throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1179 Filed 04/05/22 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 31393
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`
`
`v.
`
`RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC. and
`R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY,
`
`Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants,
`
`
`
`ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC; PHILIP
`MORRIS USA INC.; and PHILIP MORRIS
`PRODUCTS S.A.
`
`Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs.
`
`Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-393-LO-TCB
`
`
`
`MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION TO REDACT PORTIONS OF
`THE MARCH 18, 2022 HEARING TRANSCRIPT
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1179 Filed 04/05/22 Page 2 of 6 PageID# 31394
`
`The parties jointly submit this memorandum in support of their motion to designate as
`
`“Confidential” and to redact certain page/lines of the publicly-available version of the March
`
`18, 2022 hearing transcript, pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. No. 103). Certain
`
`portions of the transcript reflect Defendants’ and Plaintiffs’ confidential business information
`
`under the protective order. The parties respectfully request that this Court enter an order
`
`directing that the transcript page and line citations listed in Exhibit A be redacted and not made
`
`available to the public.
`
`I.
`
`ARGUMENT
`
`Although there is a general presumption that the public has the right to access documents
`
`in the files of the courts, this presumption may be overcome “if the public’s right of access is
`
`outweighed by competing interests.” Ashcraft v. Conoco, Inc., 218 F.3d 288, 302 (4th Cir. 2000)
`
`(citation omitted); Stone v. Univ. of Md. Med. Sys. Corp., 855 F.2d 178, 180 (4th Cir. 1988).
`
`The parties seek to redact from the public record only information that the parties must
`
`keep confidential pursuant to the stipulated protective order. This selective and narrow protection
`
`of confidential material constitutes “the least drastic method of shielding the information at issue.”
`
`Adams v. Object Innovation, Inc., No. 3:11cv272, 2011 WL 7042224, at *4 (E.D. Va. Dec. 5,
`
`2011). The public has no legitimate interest in information that is confidential to the parties. See
`
`id. (“[T]here is no legitimate public interest in disclosing the proprietary and confidential
`
`information of [the defendant] . . . and disclosure to the public could result in significant damage
`
`to the company.”). The information that the parties seek to redact includes confidential,
`
`proprietary, and competitively sensitive business information of the parties and/or third parties,
`
`each of which could face harm if such information were released publicly.
`
`There is support for filing portions of the March 18, 2022 hearing transcript with strictly
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1179 Filed 04/05/22 Page 3 of 6 PageID# 31395
`
`limited redactions. As an initial matter, the stipulated protective order requires that this information
`
`remain confidential, and the redacted portions of the transcript only pertain to this confidential
`
`information. Redacting these materials is therefore proper because the public’s interest in access
`
`is outweighed by a party’s interest in “preserving confidentiality” of limited amounts of
`
`confidential information that is “normally unavailable to the public.” Flexible Benefits Council v.
`
`Feltman, No. 08-cv-00371, 2008 WL 4924711, at *1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 13, 2008); U.S. ex rel. Carter
`
`v. Halliburton Co., No. 1:10cv864, 2011 WL 2077799, at *3 (E.D. Va. May 24, 2011).
`
`II.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant this Motion
`
`and enter the attached proposed order.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1179 Filed 04/05/22 Page 4 of 6 PageID# 31396
`
`Dated: April 5, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`Stephanie E. Parker
`JONES DAY
`1221 Peachtree Street, N.E.,
`Suite 400
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Telephone: (404) 521-3939
`Facsimile: (404) 581-8330
`Email: separker@jonesday.com
`
`Anthony M. Insogna
`JONES DAY
`4655 Executive Drive
`Suite 1500
`San Diego, CA 92121
`Telephone: (858) 314-1200
`Facsimile: (844) 345-3178
`Email: aminsogna@jonesday.com
`
`William E. Devitt
`JONES DAY
`77 West Wacker
`Suite 3500
`Chicago, IL 60601
`Telephone: (312) 269-4240
`Facsimile: (312) 782-8585
`Email: wdevitt@jonesday.com
`
`Sanjiv P. Laud
`JONES DAY
`90 South Seventh Street
`Suite 4950
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 217-8800
`Facsimile: (844) 345-3178
`Email: slaud@jonesday.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ David M. Maiorana
`David M. Maiorana (VA Bar No. 42334)
`Ryan B. McCrum
`JONES DAY
`901 Lakeside Avenue
`Cleveland, OH 44114
`Telephone: (216) 586-3939
`Facsimile: (216) 579-0212
`Email: dmaiorana@jonesday.com
`Email: rbmccrum@jonesday.com
`
`John J. Normile
`JONES DAY
`250 Vesey Street
`New York, NY 10281
`Telephone: (212) 326-3939
`Facsimile: (212) 755-7306
`Email: jjnormile@jonesday.com
`
`Alexis A. Smith
`JONES DAY
`555 South Flower Street
`Fiftieth Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (213) 243-2653
`Facsimile: (213) 243-2539
`Email: asmith@jonesday.com
`
`Charles Bennett Molster , III
`The Law Offices of Charles B. Molster III
`PLLC
`2141 Wisconsin Ave Nw Suite M
`Washington, DC 20007
`Telephone: 703-346-1505
`Email: Cmolster@molsterlaw.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiffs-Counterclaim
`Defendants RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. and
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1179 Filed 04/05/22 Page 5 of 6 PageID# 31397
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ W. Sutton Ansley
`W. Sutton Ansley (VSB No. 80085)
`sutton.ansley@weil.com
`Robert T. Vlasis III (pro hac vice)
`robert.vlasis@weil.com
`Stephanie Adamakos (pro hac vice)
`stephanie.adamakos@weil.com
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`2001 M Street, NW, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20036
`Tel: (202) 682-7000; Fax: 202-857-0940
`
`Elizabeth Stotland Weiswasser (pro hac vice)
`elizabeth.weiswasser@weil.com
`Anish R. Desai (pro hac vice)
`anish.desai@weil.com
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`767 5th Avenue
`New York, NY 10153
`Tel: (212) 310-8000; Fax: 212-310-8007
`
`Adrian C. Percer (pro hac vice)
`adrian.percer@weil.com
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`201 Redwood Shores Parkway
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Tel: (650) 802-3000; Fax: 850-802-3100
`
`Counsel for Plaintiffs Altria Client Services
`LLC and Philip Morris USA Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Maximilian A Grant
`Maximilian A. Grant (VSB No. 91792)
`max.grant@lw.com
`Matthew J. Moore
`matthew.moore@law.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`555 Eleventh Street, N.W., Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20004
`Tel: (202) 637-2200; Fax: (202) 637-2201
`
`Clement J. Naples
`clement.naples@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`885 Third Avenue
`New York, NY 10022-4834
`Tel: (212) 906-1200; Fax: (212) 751-4864
`Gregory K. Sobolski
`greg.sobolski@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel: (415) 391-0600; Fax: (415) 395-8095
`
`Brenda L. Danek
`brenda.danek@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`330 North Wabash Avenue, Suite 2800
`Chicago, IL 60611
`Tel: (312) 876-7700; Fax: (312) 993-9767
`
`Counsel for Defendants-Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs Philip Morris Products S.A., Altria
`Client Services LLC, and Philip Morris USA,
`Inc.
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1179 Filed 04/05/22 Page 6 of 6 PageID# 31398
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 5th day of April, 2022, a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing was served using the Court’s CM/ECF system, with electronic notification of such
`
`filing to all counsel of record.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Maximilian A. Grant
`Maximilian A. Grant (VSB No. 91792)
`max.grant@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`555 Eleventh Street, N.W., Ste. 1000
`Washington, DC 20004
`Tel: (202) 637-2200; Fax: (202) 637-2201
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket