`
`NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Plaintiff-Appellant
`
`v.
`
`SANDOZ INC., ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC.,
`ACTAVIS LLC, MYLAN LABORATORIES LIMITED,
`AGILA SPECIALTIES INC., DR. REDDY'S
`LABORATORIES, LTD., DR. REDDY'S
`LABORATORIES, INC., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL
`INDUSTRIES LIMITED, SUN PHARMA GLOBAL
`FZE, APOTEX CORP., APOTEX INC., TEVA
`PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., GLENMARK
`PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., HOSPIRA, INC.,
`GLENMARK GENERICS LTD., GLENMARK
`GENERICS INC., USA, WOCKHARDT BIO AG,
`WOCKHARDT USA LLC,
`Defendants-Appellees.
`______________________
`
`2015-2066, -1008, -1009, -1010, -1109, -1110, -1283, -1762
`______________________
`
`Appeals from the United States District Court for the
`District of Delaware in Nos. 1:12-cv-01011-GMS, 1:12-cv-
`01490-GMS, 1:12-cv-01750-GMS, 1:13-cv-01874-GMS,
`1:14-cv-01156-GMS, 1:15-cv-00040-GMS, 1:15-cv-00539-
`GMS, 1:15-cv-00540-GMS, 1:15-cv-00804-GMS, 1:16-cv-
`00034-GMS, Judge Gregory M. Sleet.
`______________________
`
`
`
`Case: 15-2066 Document: 150 Page: 2 Filed: 10/19/2017
`
`
`
` 2
`
` MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS v. SANDOZ INC.
`
`
`ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND
`REHEARING EN BANC
`______________________
`
`Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, MAYER*, LOURIE,
`DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO,
`CHEN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
`PER CURIAM.
`
`O R D E R
`Appellees Sandoz Inc., et al. filed a combined petition
`for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. The petition
`was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and
`thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc was referred
`to the circuit judges who are in regular active service.
` Upon consideration thereof,
`IT IS ORDERED THAT:
`
`
`The petition for panel rehearing is denied.
`
`The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
`
`The mandate of the court will issue on October 26,
`2017.
`
`
`
` October 19, 2017
`
` Date
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` FOR THE COURT
`
` /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
` Peter R. Marksteiner
` Clerk of Court
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* Circuit Judge Mayer participated only in the deci-
`sion on the petition for panel rehearing.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
