USA v. Roy Smart
22-1584 | U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Interested in this case?
Request a Demo Track this case, and find millions of cases like it, let us show you how.Filing Date | # | Docket Text |
---|---|---|
4/28/2022 | 00703995474 | FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7232745-2] [7232745] [22-1584] (AD) [Entered: 04/28/2022 03:43 PM] |
4/28/2022 | 8 | ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b) and Cir. R. 51(f). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [4] [7] [8] [7232732] [22-1584] (AD) [Entered: 04/28/2022 03:33 PM] |
4/28/2022 | 7 | Motion filed by Appellant Roy D. Smart to dismiss case. [7] [7232673] [22-1584] (Stanton, William) [Entered: 04/28/2022 02:05 PM] |
4/25/2022 | 6 | ORDER: Appellant Roy D. Smart is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Roy D. Smart by 05/09/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0002 1930 4751. [6] [7231669] [22-1584] (AD) [Entered: 04/25/2022 10:36 AM] |
4/20/2022 | 5 | ORDER re: Appellant’s motion to dismiss appeal. [4] Counsel for the appellant shall file, by May 13, 2022, a supplement to the motion that includes the appellant’s signed acknowledgment and consent to the dismissal of this appeal. See Cir. R. 51(f). CMD [5] [7230833] [22-1584] (PS) [Entered: 04/20/2022 10:32 AM] |
4/19/2022 | 4 | Motion filed by Appellant Roy D. Smart to dismiss case. [4] [7230633] [22-1584] (Stanton, William) [Entered: 04/19/2022 11:58 AM] |
4/13/2022 | 3 | ORDER: This is an appeal from a decision ordering defendant Roy D. Smart’s arrest, and presumably his detention, based on a pending revocation of a supervised release report filed in the district court. Matters like this should be resolved quickly. Appellant should, therefore, file an appropriate motion rather than having the case proceed to full briefing. [7229445][3] DW [3] [7229445] [22-1584] (AD) [Entered: 04/13/2022 09:54 AM] |
4/12/2022 | 2 | ORDER: Defendant filed his notice of appeal pro se in this criminal action although he was represented in the district court by attorney William Sean Stanton. Counsel is reminded of his obligation to represent defendant on appeal unless specifically relieved by this court upon a motion to withdraw. See Circuit Rule 51(a), (c). DW [2] [7229282] [22-1584] (HTP) [Entered: 04/12/2022 03:08 PM] |
4/8/2022 | 1 | Criminal case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Roy D. Smart by 04/15/2022. Appellant's brief due on or before 05/18/2022 for Roy D. Smart. Transcript information sheet due by 04/22/2022. [1] [7228722] [22-1584] (MM) [Entered: 04/11/2022 12:27 PM] |