throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1313-1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 33320
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1313-1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 1 of 7 PagelD# 33320
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1313-1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 2 of 7 PageID# 33321
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY
`
`Defendant.
`
`Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-393-LO-TCB
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
`
`The below verdict form provides questions and instructions that will serve as your verdict
`
`in this case. When answering the questions and instructions, please follow the instructions
`
`provided throughout the form. Your answer to each question must be unanimous. Some of the
`
`questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in the Court’s Jury
`
`Instructions. Please refer to the Jury Instructions if you are unsure about the meaning or usage of
`
`any legal term that appears in the questions below.
`
`In the verdict form, Plaintiff Philip Morris Products S.A. may be referred to as “Philip
`
`Morris.” Defendant R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company may be referred to as “Reynolds.”
`
`We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return them
`
`under the instructions of this Court as our verdict in this case.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1313-1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 3 of 7 PageID# 33322
`
`I.
`
`QUESTION NO. 1 – INFRINGEMENT
`
`Do you find that Philip Morris has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that
`Reynolds has infringed any of the following claims? Answer “Yes” or “No” for each claim
`identified below.
`
`
`
`A.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,814,265
`
`1. Claim 1
`
`2. Claim 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`B.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,104,911
`
`1. Claim 2
`
`2. Claim 11
`
`3. Claim 12
`
`4. Claim 13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1313-1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 33323
`
`II.
`
`QUESTION NO. 2 – WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT
`
`Do you find that Philip Morris has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that
`Reynolds’ infringement was willful?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1313-1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 5 of 7 PageID# 33324
`
`III. QUESTION NO. 3 – VALIDITY
`
`Do you find that Reynolds has proven by clear and convincing evidence that any of the
`following claims are invalid? Answer “Yes” or “No” for each claim identified below.
`
`A.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,814,265
`
`1. Claim 1
`
`2. Claim 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`B.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,104,911
`
`1. Claim 2
`
`2. Claim 11
`
`3. Claim 12
`
`4. Claim 13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1313-1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 6 of 7 PageID# 33325
`
`IV. QUESTION NO. 4 – DAMAGES
`
`For each patent identified below, answer the question below only if you found above that Reynolds
`infringed at least one claim that you also found is not invalid.
`
`A.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,814,265
`
`What sum of money did Philip Morris prove by a preponderance of the evidence would be
`adequate compensation for Reynolds’ infringement of the ’265 Patent through December 31,
`2021? Provide the reasonable royalty rate, and amount in dollars and cents, below.
`
`
`
`_________________%
`
`(rate)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`$______________________________
`
` (amount)
`
`B.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,104,911
`
`What sum of money did Philip Morris prove by a preponderance of the evidence would be
`adequate compensation for Reynolds’ infringement of the ’911 Patent through December 31,
`2021? Provide the reasonable royalty rate, and amount in dollars and cents, below.
`
`
`
`
`
`_________________%
`
`(rate)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`$______________________________
`
` (amount)
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1313-1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 7 of 7 PageID# 33326
`
`END OF JURY VERDICT FORM
`
`You have now reached the end of the Verdict Form and should review it to ensure it
`accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. If you are satisfied that your unanimous
`answers are accurately reflected above, please have the Jury Foreperson sign and date this form in
`the spaces below.
`
`
`
`
`
`Jury Foreperson:______________________
`
`
`
`Date: ______________________
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket