throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1468-2 Filed 04/05/23 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 40772
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 5
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1468-2 Filed 04/05/23 Page 2 of 6 PageID# 40773
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`
`PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-TCB
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. MOIRA GILCHRIST
`
`I, Dr. Moira Gilchrist, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am the Vice President of Strategic and Scientific Communications at Philip Morris
`
`International (“PMI”) and am employed by Philip Morris Products S.A. (“Philip Morris”). Philip
`
`Morris owns the ’265 and ’911 patents that are being asserted in this case.
`
`2.
`
`Philip Morris is a Swiss company headquartered in Neuchâtel, Switzerland. It is a
`
`global leader and pioneer in creating and commercializing smoke-free alternatives to combustible
`
`cigarettes (“CCs”). In fact, Philip Morris has publicly committed to transitioning away completely
`
`from manufacturing and selling CCs to only offering smoke-free products. To my knowledge,
`
`Philip Morris is the only tobacco company in the world to make such a commitment.
`
`3.
`
`To accomplish this unprecedented smoke-free transformation, since 2008, Philip
`
`Morris has invested billions of U.S. dollars in the development, scientific substantiation,
`
`manufacturing, commercialization, and continuous innovation of smoke-free products. Other
`
`Philip Morris-related entities have made additional investments in such pursuits.
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1468-2 Filed 04/05/23 Page 3 of 6 PageID# 40774
`
`
`4.
`
`Philip Morris’ above-described investment has yielded a number of patents.
`
`Patenting its innovations is important to the company because it is how Philip Morris protects its
`
`ideas and R&D in both the short term and the longer term.
`
`5.
`
`For example, it may take many years to commercialize products after the company
`
`develops a particular technology. A patent ensures that Philip Morris can choose when and how
`
`its innovation is introduced and protects against the risk of competitors unfairly appropriating that
`
`innovation in the interim. The ability to do this is key, as first-mover status in a product category,
`
`technology, or market is incredibly valuable to Philip Morris.
`
`6.
`
`It also is important for the success of Philip Morris’ smoke-free transformation to
`
`maintain and build its brand, reputation, and good will as a leader and innovator in the non-
`
`combustible space.
`
`7.
`
`All of Philip Morris’ smoke-free alternatives fall under the IQOS brand. This
`
`includes, but is not limited to, the IQOS heat-not-burn device (“HNB”) and the IQOS VEEV e-
`
`cigarette. Any damage done to the IQOS brand overall damages both existing and planned IQOS
`
`products.
`
`8.
`
`I understand that the jury in the above-captioned case found that the cartridges
`
`Reynolds sells in the United States for its VUSE Alto and VUSE Solo G2 e-cigarettes use Philip
`
`Morris’ technology claimed in the ’265 and ’911 patents, respectively. Such use teaches the U.S.
`
`market to associate that innovative technology with Reynolds, not Philip Morris. This lost
`
`opportunity to further establish itself as an innovator through the technology Philip Morris
`
`developed has diluted, and continues to dilute, the IQOS and Philip Morris brands, consumer
`
`loyalty, reputation, and good will.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1468-2 Filed 04/05/23 Page 4 of 6 PageID# 40775
`
`
`9.
`
`Reynolds’ use of Philip Morris’ technology in the cartridges for the VUSE Alto and
`
`VUSE Solo G2 e-cigarettes also took away sales from the IQOS HNB, and consumables and
`
`accessories related thereto, during the business-critical time of its U.S. launch (beginning in
`
`September 2019), causing financial harm to Philip Morris. Philip Morris International
`
`Management S.A., which was merged into Philip Morris in April 2019, contracted with Altria
`
`Client Services LLC (“Altria”) to sell and distribute in the U.S. market those IQOS HNB-related
`
`products.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10.
`
`In addition to harm done to Philip Morris involving the IQOS HNB, Reynolds’
`
`past, present, and future U.S. sales of cartridges for Reynolds’ VUSE Alto and VUSE Solo G2 e-
`
`cigarettes inhibit the success of the IQOS VEEV. The IQOS VEEV already is offered in multiple
`
`countries, and is making significant commercial strides. For example,
`
`
`
` Philip Morris has
`
`announced plans for expansion into additional markets, including the U.S. market.
`
`11.
`
`By the time Philip Morris introduces its IQOS VEEV in the United States, however,
`
`the market will no longer view the technology claimed in the ’265 and ’911 patents as innovative,
`
`given Reynolds’ years of use. Such a consequence illustrates yet another lost opportunity for
`
`Philip Morris to benefit from its own innovations, resulting in further erosion of the IQOS and
`
`Philip Morris brands, consumer loyalty, reputation, and good will.
`
`12.
`
`The above-described harms caused by Reynolds’ past, present, and future use of
`
`Philip Morris’ technology are particularly acute because they have benefitted, and continue to
`
`benefit, the company’s primary competitor, Reynolds, in a market in which Philip Morris has sold
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1468-2 Filed 04/05/23 Page 5 of 6 PageID# 40776
`
`
`and/or plans to sell competing smoke-free alternatives. Indeed, through such use, Reynolds has
`
`gained a significant share of the U.S. non-combustible market, making it more difficult for Philip
`
`Morris to obtain successful entry into that same market for the IQOS HNB and the IQOS VEEV—
`
`both of which have competed and will compete with Reynolds’ VUSE Alto and VUSE Solo G2
`
`e-cigarettes.
`
`13.
`
`Despite the challenges presented by Reynolds’ use of Philip Morris’ technology,
`
`the company continues to commit substantial resources to enable a U.S. launch of IQOS VEEV.
`
`.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
` plans to submit that application to FDA in Spring 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`17.
`
`Philip Morris also is taking steps to begin manufacturing IQOS HNBs and/or
`
`components thereof in the United States. Philip Morris expects such production to begin by the
`
`first half of 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1468-2 Filed 04/05/23 Page 6 of 6 PageID# 40777
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1468-2 Filed 04/05/23 Page 6 of 6 PagelD# 40777
`
`
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoingis true and correct to the best of by
`
`knowledge.
`
`Executed on August 12, 2022
`
`
`
`Dr. Moira Gilchrist
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket