throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1419 Filed 09/02/22 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 35797
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`
`PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SEAL
`
`Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5(C), Defendant R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company (“RJRV”)
`
`hereby moves the Court for leave to file under seal (“Motion”) the following documents:
`
`• An unredacted version of RJRV’s Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff’s
`
`Motion for a Permanent Injunction or, Alternatively, an Ongoing Royalty
`
`(“Opposition Brief”).
`
`• An unredacted version of Exhibit 1 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which is the
`
`confidential declaration of Christy Canary-Garner, dated August 31, 2022.
`
`• An unredacted version of Exhibit 2 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which is the
`
`confidential declaration of Dr. Jeffrey C. Suhling, dated September 1, 2022.
`
`• An unredacted version of Exhibit 3 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which is the
`
`confidential declaration of Ryan Sullivan, Ph.D and attachments thereto, dated
`
`September 1, 2022.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1419 Filed 09/02/22 Page 2 of 7 PageID# 35798
`
`
`
`
`
`• Exhibit 4 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from the
`
`confidential version of the ITC Commission Opinion, issued on September 29,
`
`2021 in Certain Tobacco Heating Articles, Inv. No. 337-TA-1199 (U.S.I.T.C.) (the
`
`“ITC Investigation” or “ITC”), that Plaintiff Philip Morris Products S.A. (“PMP”)
`
`and/or Altria Client Services, LLC/Philip Morris USA Inc. (collectively,
`
`“Altria/PM”) designated as containing confidential business information subject to
`
`the Protective Order.
`
`• Exhibit 9 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from PMP’s 3rd
`
`Supplemental Responses to RJRV's 2nd Set of E.D. Va. Interrogatories (No. 14),
`
`dated April 6, 2021, that PMP designated as confidential business information
`
`subject to the Protective Order.
`
`• Exhibit 10 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from the
`
`deposition transcript of Martin King, dated June 25, 2021, that PMP designated as
`
`confidential business information subject to the Protective Order.
`
`• Exhibit 11 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from ITC Hearing
`
`Exhibit RX-0188, a distribution agreement that Altria/PM produced and designated
`
`as confidential business information subject to the Protective Order.
`
`• Exhibit 12 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from ITC Hearing
`
`Exhibit RX-0544, a relationship agreement that PMP produced and designated as
`
`confidential business information subject to the Protective Order.
`
`• Exhibit 13 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from the
`
`deposition transcript of Dr. Moira Gilchrist, dated June 18, 2021, that PMP
`
`designated as confidential business information subject to the Protective Order.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1419 Filed 09/02/22 Page 3 of 7 PageID# 35799
`
`
`
`
`
`• Exhibit 14 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from Altria/PM’s
`
`8th Supplemental Responses to RJRV's ITC Interrogatories (Nos. 1-19), dated
`
`September 25, 2020, that Altria/PM designated as confidential business
`
`information subject to the Protective Order.
`
`• Exhibit 18 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from Dr. Stacey
`
`M. Benson’s ITC Expert Rebuttal Report, dated October 23, 2020, that PMP and/or
`
`Altria/PM designated as confidential business information subject to the Protective
`
`Order.
`
`• Exhibit 19 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from Dr. Jonathan
`
`Arnold’s ITC Expert Rebuttal Report, dated October 23, 2020, that PMP and/or
`
`Altria/PM designated as confidential business information subject to the Protective
`
`Order.
`
`• Exhibit 20 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from Stacy
`
`Ehrlich’s ITC Expert Rebuttal Report, dated Oct. 23, 2020, that PMP and/or
`
`Altria/PM designated as confidential business information subject to the Protective
`
`Order.
`
`• Exhibit 21 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from Brad Rodu’s
`
`ITC Expert Report, dated Oct. 5, 2020, that PMP and/or Altria/PM designated as
`
`confidential business information subject to the Protective Order.
`
`• Exhibit 23 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from PMP’s 3rd
`
`Supplemental Responses to RJRV's 2nd Set of E.D. Va. Interrogatories (No. 14),
`
`dated April 6, 2021, that PMP designated as confidential business information
`
`subject to the Protective Order.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1419 Filed 09/02/22 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 35800
`
`
`
`
`
`• Exhibit 25 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from the
`
`deposition transcript of Edward Kiernan, dated April 16, 2021, that PMP designated
`
`as confidential business information subject to the Protective Order.
`
`• Exhibit 26 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from the June 8-
`
`15, 2022 trial transcript in the above-captioned action, which has not yet been
`
`publicly released.
`
`• Exhibit 28 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from ITC Hearing
`
`Exhibit CX-0183C, a presentation that Altria/PM produced and designated as
`
`confidential business information subject to the Protective Order.
`
`• Exhibit 29 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from ITC Hearing
`
`Exhibit CX-0190C, a presentation that Altria/PM produced and designated as
`
`confidential business information subject to the Protective Order.
`
`• Exhibit 30 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from ITC Hearing
`
`Exhibit CX-0614C, a regulatory document that PMP produced and designated as
`
`confidential business information subject to the Protective Order.
`
`• Exhibit 31 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from the
`
`confidential version of RJRV’s March 31, 2021 Opening Post-Hearing Brief filed
`
`in the ITC Investigation, that PMP and/or Altria/PM designated as containing
`
`confidential business information subject to the Protective Order.
`
`• Exhibit 39 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which is a PMP intellectual property
`
`assignment agreement, that PMP produced and designated as confidential business
`
`information subject to the Protective Order.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1419 Filed 09/02/22 Page 5 of 7 PageID# 35801
`
`
`
`• Exhibit 42 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which includes excerpts from PMP’s 8th
`
`Supplemental Responses to RJRV's 1st Set of ITC Interrogatories (Nos. 1-19),
`
`dated September 25, 2020, that PMP designated as confidential business
`
`information subject to the Protective Order.
`
`• Exhibit 44 to RJRV’s Opposition Brief, which is Trial Exhibit PX-125, a RJRV
`
`settlement and license agreement, that RJRV produced and designated as
`
`confidential business information subject to the Protective Order.
`
`In support of this Motion, RJRV submits contemporaneously herewith a non-confidential
`
`Memorandum in Support of Motion to File Documents Under Seal, along with a proposed Order.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1419 Filed 09/02/22 Page 6 of 7 PageID# 35802
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ David M. Maiorana
`David M. Maiorana (VA Bar No. 42334)
`Ryan B. McCrum
`JONES DAY
`901 Lakeside Ave.
`Cleveland, OH 44114
`Telephone: (216) 586-3939
`Facsimile: (216) 579-0212
`Email: dmaiorana@jonesday.com
`Email: rbmccrum@jonesday.com
`
`John J. Normile
`JONES DAY
`250 Vesey Street
`New York, NY 10281
`Telephone: (212) 326-3939
`Facsimile: (212) 755-7306
`Email: jjnormile@jonesday.com
`
`
`Alexis A. Smith
`JONES DAY
`555 South Flower Street
`Fiftieth Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (213) 243-2653
`Facsimile: (213) 243-2539
`Email: asmith@jonesday.com
`
`Charles B. Molster, III Va. Bar No. 23613
`THE LAW OFFICES OF
`CHARLES B. MOLSTER, III PLLC
`2141 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W. Suite M
`Washington, DC 20007
`Telephone: (703) 346-1505
`Email: cmolster@molsterlaw.com
`
`Counsel for RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. and
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
`
`
`Dated: September 2, 2022
`
`
`
`Stephanie E. Parker
`JONES DAY
`1221 Peachtree Street, N.E.
`Suite 400
`Atlanta, GA 30361
`Telephone: (404) 521-3939
`Facsimile: (404) 581-8330
`Email: separker@jonesday.com
`
`
`Anthony M. Insogna
`JONES DAY
`4655 Executive Drive
`Suite 1500
`San Diego, CA 92121
`Telephone: (858) 314-1200
`Facsimile: (844) 345-3178
`Email: aminsogna@jonesday.com
`
`William E. Devitt
`JONES DAY
`110 North Wacker
`Suite 4800
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Telephone: (312) 269-4240
`Facsimile: (312) 782-8585
`Email: wdevitt@jonesday.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1419 Filed 09/02/22 Page 7 of 7 PageID# 35803
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 2nd day of September, 2022, a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing was served using the Court’s CM/ECF system, with electronic notification of such filing
`
`to all counsel of record.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ David M. Maiorana
`David M. Maiorana (VA Bar No. 42334)
`JONES DAY
`901 Lakeside Ave.
`Cleveland, OH 44114
`Telephone: (216) 586-3939
`Facsimile: (216) 579-0212
`Email: dmaiorana@jonesday.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiffs RAI Strategic Holdings,
`Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket