throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1273-2 Filed 06/06/22 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 32833
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1273-2 Filed 06/06/22 Page 1 of 8 PagelD# 32833
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1273-2 Filed 06/06/22 Page 2 of 8 PageID# 32834
`
`1
`
` UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`
`Civil Action
`No. 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB
`May 20, 2022
`2:00 p.m.
`
`)))))))))))))
`
`ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES, LLC
`et al.,
` Counterclaim Plaintiffs,
`v.
`RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC.,
`et al.,
`Counterclaim Defendants.
`
`TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING PROCEEDINGS
`BEFORE THE HONORABLE LIAM O'GRADY,
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`APPEARANCES:
`For the Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs:
`
`Maximilian Antony Grant, Esq.
`Latham & Watkins, LLP (DC)
`555 11th Street, N.W.
`Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20004-1304
`202-637-2200
`Email: Max.grant@lw.com
`Clement Joseph Naples, Esq.
`Latham & Watkins, LLP
`885 Third Avenue
`25th Floor
`New York, NY 10022
`212-906-1200
`Email: Dement.naples@lw.com
`William Sutton Ansley, Esq.
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges
`2001 M Street, N.W.
`Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20036
`202-682-7000
`Email: Sutton.Ansley@weil.com
`
`Scott L. Wallace, RDR, CRR
`Official Court Reporter
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1273-2 Filed 06/06/22 Page 3 of 8 PageID# 32835
`
`2
`
`APPEARANCES: (Cont.)
`For the Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs:
`
`
`For the Counterclaim
`Defendants:
`
`Lawrence Jay Gotts, Esq.
`Latham & Watkins, LLP (DC)
`555 11th Street, N.W.
`Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20004-1304
`202-637-2200
`Email: Lawrence.gotts@lw.com
`Elizabeth Stotland Weiswasser, Esq.
`Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (NY-NA)
`767 5th Avenue
`New York, NY 10153
`212-310-8000
`Email: Elizabeth.weiswasser@weil.com
`Charles Bennett Molster, III, Esq.
`The Law Offices of Charles B. Molster
`III, PLLC
`2141 Wisconsin Ave N.W.,
`Suite M
`Washington, DC 20007
`703-346-1505
`Email: Cmolster@molsterlaw.com
`Michael Shamus Quinlan, Esq.
`Jones Day (OH-NA)
`901 Lakeside Ave
`Cleveland, OH 44114-1190
`216-586-3939
`Email: Msquinlan@jonesday.com
`John Michael Michalik, Esq.
`77 West Wacker Street
`Suite 3500
`Chicago, Illinois 60601-1692
`312-269-4240
`Email: Jmachalik@jonesday.com
`Stephanie Ethel, Parker, Esq.
`Jones Day (GA)
`420 Peach Tree Street, N.E.
`Suite 800
`Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3053
`404-521-3939
`Email: Separker@jonesday.com
`
`Scott L. Wallace, RDR, CRR
`Official Court Reporter
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1273-2 Filed 06/06/22 Page 4 of 8 PageID# 32836
`
`3
`
`APPEARANCES: (Cont.)
`For the Counterclaim
`Defendants:
`
`Court Reporter:
`
`Alexis Adian Smith, Esq.
`Jones Day (CA)
`555 South Flower Street
`Fiftieth Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`213-489-3939
`Email: Asmith@jonesday.com
`Scott L. Wallace, RDR, RMR, CRR
`Official Court Reporter
`United States District Court
`401 Courthouse Square
`Alexandria, VA 2231-5798
`202-277-3739
`Email: scottwallace.edva@gmail.com
`
`Proceedings reported by machine shorthand, transcript produced
`by computer-aided transcription.
`
`Scott L. Wallace, RDR, CRR
`Official Court Reporter
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1273-2 Filed 06/06/22 Page 5 of 8 PageID# 32837
`
`24
`
`up to sidebar saying, "How does he know that," right?
`THE COURT: Well, you can cross him and say, "Well, you
`told us back in April you didn't know anything about that subject
`and now you've been directly testifying about it." But that --
`you're right, that's not the best way of presenting that issue
`before a jury.
`Okay. Let me hear from Reynolds again.
`MR. GOTTS: Thank you, Your Honor.
`MR. QUINLAN: Briefly, Your Honor.
`THE COURT: Yeah.
`MR. QUINLAN: We did describe the general nature of the
`conversations. No lawyer was present for these conversations.
`It was simply Dr. Figlar and his formal colleagues from Reynolds.
`We did give them a description of -- I would say a broad
`description of what they talked about. But if they want to know
`more about the conversations, that's why we offered for them to
`take the deposition. I think they can learn everything they want
`to know, other than -- what they're requesting is we have to go
`back to Dr. Figlar, ask him what they talked about, write it up,
`send it to them, and they take his deposition anyway. I mean, we
`can just shortcut it.
`THE COURT: Is he available for deposition?
`MR. QUINLAN: He is available. I don't believe he's
`available next week, but we can make him available at any other
`time. I'm sure we can work it out with the other side to make
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Scott L. Wallace, RDR, CRR, Official Court Reporter
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1273-2 Filed 06/06/22 Page 6 of 8 PageID# 32838
`
`25
`
`him available. I think that's the beauty of the Webex; he can be
`available via Webex to take his deposition whenever they'd like,
`convenient with this schedule.
`We will make him as available as possible for them, and
`we're happy to stipulate -- if Your Honor wants, or if the other
`side wants, we can stipulate that he didn't learn anything new
`and that he's not going to testify about anything new and we can
`short-circuit all of this; but I'm not hopeful that that's going
`to be acceptable to the other side.
`THE COURT: All right. Let's make him available for
`deposition on the week of May 30th through the -- that first week
`in June. Arrange dates and take his deposition. Otherwise,
`we're back here again because you proffered what he would say and
`his actual testimony is a little different and we're spending
`half a day at sidebar. So, let's take his deposition, okay?
`MR. GRANT: That sounds fine, Your Honor. But just so
`we're clear, the topic of FDA authorizations is fine; but the
`broad topics include financial information related to Vuse
`products, a vaccine project related to COVID.
`THE COURT: Right.
`MR. GRANT: None of that he's competent to testify about.
`But we'll take the deposition, but the challenge, of course, is
`getting the horse to stop before he leaves the barn and not just
`cross-examining him after the fact.
`THE COURT: I understand that, and that's going to depend
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Scott L. Wallace, RDR, CRR, Official Court Reporter
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1273-2 Filed 06/06/22 Page 7 of 8 PageID# 32839
`
`26
`
`on what he says on direct examination. What I expect your
`deposition will be is, "What have you learned from these
`gentlemen that you believe will affect your testimony as you
`prepare to testify in this case?"
`MR. GRANT: Right. We'll proffer it that way.
`THE COURT: I think that's the best way to do it.
`MR. GRANT: Yes, sir.
`MR. QUINLAN: Thank you, Your Honor.
`THE COURT: All right. Let's go to the motion for
`sanctions. I've read the -- you know, I've read the pleadings,
`obviously. I've read the transcripts of the hearings before
`Judge Buchanan. I'm not going to overrule her decisions she
`made. If I had the issue myself, would I have decided it the
`same way, maybe not. But it's certainly within her -- it's not
`incorrect as a matter of law to limit the discovery the way she
`did to the actual agreements, not the materials that went into
`it, and so it's a rather narrow decision; but it's not an
`incorrect decision as a matter of law and it's certainly not an
`abuse of discretion.
`So what I'm concerned about is the representations of when
`Jones Day knew about the
`
` and what they said to me in
`open court and what they put in their pleading in trying to
`disqualify Mr. Myer. So, I didn't get her response in the
`opposition from Jones Day that satisfied me, and so that's why
`we're here today.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Scott L. Wallace, RDR, CRR, Official Court Reporter
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1273-2 Filed 06/06/22 Page 8 of 8 PageID# 32840
`
`62
`
`
` C E R T I F I C A T E
`
` I, Scott L. Wallace, RDR-CRR, certify that
`the foregoing is a correct transcript from the record of
`proceedings in the above-entitled matter.
`
`5/23/22
` /s/ Scott L. Wallace
` ---------------------------- ----------------
` Scott L. Wallace, RDR, CRR
` Date
` Official Court Reporter
`
`Scott L. Wallace, RDR, CRR, Official Court Reporter
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket