throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 470 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 10408
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`
`RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND R.J.
`REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY
`
`
`Plaintiffs-Counterclaim
`Defendants,
`
`
`v.
`
`ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC; PHILIP
`MORRIS USA INC.; PHILIP MORRIS
`PRODUCTS S.A.
`
`
`Defendants-Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs.
`
`Case No. 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS, AND
`DIRECTION OF SUBMISSION OF HAGUE CONVENTION APPLICATION FOR
`AUTHORIZATION OF THE DULY APPOINTED COMMISSIONERS TO TAKE
`EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 17 OF THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 18
`MARCH 1970 ON THE TAKING OF EVIDENCE ABROAD IN CIVIL OR
`COMMERCIAL MATTERS
`
`i
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 470 Filed 03/05/21 Page 2 of 6 PageID# 10409
`
`
`
`Counterclaim Plaintiffs hereby move the Court for entry of an order duly appointing
`
`counsel for the parties as Commissioners for the purpose of taking the voluntary testimony by
`
`oral examination under oath via videoconference in Switzerland of six (6) witnesses,1 whom
`
`have been identified by the parties as witnesses who will be deposed in this case, who either live
`
`or work in Switzerland pursuant to Article 17 of the Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on
`
`Taking Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (the “Hague Convention”).
`
`Counterclaim Plaintiffs have conferred with its Swiss counsel, Bär and Karrer, who has advised
`
`to use the procedures of Article 17 of the Hague Convention to facilitate the taking of evidence
`
`in Switzerland.
`
`Article 17 of the Hague Convention provides that “[i]n a civil or commercial matter, a
`
`person duly appointed as a commissioner for the purpose may, without compulsion, take
`
`evidence in the territory of a Contracting State in aid of proceedings commenced in the courts
`
`of another Contracting State if – (a) a competent authority designated by the State where the
`
`evidence is to be taken has given its permission either generally or in the particular case; and (b)
`
`he complies with the conditions which the competent authority has specified in the permission.
`
`A Contracting State may declare that the evidence may be taken under this Article without its
`
`prior permission.” Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in
`
`Civil
`
`and
`
`Commercial
`
`Matters,
`
`Article
`
`17,
`
`available
`
`at
`
`https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=82.
`
` Therefore, pursuant to
`
`Article 17 of the Hague Convention, a U.S. court can appoint certain U.S. attorneys to take the
`
`
`1 For avoidance of doubt, the witnesses at issue in this motion are Moira Gilchrist, Filip Tack,
`Masja Hoogland, Michel Thorens, Noori Brifcani, and Edward Kiernan.
`1
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 470 Filed 03/05/21 Page 3 of 6 PageID# 10410
`
`
`
`voluntary testimony of a witness in Switzerland. Counterclaim Defendants do not oppose this
`
`motion.
`
`Swiss law can prohibit the taking of evidence in Switzerland for purposes of a foreign
`
`civil proceeding absent compliance with treaties or international agreements. See, e.g., U.S.
`
`Embassy
`
`in Switzerland and Liechtenstein, at https://ch.usembassy.gov/u-s-citizen-
`
`services/local-resources-of-u-s-citizens/living-in-ch/judicial-information/obtaining-evidence/
`
`(last visited November 12, 2020). Indeed, the Swiss Penal Code provides that attorneys
`
`attempting to take a deposition or carry out other activities on behalf of a foreign state in
`
`Switzerland outside of these authorized methods are subject to arrest on criminal charges. See,
`
`e.g., Article 271 of
`
`the Swiss Penal Code (https://www.admin.ch/opc/en/classified-
`
`compilation/19370083/index.html). Thus, to comply with Swiss law, Counterclaim Plaintiffs
`
`must comply with the Hague Convention in providing testimony in this matter. Both the United
`
`States and Switzerland are parties to the Hague Convention. Switzerland ratified the Hague
`
`Convention on November 2, 1994. See Hague Conf. on Private Int’l Law, Status Table,
`
`http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.status&cid=82 (last updated April 2020).
`
`Counterclaim Plaintiffs respectfully requests that the Court issue an order appointing the
`
`following counsel for Counterclaim Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants as commissioners
`
`pursuant to Article 17 of the Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on Taking Evidence Abroad
`
`in Civil or Commercial Matters:
`
`Counsel at Latham & Watkins LLP for Counterclaim Plaintiffs (located at 555 11th
`
`Street NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20004; 330 N Wabash Avenue, Suite 2800, Chicago, IL
`
`60611; 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000, San Francisco, CA 94111; 355 South Grand Avenue,
`
`Suite 100 Los Angeles, CA 90071; 140 Scott Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025): Maximilian Grant,
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 470 Filed 03/05/21 Page 4 of 6 PageID# 10411
`
`
`
`Bert Reiser, Matthew Moore, Jamie Underwood, Brenda Danek, Gregory Sobolski, Lawrence
`
`Gotts, Clement Naples, Brett Sandford, Thomas Yeh, and Surendra Ravula.
`
`Counsel at Bär & Karrer AG
`
`for Counterclaim Plaintiffs
`
`(located at
`
`Brandschenkestrasse 90, 8027 Zurich, Switzerland): Matthew Reiter and Martina Athanas.
`
`Counsel at Jones Day for Counterclaim Defendants (located at 1420 Peachtree Street,
`
`N.E., Suite 800, Atlanta, GA 30309; 77 West Wacker, Suite 3500, Chicago, IL 60601; 901
`
`Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44114; 4655 Executive Drive, Suite 1500, San Diego, CA
`
`92121; 555 California Street, 26th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104; 90 South 7th Street, Suite 4950,
`
`Minneapolis, MN 55402; 51 Louisiana Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC, 20001; 250 Vesey Street,
`
`New York, NY 10281; 555 South Flower Street, 50th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071; 150 West
`
`Jefferson, Suite 2100, Detroit, MI, 48226; 2727 North Harwood Street, Suite 500, Dallas, TX,
`
`75201): Stephanie Parker, William Devitt, David Maiorana, Emily Baker, Frank Bayuk, Robert
`
`Breetz, Douglas Clark, Michael Lavine, Sanjiv Laud, Christopher Liu, Kenneth Luchesi, John
`
`Marlott, Kevin McCarthy, John Michalik, Amelia Murray, Michael Quinlan, Nicole Smith, Alexis
`
`Smith, Michelle Smit, Emily Tait, Thomas Vitt, Jennifer Weizenecker, and Jeffrey White.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Counterclaim Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court issue
`
`an order appointing the persons listed above as commissioners for the purpose of taking voluntary
`
`testimony by oral examination under oath via videoconference in Switzerland. The Court’s signed
`
`order will be filed together with the necessary application for authorization from the relevant Swiss
`
`authorities.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 470 Filed 03/05/21 Page 5 of 6 PageID# 10412
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 5, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Maximilian A. Grant
`Maximilian A. Grant (VSB No. 91792)
`max.grant@lw.com
`Lawrence J. Gotts (VSB No. 25337)
`lawrence.gotts@lw.com
`Matthew J. Moore (pro hac vice)
`matthew.moore@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`555 Eleventh Street, N.W., Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20004
`Telephone: (202) 637-2200
`Facsimile: (202) 637-2201
`
`Clement J. Naples (pro hac vice)
`clement.naples@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`885 Third Avenue
`New York, NY 10022-4834
`Tel: (212) 906-1200; Fax: (212) 751-4864
`
`Gregory J. Sobolski (pro hac vice)
`greg.sobolski@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 391-0600
`Facsimile: (415) 395-8095
`
`Brenda L. Danek (pro hac vice)
`brenda.danek@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`330 North Wabash Avenue, Suite 2800
`Chicago, IL 60611
`Tel: (312) 876-7700; Fax: (312) 993-9767
`
`Counsel for Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs
`Altria Client Services LLC, Philip Morris USA Inc.,
`and Philip Morris Products S.A.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 470 Filed 03/05/21 Page 6 of 6 PageID# 10413
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 5th day of March, 2021, a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`
`was served using the Court’s CM/ECF system, with electronic notification of such filing to all
`
`counsel of record:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Maximilian A. Grant
`Maximilian A. Grant (VSB No. 91792)
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`555 Eleventh Street, N.W., Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20004
`Telephone: (202) 637-2200
`Facsimile: (202) 637-2201
`Email: max.grant@lw.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants-Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs Altria Client Services LLC, Philip
`Morris USA Inc., and Philip Morris
`Products S.A.
`
`1
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket