`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
`No. 22-1120
`
`GAMEVICE, INC. v. ITC
`
`DOCKETING STATEMENT
`
`Names of parties represented:
`
`Nintendo Co., Ltd., and Nintendo of
`America Inc.
`
`Parties are:
`
`Intervenors
`
`Tribunal and case appealed from:
`
`United States International Trade
`Commission, No. 337-TA-1197
`
`Date of judgment/order:
`
`September 3, 2021
`
`Type of case:
`
`Administrative proceedings (ITC)
`
`Relief sought on appeal:
`
`Gamevice seeks to overturn the
`Commission’s finding of no violation of
`19 U.S.C. § 337. Intervenors request
`affirmance.
`
`Relief awarded below:
`
`None
`
`Briefly describe the judgment/order
`appealed from:
`
`The Commission found no violation of
`section 1337 because the asserted claims
`of U.S. Patent No. 10,391,393 were either
`not infringed or invalid (or both).
`
`Nature of judgment:
`
`Final Judgment, 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(6)
`
`
`
`Case: 22-1120 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 11/18/2021
`
`Related cases in this Court:
`
`Brief statement of issues to be raised on
`appeal:
`
`Settlement discussions and mediation:
`
`Gamevice, Inc. v. ITC, No. 20-1264 -
`Fed. Cir. R. 30(b)(6) Affirmance
`
`Whether the Commission erred in
`finding no violation of section 337 by
`finding that the asserted claims were
`either not infringed or invalid (or both).
`
`The parties had mediated settlement
`discussions before the Hon. Faith
`Hochberg during the course of the case
`below. Given the status of the case,
`Nintendo believes further mediation
`would not resolve the matter.
`
`Dated: November 18, 2021
`
`/s/Grant E. Kinsel
` Grant E. Kinsel
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`1201 Third Ave., Suite 4900
`Seattle, WA 98101-3099
`tel: (206) 359.3516
`fax: (206) 359.4516
`gkinsel@perkinscoie.com
`
`
`
`Case: 22-1120 Document: 10 Page: 3 Filed: 11/18/2021
`
`CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY
`
`I certify that I have the authority of my colleague Grant E. Kinsel to file this
`
`document with his electronic signature.
`
`Dated: November 18, 2021
`
`/s/Dan L. Bagatell
` Dan L. Bagatell
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
