throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1468-12 Filed 04/05/23 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 40835
`
`Exhibit 22
`
`
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1468-12 Filed 04/05/23 Page 2 of 6 PageID# 40836
`
`
`INTENSITY, LLC
`12730 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300
`San Diego, California 92130
`telephone 858.876.9101
`
`www.intensity.com
`
`
`
`I N T E N SI T Y
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC. and
`R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY,
`
`Plaintiffs and Counterclaim
`Defendants,
`
`v.
`
`ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC; PHILIP
`MORRIS USA, INC.; and PHILIP
`MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A.,
`
`Defendants and Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 1:20-cv-00393
`
`REPORT OF
`RYAN SULLIVAN, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`
`Ryan Sullivan, Ph.D.
`March 24, 2021
`
`CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1468-12 Filed 04/05/23 Page 3 of 6 PageID# 40837
`CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`China.54 For example, certain Nu Mark MarkTen products were manufactured in China, and
`certain JUUL products are manufactured in China.55 As discussed in Section 3.1, e-cigarettes
`are regulated in the United States by the FDA.56
`
`(30)
`
`In 2014, there were more than 460 brands of e-cigarettes and 7,700 flavors sold on the
`internet.57 As of 2017, the number of e-cigarette brands decreased to 433, 12 of which were
`operated by major tobacco companies.58 Four companies have achieved more than a 40%
`share in the market since 2012: NJOY, Imperial Brands, British American Tobacco (Reynolds),
`and JUUL.59
`
`(31)
`
`Reynolds first entered the market with the launch of VUSE Solo in 2013,60 followed by the
`Alto, Ciro, and Vibe.61 Upon its release, VUSE was deemed “technologically interesting,” and
`that “[n]ear-term, [VUSE] clearly raises the competitive stakes[.]”62 Reynolds was the market
`
`
`
`The New York Times, “China’s Vaping Boo Alarms the Government,” 11/22/2019,
`https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/22/business/international/china-vaping-ban.html. (“Ninety percent of the world’s e-
`cigarettes are made in China, and most of them are produced in Shenzhen, a southern city that borders Hong Kong.”)
`While some manufacturing is performed in China, Reynolds manufactures its VUSE Solo cartridges in the United States.
`In addition, all of the e-liquid used in the VUSE products is blended in the United States, and e-liquid is a critical
`component of the VUSE products. See:
`Section 7.7.5.
`Juul Labs Press Release, “Juul Labs Commitment to High Manufacturing and Quality Standards,” 8/23/2019,
`https://www.juullabs.com/juul-labs-commitment-to-exacting-standards/. (“JUUL products are manufactured in China,
`Hungary, Mexico, and several locations in the United States.”)
`Appendix 4.1 to “2016 Surgeon General's Report: E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults,” at A4.1-2, available
`at: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/e-cigarettes/pdfs/2016_SGR_App_4-1_508.pdf. (“MarkTen is a brand
`from NuMark. MarkTen is manufactured in China, and its e-liquids are produced by an affiliate of NuMark in the United
`States.”)
`Kowitt, Sarah D. et al. (2017), “Attitudes Toward FDA Regulation of Newly Deemed Tobacco Products,” Tobacco Regulatory
`Science 3(4): 504-515 at 504.
`Zhu, Shu-Hong, et al. (2014), “Four Hundred and Sixty Brands of e-Cigarettes and Counting: Implications for Product
`Regulation,” Tobacco Control 23: iii3–iii9, at iii6.
`Hsu, Greta, Jessica Y Sun, and Shu-Hong Zhu (2018), “Evolution of Electronic Cigarette Brands From 2013-2014 to 2016-
`2017: Analysis of Brand Websites,” Journal of Medical Internet Research 20(3): e80, at pdf 3.
`JP Morgan, “Juul’s Success Triggers FDA Actions. Positive for European Tobacco,” 9/13/2018 at 3. (“[F]our players reached
`more than 40% share in e-cigarettes since 2012 (Njoy, Imperial, British American Tobacco and now Juul).”)
`VUSE Website, Devices, https://vusevapor.com/devices (accessed 3/16/2021). (“Vuse has been pioneering vapor
`technology since 2013, when we launched Vuse Solo – the world’s first truly digital vapor cigarette.”)
`VUSE Website, Devices, https://vusevapor.com/devices (accessed 3/16/2021).
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company Website, Vapor, https://www.rjrvapor.com/products/vapor (accessed 3/16/2021).
`Morgan Stanley, “Reynolds American Blazing a Digital Vapor Trail with VUSE Launch,” 6/6/2013, at 1.
`
`
`54
`
`
`
`
`55
`
`
`
`56
`
`57
`
`58
`
`59
`
`60
`
`61
`
`62
`
`________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
`Report of Ryan Sullivan, Ph.D.
`
`Page 15
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1468-12 Filed 04/05/23 Page 4 of 6 PageID# 40838
`CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`share leader from 2015 to 2017,63 and their e-vapor developments have been part of Reynolds’
`“multi-decade track-record of thought-leading innovation” in the U.S. tobacco industry.64
`NJOY sells e-cigarettes in two variants, the “ACE” and the “DAILY.65 Imperial Brands sells the
`vapor product “blu” or “myblu”.66 In 2015 JUUL Labs launched JUUL, which has been the
`market share leader since 2017.67 Altria previously operated within the market through their
`subsidiary Nu Mark, with the “MarkTen” and “Green Smoke” products, although both
`products were discontinued as of December 19, 2018.68 The same day, Altria announced its
`offer for a $12.8 billion investment for a 35% share in JUUL.69 Per the terms of their
`investment agreements, Altria is subject to non-competition obligations, restricting them from
`investing or engaging in the e-vapor business other than through JUUL.70 PM USA sells the
`
`
`
`Levy, David T. et al. (2019), “An Economic Analysis of the Pre-Deeming U.S. Market for Nicotine Vaping Products,” Tobacco
`Regulatory Science, 5(2): 169–181, at 176, Table 2.
`Cowen and Company, “MA+Innovation = Structurally Advantaged Growth; Groans Over Guidance Priced In,” 8/15/2016,
`at 1. (“As seen in Figure 1, RAI has a multidecade track-record of thought-leading innovation in U.S. tobacco, including
`VUSE which is the market share leader in e-cigarettes in traditional retail outlets.)
`NJOY, NJOY ACE, https://shop.njoy.com/shop/devices/njoy-ace/ (accessed 3/16/2021).
`NJOY, NJOY DAILY, https://shop.njoy.com/shop/devices/daily/ (accessed 3/16/2021).
`Imperial Brands Website, Next Generation Products, https://www.imperialbrandsplc.com/about-us/next-generation-
`products.html (accessed 3/5/2021).
`JUUL Labs, Discover JUUL, https://www.juul.com/learn/discover (accessed 3/16/2021).
`Business Insider, “The Precarious Path of E-Cig Startup Juul: From Silicon Valley Darling to $24 Billion Behemoth Under
`Criminal Investigation,” 10/31/2019, https://www.businessinsider.com/juul-timeline-from-startup-to-tobacco-company-
`challenges-bans-2019-9, at PDF 12.
`Barclays, “JUUL – Disruption Comes to Tobacco,” 7/30/2018, at 2.
`Credit Suisse, “US Market Data from Nielsen,” 5/26/2020, at 6.
`MarkTen Website, FAQs, https://www.markten.com/ (accessed 12/3/2020).
`Green Smoke Website, FAQs,
`https://www.greensmoke.com/#:~:text=As%20of%20December%2019th%2C%202018,retail%20locations%20while%20su
`pplies%20last. (accessed 3/4/2021).
`Altria, Form 10-K, 2018, at 45. (“Altria’s other operating companies included Philip Morris Capital Corporation (“PMCC”).
`. . and Nu Mark LLC (“Nu Mark”), both of which are wholly-owned subsidiaries. In December 2018, Altria announced the
`decision to refocus its innovative product efforts, which includes the discontinuation of production and distribution of all
`MarkTen and Green Smoke e-vapor products. Prior to that time, Nu Mark was engaged in the manufacture and sale of
`innovative tobacco products.”)
`Levy, David T. et al. (2019), “Altria-Juul labs Deal: Why Did it Occur and What Does it Mean for the US Nicotine Delivery
`Product Market,” Tobacco Control 0: 1–4, at 1. (“On 19 December 2018, Altria announced an offer of US$12.8 billion for a
`35% share of Juul Labs.”)
`Altria, Form 10-K, 2019, at 7. (“Our minority investment in JUUL subjects us to non-competition obligations restricting us
`from investing or engaging in the e-vapor business other than through JUUL, subject to certain exceptions.”)
`SEC Exhibit 99.1, “Altria Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2018 and
`2017, and for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2018,”
`
`
`63
`
`64
`
`65
`
`66
`
`67
`
`
`
`
`68
`
`
`
`
`69
`
`70
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
`Report of Ryan Sullivan, Ph.D.
`
`Page 16
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1468-12 Filed 04/05/23 Page 5 of 6 PageID# 40839
`CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`heat-not-burn product IQOS in limited markets within the United States through an
`agreement with Philip Morris International, Inc.71 Although not an e-cigarette, IQOS competes
`with e-cigarettes within the U.S. non-combustible market for adult smokers looking for
`alternatives to combustible cigarettes.72
`
`(32)
`
`As of January 2021, for in-store retail purchases, JUUL accounted for a 52.1% dollar share
`of e-cigarette sales, followed by VUSE at 29.2%, NJOY at 5.0%, blu at 3.5%, Logic at 1.2%,
`and all other brands at an implied 9.0%.73 In the same period, JUUL accounted for a 40.2%
`
`
`
`
`
`71
`
`
`
`72
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`73
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/764180/000076418019000012/exhibit9912018financialsta.htm at PDF 27.
`(“Altria has agreed to non-competition obligations generally requiring that it participate in the e-vapor business only
`through JUUL as long as Altria is supplying JUUL services, which Altria is committed to doing for at least six years.”)
`See also:
`Section 12.3.4.
`Altria, From 10-K, 2020, at 18. (“In March 2020, PM USA temporarily closed its Atlanta and Richmond IQOS stores and
`paused its IQOS interactive marketing efforts. In June 2020, PM USA reopened its Atlanta and Richmond IQOS stores, and
`in July 2020, PM USA launched IQOS in Charlotte, with all stores operating under enhanced safety protocols.”)
`Altria, From 10-K, 2019, at 7. (“Some innovative tobacco products may reduce the health risks associated with current
`tobacco products, while continuing to offer adult tobacco consumers (within and outside the United States) products that
`meet their taste expectations and evolving preferences. . . In addition to internal product development, these efforts
`include arrangements with, or investments in, third parties such as our exclusive arrangement with PMI to sell IQOS and
`related heatstick [sic] products in the United States, which is dependent upon our continued ability to license these
`products from PMI, and our minority investment in JUUL.”)
`Philip Morris International, “2020 First-Quarter Results,” 4/21/2020, at 18, available at:
`https://philipmorrisinternational.gcs-web.com/static-files/4f3ed693-a022-4770-9d6c-ddb2ea81d7d2. (Financial chart
`places IQOS within the RRP category).
`Altria Client Services, “Aerosol Products Global Competitive Landscape,” 4/19/2016, (Altria_IQOS_ITC_0123268–298, at
`Altria_IQOS_ITC_0123271). (Identifies “E-Vapor, Heat-Not-Burn, Tobacco & Vapor, and Inhaler” product categories as
`being “in-scope” and provides VUSE and IQOS as examples of the e-vapor and heat-not-burn categories, respectively.)
`Philip Morris International, “PMI/PM USA Meeting, Competitive Intelligence,” 4/30/2018, (Altria_IQOS_ITC_00160771–
`785, at Altria_IQOS_ITC_00160776–77). (“Competitive Intelligence” discusses BAT’s product portfolio including heat-not-
`burn, vapor, and smokeless/snus products.)
`Levy, David T. et al. (2019), “Altria-Juul Labs Deal: Why Did it Occur and What Does it Mean for the US Nicotine Delivery
`Product Market,” Tobacco Control 0: 1–4, at 1. (“Altria has recently gained permission from the FDA to market Phillip
`Morris International (PMI’s) heated-tobacco product, iQOS, which is also likely to compete with vaping products for a
`share of the nicotine delivery market.”)
`Cowen and Company, “Tobacco Analysis: Nielsen xAOC + C-Store,” 1/5/2021, at 7.
`Implied “other brand” dollar share = 100% - (Sum of market shares) = 100% - (52.1% + 29.2% + 3.5% + 1.2% + 5.0%) =
`100% - 91% = 9.0%.
`Data is from the four-week period ending 12/26/2020. Data used for the report is Nielsen xAOC and C-Store purchase
`data. xAOC stands for eXtended All Outlet Combined and C-Store is short for convenience stores. The xAOC data include
`sales from food, drug, mass merchandise, club, and military stores. See:
`CPG Data Insights, “Test Your Knowledge: Are you Syndicated Data Literate? (Part 1),” 5/25/2016,
`https://www.cpgdatainsights.com/get-started-with-nielsen-iri/syndicated-data-literacy/.
`
`________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
`Report of Ryan Sullivan, Ph.D.
`
`Page 17
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1468-12 Filed 04/05/23 Page 6 of 6 PageID# 40840
`CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`(200) However, my evaluation of reasonable royalties for the ’911 patent using the Fontem-RJRV
`agreement (see Section 13) also reasonably accounts for any competitive considerations
`between RJRV and PMP.
`
`(201) Even further, similar to the ’265 patent, the presence of an acceptable non-infringing
`alternative would mitigate the competitive dynamics at play because PMP would not have as
`much bargaining power for an increased royalty since RJRV would be able to reasonably
`design around the allegedly infringing component in the accused products.
`
`10.5. The ’374 patent
`(202) As discussed in Section 9, the hypothetical negotiation for the ’374 patent would occur on or
`around September 24, 2019 between ACS and RJRV. By this time, Nu Mark had discontinued
`its e-cigarette lines of products MarkTen and Green Smoke.435, Upon discontinuing the line in
`December 2018, ACS’ parent company AGI entered into an agreement with JUUL that
`provided them a 35% minority share in JUUL. See Sections 2.5 and 12.3.4. Similarly, PM
`USA first sold its IQOS heat-not-burn device in the United States in August 2019.436 As
`discussed in Section 3, IQOS competes with e-cigarettes within the U.S. non-combustible
`market for adult smokers looking for alternatives to combustible cigarettes. Therefore, the
`parties at the hypothetical negotiation would likely consider the competitive impact of ACS
`granting a license to RJRV to the ’374 patent on JUUL’s e-cigarette products as well as PM
`USA’s IQOS.
`
`(203) To the extent the competitive dynamics would influence the negotiation for the ’374 patent,
`my use of the Fontem-RJRV agreement to evaluate reasonable royalties for the ’374 patent
`(see Section 13) would reasonably account for these competitive dynamics.
`
`10.6. The ’556 patent
`(204) As discussed in Section 9, the hypothetical negotiation for the ’556 patent would occur on or
`around February 11, 2020 between PMP and RJRV. As discussed above, by this point in time
`PMP had launched IQOS in the United States, which has competed with e-cigarettes in the
`U.S. non-combustible market. However, to the extent competitive dynamics would be a
`
`
`435
`436
`
`
`
`See Section 2.5.
`Philip Morris Annual Report, 2019, at 1. (“In September, our U.S. licensee, Altria Group, Inc., launched IQOS in the initial
`lead market of Atlanta, GA, followed by a subsequent expansion into the Richmond, VA, market in late 2019.”)
`
`________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
`Report of Ryan Sullivan, Ph.D.
`
`Page 95
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket