throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1007-1 Filed 02/11/22 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 28134
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1007-1 Filed 02/11/22 Page 1 of 10 PagelD# 28134
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1007-1 Filed 02/11/22 Page 2 of 10 PageID# 28135
`
`Enforcement Priorities for
`Electronic Nicotine Delivery
`Systems (ENDS) and Other
`Deemed Products on the Market
`Without Premarket
`Authorization (Revised)*
`
`Guidance for Industry
`
`Comments may be submitted at any time for Agency consideration. Electronic comments may be
`submitted to https://www.regulations.gov. Alternatively, submit written comments to the
`Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
`Room 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with docket number
`FDA-2019-D-0661.
`
`For questions regarding this guidance, contact the Center for Tobacco Products at (Tel) 1-877-
`CTP-1373 (1-877-287-1373) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m. — 4 p.m. ET.
`
`Additional copies are available online at https://wwwida.gov/tobacco-products/products-
`guidance-regulationskules-regulations-and-guidance. You may send an e-mail request to
`SmallBiz.Tobacco@fda.hhs.gov to receive an electronic copy of this guidance. You may send a
`request for hard copies to U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Tobacco Products,
`Attn: Office of Small Business Assistance, Document Control Center, Bldg. 71, Rm. G335,
`10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MID 20993-2000.
`
`U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Tobacco Products
`
`April 2020
`
`* This is a revision to the first edition of this guidance, which issued in January 2020.
`
`1199_RESP00014118
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1007-1 Filed 02/11/22 Page 3 of 10 PageID# 28136
`
`Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
`
`For ENDS products marketed without FDA authorization, FDA intends to prioritize enforcement
`against:
`
`• Any flavored, cartridge-based ENDS product (other than a tobacco- or menthol-flavored
`ENDS product);
`• All other ENDS products for which the manufacturer has failed to take (or is failing to
`take) adequate measures to prevent minors' access; and
`• Any ENDS product that is targeted to minors or whose marketing is likely to promote use
`of ENDS by minors.3
`
`Further, FDA intends to prioritize enforcement of any ENDS product that is offered for sale after
`September 9, 2020, and for which the manufacturer has not submitted a premarket application
`(or after a negative action by FDA on a timely submitted application).
`
`This guidance does not in any way alter the fact that it is illegal to market any new tobacco
`product without premarket authorization. FDA is continuously evaluating new information and
`adjusting its enforcement priorities in light of the best available data, and it will continue to do so
`with respect to these products. FDA will take appropriate action regarding tobacco products that
`are marketed without premarket authorization, including as warranted based on changed
`circumstances, new information, or to better address minors' use of those products.
`
`FDA's guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable
`responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency's current thinking on a topic and should
`be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are
`cited. The use of the word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or
`recommended, but not required.
`
`II. BACKGROUND
`
`A. Statutory and Regulatory History
`
`The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Tobacco Control Act) (Public
`Law 111-31) granted FDA the authority to regulate the manufacture, marketing, and
`distribution of cigarettes, cigarette tobacco, roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco, and smokeless
`tobacco products to protect the public health and to reduce tobacco use by minors. The
`Tobacco Control Act also gave FDA the authority to issue regulations deeming other
`products that meet the statutory definition of a tobacco product4 to be subject to chapter IX of
`the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 387 through 387u)
`(section 901(b) of the FD&C Act).
`
`3 For purposes of this Final Guidance, FDA's use of the term "minor" refers to individuals under the age of 21. This
`is consistent with the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (H.R. 1865), signed into law on December 20,
`2019, which included a provision amending section 906(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to increase
`the federal minimum age to purchase tobacco products from 18 to 21, and adding a provision that it is unlawful for
`any retailer to sell a tobacco product to any person younger than 21 years of age. In addition, FDA is working to
`update our regulations within 180 days, consistent with the timeline set forth in the law.
`
`4 21 U.S.0 321(rr) (section 201(rr) of the FD&C Act).
`
`3
`
`1199_RESP00014121
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1007-1 Filed 02/11/22 Page 4 of 10 PageID# 28137
`
`Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
`
`In accordance with that authority, on May 10, 2016, FDA issued a final rule deeming all
`products that meet the statutory definition of a tobacco product, except accessories of deemed
`tobacco products, to be subject to FDA's tobacco product authority. This included electronic
`nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), cigars, waterpipe (hookah) tobacco, pipe tobacco,
`nicotine gels, and dissolvables that were not already subject to the FD&C Act (81 FR 28974
`at 28976 (May 10, 2016)).
`
`The requirements in Chapter IX of the FD&C Act now apply to deemed products.
`Particularly relevant to this guidance is section 910, which imposes certain premarket-review
`requirements for "new tobacco products"—i.e., those that were not commercially marketed in
`the United States as of February 15, 2007. Accordingly, after the rule's effective date,
`deemed new tobacco products were required to obtain premarket authorization under Section
`910. Deemed new tobacco products that remain on the market without marketing
`authorization are marketed unlawfully in contravention of the Tobacco Control Act. Through
`the premarket review process, FDA conducts a science-based evaluation to determine
`whether a new tobacco product meets the applicable statutory standard for marketing
`authorization—for example, whether the product is appropriate for the protection of public
`health with respect to the risks and benefits to the population as a whole, including users and
`nonusers, and taking into account, among other things, the likelihood that those who do not
`use tobacco products will start using them.
`
`The preamble to the May 10, 2016, final deeming rule explained that FDA intended to defer
`enforcement for failure to have premarket authorization during two compliance periods
`related to premarket review: one for submission and FDA receipt of applications and one for
`obtaining premarket authorization. The first compliance period depended on the type of
`application. The compliance date was 12 months from the effective date of the rule for
`substantial equivalence exemption requests (EX REQs), 18 months for substantial
`equivalence reports (SE Reports), and 24 months for premarket tobacco applications
`(PMTAs). In addition, the preamble explained that under the second compliance period:
`
`Unless FDA has issued an order denying or refusing to accept the submission,
`products for which timely premarket submissions have been submitted will be subject
`to a continued compliance period for 12 months after the initial compliance period
`described previously. For such products, FDA does not intend to initiate enforcement
`for failure to have premarket authorization during this continued compliance period.5
`
`The preamble further explained that this compliance policy did not apply to any new tobacco
`product that was not on the market on August 8, 2016. Significantly, this policy did not
`confer lawful marketing status on new tobacco products being marketed without the
`necessary premarket authorization.
`
`In May 2017, FDA published a guidance document, Three-Month Extension of Certain Tobacco
`Product Compliance Deadlines Related to the Final Deeming Rule, under which the Agency, as
`
`5 81 FR at 29011.
`
`4
`
`1199_RESP00014122
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1007-1 Filed 02/11/22 Page 5 of 10 PageID# 28138
`
`Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
`
`E-liquids are a type of ENDS product and generally refer to liquid nicotine and nicotine-
`containing e-liquids (i.e., liquid nicotine combined with colorings, flavorings, and/or other
`ingredients). Liquids that do not contain nicotine or other material made or derived from tobacco,
`but that are intended or reasonably expected to be used with or for the human consumption of a
`tobacco product, may be components or parts and, therefore, subject to FDA's tobacco control
`authorities.
`
`Label means a display of written, printed, or graphic matter upon the immediate container of any
`article. Section 201(k) of the FD&C Act.
`
`Labeling means all labels and other written, printed, or graphic matter (1) upon any article or any
`of its containers or wrappers, or (2) accompanying such article. Section 201(m) of the FD&C
`Act.
`
`New tobacco product means (1) any tobacco product (including those products in test markets)
`that was not commercially marketed in the United States as of February 15, 2007; or (2) any
`modification (including a change in design, any component, any part, or any constituent,
`including a smoke constituent, or in the content, delivery or form of nicotine, or any other
`additive or ingredient) of a tobacco product where the modified product was commercially
`marketed in the United States after February 15, 2007. Section 910(a) of the FD&C Act.
`
`Tobacco product means any product made or derived from tobacco that is intended for human
`consumption, including any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product (except for raw
`materials other than tobacco used in manufacturing a component, part, or accessory of a tobacco
`product). The term "tobacco product" does not mean an article that under the FD&C Act is a
`drug (section 201(g)(1) (21 U.S.0 321(g)(1))), a device (section 201(h)), or a combination
`product (section 503(g) (21 U.S.0 353(g))). Section 201(rr) of the FD&C Act.
`
`IV. ENFORCEMENT PRIORITIES REGARDING CERTAIN ENDS PRODUCTS ON
`THE MARKET WITHOUT PREMARKET AUTHORIZATION
`
`A. Overview
`
`The Tobacco Control Act provides that new tobacco products (i.e., non-grandfathered products)
`may not legally be marketed without premarket authorization. Accordingly, all deemed new
`tobacco products on the market without authorization are illegally marketed products.
`
`Beginning February 6, 2020, FDA intends to prioritize enforcement of the premarket review
`requirements for certain ENDS products, including against retailers selling such products.
`Specifically, FDA intends to prioritize enforcement against:
`
`(1) Flavored, cartridge-based ENDS products (except for tobacco- or menthol-flavored
`products);
`(2) All other ENDS products for which the manufacturer has failed to take (or is failing to
`take) adequate measures to prevent minors' access; and
`
`10
`
`1199_RESP00014128
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1007-1 Filed 02/11/22 Page 6 of 10 PageID# 28139
`
`Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
`
`(3) Any ENDS products targeted to, or whose marketing is likely to promote use by,
`minors.
`
`In addition, FDA intends to prioritize enforcement of any ENDS product that is offered for sale
`in the United States after September 9, 2020, and for which the manufacturer has not submitted a
`premarket application (or after a negative action by FDA on a timely submitted application).22
`
`FDA will make enforcement decisions on a case-by-case basis, recognizing that it is unable, as a
`practical matter, to take enforcement action against every illegally marketed tobacco product,
`and that it needs to make the best use of Agency resources. This guidance does not in any way
`alter the fact that it is illegal to market any new tobacco product without premarket authorization,
`or to sell any tobacco product to minors. The Agency also retains discretion to pursue
`enforcement action at any time against any deemed new tobacco product marketed without
`premarket authorization, regardless of whether it falls within one of these categories of
`enforcement priorities.
`
`B. Data Show Substantial Increase in Youth Use of ENDS Products, Particularly Certain
`Flavored, Cartridge-Based ENDS Products
`
`At the time FDA issued the August 2017 Compliance Policy to announce changes in its approach
`to enforcement regarding premarket authorization (as described in the preamble to the final
`deeming rule), data from the 2016 NYTS showed a decrease in prevalence of current e-cigarette
`use (i.e., past 30-day use) among high school students, from 16 percent in 2015 to 11.3 percent in
`2016.23 Results from the 2017 NYTS later confirmed that in regards to youth use there was no
`statistically significant rise at the time, with data suggesting that high school student use had
`leveled off between 2016 (11.3 percent)24 and 2017 (11.7 percent).25
`
`However, multiple survey results over the past several years demonstrate that there is significant
`initiation by youth. The recent surge in youth use of ENDS products has caused us to reevaluate
`our July 2017 assessment and to modify our enforcement priorities for ENDS products. Recent
`data show an alarming increase in youth use of ENDS products in the past two years. They also
`show youth are more likely to use certain flavored, cartridge-based ENDS products.
`
`22 We note that FDA would be enforcing the priorities discussed in Section IV of this guidance regardless of the
`court's decision in the AAP case. As discussed in this Final Guidance, FDA is implementing this policy to address
`the alarming increase in youth use of ENDS products as well as other recent health and safety issues regarding such
`products.
`
`23 Jamal, A, A. Gentzke, S.S. Hu, et al., "Tobacco Use Among Middle and High School Students — United States,
`2011-2016," Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66:597-603, 2017, available at:
`https://www.cdc.gov/mmwevolumes/66/wrimm6623a1 .htm.
`
`241d
`
`25 Wang, T.W., A. Gentzke, S. Sharapova, et al., "Tobacco Product Use Among Middle and High School Students —
`United States, 2011-2017," Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67:629-633, 2018, available at:
`hitp://dx doi.org/ 1 0.15585/mmwtmm6722a3.
`
`11
`
`1199_RESP00014129
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1007-1 Filed 02/11/22 Page 7 of 10 PageID# 28140
`
`Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
`
`FDA also remains concerned about health and safety issues connected to ENDS products—e.g.,
`cases of lung injuries associated with use of vaping products69 as well as battery explosions with
`ENDS products70—particularly given that these products have been marketed without premarket
`evaluation. These current public health issues affirm the importance of the premarket review
`process, as contemplated by the Tobacco Control Act, to scientifically evaluate products based
`on a public health standard. For example, FDA review of premarket tobacco product
`applications considers the risks and benefits of the product to the population as a whole,
`including tobacco product users and non-users. In reviewing premarket tobacco product
`applications, FDA will consider, among other things: the product's components, ingredients,
`additives, and properties; manufacturing practices; and any studies or investigations into the
`health risks of the tobacco product.
`
`D. Enforcement Priorities for ENDS Products
`
`In the discussion that follows, we describe our current intent regarding prioritizing our
`enforcement resources with respect to certain illegally marketed ENDS products.
`
`FDA will prioritize enforcement of flavored, cartridge-based ENDS products (other than
`tobacco- and menthol-flavored products), which are produced primarily by large manufacturers.
`This policy should have minimal impact on small manufacturers (e.g., vape shops) that primarily
`sell non-cartridge-based ENDS products, unless they market to youth or fail to take adequate
`measures to prevent youth access. Specifically, FDA intends to prioritize enforcement regarding
`the lack of marketing authorization against:
`
`• Any flavored, cartridge-based ENDS product (other than a tobacco- or menthol-flavored
`ENDS product);
`• All other ENDS products for which the manufacturer has failed to take (or is failing to
`take) adequate measures to prevent minors' access; and
`• Any ENDS product that is targeted to minors or whose marketing is likely to promote use
`of ENDS by minors.
`
`FDA intends to prioritize enforcement beginning February 6, 2020.
`
`establishes a policy, practice, or precedent requiring the Agency to do so with respect to future iterations of this
`document or any other guidance document.
`
`69 See, e.g., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Outbreak of Lung Injury Associated with E-cigarette Use,
`or Vaping," available at: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_informationk-cigarettes/severe-lung-
`disease.html#latest-outbreak-information; Layden, J. E., I. Ghinai, I. Pray, et al., "Pulmonary Illness Related to E-
`Cigarette Use in Illinois and Wisconsin — Preliminary Report," New England Journal of Medicine, Sept. 2019; DOT:
`10.1056/NEJMoa1911614.
`
`7° See, e.g., Rossheim, ME., M.D. Livingston, E.K. Soule, et al., "Electronic Cigarette Explosion and Burn Injuries,
`US Emergency Departments 2015-2017," Tobacco Control, 2019; 28:472-474, available at:
`http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054518.
`
`18
`
`1199_RESP00014136
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1007-1 Filed 02/11/22 Page 8 of 10 PageID# 28141
`
`Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
`
`additives, and properties; manufacturing practices; and any studies or investigations into the
`health risks of the tobacco product. FDA also has stated its intention to issue a regulation that
`would ban the use of characterizing flavors in cigars, and FDA is actively working towards that
`proposed rule.
`
`After September 9, 2020, FDA will make enforcement decisions on a case-by-case basis,
`recognizing that it is unable, as a practical matter, to take enforcement action against every
`illegally marketed tobacco product, and that it needs to make the best use of Agency
`resources. FDA intends to prioritize enforcement based on the likelihood of youth use or
`initiation to make the most efficient use of its resources. In assessing this, factors the Agency
`intends to consider include, but are not limited to:
`
`• What FDA understands about the number of youth currently using the product or
`category of product;
`• The trends in those numbers, particularly since 2016;
`• Whether the product contains added flavors;
`• What FDA understands about how the product or category of product is typically sold
`and how that is likely to impact access and use by minors; and
`• What FDA understands about the frequency and other demographics of use by minors.
`
`To illustrate, based on these factors, FDA's lowest priority among these products will include
`relatively expensive, large hand-rolled cigars that do not have flavors (e.g., fruit, candy, or mint),
`given what FDA understands to be their comparatively lower youth usage rates.
`
`FDA is continuously evaluating new information and adjusting its enforcement priorities in light
`of the best available data, and it will continue to do so with respect to these products. FDA will
`take appropriate action regarding tobacco products that are marketed without premarket
`authorization, including as warranted based on changed circumstances, new information, or to
`better address minors' use of those products.
`
`VI. DOCUMENT HISTORY
`
`January 2020 — First edition of guidance issued.
`
`April 2020 — Guidance is revised to reflect the court's order in American Academy of Pediatrics,
`et at. v. Food and Drug Administration, et at., Case No. 8:18-cv-883 (PWG), (D. Md. Apr. 22,
`2020), Dkt. No. 182, granting a motion for a 120-day extension (until September 9, 2020) in
`light of the global outbreak of respiratory illness caused by a new coronavirus. Specific
`revisions include the following:
`
`• Section II.A — Added reference to order granting 120-day extension.
`
`• Section IV.A (and throughout) — Changed language stating that FDA's new enforcement
`priorities would begin "30 days after issuance of this Final Guidance" to "February 6,
`
`31
`
`1199_RESP00014149
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1007-1 Filed 02/11/22 Page 9 of 10 PageID# 28142
`
`Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
`
`Draft guidance will kill innovation and force
`industry out of work.
`
`Draft guidance policy on marketing practices
`would violate the First Amendment as it
`represents an impermissibly broad commercial
`speech restriction.
`
`population level to be positive. If, on the other hand,
`there is significant initiation by youth, minimal
`q uitting, or significant dual use of combust[ed] and
`non-combust[ed] products, then the public health
`impact could be negative." As such policies are
`subject to change, manufacturers cannot have settled
`expectations to market unlawful products, especially
`in the face of evolving public health concerns.
`Therefore, FDA believes that manufacturers should
`have begun contemplating and/or preparing
`premarket applications at no later than the time of the
`final deeming rule.
`
`FDA disagrees that the Final Guidance will cause these
`results. The Final Guidance explains FDA's
`enforcement priorities for certain deemed new
`products that are being marketed without required
`premarket tobacco product authorization. The Final
`G uidance would only affect those products that are
`illegally on the market; none of the products affected
`by the guidance were ever in compliance with the
`premarket authorization requirements of the law. In
`a ny event, FDA believes that the use of premarket
`pathways will incentivize development of innovative
`tobacco products that meet the applicable statutory
`standards.
`
`FDA disagrees that the Final Guidance violates the
`First Amendment. Speech regarding an illegal activity
`— including distribution of a product that requires
`premarket review under the FDCA— is not protected
`u nder the First Amendment. See United States v.
`Caputo, 517 F.3d 935, 941 (7th Cir. 2008) (unapproved
`device); United States v. LeBeau, 654 Fed. App'x 826,
`831 (7th Cir. 2016) (unapproved drug); United States v.
`Cole, 84 F. Supp. 3d 1159, 11-66-67 (D. Or. 2015)
`(unapproved drug). Even if the First Amendment were
`applicable, the government has a substantial interest
`in protecting youth from tobacco products, and
`prioritizing enforcement actions with respect to ENDS
`products targeted to, or likely to promote use by,
`minors is a reasonable measure to directly advance
`that interest. See, e.g., Discount Tobacco City &
`Lottery, Inc. v. United States, 674 F.3d 509, 536 (6th
`Cir. 2012). We have provided additional examples for
`clarity in the Final Guidance.
`
`Modifications to ENDS Compliance Policy — Flavored ENDS except Tobacco, Mint, Menthol
`
`Comment
`
`Response
`
`36
`
`1199_RESP00014154
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 1007-1 Filed 02/11/22 Page 10 of 10 PageID# 28143
`
`Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
`
`There is no evidence/limited evidence to connect
`liquid nicotine use with harmful health effects in
`youth.
`
`"Banning" flavors outside of tobacco, mint, and
`menthol would deter cigarette smokers from
`
`As discussed in the Final Guidance the studies of the
`effects of nicotine exposure in the naïve adolescent
`brain find that the adolescent brain is uniquely
`vulnerable to nicotine compared to the adult brain.
`Repeated exposure to nicotine during adolescence
`induces long-lasting structural and functional changes
`in brain regions involved in addiction, attention,
`learning, and memory.'
`
`Studies further suggest that nicotine-induced changes
`in the adolescent brain can lead to long-lasting effects
`on cognitive function, such as cognitive deficits
`following nicotine abstinence, and may contribute to
`the risk for mood and anxiety disorders. Nicotine is the
`primary addictive substance in tobacco products,
`including e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes. The
`rate and extent of nicotine delivery significantly
`i mpact product abuse liability. Higher nicotine content
`and faster rates of nicotine delivery increase products'
`abuse liability due to the rapid absorption of nicotine
`into the brain. Some e-cigarettes are capable of
`achieving similar or greater nicotine delivery as
`cigarettes.'
`
`The Final Guidance does not ban any products but
`rather identifies FDA's priorities in connection with the
`enforcement of the statutory premarket review
`
`103 McDonald, C.G., A.K. Eppolito, J.M. Brielmaier, et. al., "Evidence for elevated nicotine-induced structural
`plasticity in nucleus accumbens of adolescent rats," Brain Research, 1151, 211-218, 2007; doi:
`10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.019; Bergstrom, H.C., R.F. Smith„ N.S. Mollinedo, et al., "Chronic nicotine exposure
`produces lateralized, age-dependent dendritic remodeling in the rodent basolateral amygdala," Synapse, 64(10), 754-
`764, 2010; doi:10.1002/syn.20783; England, L.J., K. Aagaard, M. Bloch, et al., "Developmental toxicity of
`nicotine: a transdisciplinary synthesis and implications for emerging tobacco products," Neuroscience and
`Biobehavioral Reviews, 72:176-189, 2017.
`
`104 Hiler, M., A. Breland, T. Spindle, et al., "Electronic cigarette user plasma nicotine concentration, puff
`topography, heart rate, and subjective effects: Influence of liquid nicotine concentration and user experience,"
`Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, 25(5), 380-392, 2017; doi:10.1037/pha0000140; Lopez, A.A., M.M.
`Hiler, E.K. Soule, et al., "Effects of Electronic Cigarette Liquid Nicotine Concentration on Plasma Nicotine and Puff
`Topography in Tobacco Cigarette Smokers: A Preliminary Report," Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 18(5):720-723,
`2016; doi:10.1093/ntrintv182; Maloney, S. F., A. Breland, E.K. Soule, et al. "Abuse liability assessment of an
`electronic cigarette in combustible cigarette smokers," Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 27(5):443-
`454, 2019; doi:10.1037/pha0000261; O'Connell, G., J.D. Pritchard, C. Prue, et al, "A randomised, open-label, cross-
`over clinical study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of cigarettes and e-cigarettes with nicotine salt
`formulations in US adult smokers," Internal and Emergency Medicine, 14(6):853-861, 2019; doi:10.1007/s11739-
`019-02025-3; Ramoa, C. P., M.M. Hiler, T.R. Spindle, et al. "Electronic cigarette nicotine delivery can exceed that
`of combustible cigarettes: a preliminary report," Tobacco Control, 25(e1): e6-9, 2016; doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-
`2015-052447; Yan, X. S., & C. D'Ruiz, "Effects of using electronic cigarettes on nicotine delivery and
`cardiovascular function in comparison with regular cigarettes," Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 71(1):24-
`34, 2015; doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.11.004.
`
`37
`
`1199_RESP00014155
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket