`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
`717 MADISON PLACE, N.W.
`WASHINGTON, D.C. 20439
`
`
`
`
`
`CLERK’S OFFICE
`202-275-8000
`
`
`
`
`
`PETER R. MARKSTEINER
`
`CLERK OF COURT
`
`2022-1595 - Genentech, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
`
`NOTICE TO ADVISE OF SCHEDULING CONFLICTS OF ARGUING COUNSEL
`
`Briefing is completed in this case. Within seven days of this notice, arguing counsel must
`complete and file a Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts advising of any
`scheduling conflicts during the following upcoming court session months: October,
`November, December, January, February, March. Non-arguing counsel should not
`advise of scheduling conflicts.
`
`Calendar of Sessions. Arguing counsel should review the Calendar of Sessions on the
`court's website for the specific dates of each session. Arguing counsel should only advise of
`conflicts with scheduled court dates and not dates when the court is not scheduled to sit.
`
`Limitation on Conflicts. To ensure the timely scheduling of argument in this case,
`arguing counsel is limited to identifying scheduling conflicts for only ten days during the
`above session months. Arguing counsel must also show good cause for each identified
`scheduling conflict. Conflicts without a sufficient showing of good cause will not be
`considered. Counsel is advised that the unavailability of a client or non-arguing counsel is
`an insufficient basis for showing good cause.
`
`
`
`July 13, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR THE COURT
`
`/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`Peter R. Marksteiner
`Clerk of Court
`By: J. West, Deputy Clerk
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
