throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1296-1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 33103
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1296-1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 1 of 7 PagelD# 33103
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1296-1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 2 of 7 PageID# 33104
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`
`
`v.
`
`RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC. and
`R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY,
`
`Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants,
`
`
`
`ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC; PHILIP
`MORRIS USA INC.; and PHILIP MORRIS
`PRODUCTS S.A.,
`
`Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs.
`
`Case No. 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB
`
`
`JOINT NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL AGREED MOTIONS IN LIMINE
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1296-1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 3 of 7 PageID# 33105
`
`All parties in this case stipulate to the following motions in limine. In addition to the agreed
`
`motions in limine 1-8 listed in Dkt. 822, all parties agree that they, their counsel, representatives,
`
`and all witnesses called by them (whether live or by deposition) will not mention, refer to,
`
`interrogate about, or attempt to convey to the jury in any manner, either directly or indirectly, any
`
`of the matters set forth below without obtaining a favorable ruling from this Court outside the
`
`presence of the jury. Should any party violate this stipulation, the parties agree that the Court
`
`should give they can seek a curative instruction from the Court to the jury to disregard the
`
`evidence; understanding that the parties retain their right to provided, however, that the other party
`
`reserves the right to move for any other additional relief, including but not limited to a mistrial as
`
`alternative relief if in its view a curative instruction would be insufficient to remove the prejudicial
`
`effect.
`
`9. Alleged
`class-based marketing of menthol products.
`race- and
`PMI/AltriaNeither party will not present argument, evidence, or testimony that
`Reynolds or any other company targets menthol products to any racial or class
`group. For example, Reynolds will not offer argument, evidence, or testimony that
`it did not market menthol products to or target African Americans with menthol
`products, and PMI/Altria will not in response interrogate any witness regarding
`such targeting or marketing.with questions like the ones asked by PMI/Altria’s
`counsel at the recent update 30(b)(6) deposition of Dr. James Figlar on June 3,
`2022:
`
` “Does Reynolds market menthol products to African-Americans?”
`
` “Has Reynolds ever been accused of targeting African-Americans with
`menthol tobacco products?”
`
` “Historically are you aware of any targeted marketing of menthol products
`to African-Americans by Reynolds?”
`10. Alleged youth marketing of menthol products. PMI/Altria Neither party will not
`present argument, evidence, or testimony that Reynolds or any other company
`targets menthol products to youth. For example, Reynolds will not offer argument,
`evidence, or testimony that it has not targeted youths with, or that it was unaware
`of youth use of, menthol or other non-tobacco flavored products, and PMI/Altria
`will not in response interrogate any witness regarding such targeting or
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1296-1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 33106
`
`marketing.with questions like the ones asked by PMI/Altria’s counsel at the recent
`update 30(b)(6) deposition of Dr. James Figlar on June 3, 2022:
`
` “[D]id Reynolds determine that youths are more likely to use menthol
`products than non-menthol products?”
`
` “Did Reynolds … reach any conclusions about … whether youth are more
`likely to use menthol than regular tobacco products?”
`11. Prospective FDA action regarding menthol or flavored tobacco products.
`PMI/AltriaNeither party will not present argument, evidence, or testimony
`connected to PMT authorization of menthol products, other than the undisputed fact
`that such PMT authorization requests remain pending with the FDA. For example,
`PMI/Altria will not interrogate any witness with questions like the ones asked by
`PMI/Altria’s counsel at the recent update 30(b)(6) deposition of Dr. James Figlar
`on June 3, 2022:
`
` “[W]hy the menthol flavors are still in review for the Vuse PMTAs”?
`
` “What’s your understanding of what the FDA’s concern is about menthol
`products”?
`12. Allegations made against Reynolds the Parties in product-liability cases.
`PMI/Altria Neither party will not present argument, evidence or testimony
`regarding the substance of the allegations made by plaintiffs in cigarette product
`liability cases. For instance, neither party will ask questions such asrelated to
`allegations against Reynolds in product-liability cases. For example, PMI/Altria
`will not interrogate any witness about these allegations with questions like the
`followingones asked by PMI/Altria’s counsel at the recent update 30(b)(6)
`deposition of Dr. James Figlar on June 3, 2022:
`
` “[W]hat were the allegations against Reynolds or Phillip Morris/Altria in
`those product liability cases?”
`
` “If you had to summarize for the jury in this case what the allegations were
`in the product liability cases that you testified in, what would you tell
`them?”
`13. Prior exclusion of expert testimony or opinion. Neither party will present
`argument, evidence, testimony, or suggestion related to the exclusion of any
`expert’s prior testimony or opinion in this case or any other case based on any
`court’s orders limiting the scope of testimony.
`
`
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1296-1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 5 of 7 PageID# 33107
`
`
`
`/s/ David M. Maiorana
`David M. Maiorana (VA Bar No. 42334)
`Ryan B. McCrum
`JONES DAY
`901 Lakeside Avenue
`Cleveland, OH 44114
`Telephone: (216) 586-3939
`Facsimile: (216) 579-0212
`Email: dmaiorana@jonesday.com
`Email: rbmccrum@jonesday.com
`
`John J. Normile
`JONES DAY
`250 Vesey Street
`New York, NY 10281
`Tel: (212) 326-3939
`Fax: (212) 755-7306
`Email: jjnormile@jonesday.com
`
`Alexis A. Smith
`JONES DAY
`555 South Flower Street
`Fiftieth Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (213) 243-2653
`Facsimile: (213) 243-2539
`Email: asmith@jonesday.com
`
`Stephanie E. Parker
`JONES DAY
`1221 Peachtree Street, N.E.
`Suite 400
`Atlanta, GA 30361
`Telephone: (404) 521-3939
`Facsimile: (404) 581-8330
`Email: separker@jonesday.com
`
`Anthony M. Insogna
`JONES DAY
`4655 Executive Drive
`Suite 1500
`San Diego, CA 92121
`Telephone: (858) 314-1200
`Facsimile: (844) 345-3178
`Email: aminsogna@jonesday.com
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Maximilian A. Grant
`Maximilian A. Grant (VSB No. 91792)
`max.grant@lw.com
`Matthew J. Moore (pro hac vice)
`matthew.moore@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`555 Eleventh Street, N.W., Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20004
`Telephone: (202) 637-2200
`Facsimile: (202) 637-2201
`
`Clement J. Naples (pro hac vice)
`clement.naples@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`885 Third Avenue
`New York, NY 10022-4834
`Tel: (212) 906-1200; Fax: (212) 751-4864
`
`Gregory J. Sobolski (pro hac vice)
`greg.sobolski@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 391-0600
`Facsimile: (415) 395-8095
`
`Brenda L. Danek (pro hac vice)
`brenda.danek@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`330 North Wabash Avenue, Suite 2800
`Chicago, IL 60611
`Tel: (312) 876-7700; Fax: (312) 993-9767
`
`Counsel for Defendants-Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs Altria Client Services LLC, Philip
`Morris USA Inc., and Philip Morris Products
`S.A.
`
`
`/s/ Elizabeth Stotland Weiswasser
`W. Sutton Ansley (VSB No. 80085)
`sutton.ansley@weil.com
`Robert T. Vlasis III (pro hac vice)
`robert.vlasis@weil.com
`Stephanie Adamakos (pro hac vice)
`stephanie.adamakos@weil.com
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1296-1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 6 of 7 PageID# 33108
`
`William E. Devitt
`JONES DAY
`110 North Wacker Drive
`Suite 4800
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Telephone: (312) 269-4240
`Facsimile: (312) 782-8585
`Email: wdevitt@jonesday.com
`
`Sanjiv P. Laud
`JONES DAY
`90 South Seventh Street
`Suite 4950
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 217-8800
`Facsimile: (844) 345-3178
`Email: slaud@jonesday.com
`
`Charles B. Molster
`THE LAW OFFICES OF
`CHARLES B. MOLSTER, III PLLC
`2141 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W. Suite M
`Washington, DC 20007
`Telephone: (202) 787-1312
`Email: cmolster@molsterlaw.com
`
`Counsel for RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. and
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
`
`2001 M Street, NW, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20036
`Tel: (202) 682-7000; Fax: 202-857-0940
`
`Elizabeth Stotland Weiswasser (pro hac vice)
`elizabeth.weiswasser@weil.com
`Anish R. Desai (pro hac vice)
`anish.desai@weil.com
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`767 5th Avenue
`New York, NY 10153
`Tel: (212) 310-8000; Fax: 212-310-8007
`
`Adrian C. Percer (pro hac vice)
`adrian.percer@weil.com
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`201 Redwood Shores Parkway
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Tel: (650) 802-3000; Fax: 850-802-3100
`
`Counsel for Defendants-Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs Altria Client Services LLC and
`Philip Morris USA Inc.
`
`
`
`
`-5-
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1296-1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 7 of 7 PageID# 33109
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 6th day of June, 2022, a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`
`was served using the Court’s CM/ECF system, with electronic notification of such filing to all
`
`counsel of record.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ David M. Maiorana
`David M. Maiorana (VA Bar No. 42334)
`JONES DAY
`901 Lakeside Ave.
`Cleveland, OH 44114
`Telephone: (216) 586-3939
`Facsimile: (216) 579-0212
`Email: dmaiorana@jonesday.com
`
`Counsel for RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. and
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket