throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 476-3 Filed 03/10/21 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 10635
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 476-3 Filed 03/10/21 Page 1 of 6 Page|D# 10635
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 476-3 Filed 03/10/21 Page 2 of 6 PageID# 10636
`
`
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Max.Grant@lw.com
`Wednesday, February 17, 2021 6:03 PM
`Devitt, William E.; RJREDVA; cmolster@molsterlaw.com; Maiorana, David M.
`Jennifer.Koh@lw.com; Lawrence.Gotts@lw.com; Matthew.Moore@lw.com;
`Amy.Thomas@lw.com; Clement.Naples@lw.com
`RE: RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. Altria Client Services LLC - Case No. 1:20-cv-00393-
`LO-TCB (E.D. Va.)
`
`** External mail **
`
`Bill – I understand your proposal but appreciate the clarification nonetheless.  The problem with your proposal is that, 
`assuming it were possible to take just 2 business days to read and absorb the expert reports, that would only leave 1 
`week/5 days to complete all the expert depositions on five different patents, which is insufficient and which will 
`prejudice our clients. More realistically ‐ assuming it takes a week to read/absorb the expert reports and prepare a 
`deposition outline – that leaves just 2 days for the parties to conduct ALL the expert depositions.   That is unworkable.  It 
`also effectively forecloses any follow up on existing fact discovery after reports, and unduly compresses the time for 
`dispositive motions. 

`Separately, it is inconsistent with the Court’s schedule and inconsistent with the explicit directions Judge Buchanan 
`directed to Reynolds in open court:  

`I expect counsel for the plaintiffs to be ready to file that
`within the same time period, once the stay is lifted. So, if
`it's due in ten days, I expect, once the stay is lifted, you'll
`file it in ten days. Okay? 
`

`I’m sympathetic to the problem of expert schedules, but once we filed our motion to lift the stay you should have 
`engaged with your experts just in case our motion turned out to be well founded, as we did with the Court’s express 
`directions of December 4 in mind.  This schedule was not unforeseeable, it was the opposite.  

`If you want to push the expert report dates to February 24 and March 24, we will not oppose a motion by Plaintiffs to do 
`that. Any more delay than that will unduly prejudice our clients.  

`I’m open chat at 8pm tonight, and at 830am or 11am tomorrow.  Send me the number where I can reach you and your 
`preferred time.    
`                
`Thanks.  
`               Max 


`From: Devitt, William E. <wdevitt@jonesday.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 5:41 PM 
`To: Grant, Max (NY‐DC) <Max.Grant@lw.com>; RJREDVA <RJREDVA@jonesday.com>; cmolster@molsterlaw.com; 
`Maiorana, David M. <dmaiorana@JonesDay.com> 
`Cc: Koh, Jennifer (SD) <Jennifer.Koh@lw.com>; Gotts, Larry (DC) <Lawrence.Gotts@lw.com>; Moore, Matthew (DC) 
`<Matthew.Moore@lw.com>; Thomas, Amy (DC) <Amy.Thomas@lw.com>; Naples, Clement (NY) 
`<Clement.Naples@lw.com> 
`Subject: RE: RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. Altria Client Services LLC ‐ Case No. 1:20‐cv‐00393‐LO‐TCB (E.D. Va.)  

`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 476-3 Filed 03/10/21 Page 3 of 6 PageID# 10637
`
`Max:
`
`To be clear, we are only proposing to move the date for exchange of expert reports 10 days in order to
`accommodate our experts’ schedules. These dates would not affect any other dates in the schedule you
`proposed.
`
`We are prepared to move forward with litigation as the Court ordered, but we also wanted to avoid unnecessary
`Motion practice with the Court on the schedule if possible.
`
`If Altria and PM do not agree to our proposed dates, let me know if you are available for a meet and confer
`tonight or early tomorrow, so that we can file our motion before the end of the day tomorrow.
`
`Regards.
`
`Bill
`
`
`
`From: Max.Grant@lw.com <Max.Grant@lw.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 4:16 PM 
`To: Devitt, William E. <wdevitt@jonesday.com>; RJREDVA <RJREDVA@jonesday.com>; cmolster@molsterlaw.com; 
`Maiorana, David M. <dmaiorana@JonesDay.com> 
`Cc: Jennifer.Koh@lw.com; Lawrence.Gotts@lw.com; Matthew.Moore@lw.com; Amy.Thomas@lw.com; 
`Clement.Naples@lw.com 
`Subject: RE: RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. Altria Client Services LLC ‐ Case No. 1:20‐cv‐00393‐LO‐TCB (E.D. Va.)  

`** External mail **
`
`Bill – your proposed change to the Court’s existing schedule is not acceptable.  That does not provide anything close to 
`enough time to complete the rest of what needs to be done by the Court’s April 16 deadline for the final pretrial 
`conference.  Everyone has had plenty of notice.  I’ve been on trial with your partners and you and the JoneDay EDVa 
`team has not (it also has functionally no overlap with the JonesDay ITC team).  We’re ready and we assume you are too.  

`Sincerely,  
`               Max 


`From: Devitt, William E. <wdevitt@jonesday.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 5:06 PM 
`To: Grant, Max (NY‐DC) <Max.Grant@lw.com>; RJREDVA <RJREDVA@jonesday.com>; cmolster@molsterlaw.com; 
`Maiorana, David M. <dmaiorana@JonesDay.com> 
`Cc: Koh, Jennifer (SD) <Jennifer.Koh@lw.com>; Gotts, Larry (DC) <Lawrence.Gotts@lw.com>; Moore, Matthew (DC) 
`<Matthew.Moore@lw.com>; Thomas, Amy (DC) <Amy.Thomas@lw.com>; Naples, Clement (NY) 
`<Clement.Naples@lw.com> 
`Subject: RE: RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. Altria Client Services LLC ‐ Case No. 1:20‐cv‐00393‐LO‐TCB (E.D. Va.)  

`Max:
`
`Thanks for your response. We appreciate what the Court stated at the December 4 hearing. But you will recall
`that the Court also stated that it expected the parties to work out a timeline that makes sense in view of all the
`things that need to be completed.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 476-3 Filed 03/10/21 Page 4 of 6 PageID# 10638
`
`
`Accordingly, we propose exchanging Opening Expert Reports on March 3, and Responsive Expert Reports on
`March 31. Let us know if that is acceptable. If Altria and PM are unwilling to agree, Reynolds intends to file a
`Motion with the Court.
`
`Regards.
`
`Bill
`
`
`From: Max.Grant@lw.com <Max.Grant@lw.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 3:03 PM 
`To: Devitt, William E. <wdevitt@jonesday.com>; RJREDVA <RJREDVA@jonesday.com>; cmolster@molsterlaw.com; 
`Maiorana, David M. <dmaiorana@JonesDay.com> 
`Cc: Jennifer.Koh@lw.com; Lawrence.Gotts@lw.com; Matthew.Moore@lw.com; Amy.Thomas@lw.com; 
`Clement.Naples@lw.com 
`Subject: RE: RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. Altria Client Services LLC ‐ Case No. 1:20‐cv‐00393‐LO‐TCB (E.D. Va.)  

`** External mail **
`
`Thanks Bill.  Our view is the Court made itself very clear and said where we’d be picking up precisely where we left 
`off.  The Court said that expressly and it has been known by the parties and their counsel for the last 10 weeks.  We’re 
`not inclined to pushing the dates at all. In our view, the parties are subject to an existing court order the requires service 
`of reports on Monday.   

`If Reynolds intends to seek relief, it needs to do so in an expedited manner. 

`Sincerely,  
`               Max 

`From: Devitt, William E. <wdevitt@jonesday.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 3:55 PM 
`To: Grant, Max (NY‐DC) <Max.Grant@lw.com>; RJREDVA <RJREDVA@jonesday.com>; cmolster@molsterlaw.com; 
`Maiorana, David M. <dmaiorana@JonesDay.com> 
`Cc: Koh, Jennifer (SD) <Jennifer.Koh@lw.com>; Gotts, Larry (DC) <Lawrence.Gotts@lw.com>; Moore, Matthew (DC) 
`<Matthew.Moore@lw.com>; Thomas, Amy (DC) <Amy.Thomas@lw.com> 
`Subject: RE: RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. Altria Client Services LLC ‐ Case No. 1:20‐cv‐00393‐LO‐TCB (E.D. Va.)  

`Max:
`
`Thanks for the proposed schedule. Our initial thought is that some of dates look a little tight. Please let us
`know if Altria/Philip Morris is amenable to pushing the dates out a little bit, at a minimum the Opening and
`Responsive Expert Reports in order to the give the experts a little more time to re-engage. Several of our
`experts/university professors have been very busy with the new semester and the accompanying COVID issues
`on campus.
`
`Please advise.
`
`Regards.
`
`Bill
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 476-3 Filed 03/10/21 Page 5 of 6 PageID# 10639
`
`
`
`William E. Devitt
`Partner
`JONES DAY® - One Firm Worldwide℠
`77 West Wacker, Suite 3500
`Chicago, Illinois 60601-1692
`Office: +1.312.269.4240
`wdevitt@jonesday.com
`
`From: Max.Grant@lw.com <Max.Grant@lw.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 11:48 AM 
`To: RJREDVA <RJREDVA@jonesday.com>; cmolster@molsterlaw.com; Maiorana, David M. <dmaiorana@JonesDay.com> 
`Cc: Jennifer.Koh@lw.com; Lawrence.Gotts@lw.com; Matthew.Moore@lw.com; Amy.Thomas@lw.com 
`Subject: RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. Altria Client Services LLC ‐ Case No. 1:20‐cv‐00393‐LO‐TCB (E.D. Va.)  

`** External mail **
`
`Counsel – Consistent with the Court’s order of yesterday granting our motion to lift the stay, and the 
`December 4, 2020 hearing (Tr. at 11‐12), please confirm RJR will serve its burden of proof expert reports no 
`later than 5:00 p.m., February 22, 2021.  To the extent you dispute that they are due at that time, please 
`provide your position by the close of business today so we can jointly approach the Court to confirm that due 
`date and the following schedule.   

`If we do not hear from you today we will understand you are confirming our understanding of the below 
`schedule and will serve your expert reports by 5:00 p.m. on Monday. 


`
`Opening Expert Reports
`Responsive Expert Reports
`Close of Discovery
`Last Day to File Dispositive
`Motions
`Oppositions to Dispositive
`Motions
`Parties file pre-trial disclosures
`Exhibit List, Witness List, Written
`Stipulation of Uncontested Facts
`Final Pretrial Conference
`File Objections to Trial Exhibits
`
`Monday, Feb. 22
`Monday, March 22
`Monday, April 12
`Friday, April 16
`
`Friday, April 30
`
`Friday, April 16
`
`Friday, April 16
`Monday, April 26
`
` I
`
` also presume since we are now the putative plaintiff that you agree the trial presentation will proceed in that 
`manner with us as the plaintiff and Reynolds as the defendant. If not, we need to confer on that as well, 
`though there is less urgency on that.  

`Thank you.  

`Maximilian A. Grant
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 476-3 Filed 03/10/21 Page 6 of 6 PageID# 10640
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`885 Third Ave. (53rd St.) | New York, NY 10022 | 1.212.906.1325
`555 Eleventh Street, NW | Washington, D.C. 20004 | 1.202.637.2267
`Email: max.grant@lw.com
`Bio: Attorney Profile
`http://www.lw.com


`_________________________________
`
`This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of
`the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express
`permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
`copies including any attachments.
`
`Latham & Watkins LLP or any of its affiliates may monitor electronic communications sent or received by our
`networks in order to protect our business and verify compliance with our policies and relevant legal
`requirements. Any personal information contained or referred to within this electronic communication will be
`processed in accordance with the firm's privacy notices and Global Privacy Standards available at www.lw.com.
`***This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected
`by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system
`without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected.***
`***This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected
`by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system
`without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected.***
`***This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected
`by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system
`without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected.***
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket