`
`No. 23-60167
`
`IN THE
`United States Court of Appeals
`FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
`
`ILLUMINA, INC. AND GRAIL, INC.,
`
`v.
`FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
`
`Petitioners,
`
`Respondent.
`
`PETITION FOR REVIEW OF
`AN ORDER OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE
`MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART AND
`THE NATIONAL TRAUMA EDUCATION AND POLICY INSTITUTE
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS
`
`STEVEN A. ENGEL
`M. SCOTT PROCTOR
`DECHERT LLP
`1900 K Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20006-1110
`Phone: (202) 261-3300
`Fax: (202) 261-3333
`steven.engel@dechert.com
`scott.proctor@dechert.com
`
`MICHAEL H. MCGINLEY
` Attorney of Record
`ANTHONY R. JADICK
`DECHERT LLP
`Cira Centre
`2929 Arch Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19104
`Phone: (215) 994-2000
`Fax: (215) 994-2222
`michael.mcginley@dechert.com
`anthony.jadick@dechert.com
`
`Counsel for Amici Curiae
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS
`
`Illumina, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, No. 23-60167
`
`The undersigned counsel of record certifies that the following listed persons
`
`and entities as described in the fourth sentence of 5th CIR. Rule 28.2.1 have an
`
`interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the
`
`judges of this Court may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal.
`
`1.
`
`Illumina, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellant, represented by:
`
`David R. Marriott,
`Sharonmoyee Goswami,
`Christine A. Varney,
`Jesse M. Weiss,
`Michael J. Zaken,
`Antony L. Ryan,
`Benjamin A. Atlas
`CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
`
`2.
`
`GRAIL, Incorporated, now known as GRAIL, L.L.C., Defendant-
`
`Appellant, represented by:
`
`Gregory G. Garre,
`Michael G. Egge,
`Marguerite M. Sullivan,
`Anna M. Rathbun,
`David L. Johnson,
`
`Alfred C. Pfeiffer, Jr.
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`
`3.
`
`Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff-Appellee, represented by:
`
`Anisha S. Dasgupta,
`Joel Marcus-Kurn,
`Matthew M. Hoffman
`
`
`
`i
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 3 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`5. Washington Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by:
`
`John M. Masslon II,
`Cory L. Andrews
`WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
`
`6. Military Order of the Purple Heart, Amicus Curiae, represented by:
`
`Steven A. Engel
`Michael H. McGinley
`M. Scott Proctor
`Anthony R. Jadick
`DECHERT LLP
`
`The Military Order of the Purple Heart is a congressionally chartered United
`
`States war veterans organization headquartered in the District of Columbia. The
`
`Order has no parent corporation, and no publicly held company has 10% or greater
`
`ownership in the Order.
`
`7.
`
`The National Trauma and Education Policy Institute, Amicus
`
`Curiae, represented by:
`
`Steven A. Engel
`Michael H. McGinley
`M. Scott Proctor
`Anthony R. Jadick
`DECHERT LLP
`
`The National Trauma and Education Policy Institute is a nonprofit, tax-
`
`exempt organization incorporated in Silver Spring, Maryland. The Institute has no
`
`ii
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 4 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`parent corporation, and no publicly held company has 10% or greater ownership in
`
`the Institute.
`
`8.
`
`The Chamber of Commerce of the United States, Amicus Curiae,
`
`represented by:
`
`Tyler S. Badgley
`Jordan L. Von Bokern
`U.S. CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER
`
`Jeffrey M. Harris
`Frank H. Chang
`CONSOVOY MCCARTHY PLLC
`
`Dated: June 12, 2023
`
`
`
`/s/ Michael H. McGinley
`Michael H. McGinley
`DECHERT LLP
`Cira Centre
`2929 Arch Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19104
`Phone: (215) 994-2000
`Fax: (215) 994-2222
`michael.mcginley@dechert.com
`
`Attorney of record for Amici Curiae
`
`iii
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 5 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page
`CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS ......................................................... i
`STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL RULE OF
`APPELLATE PROCEDURE 29 .............................................................................. ix
`INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ............................................................................... 1
`INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ........................................ 3
`ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................. 5
`I.
`The Illumina-Grail Vertical Merger Will Save Veterans’ Lives. ......... 5
`A.
`Veterans Face a Higher Rate of Cancer than Their Civilian
`Counterparts. ............................................................................... 5
`By Enhancing Early Detection, Galleri Promises to Prolong and
`Improve Veterans’ Lives. ............................................................ 7
`The Illumina-Grail Vertical Merger Will Improve the Department of
`Veterans Affairs’ Overall Effectiveness. ............................................ 10
`A.
`Access to the Galleri Test Will Improve the VA’s Ability to
`Care for Veterans. ..................................................................... 11
`Access to the Galleri Test Will Further VA Policy Goals. ....... 15
`B.
`CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 18
`CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ....................................................................... 19
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ................................................................................ 20
`
`B.
`
`II.
`
`iv
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 6 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
`CASES
`Comcast Cable Commc’ns, LLC v. FCC,
`717 F.3d 982 (D.C. Cir. 2013) (Kavanaugh, J., concurring) ................................ 3
`STATUTES
`36 U.S.C. § 140501 et seq. ......................................................................................... 1
`36 U.S.C. § 140502(b)(4), (5) .................................................................................... 1
`36 U.S.C. § 140503 .................................................................................................... 1
`LEGISLATIVE MATERIALS
`Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022,
` Pub. L. No. 117-168, 136 Stat. 1789 (2022) ..................................................... 15
`Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022 § 103 .................................................................. 15
`Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022 § 604 .................................................................. 15
`Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022 § 704 .................................................................. 15
`Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022 § 902 .................................................................. 15
`OTHER AUTHORITIES
`Ady Oster & Andrew B. Bindman, Emergency Department Visits for Ambulatory
`Care Sensitive Conditions: Insights into Preventable Hospitalizations, 41 MED.
`CARE 198 (Feb. 2003) ......................................................................................... 12
`Amir A. Tabriz A et al., Trends and Characteristics of Potentially Preventable
`Emergency Department Visits Among Patients With Cancer in the US, 6 JAMA
`NETW. OPEN e2250423 (Jan. 2023) .................................................................... 12
`Angela B. Mariotto et al., Medical Care Costs Associated with Cancer
`Survivorship in the United States, 29 CANCER EPIDEMIOL. BIOMARKERS &
`PREV. 1304 (July 2020) ....................................................................................... 11
`
`v
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 7 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`Courtney Franchio, Cancer Screenings Save Lives, VA News (Oct. 27, 2021),
`http://bit.ly/3J8C2Px (last accessed June 4, 2023) ............................................... 7
`Dave Philipps, For Suicidal Veterans, a Frayed Lifeline, N.Y. TIMES (July 17,
`2016), https://nyti.ms/3J9k13L ........................................................................... 11
`David Crosby et al., Early Detection of Cancer, 375 SCIENCE 1244 (Mar. 2022),
`available at https://bit.ly/3CkZ41X ...................................................................... 7
`David Mosher, Trends in DoD’s and VA’s Budgets for Military Compensation
`(Mar. 22, 2023, Cong. Budget Office), available at http://bit.ly/3P7Wxzt ....... 13
`Department of Defense, Study on the Incidence of Cancer Diagnosis and Mortality
`among Military Aviators and Aviation Support Personnel (Feb. 8, 2023),
`http://bit.ly/3p2v6fS .......................................................................................... 6, 7
`Department of Veterans Affairs, Spotlight on Cancer Research (Oct. 2021),
`http://bit.ly/3Noy5Zz ........................................................................................... 5
`Department of Veterans Affairs, VA MISSION Act: What is the Latest on
`Community Care? (Apr. 2019), https://bit.ly/43zToNg; .................................... 15
`Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Research on Cancer, http://bit.ly/3X3Ckgn
`(last accessed June 3, 2023) ............................................................................... 16
`Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Benefits Administration Reports,
`Appeals Modernization Act Comprehensive Plan and
`Reporting, https://bit.ly/3oVSk7B (last accessed June 3, 2023) ........................ 15
`Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans’ Diseases Associated with Agent
`Orange, http://bit.ly/43UYKm9 (last accessed June 3, 2023) .............................. 6
`Donald Musa et al., Trust in the Health Care System and the Use of Preventive
`Health Services by Older Black and White Adults, 99 AM. J. PUB. HEALTH 1293
`(July 2009) .......................................................................................................... 16
`Empowerment Behavioral Services, National Trauma Education and Policy
`Institute, https://bit.ly/461ZHv0 (last accessed June 10, 2023) ............................ 2
`Erika L. Sabbath et al., Preventive Care Utilization: Association with Individual-
`and Workgroup-Level Policy and Practice Perceptions, 111 PREV. MED. 235
`(June 2018) .......................................................................................................... 10
`
`vi
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 8 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`Galleri, Types of Cancer Detected, http://bit.ly/3X5W7M3 (last accessed June 7,
`2023) ..................................................................................................................... 8
`Girish Putcha G. et al., Multicancer Screening: One Size Does Not Fit All, 5 JCO
`PRECIS. ONCOL. 574 (Nov. 2021) ......................................................................... 7
`Grace C. Hillyer et al., Positive Attitudes Toward Clinical Trials Among Military
`Veterans Leaves Unanswered Questions About Poor Trial Accrual, 48 SEMIN.
`ONCOL. 130 (May 2021) ..................................................................................... 14
`Hermann Faller et al., Effects of Psycho-Oncologic Interventions on Emotional
`Distress and Quality of Life in Adult Patients with Cancer: Systematic Review
`and Meta-Analysis, 31 J. CLIN. ONCOL. 782 (Feb. 2013) .................................... 8
`Jerry SH Lee et al., From Discovery to Practice and Survivorship: Building a
`National Real-World Data Learning Healthcare Framework for Military and
`Veteran Cancer Patients, 6 CLIN. PHARMACOL. THER. 52 (Jul. 2019) ......... 11, 16
`John E. Till et al., Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma Mortality among Atomic
`Veterans, 98 INT’L J. RADIATION BIOLOGY 1 (Sept. 2018) ................................... 7
`K. Robin Yabroff et al., Economic Burden of Cancer in the U.S.: Estimates,
`Projections, and Future Research, 20 CANCER EPIDEMIOL. BIOMARKERS &
`PREV. 2006, 2008 (Oct. 2011) ............................................................................ 10
`Kangmin Zhu et al., Cancer Incidence in the U.S. Military Population:
`Comparison with Rates from the SEER Program, 18 CANCER EPIDEMIOL.
`BIOMARKERS PREV. 1740 (2009) .......................................................................... 5
`Leslie R. Martin et al., The Challenge of Patient Adherence, 1 THERAPEUTICS AND
`CLINICAL RISK MGMT. 189 (Oct. 2005) ................................................................ 9
`Mesothelioma Veterans Center, Asbestos on Frigates, http://bit.ly/3N22j3g (last
`accessed June 6, 2023) .......................................................................................... 7
`The Military Order of the Purple Heart, About: The Purple Heart,
`http://bit.ly/3NmWxuo (last accessed June 10, 2023) .......................................... 2
`National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Committee to
`Review the Health Effect in Vietnam Veterans of Exposure to Herbicides, A
`Consensus Study Report, Veterans and Agent Orange: Update 11 (2018)
`(2018), http://bit.ly/3N30dAb ............................................................................. 16
`
`vii
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 9 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`National Cancer Inst., Clinical Trials Information for Patients and Caregivers,
`http://bit.ly/3PfTvt0 (last accessed June 3, 2023) ............................................... 14
`News Release, Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary McDonough Statement
`on FY 2023 Budget (Mar. 28, 2022), http://bit.ly/42uNk7y .............................. 12
`News Release, H.R. 6092, 116th Cong., Veterans Prostate Cancer Treatment and
`Research Act (2020), H. Comm. on Veterans’ Affairs, https://bit.ly/3qALF34 .. 5
`Patrick Richard et al., The Financial Burden of Cancer on Families in the United
`States, 18 INT’L J ENVT’L RES. PUBLIC HEALTH 3790 (Apr. 2021) ...................... 9
`U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Celebrating America’s Freedoms: The
`Purple Heart, http://bit.ly/3JatlnI ......................................................................... 1
`
`viii
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 10 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH
`FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 29
`All parties have consented to the filing of this brief. No counsel for a party
`
`authored any part of this brief. No party, party’s counsel or any person other than
`
`the amici curiae or their counsel contributed money that was intended to finance the
`
`preparation or submission of this brief.
`
`ix
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 11 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE
`In 1782, then-General George Washington ordered the creation of a new
`
`military award. Fashioned in “the figure of a heart in purple cloth, or silk,” it was to
`
`be awarded to those who exhibited “unusual gallantry” in the field or rendered
`
`“extraordinary fidelity and essential service” to their country. U.S. Department of
`
`Veterans Affairs, Celebrating America’s Freedoms: The Purple Heart,
`
`http://bit.ly/3JatlnI (last accessed June 10, 2023) (quoting Washington’s 1782
`
`order). After the Revolutionary War ended, the award fell into disuse for 150 years.
`
`Then, in 1932, President Franklin D. Roosevelt revived it. He ordered that the
`
`military bestow it upon those wounded or killed in combat. Id.
`
`The Military Order of the Purple Heart was formed the same year that
`
`President Roosevelt revived the award. Id. Today, it is congressionally chartered.
`
`See 36 U.S.C. §140501 et seq. By statute, all members of the Order must have
`
`received the decoration, making it the only veteran service organization composed
`
`entirely of combat veterans. Id. §140503. The Order exists to protect the interests
`
`of all combat-wounded veterans by, among other things, “assisting, comforting, and
`
`aiding all needy and distressed members and their dependents” and “giving needed
`
`hospital and service work through its Department of Veterans Affairs certified
`
`service officers.” Id. §140502(b)(4), (5); see also The Military Order of the Purple
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 12 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`Heart, About: The Purple Heart, http://bit.ly/3NmWxuo (last accessed June 10,
`
`2023).
`
`The Order’s interest in the Illumina-Grail vertical merger stems from the fact
`
`that tens of thousands of veterans, including many who have received the Purple
`
`Heart, are diagnosed with cancer every year. Their diagnoses often come too late
`
`for effective treatment. Grail’s product, Galleri, promises to provide a non-invasive
`
`test for a host of the cancers from which these veterans suffer. And Illumina
`
`produces the inputs that the Galleri test uses. Their merger would speed up the
`
`widespread production, distribution, and use of the Galleri test. Once widely
`
`available, the test will help diagnose cancer in veterans early, saving or improving
`
`their lives. The Order thus has an interest in seeing Galleri sped to market because
`
`it will “assist[], comfort[], and aid[]” many “needy and distressed” veterans. Id.
`
`The National Trauma Education and Policy Institute too has an interest in this
`
`case. Among other things, the Institute seeks to influence and improve how U.S.
`
`communities identify and treat trauma of all types, including the trauma suffered by
`
`veterans afflicted with cancer. See Empowerment Behavioral Services, National
`
`Trauma Education and Policy Institute, https://bit.ly/461ZHv0 (last accessed June
`
`10, 2023). Like the Order, the Institute expects that the Illumina-Grail vertical
`
`merger will speed up the widespread distribution and use of Galleri, which will help
`
`reduce the harm that cancer inflicts on the veteran community.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 13 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
`The Illumina-Grail merger would significantly improve the lives of this
`
`Nation’s veterans, who disproportionately suffer from cancer and thus would acutely
`
`benefit from the early screening test that this merger would speed to market.
`
`The merger would vertically integrate a producer of blood-based cancer tests
`
`with the company that supplies the inputs for the tests. Unlike horizontal mergers,
`
`which can in certain circumstances risk concentrating market power in few
`
`participants, vertical mergers typically benefit consumers. They “encourage product
`
`innovation, lower costs for businesses, and create efficiencies—and thus reduce
`
`prices and lead to better goods and services for consumers.” Comcast Cable
`
`Commc’ns, LLC v. FCC, 717 F.3d 982, 990 (D.C. Cir. 2013) (Kavanaugh, J.,
`
`concurring). Consumers then enjoy cheaper, better products and services. Id.
`
`The Illumina-Grail vertical merger would yield precisely those beneficial
`
`results. Illumina “is a global leader in next-generation sequencing (‘NGS’).”
`
`Illumina Br. at 5.1 Grail makes a blood test, called Galleri, that uses NGS technology
`
`to “detect more than 50 cancer types in asymptomatic patients from a single blood
`
`draw.” Id. at 6. As Petitioners explain, the merger would spur innovation and reduce
`
`costs by enabling Galleri to be brought to market more efficiently. See, e.g., id. at 7–
`
`1 Amici cites Petitioners’ brief filed on June 5, 2023. As of the time of this filing,
`Petitioners have not filed a subsequent brief.
`3
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 14 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`8, 70–71. And that will accelerate Galleri’s widespread availability—which will
`
`save countless lives.
`
`Veterans in particular stand to benefit. Military service calls on those who
`
`serve to hazard many dangers. Some of those dangers are familiar and tangible, such
`
`as those faced in combat. But other dangers are subtle and insidious. Millions of
`
`veterans answered the call to duty by serving in locales or aboard platforms rife with
`
`carcinogens. Today, those veterans face significantly higher cancer risks than their
`
`civilian peers, and they rely on the United States Department of Veterans Affairs
`
`(“VA”) to help them detect and then combat those cancers. But the VA’s resources
`
`are limited, and many cancers are difficult to detect until it is too late. By speeding
`
`Galleri to market, the Illumina-Grail merger promises both to help mitigate cancer
`
`risks through early detection and treatment and to save the VA resources that it could
`
`then use to improve veteran medical care generally.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 15 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`I.
`
`ARGUMENT
`The Illumina-Grail Vertical Merger Will Save Veterans’ Lives.
`A.
`Veterans Face a Higher Rate of Cancer than Their Civilian
`Counterparts.
`Statistics show that cancer strikes veterans harder than their peers. For
`
`example, studies have shown breast cancer rates are 20% to 40% higher among
`
`veterans than among the general population. See Kangmin Zhu et al., Cancer
`
`Incidence in the U.S. Military Population: Comparison with Rates from the SEER
`
`Program, 18 CANCER EPIDEMIOL. BIOMARKERS PREV. 1740 (2009). Veteran
`
`prostate cancer rates have been found to be double those in the general population,
`
`with an estimated 1 in 5 male veterans expected to suffer from prostate cancer in
`
`their lifetime. Id.; see also News Release, H.R. 6092, 116th Cong., Veterans
`
`Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research Act (2020), H. Comm. on Veterans’
`
`Affairs, https://bit.ly/3qALF34. Overall, approximately 50,000 veterans are
`
`diagnosed with cancer every year. Department of Veterans Affairs, Spotlight on
`
`Cancer Research (Oct. 2021), http://bit.ly/3Noy5Zz (hereinafter “VA Spotlight on
`
`Cancer Research”).
`
`Veterans face these heightened cancer risks because they answered the call to
`
`safeguard our liberties wherever and whenever necessary. Often, their duties took
`
`them to inhospitable environments. Infantrymen advancing across burning Middle
`
`Eastern deserts, crewmen strapped to jumpseats of heavy-lift aircraft, and enginemen
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 16 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`sweating in the bowels of a ship’s main space all endured heat, cold, fatigue, and
`
`extreme discomfort. And, too often, they endured exposure to hazards that
`
`permeated the environments in which they served.
`
`As one example, consider the land force’s exposure to Agent Orange during
`
`the Vietnam conflict. During that conflict, U.S. aircraft drenched the Vietnamese
`
`jungles in the defoliant Agent Orange to deprive enemy soldiers of cover. U.S.
`
`servicemembers inhaled it alongside their enemy. Today, the VA recognizes an
`
`association between exposure to Agent Orange and an increased risk of developing
`
`various types of cancer, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma, soft tissue sarcomas,
`
`and certain respiratory cancers. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans’ Diseases
`
`Associated with Agent Orange, http://bit.ly/43UYKm9 (last accessed June 3, 2023).
`
`For another example, consider the air service’s exposure to military
`
`chemicals. A comprehensive yearlong study conducted by the Pentagon examined
`
`900,000 service members who either flew on or worked with military aircraft
`
`between 1992 and 2017. Department of Defense, Study on the Incidence of Cancer
`
`Diagnosis and Mortality among Military Aviators and Aviation Support Personnel
`
`(Feb. 8, 2023), http://bit.ly/3p2v6fS. The findings revealed that aircrew members
`
`experienced an 87% higher rate of melanoma and a 39% higher rate of thyroid
`
`cancer. Further, within this study, men exhibited a 16% higher rate of prostate
`
`cancer, while women showed a 16% higher rate of breast cancer. Overall, the study
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 17 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`concluded that veterans who served as aircrew members experienced a 24% increase
`
`in cancer diagnoses. Id. at 4, 16.
`
`For a third example, take the sea service’s exposure to asbestos. Navy ships
`
`employed asbestos to mitigate fire risks. See Mesothelioma Veterans Center,
`
`Asbestos on Frigates, http://bit.ly/3N22j3g (last accessed June 6, 2023). Studies link
`
`asbestos to higher cancer death rates among machinist’s mates, boiler technicians,
`
`pipe fitters, and other ratings who worked in spaces containing asbestos. See John
`
`E. Till et al., Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma Mortality among Atomic
`
`Veterans, 98 INT’L J. RADIATION BIOLOGY 1 (Sept. 2018).
`
`B.
`
`By Enhancing Early Detection, Galleri Promises to Prolong and
`Improve Veterans’ Lives.
`Needless to say, the “earlier a cancer is diagnosed, the better the outcome” for
`
`the cancer patient. See Courtney Franchio, Cancer Screenings Save Lives, VA News
`
`(Oct. 27, 2021), http://bit.ly/3J8C2Px (last accessed June 4, 2023). More patients
`
`live longer when doctors identify a cancer at an early, localized stage rather than at
`
`a later, regional/metastatic stage. See David Crosby et al., Early Detection of
`
`Cancer, 375 SCIENCE 1244 (Mar. 2022), available at https://bit.ly/3CkZ41X; see
`
`also Girish Putcha G. et al., Multicancer Screening: One Size Does Not Fit All,
`
`5 JCO PRECIS. ONCOL. 574 (Nov. 2021). Unfortunately, for many cancers,
`
`physicians lack the tools to detect those diseases early. Thus, veterans, who
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 18 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`disproportionately suffer from cancer, stand to disproportionately benefit from
`
`advances in cancer detection tools.
`
`As a result, the Galleri test promises to be a game-changer for veterans. As
`
`explained in Illumina’s brief, Galleri would provide a non-invasive means to detect
`
`over 50 types of cancer early on, using a simple blood test. See Illumina Br. at 6.
`
`Those would include the cancers that often strike veterans, including non-Hodgkin
`
`lymphoma, melanoma, prostate cancer, and breast cancer. See Galleri, Types of
`
`Cancer Detected, http://bit.ly/3X5W7M3 (last accessed June 7, 2023). While the
`
`VA cannot reverse the service-related exposures that cause veterans to suffer
`
`disproportionately from cancer, a test like Galleri could revolutionize how the VA
`
`catches and treats it.
`
`Moreover, the very existence of an early detection test like Galleri would
`
`improve the lives of many veterans. In addition to the myriad cancers that arise from
`
`their service, veterans often suffer from mental health issues. If a veteran’s cancer
`
`is caught early, physicians have time to integrate mental health and cancer care into
`
`a holistic care plan. Researchers have shown that doing so elevates patients’
`
`psychological well-being and overall satisfaction with care, potentially improving
`
`their overall prospect of achieving remission and returning to a normal life. See
`
`Hermann Faller et al., Effects of Psycho-Oncologic Interventions on Emotional
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 19 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`Distress and Quality of Life in Adult Patients with Cancer: Systematic Review and
`
`Meta-Analysis, 31 J. CLIN. ONCOL. 782 (Feb. 2013).
`
`And the data collected from the early and widespread use of a test like Galleri
`
`could itself have a direct salutary effect on veterans. Psychiatrists and
`
`neuroscientists have recognized that it matters what a patient believes about a
`
`diagnosis and accompanying treatment. A patient is less likely to comply with
`
`cancer treatment requirements if he or she does not understand the illness’s cause,
`
`the treatment’s effects, or their connection. Leslie R. Martin et al., The Challenge
`
`of Patient Adherence, 1 THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MGMT. 189 (Oct. 2005).
`
`Access to the multi-cancer early detection tests—along with the better association
`
`between exposure and illness gleaned from widespread usage—can provide medical
`
`professionals with data needed to connect an illness to service, teach the veteran
`
`about that connection, and encourage the veteran to stick with proven treatments.
`
`Comprehensive early screening would enhance the overall health and well-
`
`being of not only veterans, but their families as well. A cancer diagnosis can also
`
`have a devastating impact on the quality of life for those who live and care for the
`
`patient. See, e.g., Patrick Richard et al., The Financial Burden of Cancer on Families
`
`in the United States, 18 INT’L J ENVT’L RES. PUBLIC HEALTH 3790 (Apr. 2021).
`
`Early detection would promote positive treatment outcomes and minimize the
`
`financial, physical, and emotional toll on veterans and their loved ones.
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 20 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`Finally, Galleri tests would facilitate a veteran’s return to work. Cancer levies
`
`a heavy toll on the U.S. economy by removing people from the workforce or, if they
`
`stay on the job, reducing their productivity. See K. Robin Yabroff et al., Economic
`
`Burden of Cancer in the U.S.: Estimates, Projections, and Future Research,
`
`20 CANCER EPIDEMIOL. BIOMARKERS & PREV. 2006, 2008 (Oct. 2011). And it levies
`
`a heavy toll on individuals who derived a livelihood and sense of purpose from their
`
`work. Veterans are no exception. With multi-cancer early screening tests like
`
`Galleri, doctors would have a better chance of detecting cancer early, optimizing
`
`treatment outcomes, and minimizing the impact on veterans’ ability to work, thus
`
`enhancing the overall quality of life for afflicted veterans. See Erika L. Sabbath et
`
`al., Preventive Care Utilization: Association with Individual- and Workgroup-Level
`
`Policy and Practice Perceptions, 111 PREV. MED. 235 (June 2018).
`
`II.
`
`The Illumina-Grail Vertical Merger Will Improve the Department of
`Veterans Affairs’ Overall Effectiveness.
`The benefits of Illumina-Grail merger will also improve the overall
`
`effectiveness of the VA by speeding the introduction of Galleri. Once in widespread
`
`use, this cancer-testing tool promises to improve the VA’s ability to care for
`
`veterans, reduce costs, and further other VA policy goals.
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 21 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`A.
`
`Access to the Galleri Test Will Improve the VA’s Ability to Care
`for Veterans.
`Early cancer screening would enable the VA to provide more and better care
`
`to veterans. Cancer treatment can be incredibly expensive—especially when
`
`detected at a later stage. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Medical
`
`Expenditure Panel Survey estimates that, for 2019, the direct medical costs for
`
`cancer in the United States were $172.1 billion. Agency for Healthcare Research
`
`and Quality. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Medical Expenditure
`
`Panel
`
`Survey
`
`(MEPS) Household Component
`
`(HC),
`
`available
`
`at
`
`http://bit.ly/3qKCzRa. And experts expect those costs to reach more than $240
`
`billion by 2030. Angela B. Mariotto et al., Medical Care Costs Associated with
`
`Cancer Survivorship in the United States, 29 CANCER EPIDEMIOL. BIOMARKERS &
`
`PREV. 1304 (July 2020).
`
`The Veterans Health Administration operates the largest integrated healthcare
`
`system in the United States, serving more than 9 million veterans annually. Jerry
`
`SH Lee et al., From Discovery to Practice and Survivorship: Building a National
`
`Real-World Data Learning Healthcare Framework for Military and Veteran Cancer
`
`Patients, 6 CLIN. PHARMACOL. THER. 52 (Jul. 2019). Unsurprisingly, it is often
`
`overstretched. See, e.g., Dave Philipps, For Suicidal Veterans, a Frayed Lifeline,
`
`N.Y. TIMES (July 17, 2016), https://nyti.ms/3J9k13L.
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case: 23-60167 Document: 134 Page: 22 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
`
`The heavy cost of cancer care does not help. With 50,000 new diagnoses per
`
`year, cancer care absorbs a particularly significant portion VA resources. See also,
`
`e.g., News Release, Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary McDonough
`
`Statement on FY 2023 Budget (Mar. 28, 2022), http://bit.ly/42uNk7y (noting that
`
`the fiscal year 2023 budget included $167 million in funds just for precision
`
`oncology). A rapid cancer screening test like Galleri would reduce the demand for
`
`intensive late-stage care among veterans, which would alleviate strain on the VA.
`
`VA hospitals and clinics could then provide more efficient and effective care for all
`
`veterans, enhancing the overall healthcare system for all those who have served our
`
`country.
`
`Early cancer detection also leads to less emergency care. Emergency care is
`
`costly and often less effective than preventive care and early intervention. Increased
`
`access to preventive care services might prevent a significant proportion of
`
`emergency department visits by cancer patients. See, e.g., Ady Oster & Andrew B.
`
`Bindman, Emergency Department Visits for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Cond

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site