`
` 1 A. Sure. So -- so deemed products when -- when the
`
` 2 Deeming Rule became effective, they were all required to go
`
` 3 through pre-market authorization, but at the same time, FDA
`
` 4 announced an enforcement discretion policy that allowed the
`
` 5 products to stay on the market while FDA, you know, got the
`
` 6 basics in place to accept PMTAs and then while they
`
` 7 reviewed.
`
` 8 So the -- there was a deadline for the PMTAs,
`
` 9 and that deadline changed multiple times and was pushed
`
` 10 back repeatedly. And, finally, some stakeholders,
`
` 11 including the American Academy of Pediatrics and some
`
` 12 individual pediatricians, started getting really concerned
`
` 13 about FDA's inaction in light of the, you know,
`
` 14 skyrocketing use of -- youth use of e-cigarettes, which
`
` 15 they viewed as -- as a significant public health problem.
`
` 16 So they sued FDA to try to -- to basically force
`
` 17 the agency to fulfill its legal obligations.
`
` 18 Q. Okay. And what did the federal judge in
`
` 19 Maryland, Judge Grimm, find?
`
` 20 A. Yeah, he observed that -- that the industry was
`
` 21 purposefully avoiding the pre-market requirements and
`
` 22 shortened that compliance period by almost two years.
`
` 23 Q. Okay. Did the judge make any findings on
`
` 24 whether youth use of e-cigarettes was a public health
`
` 25 problem?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 7 of 14 PageID# 10696
`
`
`
` 1416
`
`
` 1 A. Yeah, the judge focused a lot on that issue. It
`
` 2 found that there was an epidemic-level rise in -- in youth
`
` 3 use of e-cigarettes, and it observed that this was a clear
`
` 4 public health crisis.
`
` 5 Q. Okay. In light of those findings, what did the
`
` 6 judge order in the case?
`
` 7 A. So the judge ordered that all applications
`
` 8 needed to be submitted by September 9th, 2020, and for
`
` 9 timely filed PMTAs, they could stay on the market while FDA
`
` 10 reviewed any pending PMTAs for up to one year.
`
` 11 Q. Okay. Per the court's order, when does that
`
` 12 one-year grace period begin?
`
` 13 A. The -- the beginning of that one-year grace
`
` 14 period is -- is the -- the application's filing.
`
` 15 Q. Okay. Does the FDA's sort of discretionary
`
` 16 level of enforcement impact in any way the status of
`
` 17 products that are sold that are not in compliance with the
`
` 18 Maryland District Court's order as being either lawful or
`
` 19 unlawful?
`
` 20 A. No. All -- like I said, all e-cigarette
`
` 21 products are illegal products. And those that are not
`
` 22 covered by the Maryland court's enforcement discretion
`
` 23 policy are subject to immediate enforcement and -- and are
`
` 24 not permitted on the market.
`
` 25 Q. Now, we had some witnesses testify that the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 8 of 14 PageID# 10697
`
`
`
` 1417
`
`
` 1 Reynolds Vuse Solo PMTA was filed in October of 2019. Just
`
` 2 so we're crystal clear, when does the one-year grace period
`
` 3 imposed by the federal court expire?
`
` 4 A. For that product, it expired in October of 2020,
`
` 5 this past October.
`
` 6 Q. Okay. Now, is this Maryland case ongoing?
`
` 7 A. Well, the -- the court retained jurisdiction
`
` 8 over the case to ensure that he could take further action,
`
` 9 if necessary.
`
` 10 Q. Okay. Now, from a regulatory perspective,
`
` 11 what's the -- what's the status of the sort of U.S.
`
` 12 e-cigarette market?
`
` 13 A. It's extremely uncertain. You know, the former
`
` 14 commissioner, Dr. David -- FDA commissioner, Dr. David
`
` 15 Kessler, you know, has observed the uncertainty, as has --
`
` 16 and -- and Dr. Clissold, the Complainant's FDA expert, has
`
` 17 acknowledged that there's a lot of uncertainty.
`
` 18 Q. Okay. And have you provided a demonstrative
`
` 19 that sort of summarizes those uncertainties?
`
` 20 A. Yes.
`
` 21 Q. Okay. Let's pull up RDX-11.1. Is this what you
`
` 22 were referring to?
`
` 23 A. Yes.
`
` 24 Q. Okay. Let me walk you through this or let you
`
` 25 walk the Judge through this, is the better way to put it.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 9 of 14 PageID# 10698
`
`
`
` 1419
`
`
` 1 You know, I think -- I think they will start
`
` 2 taking enforcement action at some point. We just don't
`
` 3 know when. And, you know, the other thing that -- and they
`
` 4 have -- actually, they have been taking enforcement action
`
` 5 against products in this category. But the other unknown
`
` 6 that is on this demonstrative is this youth use problem is
`
` 7 still a real significant concern for the agency and for a
`
` 8 lot of stakeholders.
`
` 9 Q. Some people have testified that this enforcement
`
` 10 issue isn't a concern at all. Can I ask you, is there any
`
` 11 chance that the FDA simply chooses to ignore its
`
` 12 obligations and not exercise its enforcement powers?
`
` 13 A. No, the FDA has indicated what its enforcement
`
` 14 priorities are and it has been taking enforcement action.
`
` 15 Q. Okay. We can take that down. Let's pull up
`
` 16 RX-324, if we can. And can you tell the Judge what this
`
` 17 exhibit is, Ms. Ehrlich?
`
` 18 A. That's FDA's guidance on its enforcement
`
` 19 priorities for illegally marketed e-cigarettes and other
`
` 20 products.
`
` 21 Q. Okay. And we heard about a deficiency letter
`
` 22 that Reynolds had received. Let me ask you this question:
`
` 23 Has the FDA sent out any letters to enforce that court's
`
` 24 September 2020 deadline?
`
` 25 A. Sure, yeah. The FDA has sent a number of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 10 of 14 PageID# 10699
`
`
`
` 1420
`
`
` 1 warning letters. In fact, this past Friday, it sent
`
` 2 another bolus of warning letters against illegally marketed
`
` 3 e-cigarette products. So I think there are at least 22
`
` 4 that FDA has issued since the September 9th deadline.
`
` 5 Q. Okay. Putting aside the federal FDA, are there
`
` 6 any other authorities that can and are taking enforcement
`
` 7 action against e-cigarettes?
`
` 8 A. Yeah, for example, the U.S. Federal Trade
`
` 9 Commission has a study undergoing the marketing of
`
` 10 e-cigarette products, and I believe that Complainants have
`
` 11 been ordered to submit data and information to that
`
` 12 investigation.
`
` 13 State and local authorities have been, you know,
`
` 14 really concerned about these products and have -- and many
`
` 15 have banned flavored products in their jurisdictions.
`
` 16 Congress held a hearing on youth use of e-cigarettes at
`
` 17 which the Reynolds U.S.A. CEO, I believe, testified about
`
` 18 the youth abuse problem.
`
` 19 So there -- there's a lot of concern on those
`
` 20 fronts and a lot of inspected -- expected enforcement from
`
` 21 state and local authorities and -- and from the import --
`
` 22 enforcement upon import, of a lot of these products.
`
` 23 Q. Okay. We can take that down. Let's pull up, if
`
` 24 we can, JX-39. And let me ask you, Ms. Ehrlich, to
`
` 25 describe for the Judge what JX-39 is.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 11 of 14 PageID# 10700
`
`
`
` 1429
`
`
` 1 billing rate, under the terms of your retainer for this
`
` 2 investigation?
`
` 3 THE WITNESS: Well, I think my -- the rate is in
`
` 4 my report, so you can look at my report to see my rate.
`
` 5 BY MR. BAYUK:
`
` 6 Q. Okay. I guess not to lose the point of where I
`
` 7 wanted to go --
`
` 8 A. It's less -- it's less than what your FDA expert
`
` 9 is being compensated, I noticed that.
`
` 10 Q. You're not doing this for free, are you,
`
` 11 Ms. Ehrlich?
`
` 12 A. No, sir.
`
` 13 Q. Okay. Let me switch gears and ask you some
`
` 14 questions about PMTAs and the standard for PMTAs. We've
`
` 15 heard this term, I can't remember if you used it, but
`
` 16 certainly you're familiar with the term "appropriate for
`
` 17 the protection of public health," right?
`
` 18 A. Of course.
`
` 19 Q. Okay. And that's the standard in the statute
`
` 20 that governs the -- the authorization of PMTAs, right?
`
` 21 A. Correct.
`
` 22 Q. Okay. Now, FDA has never published a list of
`
` 23 requirements that are needed to get PMTA authorization, has
`
` 24 it?
`
` 25 A. Well, that's a little complicated. So as you
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 12 of 14 PageID# 10701
`
`
`
` 1430
`
`
` 1 may have heard references from FDA to foundational rules,
`
` 2 one of the reasons why FDA initially delayed the deadline
`
` 3 for submission of PMTAs is because it wanted to have in
`
` 4 place its foundational rules for PMTAs. And, in fact,
`
` 5 those foundational rules were sent to the office of the
`
` 6 Federal Register on January 19th and placed in the
`
` 7 pre-publication review.
`
` 8 And so we all -- I reviewed those closely.
`
` 9 Unfortunately, because of the administration change, those
`
` 10 regulations, because they had not yet been published in the
`
` 11 Federal Register, were withdrawn by the new administration.
`
` 12 So that document does, in fact, list the information
`
` 13 required for PMTA review very -- very clearly. It's
`
` 14 possible that it will be republished by this
`
` 15 administration, but we just don't know at this point.
`
` 16 Q. Let me ask you about some language you used just
`
` 17 a few months ago in your deposition. Tell me if you recall
`
` 18 these words.
`
` 19 "FDA has not issued any list of requirements for
`
` 20 a PMTA order," right?
`
` 21 A. That's what I testified to at the time, yes.
`
` 22 Q. Okay. And this standard, appropriate for the
`
` 23 protection of public health, in your view that is a vague
`
` 24 standard that can be interpreted in various different ways
`
` 25 by FDA, true?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 13 of 14 PageID# 10702
`
`
`
` 1451
`
`
` 1 You talked about this enforcement discretion
`
` 2 policy and the timeline that FDA is operating under to
`
` 3 review these -- these applications.
`
` 4 You agree that unless FDA decides to take
`
` 5 enforcement action, it allows these products, these ENDS
`
` 6 products, to remain on the market and to be sold, right?
`
` 7 A. Well, there are plenty of other entities that
`
` 8 could take action against these products, and state and
`
` 9 local authorities have been quite active in the area. And
`
` 10 a lot of these products have been blocked at the border.
`
` 11 There's an import alert for unauthorized e-cigarette
`
` 12 products that -- that has been issued and there have been
`
` 13 quite a number of import detentions.
`
` 14 In December, there was a huge seizure of
`
` 15 e-cigarette products upon importation. I think it covered
`
` 16 at least 33,000 products. So in addition to FDA
`
` 17 enforcement, there are a lot of other ways that these
`
` 18 products can -- can be removed from the -- the market or
`
` 19 blocked from the market. In fact, state and local
`
` 20 authorities, a lot of them have banned flavored products
`
` 21 from the marketplace, which is a huge percentage of these
`
` 22 products.
`
` 23 Q. Let me ask you -- let's pull up your deposition.
`
` 24 This is page 266. And I want to ask you about testimony
`
` 25 that appears at lines 16 to 23 on this page, 266, lines 16.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 14 of 14 PageID# 10703
`
`
`
` 1603
`
`
` 1 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER
`
` 2 TITLE: Certain Tobacco Heating Articles
`
` 3 INVESTIGATION NO: 337-TA-1199
`
` 4 HEARING DATE: February 1, 2021
`
` 5 LOCATION: Washington, D.C. - Remote
`
` 6 NATURE OF HEARING: Evidentiary Hearing
`
` 7 I hereby certify that the foregoing/attached
` transcript is a true, correct and complete record of the
` 8 above-referenced proceedings of the U.S. International
` Trade Commission.
` 9 Date: February 1, 2021
`
` 10 SIGNED:
`
` 11 Signature of the Contractor of the
` Authorized Contractor's Representative
` 12 1220 L Street, N.W, Suite 206
` Washington, D.C. 20005
` 13
` I hereby certify that I am not the Court Reporter
` 14 and that I have proofread the above-referenced transcript
` of the proceedings of the U.S. International Trade
` 15 Commission, against the aforementioned Court Reporter's
` notes and recordings, for accuracy in transcription in the
` 16 spelling, hyphenation, punctuation and speaker
` identification and did not make any changes of a
` 17 substantive nature. The foregoing/attached transcript is a
` true, correct and complete transcription of the
` 18 proceedings.
`
` 19 SIGNED:
` Signature of Proofreader
` 20
` I hereby certify that I reported the above-referenced
` 21 proceedings of the U.S. International Trade Commission and
` caused to be prepared from my tapes and notes of the
` 22 proceedings a true, correct and complete verbatim recording
` of the proceedings.
` 23
` SIGNED:
` 24 Signature of the Court Reporter
`
` 25
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket