throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1278-5 Filed 06/07/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 32914
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1278-5 Filed 06/07/22 Page 1 of 3 PagelD# 32914
`
`EXHIBIT 5
`EXHIBIT 5
`
`

`

`y4
`BREAKING Stocks trim losses, Nasdaq turns positive despite Target's profit warning
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1278-5 Filed 06/07/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID# 32915
`Search quotes, news & videos
`WATCHLIST | SIGN IN
`CNBC
`MARKETS
`BUSINESS
`
`POdae
`
`WATCH Faia
`
`USA . INTL
`
`INVESTING
`
`TECH
`
`POLITICS
`
`CNBCTV
`
`INVESTINGCLUB
`
`PROG
`
`HEALTH AND SCIENCE
`
`Tobacco company Reynolds blames
`teen vaping crisis on Juul in fighting
`FDAplan to rein in e-cigarettes
`
`PUBLISHED THU, MAY 2 2019-1:00 PM EDT | UPDATED THU, MAY 2 2019-2:02 PM EDT
`
`Angelica LaVito
`@IM/ANGELICALAVITO/
`SANGELICALAVITO
`
`SHARE f ¥ in
`
`
`
`KEY
`POINTS
`
`* Reynolds opposes the FDA's proposal to limit wherefruity e-cigarette flavors can be
`sold.
`
`* A unit of British American Tobacco, Reynolds says the FDA should focus instead on
`Juul.
`
`* Former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb repeatedly blamed the teen vaping
`“epidemic” on Juul.
`
`TechCheck UP NEXT|Fast Money Halftime
`lifatime MantanaLfie
`
`a%1v
`
`12:00 pm ET
`
`TRENDING NOW
`
`Listen
`
`Target expects squeezed
`profits from aggressive
`plan to get rid of
`unwanted inventory
`
`‘Yellowstone’ boom pits
`
`
`
`Nick Gregory, a 26-year-old manager, vapes on a JUUL at Botany Bay in Lexington, Ky.
`Charles Bertram| Tr ervice|Getty Images
`
`Tobacco company Reynoldsis fighting the Food and Drug Administration’s
`proposal to curb teen vaping, singling out one competitorit says the agency
`should rein in instead: e-cigarette maker Juul.
`
`The FDAin March proposedlimiting sales offruity e-cigarette flavors to
`websites, vape shops andotherretailers that impose age restrictions in
`response to federal data showing huge increases in teenagers vaping. The
`public comment period closed Tuesday. Reynolds, a unit of British American
`Tobacco, in its response said it opposes the plan.
`
`The “FDA hasalreadyidentified the main driver ofyouth interest: Juul,” said
`Reynolds, which makes Newportcigarettes and Vuse vapes. “As the agency's
`public statements confirm, underage users disproportionatelyprefer Juulto all
`other products. ... Armed with such knowledge, we believe the agencycan take
`appropriatelytailored steps to curb youth use.”
`
`
`For more on investing in health-care innovation,click here to join
`CNBCat our Healthy Returns Summit in NewYork City on May 21.
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1278-5 Filed 06/07/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID# 32916
`Fos: GBA] Coianiésipher Foqnaryg meh at
`eRe VerDy
`“epidemic” on Juul, the clear market leader. The agencyis looking into Juul’s
`ctices and conducted a surprise inspection of its San Francisco
`
`headquarters in the fall.
`
`
`Yet faced with a surge in teen e-cigarette use, the FDA demandedplans from
`the top five e-cigarette manufacturers, including Reynolds, Altria and others.
`Forits part, Juul says categorywide action is the best wayto curb youth use.
`
`“Tris disappointing but not surprising to see a legacy tobacco company whose
`core business remains combustible cigarettes — the very product we intend to
`eliminate byoffering adult smokers an alternative — attempting to thwart the
`
`category-wide regulationthat’s needed,” Juul said in an emailed statement,
`addingthat it supports the FDA’s draft regulation as a “starting point.”
`
`Reynolds says the FDA’s plan to limit wherethe fruity flavors can be purchased
`will hurt adults who want to switch to e-cigarettes because they'll be harder to
`find and won’t curb teen use because minors can always get them from older
`friends.It also says thoserestrictions would overstep the FDA's legal authority.
`
`Instead, Reynolds wants the FDA to tamp downon“irresponsible” marketing.
`
`“At the end of the day, we are encouraging the FDA to use more appropriate
`regulatoryaction,” Dr. James Figlar, Reynolds’ executive vice president of
`research and development andscientific and regulatoryaffairs, said in an
`interview.
`
`Critics often point to Juul’s early ad campaigns, which featured youthful
`looking models and bright colors regulators said appealed to teens. Juul has
`said it regrets the ads and has since rolled out newadsthat feature older adults
`who share their stories of switching to the e-cigarette from cigarettes.
`
`Reynolds debuted a commercial for its Vuse Alto e-cigarette earlier this year.
`Vapor products are not subject to restrictions barring cigarette ads from
`television andradio.
`
`Juul and Marlboro cigarette maker Altria, which owns a 35% stake in Juul, have
`
`both said they support the agency’s proposal. Juul in Novemberstopped selling
`its fruity flavors to retailers, instead saying it would onlysell them directlyto
`consumers on its age-verified website.
`
`The FDAsaid in response to Reynolds’ letter that it “appreciates”all the
`comments that were submitted and will review them. The agencysaidit’s
`“committed to ensuring all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, aren’t
`being marketed to, sold to or used by kids.”
`
`TechCheck
`UP NEXT|Fast Money Halftime 12:09 pm ET
`
`Cee eee
`
`feee - Sd)
`
`NewsTips
`Got aconfidential newstip? We want to hear
`from you.
`
`=>] CNBC Newsletters
`Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC
`delivered to your inbox
`
`cere CUeR aL
`
`Subscribe to CNBC PRO
`
`Supply Chain Values
`Join the CNBC Panel
`
`[eleRecee!
`
`aceiteer]
`Ad Choices
`
`LOCelaltas
`
`Pereirased
`CNBC on Peacock
`
`PBiTeTeM cece(icy
`[Melaccomitecy
`
`Site Map
`erties
`
`CNBC Councils
`
`etoOd
`
`Deooer
`
`About CNBC
`
`bierfete
`
`ats]
`
`Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information | CA Notice | Terms of Service
`© 2022 CNBC LLC.All Rights Reserved. A Division of NBCUniversal
`PReerar
`tM Tala aMelleleiCtee-UtLe
`Market Data Terms of Use and Disclaimers
`Preeet Aradeed
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket