`
`NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC,
`Appellant
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Cross-Appellant
`
`HTC CORP., HTC AMERICA, INC.,
`Appellees
`
`ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE
`FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER
`SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR
`INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF
`THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK
`OFFICE,
`Intervenor
`______________________
`
`2020-1306, 2020-1317, 2020-1326
`______________________
`
`Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018-
`00424, IPR2018-01028, IPR2018-01631, IPR2018-01653.
`______________________
`
`JUDGMENT
`______________________
`
`
`
`Case: 20-1306 Document: 93 Page: 2 Filed: 05/10/2021
`
`
`
`
`JEFFREY A. STEPHENS, Etheridge Law Group, South-
`lake, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES
`ETHERIDGE, RYAN S. LOVELESS, BRETT MANGRUM.
`
` ELIZABETH MOULTON, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
`LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for cross-appellant and ap-
`pellees. Cross-appellant also represented by MELANIE L.
`BOSTWICK, BENJAMIN PAUL CHAGNON, MARK S. DAVIES,
`Washington, DC.
`
` FRED WILLIAMS, Williams Simons & Landis PLLC,
`Austin, TX, for appellees. Also represented by TODD ERIC
`LANDIS, Dallas, TX.
`
` ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States
`Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for interve-
`nor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA
`YASMEEN RASHEED, MOLLY R. SILFEN.
` ______________________
`
`THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
`
`ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
`
` PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit
`Judges).
`
`AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
`
`
` ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
`
`
`
`May 10, 2021
`Date
`
`/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`Peter R. Marksteiner
`Clerk of Court
`
`