`
`Exhibit 3
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1488-3 Filed 04/28/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID# 41682
`Case: 22-1227 Document: 28 Page: 1 Filed: 01/25/2022
`
`NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A., PHILIP
`MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES
`LLC,
`Appellants
`
`v.
`
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,
`Appellee
`
`RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC., R. J.
`REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY, R.J. REYNOLDS
`TOBACCO COMPANY,
`Intervenors
`______________________
`
`2022-1227
`______________________
`
`Appeal from the United States International Trade
`Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1199.
`______________________
`
`ON MOTION
`______________________
`
`Before LOURIE, PROST, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.
`PER CURIAM.
`
`O R D E R
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1488-3 Filed 04/28/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID# 41683
`Case: 22-1227 Document: 28 Page: 2 Filed: 01/25/2022
`
`2
`
`
`
`PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A. v. ITC
`
` The appellants move pursuant to Rule 8 of the Federal
`Rules of Appellate Procedure to stay, pending appeal, re-
`medial orders issued by the International Trade Commis-
`sion. The Commission and the intervenors oppose.
`Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Proce-
`dure authorizes this court to grant a stay pending appeal.
`Our determination is governed by four factors: (1) whether
`the movant has made a strong showing of a likelihood of
`success on the merits; (2) whether the movant will be irrep-
`arably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the
`stay will substantially injure the other parties interested
`in the proceeding; and (4) where the public interest lies.
`See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009).
`Based on the papers submitted, including the letter
`filed under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(j), and
`without prejudicing the ultimate disposition of the appeal,
`we conclude that the appellants have not established that
`a stay pending this appeal is warranted here.
`
`Accordingly,
`
`IT IS ORDERED THAT:
`
`The motion is denied.
`
`
`January 25, 2022
`Date
`
`FOR THE COURT
`
`/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`Peter R. Marksteiner
`Clerk of Court
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`