`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
`CENTRAL DIVISION
`
`
`
`EAGLE VIEW TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and
`PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORP.,
`
`
`
`ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION
`TO AMEND DISCOVERY LIMITS
`(DOC. NO. 323)
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:21-cv-00283
`
`District Judge Ted Stewart
`
`Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`v.
`
`NEARMAP US, INC.; NEARMAP
`AUSTRALIA PTY LTD; and NEARMAP
`LTD,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`The parties have filed a Joint Motion to Amend Discovery Limits, (Doc. No. 323). Based
`
`on the parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED and the court
`
`ORDERS as follows.
`
`The following provisions shall apply to the current period of fact discovery that began on
`
`July 13, 2023.
`
`• Supplementation of previously served discovery responses: The parties shall
`
`supplement their responses to previously-served interrogatories and requests for
`
`production that use such terms as “Accused Products” and “Asserted Patents,” or
`
`otherwise similarly address per-patent or per-product issues, to account for the
`
`newly added products and patents, respectively. The parties shall meet and confer
`
`to identify which requests require supplementation.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00283-TS-DAO Document 324 Filed 07/25/23 PageID.18099 Page 2 of 2
`
`• Limits for new discovery: The following limits apply without regard to the prior
`
`corresponding limits or the amount of corresponding discovery taken in the prior
`
`fact discovery period.
`
`Event
`Maximum interrogatories by each side to the other side
`Maximum requests for production by each side to the other side
`Maximum requests for admission by each side to the other side
`Maximum number of depositions by either side
`Maximum number of 30(b)(6) deposition topics to the other side
`Maximum number of 30(b)(6) deposition hours of the other side
`
`
`Limitation
`
`10
`25
`20
`5
`15 topics
`20 hours
`
`DATED this 25th day of July, 2023.
`
`
`BY THE COURT:
`
`
`____________________________
`Daphne A. Oberg
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
