`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CIVIL MOTION MINUTES
`
`
`
`
`
` Judge: Liam O’Grady
`Date: 03/18/2022
`Time: 2:35 p.m. – 5:28 p.m. Reporter: S. Wallace
`(02:53)
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action Number: 1:20cv393-LO-TCB
`
`
`
`
`
`RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL.,
`
`V.
`
`ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC, ET AL.,
`
`Appearances of Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant
`
`
`
`Counsel for Defendant
`Counsel for Plaintiffs
`
`
`RAI & RJ Reynolds:
`Altria Client Services LLC & Philip Morris USA,
`
`Inc.:
`Charles Molster, III
`
`David Maiorana
`Maximilian Grant
`Jennifer Weizenecker (phv)
`Elizabeth Weiswasser (phv)
`Bill Devitt
`Jamie Underwood (phv)
`Frank Byuk
`Sutton Ansley
`Sanjiv Laud
`Brett Sandford
`Jason Burnette
`Gregory Sobolski
`John Michalik
`Tom Watson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1156 Filed 03/18/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID# 30660
`
`Motions to/for:
`
`[872] MOTION in Limine No. 11 to Exclude Evidence and Testimony Regarding PM/Altria's
`IQOS Products by R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc.
`
`ARGUED AND TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT – ORDER TO FOLLOW
`
`[879] MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stacy Ehrlich by R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company,
`RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc.
`
`ARGUED AND TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT – ORDER TO FOLLOW
`
`[883] MOTION in Limine (Omnibus) by Altria Client Services LLC, Philip Morris Products
`S.A., Philip Morris USA, Inc.
`
`ARGUED AND TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT – ORDER TO FOLLOW
`
`[887] MOTION to Exclude Certain Expert Opinions of Joseph C. McAlexander by R.J.
`Reynolds Vapor Company, RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc.
`
`ARGUED AND TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT – ORDER TO FOLLOW
`
`[894] MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Paul K. Meyer by R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company,
`RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc.
`
`ARGUED AND TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT – ORDER TO FOLLOW
`
`[903] MOTION to Exclude the Opinions of RJR's Experts Based on Rejected Claim
`Constructions by Altria Client Services LLC, Philip Morris Products S.A., Philip Morris USA,
`Inc.
`
`ARGUED AND TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT – ORDER TO FOLLOW
`
`[917] MOTION to Exclude Design-Around Testimony of RJR's Expert, David Clissold by Altria
`Client Services LLC, Philip Morris Products S.A., Philip Morris USA, Inc.
`
`ARGUED AND TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT – ORDER TO FOLLOW
`
`[1143] MOTION to be Heard on Prior Art Dispute at March 18, 2022 Hearing by Altria Client
`Services LLC, Philip Morris Products S.A., Philip Morris USA, Inc.
`
`ARGUED AND TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT – ORDER TO FOLLOW
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1156 Filed 03/18/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID# 30661
`
`[1146] MOTION to Limit the Number of Asserted Counterclaim Patents and/or Claims by R.J.
`Reynolds Vapor Company, RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc.
`
`GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART – ORDER TO FOLLOW
`
`
`
`
` Counterclaim plaintiffs are directed to identify a reasonable number of claims to be
`presented at trial. The Counterclaim Plaintiffs communicate those claims to the
`Counterclaim Defendants within 15 days.
` The Counterclaim Defendants are then to identify a reasonable number of pieces of prior
`art and prior art combinations to be presented at trial.
`In thirty days, the Parties are to notify the Court of all identifications.
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
