will filter after docket loads
Judge 
Party 
Law Firm Amy Bryant v. Timothy Moore
24-1576 | U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Interested in this case?
Request a Demo Track this case, and find millions of cases like it, let us show you how.
Filed
June 24, 2024
Nature of Suit
3950 Constitutionality of State Statute
Last Updated: 18 hours ago
Show Interactive Timeline
| Filing Date | # | Docket Text |
|---|---|---|
| 2/6/2025 | 75 | ORDER filed substituting party Jeffrey Neale Jackson for Josha Stein. Copies to all parties. [1001717348] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 02/06/2025 04:24 PM] |
| 1/28/2025 | 74 | Attorney Amar Majmundar for Joshua Stein in 24-1576, Joshua Stein in 24-1600 and Joshua Stein in 24-1617 terminated from case. Reason for termination: Order granting withdrawal. [1001710073] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 01/28/2025 12:31 PM] |
| 1/28/2025 | 73 | ORDER filed granting Motion to withdraw/relieve/substitute counsel [72]. Copies to all parties. [1001710070] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 01/28/2025 12:28 PM] |
| 1/28/2025 | 72 | MOTION by Joshua Stein in 24-1617, 24-1576, 24-1600 to withdraw/relieve/substitute counsel.Attorney or client motion? Attorney. Was a copy of the motion served on the defendant? Y. If under L.R. 46(d), was client advised of right to file response within 7 days? N/A. Date and method of service: 01/28/2025 ecf. [1001709903] [24-1617, 24-1576, 24-1600] Amar Majmundar [Entered: 01/28/2025 10:40 AM] |
| 12/31/2024 | 71 | Attorney Sarah Gardner Boyce for Joshua Stein in 24-1576, Joshua Stein in 24-1600 and Joshua Stein in 24-1617 terminated from case. Reason for termination: Order granting withdrawal. [1001694652] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 12/31/2024 04:25 PM] |
| 12/31/2024 | 70 | ORDER filed granting Motion to withdraw/relieve/substitute counsel [69]. Copies to all parties. [1001694647] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 12/31/2024 04:23 PM] |
| 12/31/2024 | 69 | MOTION by Joshua Stein in 24-1576, 24-1600 to withdraw/relieve/substitute counsel.Attorney or client motion? Attorney.. If under L.R. 46(d), was client advised of right to file response within 7 days? N/A. Date and method of service: 12/31/2024 ecf. [1001694627] [24-1617, 24-1576, 24-1600] Sarah Boyce [Entered: 12/31/2024 04:08 PM] |
| 12/18/2024 | 68 | BRIEF by Joshua Stein in 24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617. Type of Brief: REPLY. . Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? YES. Response: GenBioPro, Inc. v. Raynes, No. 23-2194 (4th Cir.), raises issues related to whether certain West Virginia laws are preempted by the FDCA, including the Food and Drug Administration Amendments of 2007.. [1001689401] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Sripriya Narasimhan [Entered: 12/18/2024 09:45 PM] |
| 12/18/2024 | 67 | BRIEF by Amy Bryant, M.D. in 24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617. Type of Brief: REPLY. . Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? YES. Response: GenBioPro, Inc. v. Raynes, 4th Circuit No. 23-2194, raises issues related to whether certain West Virginia laws are preempted by the FDCA, including the Food and Drug Administration Amendments of 2007.. [1001689343] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Eva Temkin [Entered: 12/18/2024 04:40 PM] |
| 12/3/2024 | 66 | COURT ORDER filed placing case in abeyance. Cases 24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617 placed in abeyance pending decision in 23-2194 from current appellate court. Copies to all parties. [1001680673] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 12/03/2024 04:15 PM] |
| 11/27/2024 | 65 | BRIEF by Philip E. Berger and Timothy K. Moore in 24-1576. Type of Brief: RESPONSE/REPLY. . Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? YES. Response: GenBioPro v. Raynes, CA4 Docket No. 23-2194, concerns whether the FDCA preempts state abortion laws.. [1001679090] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Erin Hawley [Entered: 11/27/2024 05:02 PM] |
| 11/27/2024 | 64 | Docket correction requested from Philip E. Berger and Timothy K. Moore in 24-1576. Re: [63] reply. Access to reply has been restricted to case participants. [1001679080] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 11/27/2024 04:54 PM] |
| 11/27/2024 | 63 | (ENTRY RESTRICTED) REPLY by Timothy K. Moore and Philip E. Berger in 24-1576 to brief [44].. [1001679077] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] [ see reply brief filed at ecf entry #65 ]--[Edited 12/02/2024 by JSN] Erin Hawley [Entered: 11/27/2024 04:50 PM] |
| 11/1/2024 | 62 | ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [61]. Number of days granted: 15. Response/Reply Brief Due 11/27/2024. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. Copies to all parties. [1001665037] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 11/01/2024 10:32 AM] |
| 10/31/2024 | 61 | MOTION by Philip E. Berger and Timothy K. Moore in 24-1576 to extend filing time for response/reply brief until November 27, 2024.. Date and method of service: 10/31/2024 ecf. [1001664863] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Erin Hawley [Entered: 10/31/2024 07:14 PM] |
| 10/25/2024 | 60 | ORDER filed granting filing of amicus curiae brief. Disclosure Statement filed (if corporate amicus)? N/A. Appearance Form filed? Y. Copies to all parties. [1001661616] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 10/25/2024 02:09 PM] |
| 10/25/2024 | 59 | ORDER filed granting Motion to file amicus curiae brief [50], granting Motion to file amicus curiae brief [52], granting Motion to file amicus curiae brief [55]. Disclosure Statement filed (if corporate amicus)? N/A. Appearance Form filed? Y. Copies to all parties. [1001661608] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 10/25/2024 02:01 PM] |
| 10/25/2024 | 58 | ORDER filed granting Motion to file amicus curiae brief [47]. Disclosure Statement filed (if corporate amicus)? Y. Appearance Form filed? Y.; granting Motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief[48]. Copies to all parties. [1001661598] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 10/25/2024 01:49 PM] |
| 10/17/2024 | 57 | AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF by American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Nursing, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, American College of Preventive Medicine, American Gynecological and Obstetrical Society, American Medical Women's Association, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Council of University Chairs of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine, Society of Family Planning, Society of General Internal Medicine and Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Method of Filing Paper Copies: N/A. Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? NO. [1001660873] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 10/24/2024 03:22 PM] |
| 10/17/2024 | 56 | AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF by The American College of Nurse-Midwives and The National Association of Nurse Practitioners in Women's Health as Amicus Supporting Appellee. . Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? NO.. [1001656403] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Jonathan Youngwood [Entered: 10/17/2024 07:49 PM] |
| 10/17/2024 | 55 | MOTION by The American College of Nurse-Midwives and The National Association of Nurse Practitioners in Women's Health as Amicus Supporting Appellee to file amicus curiae brief without consent of all parties on appeal within time allowed by FRAP 29(e).. Date and method of service: 10/17/2024 ecf. [1001656395] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Jonathan Youngwood [Entered: 10/17/2024 06:25 PM] |
| 10/17/2024 | 54 | AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF by District of Columbia, Massachusetts, et al.. . Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? YES. Response: GenBioPro v. Raynes, No. 23-2194 (4th Cir.): Raises issues related to whether certain West Virginia laws are preempted by the FDCA, including the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007.. [1001656391] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Caroline Van Zile [Entered: 10/17/2024 06:01 PM] |
| 10/17/2024 | 53 | AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF by Reproductive Health Researchers. . Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? YES. Response: GenBioPro, Inc. v. Raynes, No. 23-2194, raises issues related to whether certain West Virginia laws are preempted by the FDCA, including the Food and Drug Administration Amendments of 2007.. [1001656390] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Anjali Srinivasan [Entered: 10/17/2024 05:51 PM] |
| 10/17/2024 | 52 | MOTION by Reproductive Health Researchers to file amicus curiae brief without consent of all parties on appeal within time allowed by FRAP 29(e).. Date and method of service: 10/17/2024 ecf. [1001656386] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Anjali Srinivasan [Entered: 10/17/2024 05:29 PM] |
| 10/17/2024 | 51 | AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF by Doctors for America. . Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? YES. Response: GenBioPro, Inc. v. Raynes, No. 23-2194, whether a state law that effectively bans use of mifepristone is preempted by FDA's regulations regarding access to that drug. [1001656378] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Brian Burgess [Entered: 10/17/2024 05:11 PM] |
| 10/17/2024 | 50 | MOTION by Amici The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), The Society of Family Planning (SFP) et al. to file amicus curiae brief without consent of all parties on appeal within time allowed by FRAP 29(e).. Date and method of service: 10/17/2024 ecf. [1001656341] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Shannon Selden [Entered: 10/17/2024 04:35 PM] |
| 10/17/2024 | 49 | AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF by Pharmaceutical Companies, Executives, and Investors. . Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? YES. Response: GenBioPro, Inc. v. Raynes, 4th Circuit No. 23-2194, raises issues related to whether certain West Virginia laws are preempted by the FDCA, including the Food and Drug Administration Amendments of 2007. [1001656337] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Samantha Hong [Entered: 10/17/2024 04:30 PM] |
| 10/17/2024 | 48 | MOTION by Pharmaceutical Companies, Executives, and Investors for leave to file amicus brief without consent of all parties. Date and method of service: 10/17/2024 ecf. [1001656285] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Samantha Hong [Entered: 10/17/2024 03:53 PM] |
| 10/17/2024 | 47 | MOTION by Doctors for America to file amicus curiae brief without consent of all parties on appeal within time allowed by FRAP 29(e).. Date and method of service: 10/17/2024 ecf. [1001656277] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Brian Burgess [Entered: 10/17/2024 03:47 PM] |
| 10/10/2024 | 46 | BRIEF by Joshua Stein in 24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617. Type of Brief: OPENING/RESPONSE. . Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? YES. Response: GenBioPro, Inc. v. Raynes, No. 23-2194 (4th Cir.), raises issues related to whether certain West Virginia laws are preempted by the FDCA, including the Food and Drug Administration Amendments of 2007.. [1001652927] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Sripriya Narasimhan [Entered: 10/10/2024 11:45 PM] |
| 10/10/2024 | 45 | APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Sripriya Narasimhan for Joshua Stein in 24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617. [1001652926] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Sripriya Narasimhan [Entered: 10/10/2024 11:41 PM] |
| 10/10/2024 | 44 | BRIEF by Amy Bryant, M.D. in 24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617. Type of Brief: OPENING/RESPONSE. . Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? YES. Response: GenBioPro, Inc. v. Raynes, 4th Circuit No. 23-2194, raises issues related to whether certain West Virginia laws are preempted by the FDCA, including the Food and Drug Administration Amendments of 2007. [1001652884] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Eva Temkin [Entered: 10/10/2024 04:49 PM] |
| 10/10/2024 | 43 | Attorney William Ellis Boyle for Timothy K. Moore and Philip E. Berger in 24-1576, Chelsea Jean Corey for Amy Bryant in 24-1576, Sripriya Narasimhan for Joshua Stein in 24-1576 terminated from case. Reason for termination: Not participating. [1001652728] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 10/10/2024 03:13 PM] |
| 8/30/2024 | 42 | ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [41]. Number of days granted: 30. Opening/Response Brief Due: 10/10/2024. Response/Reply Brief Due 11/12/2024. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. Copies to all parties. [1001628988] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 08/30/2024 11:46 AM] |
| 8/30/2024 | 41 | MOTION by Amy Bryant, M.D. in 24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617 to extend filing time for opening/response brief until October 10, 2024.. Date and method of service: 08/30/2024 ecf. [1001628718] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] Paul Mezzina [Entered: 08/30/2024 09:18 AM] |
| 8/23/2024 | 40 | (ENTRY RESTRICTED) MOTION by Advancing American Freedom, Inc. in 24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617 to file amicus curiae brief without consent of all parties on appeal within time allowed by FRAP 29(e).. Date and method of service: 08/23/2024 ecf. [1001624581] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617]--[Edited 08/26/2024 by JSN] John Wheat [Entered: 08/23/2024 05:00 PM] |
| 8/23/2024 | 39 | ORDER filed granting Motion to file amicus curiae brief [38]. Disclosure Statement filed (if corporate amicus)? N/A. Appearance Form filed? Y. Copies to all parties. [1001624494] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 08/23/2024 03:31 PM] |
| 8/23/2024 | 38 | MOTION by Advancing American Freedom, Inc., et al. in 24-1576 to file amicus curiae brief without consent of all parties on appeal within time allowed by FRAP 29(e). Date and method of service: 08/23/2024 ecf. [1001624492] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 08/23/2024 03:30 PM] |
| 8/19/2024 | 36 | AMICUS OPENING BRIEF (assigned counsel) by Advancing American Freedom, Inc.. . Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? YES. Response: GenBioPro, Inc. v. Raynes, 23-2194 also before the Fourth Circuit, raises the issue of whether state laws addressing abortion drugs are preempted by the FDA's regulation of those drugs.. [1001621793] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] John Wheat [Entered: 08/19/2024 06:16 PM] |
| 8/19/2024 | 35 | ORDER filed granting filing of amicus curiae brief. Disclosure Statement filed (if corporate amicus)? N/A. Appearance Form filed? Y.; administratively terminating Motion for leave to file [33]. Copies to all parties. [1001621733] [24-1576, 24-1600, 24-1617] JSN [Entered: 08/19/2024 04:42 PM] |
