`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 1 of 14 Page|D# 10690
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 4
`
`EXHIBIT 4
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 2 of 14 PageID# 10691
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`------------------------------x
`
`In the Matter of Investigation No.
`
`
`
`CERTAIN TOBACCO HEATING ARTICLES 337-TA-1199
`
`AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`------------------------------x
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pages:
`
`Place:
`
`Date:
`
`1396 through 1603
`Washington, D.C.
`February 1, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HERITAGE REPORTING CORPORATION
`Official Reporters
`1220 L Street, N.W., Suite 206
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 628-4888
`contracts@hrccourtreporters.com
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 3 of 14 PageID# 10692
`
`
`
` 1405
`
`
` 1 regulation of tobacco and nicotine products.
`
` 2 JUDGE CHENEY: Any objection?
`
` 3 MR. BAYUK: No objection from Complainants, Your
`
` 4 Honor.
`
` 5 MS. SLADIC: No objection from the Staff.
`
` 6 JUDGE CHENEY: Hearing no objection, Ms. Ehrlich
`
` 7 will be recognized as an expert in the field of FDA law and
`
` 8 regulation of tobacco and nicotine products.
`
` 9 Please proceed, Mr. Grant.
`
` 10 MR. GRANT: Thank you very much, Your Honor.
`
` 11 BY MR. GRANT:
`
` 12 Q. Now, have you ever testified as an expert in any
`
` 13 kind of a court case before?
`
` 14 A. No, I have not, although I have been approached
`
` 15 a few times in the past.
`
` 16 Q. Okay. Well, if you've been approached in the
`
` 17 past and you haven't testified, I can only surmise that you
`
` 18 said no. If that's true, why did you say yes in this case?
`
` 19 A. Yeah, I -- I decided to participate in this case
`
` 20 because I do believe it's essential to public health for
`
` 21 smokers to have access to a wide variety of potentially
`
` 22 reduced risk products that have been evaluated and
`
` 23 authorized by FDA. IQOS is -- is one of only two products
`
` 24 that has been both PMTA and MRPT authorizations from FDA,
`
` 25 and, as a result, I think it is important to public health
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 4 of 14 PageID# 10693
`
`
`
` 1406
`
`
` 1 to maintain access to IQOS.
`
` 2 Q. Okay. Well, let's talk about MRTPs. What is
`
` 3 the purpose of an MRTP?
`
` 4 A. An MRTP application is intended to obtain a
`
` 5 modified risk tobacco product authorization from FDA.
`
` 6 Q. And what are the two types of MRTPs?
`
` 7 A. So there's only one MRTP, a modified risk
`
` 8 tobacco product. All products authorized under that
`
` 9 pathway are considered modified risk tobacco products.
`
` 10 However, there are two kinds of orders that you can get
`
` 11 under the MRTP provision.
`
` 12 You can get a risk modification order or an
`
` 13 exposure modification order.
`
` 14 Q. Okay. And just so we're clear for the Court,
`
` 15 what type of MRTP order did the FDA grant IQOS?
`
` 16 A. IQOS has an exposure modification order.
`
` 17 Q. Okay. Now, last week when court was ongoing,
`
` 18 did you have the opportunity to listen to the testimony of
`
` 19 Reynolds' experts, Dr. Murrelle and Mr. Clissold?
`
` 20 A. I did.
`
` 21 Q. Okay. And what's your reaction to
`
` 22 Dr. Murrelle's characterization that shoe polish could get
`
` 23 a reduced exposure MRTP?
`
` 24 A. I think that's preposterous. And I think
`
` 25 Mr. Clissold would agree with that. Obviously, the MRTP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 5 of 14 PageID# 10694
`
`
`
` 1414
`
`
` 1 Q. Okay. Why does it take so long to obtain a
`
` 2 PMTA?
`
` 3 A. It's just -- there's a -- there's a lot of data,
`
` 4 a lot of, you know, information in there and it has to be
`
` 5 reviewed by many different disciplines at FDA. So it's a
`
` 6 very, very rigorous review that -- you know, it just -- it
`
` 7 takes a very long time.
`
` 8 Q. Okay. We can take down the FDA authorization of
`
` 9 IQOS.
`
` 10 I'd like to turn to e-cigarettes now. So that
`
` 11 the Judge has it clear in his mind, have any e-cigarettes
`
` 12 whatsoever received a PMTA authorization?
`
` 13 A. No, none.
`
` 14 Q. Okay. Now, from a regulatory perspective, are
`
` 15 e-cigarettes IQOS substitutes?
`
` 16 A. I don't believe so. In fact, they're all
`
` 17 illegal currently. There are no legally marketed
`
` 18 e-cigarettes right now. Some are covered by FDA's
`
` 19 enforcement discretion policy under the Maryland District
`
` 20 Court order in the American Academy of Pediatrics case, but
`
` 21 none are legally marketed.
`
` 22 Q. Okay. So we've talked a little bit about this
`
` 23 American Academy of Pediatrics. Can you give the Judge a
`
` 24 little bit more background on the case and what led to its
`
` 25 filing?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 6 of 14 PageID# 10695
`
`
`
` 1415
`
`
` 1 A. Sure. So -- so deemed products when -- when the
`
` 2 Deeming Rule became effective, they were all required to go
`
` 3 through pre-market authorization, but at the same time, FDA
`
` 4 announced an enforcement discretion policy that allowed the
`
` 5 products to stay on the market while FDA, you know, got the
`
` 6 basics in place to accept PMTAs and then while they
`
` 7 reviewed.
`
` 8 So the -- there was a deadline for the PMTAs,
`
` 9 and that deadline changed multiple times and was pushed
`
` 10 back repeatedly. And, finally, some stakeholders,
`
` 11 including the American Academy of Pediatrics and some
`
` 12 individual pediatricians, started getting really concerned
`
` 13 about FDA's inaction in light of the, you know,
`
` 14 skyrocketing use of -- youth use of e-cigarettes, which
`
` 15 they viewed as -- as a significant public health problem.
`
` 16 So they sued FDA to try to -- to basically force
`
` 17 the agency to fulfill its legal obligations.
`
` 18 Q. Okay. And what did the federal judge in
`
` 19 Maryland, Judge Grimm, find?
`
` 20 A. Yeah, he observed that -- that the industry was
`
` 21 purposefully avoiding the pre-market requirements and
`
` 22 shortened that compliance period by almost two years.
`
` 23 Q. Okay. Did the judge make any findings on
`
` 24 whether youth use of e-cigarettes was a public health
`
` 25 problem?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 7 of 14 PageID# 10696
`
`
`
` 1416
`
`
` 1 A. Yeah, the judge focused a lot on that issue. It
`
` 2 found that there was an epidemic-level rise in -- in youth
`
` 3 use of e-cigarettes, and it observed that this was a clear
`
` 4 public health crisis.
`
` 5 Q. Okay. In light of those findings, what did the
`
` 6 judge order in the case?
`
` 7 A. So the judge ordered that all applications
`
` 8 needed to be submitted by September 9th, 2020, and for
`
` 9 timely filed PMTAs, they could stay on the market while FDA
`
` 10 reviewed any pending PMTAs for up to one year.
`
` 11 Q. Okay. Per the court's order, when does that
`
` 12 one-year grace period begin?
`
` 13 A. The -- the beginning of that one-year grace
`
` 14 period is -- is the -- the application's filing.
`
` 15 Q. Okay. Does the FDA's sort of discretionary
`
` 16 level of enforcement impact in any way the status of
`
` 17 products that are sold that are not in compliance with the
`
` 18 Maryland District Court's order as being either lawful or
`
` 19 unlawful?
`
` 20 A. No. All -- like I said, all e-cigarette
`
` 21 products are illegal products. And those that are not
`
` 22 covered by the Maryland court's enforcement discretion
`
` 23 policy are subject to immediate enforcement and -- and are
`
` 24 not permitted on the market.
`
` 25 Q. Now, we had some witnesses testify that the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 8 of 14 PageID# 10697
`
`
`
` 1417
`
`
` 1 Reynolds Vuse Solo PMTA was filed in October of 2019. Just
`
` 2 so we're crystal clear, when does the one-year grace period
`
` 3 imposed by the federal court expire?
`
` 4 A. For that product, it expired in October of 2020,
`
` 5 this past October.
`
` 6 Q. Okay. Now, is this Maryland case ongoing?
`
` 7 A. Well, the -- the court retained jurisdiction
`
` 8 over the case to ensure that he could take further action,
`
` 9 if necessary.
`
` 10 Q. Okay. Now, from a regulatory perspective,
`
` 11 what's the -- what's the status of the sort of U.S.
`
` 12 e-cigarette market?
`
` 13 A. It's extremely uncertain. You know, the former
`
` 14 commissioner, Dr. David -- FDA commissioner, Dr. David
`
` 15 Kessler, you know, has observed the uncertainty, as has --
`
` 16 and -- and Dr. Clissold, the Complainant's FDA expert, has
`
` 17 acknowledged that there's a lot of uncertainty.
`
` 18 Q. Okay. And have you provided a demonstrative
`
` 19 that sort of summarizes those uncertainties?
`
` 20 A. Yes.
`
` 21 Q. Okay. Let's pull up RDX-11.1. Is this what you
`
` 22 were referring to?
`
` 23 A. Yes.
`
` 24 Q. Okay. Let me walk you through this or let you
`
` 25 walk the Judge through this, is the better way to put it.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 9 of 14 PageID# 10698
`
`
`
` 1419
`
`
` 1 You know, I think -- I think they will start
`
` 2 taking enforcement action at some point. We just don't
`
` 3 know when. And, you know, the other thing that -- and they
`
` 4 have -- actually, they have been taking enforcement action
`
` 5 against products in this category. But the other unknown
`
` 6 that is on this demonstrative is this youth use problem is
`
` 7 still a real significant concern for the agency and for a
`
` 8 lot of stakeholders.
`
` 9 Q. Some people have testified that this enforcement
`
` 10 issue isn't a concern at all. Can I ask you, is there any
`
` 11 chance that the FDA simply chooses to ignore its
`
` 12 obligations and not exercise its enforcement powers?
`
` 13 A. No, the FDA has indicated what its enforcement
`
` 14 priorities are and it has been taking enforcement action.
`
` 15 Q. Okay. We can take that down. Let's pull up
`
` 16 RX-324, if we can. And can you tell the Judge what this
`
` 17 exhibit is, Ms. Ehrlich?
`
` 18 A. That's FDA's guidance on its enforcement
`
` 19 priorities for illegally marketed e-cigarettes and other
`
` 20 products.
`
` 21 Q. Okay. And we heard about a deficiency letter
`
` 22 that Reynolds had received. Let me ask you this question:
`
` 23 Has the FDA sent out any letters to enforce that court's
`
` 24 September 2020 deadline?
`
` 25 A. Sure, yeah. The FDA has sent a number of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 10 of 14 PageID# 10699
`
`
`
` 1420
`
`
` 1 warning letters. In fact, this past Friday, it sent
`
` 2 another bolus of warning letters against illegally marketed
`
` 3 e-cigarette products. So I think there are at least 22
`
` 4 that FDA has issued since the September 9th deadline.
`
` 5 Q. Okay. Putting aside the federal FDA, are there
`
` 6 any other authorities that can and are taking enforcement
`
` 7 action against e-cigarettes?
`
` 8 A. Yeah, for example, the U.S. Federal Trade
`
` 9 Commission has a study undergoing the marketing of
`
` 10 e-cigarette products, and I believe that Complainants have
`
` 11 been ordered to submit data and information to that
`
` 12 investigation.
`
` 13 State and local authorities have been, you know,
`
` 14 really concerned about these products and have -- and many
`
` 15 have banned flavored products in their jurisdictions.
`
` 16 Congress held a hearing on youth use of e-cigarettes at
`
` 17 which the Reynolds U.S.A. CEO, I believe, testified about
`
` 18 the youth abuse problem.
`
` 19 So there -- there's a lot of concern on those
`
` 20 fronts and a lot of inspected -- expected enforcement from
`
` 21 state and local authorities and -- and from the import --
`
` 22 enforcement upon import, of a lot of these products.
`
` 23 Q. Okay. We can take that down. Let's pull up, if
`
` 24 we can, JX-39. And let me ask you, Ms. Ehrlich, to
`
` 25 describe for the Judge what JX-39 is.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 11 of 14 PageID# 10700
`
`
`
` 1429
`
`
` 1 billing rate, under the terms of your retainer for this
`
` 2 investigation?
`
` 3 THE WITNESS: Well, I think my -- the rate is in
`
` 4 my report, so you can look at my report to see my rate.
`
` 5 BY MR. BAYUK:
`
` 6 Q. Okay. I guess not to lose the point of where I
`
` 7 wanted to go --
`
` 8 A. It's less -- it's less than what your FDA expert
`
` 9 is being compensated, I noticed that.
`
` 10 Q. You're not doing this for free, are you,
`
` 11 Ms. Ehrlich?
`
` 12 A. No, sir.
`
` 13 Q. Okay. Let me switch gears and ask you some
`
` 14 questions about PMTAs and the standard for PMTAs. We've
`
` 15 heard this term, I can't remember if you used it, but
`
` 16 certainly you're familiar with the term "appropriate for
`
` 17 the protection of public health," right?
`
` 18 A. Of course.
`
` 19 Q. Okay. And that's the standard in the statute
`
` 20 that governs the -- the authorization of PMTAs, right?
`
` 21 A. Correct.
`
` 22 Q. Okay. Now, FDA has never published a list of
`
` 23 requirements that are needed to get PMTA authorization, has
`
` 24 it?
`
` 25 A. Well, that's a little complicated. So as you
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 12 of 14 PageID# 10701
`
`
`
` 1430
`
`
` 1 may have heard references from FDA to foundational rules,
`
` 2 one of the reasons why FDA initially delayed the deadline
`
` 3 for submission of PMTAs is because it wanted to have in
`
` 4 place its foundational rules for PMTAs. And, in fact,
`
` 5 those foundational rules were sent to the office of the
`
` 6 Federal Register on January 19th and placed in the
`
` 7 pre-publication review.
`
` 8 And so we all -- I reviewed those closely.
`
` 9 Unfortunately, because of the administration change, those
`
` 10 regulations, because they had not yet been published in the
`
` 11 Federal Register, were withdrawn by the new administration.
`
` 12 So that document does, in fact, list the information
`
` 13 required for PMTA review very -- very clearly. It's
`
` 14 possible that it will be republished by this
`
` 15 administration, but we just don't know at this point.
`
` 16 Q. Let me ask you about some language you used just
`
` 17 a few months ago in your deposition. Tell me if you recall
`
` 18 these words.
`
` 19 "FDA has not issued any list of requirements for
`
` 20 a PMTA order," right?
`
` 21 A. That's what I testified to at the time, yes.
`
` 22 Q. Okay. And this standard, appropriate for the
`
` 23 protection of public health, in your view that is a vague
`
` 24 standard that can be interpreted in various different ways
`
` 25 by FDA, true?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 13 of 14 PageID# 10702
`
`
`
` 1451
`
`
` 1 You talked about this enforcement discretion
`
` 2 policy and the timeline that FDA is operating under to
`
` 3 review these -- these applications.
`
` 4 You agree that unless FDA decides to take
`
` 5 enforcement action, it allows these products, these ENDS
`
` 6 products, to remain on the market and to be sold, right?
`
` 7 A. Well, there are plenty of other entities that
`
` 8 could take action against these products, and state and
`
` 9 local authorities have been quite active in the area. And
`
` 10 a lot of these products have been blocked at the border.
`
` 11 There's an import alert for unauthorized e-cigarette
`
` 12 products that -- that has been issued and there have been
`
` 13 quite a number of import detentions.
`
` 14 In December, there was a huge seizure of
`
` 15 e-cigarette products upon importation. I think it covered
`
` 16 at least 33,000 products. So in addition to FDA
`
` 17 enforcement, there are a lot of other ways that these
`
` 18 products can -- can be removed from the -- the market or
`
` 19 blocked from the market. In fact, state and local
`
` 20 authorities, a lot of them have banned flavored products
`
` 21 from the marketplace, which is a huge percentage of these
`
` 22 products.
`
` 23 Q. Let me ask you -- let's pull up your deposition.
`
` 24 This is page 266. And I want to ask you about testimony
`
` 25 that appears at lines 16 to 23 on this page, 266, lines 16.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 477-3 Filed 03/11/21 Page 14 of 14 PageID# 10703
`
`
`
` 1603
`
`
` 1 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER
`
` 2 TITLE: Certain Tobacco Heating Articles
`
` 3 INVESTIGATION NO: 337-TA-1199
`
` 4 HEARING DATE: February 1, 2021
`
` 5 LOCATION: Washington, D.C. - Remote
`
` 6 NATURE OF HEARING: Evidentiary Hearing
`
` 7 I hereby certify that the foregoing/attached
` transcript is a true, correct and complete record of the
` 8 above-referenced proceedings of the U.S. International
` Trade Commission.
` 9 Date: February 1, 2021
`
` 10 SIGNED:
`
` 11 Signature of the Contractor of the
` Authorized Contractor's Representative
` 12 1220 L Street, N.W, Suite 206
` Washington, D.C. 20005
` 13
` I hereby certify that I am not the Court Reporter
` 14 and that I have proofread the above-referenced transcript
` of the proceedings of the U.S. International Trade
` 15 Commission, against the aforementioned Court Reporter's
` notes and recordings, for accuracy in transcription in the
` 16 spelling, hyphenation, punctuation and speaker
` identification and did not make any changes of a
` 17 substantive nature. The foregoing/attached transcript is a
` true, correct and complete transcription of the
` 18 proceedings.
`
` 19 SIGNED:
` Signature of Proofreader
` 20
` I hereby certify that I reported the above-referenced
` 21 proceedings of the U.S. International Trade Commission and
` caused to be prepared from my tapes and notes of the
` 22 proceedings a true, correct and complete verbatim recording
` of the proceedings.
` 23
` SIGNED:
` 24 Signature of the Court Reporter
`
` 25
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`