`
`
`D.C. No. 1:22-cv-00329-BLW
`District of Idaho,
`Boise
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Plaintiff-Appellee,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Defendant,
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`
`
` v.
`
`
`STATE OF IDAHO,
`
`
`
` v.
`
`
`MIKE MOYLE, Speaker of the Idaho House
`of Representatives; CHUCK WINDER,
`President Pro Tempore of the Idaho Senate;
`THE SIXTY-SEVENTH IDAHO
`LEGISLATURE, Proposed Intervenor-
`Defendants,
`
`
`
`Case: 23-35440, 11/13/2023, ID: 12823061, DktEntry: 73, Page 1 of 2
`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`
`FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
`
`
`FILED
`
`
`NOV 13 2023
`
`MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
`U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
`Nos. 23-35440, 23-35450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Movants-Appellants.
`
`
`
`Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and GOULD, CALLAHAN, M. SMITH,
`OWENS, MILLER, BRESS, FORREST, VANDYKE, KOH and MENDOZA,
`Circuit Judges.
`
`
`The Idaho Legislature’s motion to stay the district court’s injunction pending
`
`appeal (Dkt. 31) is denied. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009). The
`
`district court’s injunction therefore remains in effect. Further, we deny the Idaho
`
`Legislature’s Emergency Motion Under Circuit Rule 27-3 (Dkt. 71) as moot.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case: 23-35440, 11/13/2023, ID: 12823061, DktEntry: 73, Page 2 of 2
`
`The en banc court will proceed to consider the merits of this preliminary
`
`injunction appeal. Absent further order of the Court, no additional briefing is
`
`required.
`
`
`
`En banc oral argument will take place during the week of January 22, 2024,
`
`in Pasadena, California. The date and time will be determined by separate order.
`
`For further information or special requests regarding scheduling, please contact
`
`Deputy Clerk Paul Keller at paul_keller@ca9.uscourts.gov or
`
`(206) 224-2236.
`
`
`
`Within seven days from the date of this order, the parties shall forward to the
`
`Clerk of Court eighteen additional paper copies of the original briefs and ten
`
`additional paper copies of the excerpts of record. The paper copies must be
`
`accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the
`
`brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. The Form 18 certificate is
`
`available on the Court’s website at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/.
`
`Judges Callahan, Miller, Bress, and VanDyke respectfully dissent from the
`
`order denying Idaho’s motion to stay the district court’s injunction pending appeal
`
`and would have granted the stay for substantially the reasons set forth in the
`
`original three-judge motions panel order. See United States v. Idaho, 83 F.4th
`
`1130 (9th Cir. 2023).
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`